This topic is locked from further discussion.
that site is very biased against MGS 4 and overall against ps3 when that site not even nominated MGS 4 for best story award it loses all its credibility in my opiniondalavos
You could always use your old HDD. Which would also reduce the price by 40$ or so.angelkimne
that site is very biased against MGS 4 and overall against ps3 when that site not even nominated MGS 4 for best story award it loses all its credibility in my opiniondalavosno, it's not.
that site is very biased against MGS 4 and overall against ps3 when that site not even nominated MGS 4 for best story award it loses all its credibility in my opiniondalavosMGS4's story isn't gold. It's very convoluted but on the other hand MGS3 is.:P
Total Cost: $398.93By the way, that's a nice Rosewill case -- I built my latest rig with it and its a good case.
Stevo_the_gamer
Huh I wonder if this "400 dollar rig" has any framerate issues lol? Hmmm??
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Total Cost: $398.93By the way, that's a nice Rosewill case -- I built my latest rig with it and its a good case.
jasonheyman
Huh I wonder if this "400 dollar rig" has any framerate issues lol? Hmmm??
It'll play Crysis on high at around 26FPS at 1440x900 resolution. Place it at medium and you got yourself a solid game running at 40+ FPS.It'll play Crysis on high at around 26FPS at 1440x900 resolution. Place it at medium and you got yourself a solid game running at 40+ FPS.Stevo_the_gamer
So it would be fair to say:
High= No Good
Mids= Good/ Very Good
???
I mean considering this Gen console fps is higher than 26...
[QUOTE="jasonheyman"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Total Cost: $398.93By the way, that's a nice Rosewill case -- I built my latest rig with it and its a good case.
Stevo_the_gamer
Huh I wonder if this "400 dollar rig" has any framerate issues lol? Hmmm??
It'll play Crysis on high at around 26FPS at 1440x900 resolution. Place it at medium and you got yourself a solid game running at 40+ FPS. Whoa? Even a HD4870 GPU struggles to run Crysis at 30 FPS at high settings. Just how well optimized is Warhead? I really have a hard time believing 3870 can run Crysis Warhead at high settings at a plausible framerate.[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="jasonheyman"]It'll play Crysis on high at around 26FPS at 1440x900 resolution. Place it at medium and you got yourself a solid game running at 40+ FPS. Whoa? Even a HD4870 GPU struggles to run Crysis at 30 FPS at high settings. Just how well optimized is Warhead? I really have a hard time believing 3870 can run Crysis Warhead at high settings at a plausible framerate.Huh I wonder if this "400 dollar rig" has any framerate issues lol? Hmmm??
ToScA-
Depends what resolution you're playing...
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]It'll play Crysis on high at around 26FPS at 1440x900 resolution. Place it at medium and you got yourself a solid game running at 40+ FPS.jasonheyman
So it would be fair to say:
High= No Good
Mids= Good/ Very Good
???
I mean considering this Gen console fps is higher than 26...
Lower the resolution to console and you'll be able to play high.
[QUOTE="ToScA-"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]It'll play Crysis on high at around 26FPS at 1440x900 resolution. Place it at medium and you got yourself a solid game running at 40+ FPS.Bebi_vegetaWhoa? Even a HD4870 GPU struggles to run Crysis at 30 FPS at high settings. Just how well optimized is Warhead? I really have a hard time believing 3870 can run Crysis Warhead at high settings at a plausible framerate.
Depends what resolution you're playing...
Of course, talking about high settings in general though (including resolution)..wouldn't say, 1680x1050 fit well in there?of course they're biased. gametrailers are a bunch of 360 fanboys. I've blocked their IP adress from my computer. they're just a waste of time, unless you wanna hear that your console is the best and you happen to own a 360.12345678ew
whine, whine, whine... :lol:
Its funny how lemmings try and claim ownage with this yet when MGS4 won it they brought up Crysis Warhead :lol:EVOLV3
the 360 fans are simply happy that Gears 2 won the best graphics, no one's claiming ownage. you're just making up BS
Lol Gears 2 has better graphics than Crysis. :lol:Cedmln
LOL MGS4 has better graphics than Crysis :lol:
lol COWs now cry that GT are 360 fanboys and not a base site
whil LBP won in many catgoriys and R2 won FPS of the year
i think that GT is much more base site then GS GS GOTY this year list was lame
GT dont realy do PC games only console games so gears 2 is the graphics king on console and crysis have the best graphics overall
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="jasonheyman"]No they don't. My argument is that Crysis is comparable at basic PC settings. And it is. And most websites agree..
jasonheyman
So you handicap PC... you're talking whatever advantage the PC has???
Well if that's how it's gona work, console can't play games on HDTV, we need to be fair... see how lame that is?
If anything this is control damage at best.
Most website agree on what? That crysis on low settings doesn't look as good as crysis on High settings? Wow... the obvious!!!
How is it damage control when more than one website have given other games and not Crysis best graphics of the year??
sony fanboys just can't stand it that there's actually people out there who don't blindly love mgs4
GS gives a game other then Crisis a graphic award = bias
GT gives a game other then Crisis a graphic award = legitimate
very odd indeed :roll:
FragTycoon
you got it backwards
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="ToScA-"] Whoa? Even a HD4870 GPU struggles to run Crysis at 30 FPS at high settings. Just how well optimized is Warhead? I really have a hard time believing 3870 can run Crysis Warhead at high settings at a plausible framerate.ToScA-
Depends what resolution you're playing...
Of course, talking about high settings in general though (including resolution)..wouldn't say, 1680x1050 fit well in there?For PC standards, what would be I guess high... it also depends on the monitor.
[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"]GT lost any and all credibility last year.Nisim19and GS not? lol if GT lost credbilty so GS and IGN need to be shotdown
Now, I didn't say GS and IGN were great review sites, did I? I'll have you know that I think precisely the opposite.
[QUOTE="angelkimne"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"] Damn it, I knew I was forgetting something. Well, there goes my 400$ pc. :(killab2oo5You could always use your old HDD. Which would also reduce the price by 40$ or so.Correct me if I'm wrong be you have to reformat your HDD when replacing something like a mobo,let alone your entire PC.
Not if everything works fine... I did it by experience, no problemes.
Gametrailers are 360 fanboys and hates Sony. I thought everyone knew this?jharvYes. And GS hates teh MS.
[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"]GT lost any and all credibility last year.samusarmadaWhy? They kept making faulty graphics comparison video's. Always in favor of the 360.
[QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"]GT lost any and all credibility last year.Eddie-VedderWhy? They kept making faulty graphics comparison video's. Always in favor of the 360.
What? :lol: just accept that multiplats look better on the 360, no need for damage control
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Total Cost: $398.93By the way, that's a nice Rosewill case -- I built my latest rig with it and its a good case.
jasonheyman
Huh I wonder if this "400 dollar rig" has any framerate issues lol? Hmmm??
1.- Sell current PC ($400-$500)
2.-Sell console/save for a 360 and games($400-$500)
$450
+
$450
=
$900
Get that $900 and order this:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/campaigns/campaigntemplate.asp?CampaignID=716 (can't find how to make it a link, sorry i'm new)
Use the other $100 on Steam
!!!!!
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment