Gearbox's Pitchford attacks Valve's "fanboy" PS3 neglect

  • 100 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Warriorboy1990
Warriorboy1990

3813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#1 Warriorboy1990
Member since 2008 • 3813 Posts

Link

Thoughts?

Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

Valve is just trying to DC the fact that they don't want to develop for anything other than the PC format and don't want to work on anything that doesn't involve their precious source engine since that'd be too much work.

Avatar image for HGAT
HGAT

1366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#4 HGAT
Member since 2008 • 1366 Posts

Seeing Valves games only really cater for that community, I can see why they are bellyaching, they after the profits after all so if PS3 aren't nuturing that kind of community then they will not sell well on the PS3.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#5 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38062 Posts

Valve is just trying to DC the fact that they don't want to develop for anything other than the PC format and don't want to work on anything that doesn't involve their precious source engine since that'd be too much work.

TREY_FOR_LI4E
Yeah! How dare they run their business the way they want! It seems stupid to me as that's money left on the table, but it's not my business and i own a 360 so it doesn't affect me.
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

Valve is just trying to DC the fact that they don't want to develop for anything other than the PC format and don't want to work on anything that doesn't involve their precious source engine since that'd be too much work.

TREY_FOR_LI4E

Basically. It bothers me that they do that yet are praised as if they are the greatest gaming company in the world who regularly saves children from burning buildings.

Avatar image for CanYouDiglt
CanYouDiglt

8500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 CanYouDiglt
Member since 2009 • 8500 Posts
What business is it to him what other companies do? Maybe he should get his company to the same level as where Valve is before trying to tell them how they should run theirs.
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Criterion, Gearbox, and recently even heavy Xbox Devs BIOWARE have proved that the PS3 can do some wonders...but, hey, the longer VALVE says and does what Gabe wants, that's fine. It's starting to look silly mid-generation, but whatever.

Gabe hated the PS2, he hates the PS3, and quite frankly he can do whatever he wants.

Avatar image for Shafftehr
Shafftehr

2889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Shafftehr
Member since 2008 • 2889 Posts

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

Valve is just trying to DC the fact that they don't want to develop for anything other than the PC format and don't want to work on anything that doesn't involve their precious source engine since that'd be too much work.

Pixel-Pirate

Basically. It bothers me that they do that yet are praised as if they are the greatest gaming company in the world who regularly saves children from burning buildings.

So is porting to all platforms a requirement for being an incredible developer now? If so, somebody better give Nintendo a call and tell them a stable of classics and industry shapers doesn't cut it any more - if they ain't devving for the PS3, they are teh suxxorz :o Oh, and better warn Kojima too - the Cows might turn on him if he doesn't port MGS4 to the 360 and PC, since he couldn't be a praised developer if he can't do that..
Avatar image for Casual_Gamer_
Casual_Gamer_

147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Casual_Gamer_
Member since 2009 • 147 Posts
lol sony is bigger then valve, just because sony doesnt let them into the loop valve keeps hating, they are just small time a couple of college students that made only 1 thing.
Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

Valve is just trying to DC the fact that they don't want to develop for anything other than the PC format and don't want to work on anything that doesn't involve their precious source engine since that'd be too much work.

Pixel-Pirate

Basically. It bothers me that they do that yet are praised as if they are the greatest gaming company in the world who regularly saves children from burning buildings.

yeah, it's pretty sad that Valve won't take chances. They take like 10 years to make a game engine and then milk that engine for years and years.

Avatar image for beekayjay
beekayjay

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 beekayjay
Member since 2008 • 1732 Posts
Well the guy has a point, but it is odd that he's taking potshots at other companies and their practices. It shows a lack of humility thats disturbing.
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="TREY_FOR_LI4E"]

Valve is just trying to DC the fact that they don't want to develop for anything other than the PC format and don't want to work on anything that doesn't involve their precious source engine since that'd be too much work.

Shafftehr

Basically. It bothers me that they do that yet are praised as if they are the greatest gaming company in the world who regularly saves children from burning buildings.

So is porting to all platforms a requirement for being an incredible developer now? If so, somebody better give Nintendo a call and tell them a stable of classics and industry shapers doesn't cut it any more - if they ain't devving for the PS3, they are teh suxxorz :o Oh, and better warn Kojima too - the Cows might turn on him if he doesn't port MGS4 to the 360 and PC, since he couldn't be a praised developer if he can't do that..

No, but when a developer refuses to work on certain platforms (I wouldn't count Nintendo, Sony, or Microsoft considering they primarily make consoles so obviously wouldn't make products on a competitors console) and constantly hurls insults at a certain console, I don't think you can call them some unique butterfly that cares about gamers.

And Kojima is a hack.

Avatar image for Shafftehr
Shafftehr

2889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Shafftehr
Member since 2008 • 2889 Posts

[QUOTE="Shafftehr"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Basically. It bothers me that they do that yet are praised as if they are the greatest gaming company in the world who regularly saves children from burning buildings.

