GameSpot's worst review?

I think it's this one. You?

^Click.

I know a review is just someones opinion,but the one with ratchet and clank that said having to much varity is a negative point. I mean i never knew varity=bad.

I think it's this one. You?

^Click.

FantasyTwisted

I know a review is just someones opinion,but the one with ratchet and clank that said having to much varity is a negative point. I mean i never knew varity=bad.

finalfantasy94

Super Mario Galaxy 2's review was pretty bad for getting a 10 but i'm not sure about the worst review.

How canI possible pick just one? I've never read a review on GS that didn't suck.

To be fair though, i've read very few.

[QUOTE="FantasyTwisted"]

I think it's this one. You?

^Click.

Chutebox

agreed. No comparison.

- Ratchet and Clank

- Suikoden 1 = 6.7? One of the best jrpgs ever imo

- Elemental

- Alpha Protocol

- Assasins Creed1/2 (Wish I didnt buy these, not AAA material imo)

- Fallout 1 = 8.7? This is one of the best rpgs ever, AAA no doubt.

- Ultima Online = the best mmo ever, way to low score

- TF2 = on pc one of the greatest onlein game ever, less then 10/10 for this amazin game isn't right imo lol

I think it's this one. You?

^Click.

FantasyTwisted

I think it's this one. You?

^Click.

FantasyTwisted

Super Mario Galaxy 2's review was pretty bad for getting a 10 but i'm not sure about the worst review.

Jelley0

what? it was a perfect score from tons of reviewers... GameSpot was far from alone in that opinion..

Oh ODST, is also a competitor. With a full price tag its a 6.5 game.

Oh ODST, is also a competitor. With a full price tag its a 6.5 game.

argetlam00

wow, I thought exact opposite, thought it was a great deal and worth the money. Was the best campaign in halo since Halo1 imo. Plus all the DLC from Halo 3 and that new Firefight mode.

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Oh ODST, is also a competitor. With a full price tag its a 6.5 game.

argetlam00

wow, I thought exact opposite, thought it was a great deal and worth the money. Was the best campaign in halo since Halo1 imo. Plus all the DLC from Halo 3 and that new Firefight mode.

Opinions like these is why gaming is slowly going to ****

Gamers like you are the reason we have so little variety in games nowadays.

It's OK for people tp enjoy different things, and honestly, was ODST anyworse a deal then GOW3? Both were about 6 hours long, only difference is ODST had MP and DLC for Halo 3. I can think of games shorter then both that scored well too.

Oh ODST, is also a competitor. With a full price tag its a 6.5 game.

argetlam00

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Oh ODST, is also a competitor. With a full price tag its a 6.5 game.

wow, I thought exact opposite, thought it was a great deal and worth the money. Was the best campaign in halo since Halo1 imo. Plus all the DLC from Halo 3 and that new Firefight mode.

Opinions like these is why gaming is slowly going to ****

This gen: Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn

Overall: Mario Kart 64.

I know a review is just someones opinion,but the one with ratchet and clank that said having to much varity is a negative point. I mean i never knew varity=bad.

finalfantasy94

I know a review is just someones opinion,but the one with ratchet and clank that said having to much varity is a negative point. I mean i never knew varity=bad.

[QUOTE="Jelley0"]

Super Mario Galaxy 2's review was pretty bad for getting a 10 but i'm not sure about the worst review.

Scoob64

what? it was a perfect score from tons of reviewers... GameSpot was far from alone in that opinion..

Look at his avatar.

I actually agree with the bulk of their reviews. And the ones that I don't I can easily see why they gave it the review they did. You know guys, it is possible to see a person's point and not agree with them. Just because something doesn't represent your point-of-view doesn't make it **** :?

ODST getting a 9 isn't even laughable.

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Oh ODST, is also a competitor. With a full price tag its a 6.5 game.

argetlam00

wow, I thought exact opposite, thought it was a great deal and worth the money. Was the best campaign in halo since Halo1 imo. Plus all the DLC from Halo 3 and that new Firefight mode.

Opinions like these is why gaming is slowly going to ****

[QUOTE="Scoob64"]

[QUOTE="Jelley0"]

Super Mario Galaxy 2's review was pretty bad for getting a 10 but i'm not sure about the worst review.

Kandlegoat

what? it was a perfect score from tons of reviewers... GameSpot was far from alone in that opinion..

Look at his avatar.

Sackboy is lucky that LittleBigPlanet 2 was delayed until January as the above picture will describe what will happen at the end of this year if his game was released as originally scheduled.

Assassin's Creed 1 with a 9.0

seriously, that game is only pretty. it has zero substance.

ODST getting a 9 isn't even laughable.

Grawse

[QUOTE="Kandlegoat"]

[QUOTE="Scoob64"]

what? it was a perfect score from tons of reviewers... GameSpot was far from alone in that opinion..

thom_maytees

Look at his avatar.

Sackboy is lucky that LittleBigPlanet 2 was delayed until January as the above picture will describe what will happen at the end of this year if his game was released as originally scheduled.

[QUOTE="FantasyTwisted"]

I think it's this one. You?

^Click.

SaltyMeatballs

http://www.gamespot.com/n64/driving/mariokart64/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B0

this is the worst review ever, a game that provided me with endless hours of fun deserves more, perhaps the reviewer only played it alone? because multiplayer is where it shines

I think it's this one. You?

^Click.

FantasyTwisted

[QUOTE="Kandlegoat"]

[QUOTE="Scoob64"]

what? it was a perfect score from tons of reviewers... GameSpot was far from alone in that opinion..

thom_maytees

Look at his avatar.

Sackboy is lucky that LittleBigPlanet 2 was delayed until January as the above picture will describe what will happen at the end of this year if his game was released as originally scheduled.

sackboy feels no pain, and have you even seen LBP2 footage? that game looks marvelous

Anyway to contribute. I don't really think any of them are "bad". Everyone's entitled to an opinion. The only one that was weird to me was the Strange Journey one, in which they compare it to Persona 4 (for some reason) mention P4 had more variety or somesuch to its dungeons. Which it really didn't :? But whatever. Opinions are opinions. Everybody's got one.Skittles_McGee

I'd say Nier is worst review, average gameplay and optional side-quests being tedious does not hold back an immersive plot with great characters and one of the best soundtracks of this generation and turn it into a 5.5. :| The bare minimum I could see its "faults" which are mostly optional, would be a 7.0.

Edit: Gamespot, turning spread out posts into walls of text since 1999.

that was a bad review. But I'd give the WORST to twilight princess. An 8.8 is worthy of blasphemy!

Halo ODST was the worst of the bunch. any game( whether its popular or not) that gives u a 4 hour campaign, does not deserve a 9.0 no way in hell!!!reaver-x

probably was more like an 8 imo.

http://www.gamespot.com/n64/driving/mariokart64/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B0

this is the worst review ever, a game that provided me with endless hours of fun deserves more, perhaps the reviewer only played it alone? because multiplayer is where it shines

right4dead

wow, i hope that reviewer got fired.

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Oh ODST, is also a competitor. With a full price tag its a 6.5 game.

kozzy1234

wow, I thought exact opposite, thought it was a great deal and worth the money. Was the best campaign in halo since Halo1 imo. Plus all the DLC from Halo 3 and that new Firefight mode.

Firefight was cool, but full price for a 3 hour campaign and a multiplayer suite from a 2 year old game is a bit much. Basically, if you owned Halo 3, you payed $60 for firefight. As an expansion pack, it works well; as a full-priced game, I just don't see how it deserved a 9.0.

Don't forget Perfect Dark 0... At the launch of the 360, Gamespot gave the brilliant Call of Duty 2 a AA review, and then gave that piece of crap a 9.

The R&C review is pretty bad. Although the score is deserving.

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

wow, I thought exact opposite, thought it was a great deal and worth the money. Was the best campaign in halo since Halo1 imo. Plus all the DLC from Halo 3 and that new Firefight mode.

-Snooze-

Opinions like these is why gaming is slowly going to ****

Gamers like you are the reason we have so little variety in games nowadays.

It's OK for people tp enjoy different things, and honestly, was ODST anyworse a deal then GOW3? Both were about 6 hours long, only difference is ODST had MP and DLC for Halo 3. I can think of games shorter then both that scored well too.

http://www.gamespot.com/saturn/action/mrbones/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary&tag=summary%3Bread-review

This is the worst one I have read. Wow, it's so coherent with the score.:roll:

Either glitchspot missed some paragraphs or the reviewer(and whoever supervised and authorised this) was under the influence of something weird.

[QUOTE="lazerface216"]

[QUOTE="right4dead"]

http://www.gamespot.com/n64/driving/mariokart64/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B0

this is the worst review ever, a game that provided me with endless hours of fun deserves more, perhaps the reviewer only played it alone? because multiplayer is where it shines

thom_maytees

wow, i hope that reviewer got fired.

lol of course i knew it was written over 10 years ago, it's mario kart 64 for christ's sake. either way, that guy should be nowhere near a game reviewing site.