Pixel-Pirate

So is porting to all platforms a requirement for being an incredible developer now? If so, somebody better give Nintendo a call and tell them a stable of classics and industry shapers doesn't cut it any more - if they ain't devving for the PS3, they are teh suxxorz :o Oh, and better warn Kojima too - the Cows might turn on him if he doesn't port MGS4 to the 360 and PC, since he couldn't be a praised developer if he can't do that..

No, but when a developer refuses to work on certain platforms (I wouldn't count Nintendo, Sony, or Microsoft considering they primarily make consoles so obviously wouldn't make products on a competitors console) and constantly hurls insults at a certain console, I don't think you can call them some unique butterfly that cares about gamers.

And Kojima is a hack.

"Unique butterfly that cares about gamers"? What the heck does that have to do with being a spectacular dev? Nintendo was an absolute arsehat of a company using all sorts of bully tactics, witholding vital tech from other devs so their games were the best, during the NES and SNES gens, but they were still among the best devs, and maybe even the very best dev. Being nice, genuinely caring about the gamers rather than a buck, etc etc, hasn't *ever* been a key component in being a legendary game company. And what's more, Valve has been one of the most community oriented devs to ever grace gaming... Just look at their history in modding if you want proof of that. As for them "hurling insults"... Why is saying that one platform's online community is better than another hurling an insult? As I've stated in another thread, does no-one even consider the possibility that it might be true?...
Avatar image for scarface_dm
scarface_dm

1652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 scarface_dm
Member since 2009 • 1652 Posts

Hopefully someone sticks a pitchfork into gearbox

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#16 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts

Hopefully someone sticks a pitchfork into gearbox

scarface_dm
Why? They made Borderlands and it's freaking awesome.
Avatar image for KukicAdo
KukicAdo

973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 359

User Lists: 0

#17 KukicAdo
Member since 2008 • 973 Posts
Gabe Newell is a microsoft millionaire, could care less about anything non-ms related.
Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts

already a huge thread on this recently with childish antics and "lazy dev" attacks at valve

...all in all, they apparenly feel it just isnt a smart business move for them, which is absolutly ok

valve isnt as big of a company as some may believe(people wise)

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

[QUOTE="Shafftehr"] So is porting to all platforms a requirement for being an incredible developer now? If so, somebody better give Nintendo a call and tell them a stable of classics and industry shapers doesn't cut it any more - if they ain't devving for the PS3, they are teh suxxorz :o Oh, and better warn Kojima too - the Cows might turn on him if he doesn't port MGS4 to the 360 and PC, since he couldn't be a praised developer if he can't do that..Shafftehr

No, but when a developer refuses to work on certain platforms (I wouldn't count Nintendo, Sony, or Microsoft considering they primarily make consoles so obviously wouldn't make products on a competitors console) and constantly hurls insults at a certain console, I don't think you can call them some unique butterfly that cares about gamers.

And Kojima is a hack.

"Unique butterfly that cares about gamers"? What the heck does that have to do with being a spectacular dev? Nintendo was an absolute arsehat of a company using all sorts of bully tactics, witholding vital tech from other devs so their games were the best, during the NES and SNES gens, but they were still among the best devs, and maybe even the very best dev. Being nice, genuinely caring about the gamers rather than a buck, etc etc, hasn't *ever* been a key component in being a legendary game company. And what's more, Valve has been one of the most community oriented devs to ever grace gaming... Just look at their history in modding if you want proof of that. As for them "hurling insults"... Why is saying that one platform's online community is better than another hurling an insult? As I've stated in another thread, does no-one even consider the possibility that it might be true?...

Even if it is true it shows immaturity to do so. And I apologize, I simply always hear people talking about how Valve cares about it's customers which Is, In my opinion, bull. Valve cares about Money and would have no problem ripping you off to get that money, just like every company in gaming including Nintendo.

I personally don't hold Valve as a "legendary" dev team and I find their games bland and unoriginal, but that is my opinion.

Avatar image for Dystopian-X
Dystopian-X

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 Dystopian-X
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

Hopefully someone sticks a pitchfork into gearbox

scarface_dm

I knew I wasn't the only one relating his name to one : D

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
Valve sucks and so do there games. What they say is meaningless and shows they are not talented enough to develop for the PS3.
Avatar image for WasntAvailable
WasntAvailable

5605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 WasntAvailable
Member since 2008 • 5605 Posts

It would be nice if both of them wouldjust shut up and keep their opinions to themselves, and by that I mean don't go about trying to attract attention tothemselves. All it's going to do is wind some people up, give themselves alot of greif, and all because they felt they had to put their point across to the world. People say, "Well if it's a smart buisness choice then what's the problem?". It would havebeen an even smarter buisness choice if they didn't develop on the PS3 and at the same timehadn'teven bothered to mention it.

Avatar image for Wii_Gamer_277
Wii_Gamer_277

1795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Wii_Gamer_277
Member since 2009 • 1795 Posts
Pitchford is awesome he deff isnt afraid to speak his mind on other developers/publishers underhanded comments or workings. He should speak out on activsions it would be a treat to hear someone other then a SW fanboy call them out on their annual rehashes and milkage business practices.
Avatar image for Cyberfairy
Cyberfairy

5180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Cyberfairy
Member since 2003 • 5180 Posts

I don't mind what Valve do as long as they keep on making great PC-games.

Avatar image for DeadMagazines
DeadMagazines

1593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 DeadMagazines
Member since 2009 • 1593 Posts
Why do you cows cry so much about Valve? I don't see lemmings whining about ps3's third party exclusive devs..give it a rest :roll:
Avatar image for Zohluff
Zohluff

321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Zohluff
Member since 2006 • 321 Posts
Why do you cows cry so much about Valve? I don't see lemmings whining about ps3's third party exclusive devs..give it a rest :roll:DeadMagazines
Wasn't there a few tears shed when MGS4 came out?
Avatar image for Wii_Gamer_277
Wii_Gamer_277

1795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Wii_Gamer_277
Member since 2009 • 1795 Posts
Why do you cows cry so much about Valve? I don't see lemmings whining about ps3's third party exclusive devs..give it a rest :roll:DeadMagazines
Well none of them are as biased and outspoken as the fanboys at valve. I love valves games but this blatant fanboysim is ridiculous.
Avatar image for santoron
santoron

8584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 santoron
Member since 2006 • 8584 Posts

He called it like anyone reasonable would see it. Valve isn't just trying to promote their games or the platforms the work with, they try to take swipes at the PS3 for no discernable reason. We see that behaviour all the time here in SW, and we call it fanboyism. Pitchford is just stating the obvious.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

Valve owes nothing to the PS3 fanbase. This entitlement mentality has gotten absurd.

Avatar image for Zenkuso
Zenkuso

4090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Zenkuso
Member since 2006 • 4090 Posts
I have to give pitchford this fanboyism claim because honestly he takes a swipe at it whenever he opens his mouth lately as if he is just bluntly doing it to bash the console when he knows quite well theres a big enough fanbase to justify even him porting a game over in-house to the console. It personally is his choice on keeping his company platform tied to one or two but honestly if he ain't developing for the third one he should just shut up about it and talk about his games and not how much he hates the other platform.
Avatar image for Archang3l_666
Archang3l_666

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Archang3l_666
Member since 2005 • 113 Posts

[QUOTE="Shafftehr"][QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

No, but when a developer refuses to work on certain platforms (I wouldn't count Nintendo, Sony, or Microsoft considering they primarily make consoles so obviously wouldn't make products on a competitors console) and constantly hurls insults at a certain console, I don't think you can call them some unique butterfly that cares about gamers.

And Kojima is a hack.

Pixel-Pirate

"Unique butterfly that cares about gamers"? What the heck does that have to do with being a spectacular dev? Nintendo was an absolute arsehat of a company using all sorts of bully tactics, witholding vital tech from other devs so their games were the best, during the NES and SNES gens, but they were still among the best devs, and maybe even the very best dev. Being nice, genuinely caring about the gamers rather than a buck, etc etc, hasn't *ever* been a key component in being a legendary game company. And what's more, Valve has been one of the most community oriented devs to ever grace gaming... Just look at their history in modding if you want proof of that. As for them "hurling insults"... Why is saying that one platform's online community is better than another hurling an insult? As I've stated in another thread, does no-one even consider the possibility that it might be true?...

Even if it is true it shows immaturity to do so. And I apologize, I simply always hear people talking about how Valve cares about it's customers which Is, In my opinion, bull. Valve cares about Money and would have no problem ripping you off to get that money, just like every company in gaming including Nintendo.

I personally don't hold Valve as a "legendary" dev team and I find their games bland and unoriginal, but that is my opinion.

1. Actually Valve cares about it's customers much more than the other companies. How many devs or publishers continue to update their games even 2 years after its release? How about free content packs (with a ton of content)? Supporting mods and modders? Pricing their games accordingly?...

2. Every company cares abot money, show me one that doesn't. But there is one thing that developers (like a certain Activision) lack: moral integrity.

3. Valve has been one of the companies that introduced several great trends in gaming. So yeah, they are good developers.

Avatar image for johnlennon28
johnlennon28

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 johnlennon28
Member since 2008 • 2158 Posts
who cares, valve can do whatever they want, I just dont get why they have to basically imply to the public that they hate the ps3
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#34 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38062 Posts
who cares, valve can do whatever they want, I just dont get why they have to basically imply to the public that they hate the ps3johnlennon28
There is obviously some drama queen at Valve and they like to stir stuff up.
Avatar image for mgs_freak91
mgs_freak91

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 mgs_freak91
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts
[QUOTE="scarface_dm"]

Hopefully someone sticks a pitchfork into gearbox

siLVURcross
Why? They made Borderlands and it's freaking awesome.

I know. Gearbox has done great this gen. What has valve done this gen? I mean really, not developing for one console because they think it's to "hard". Their are several other developers who think otherwise!
Avatar image for mgs_freak91
mgs_freak91

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 mgs_freak91
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts
Valve sucks and so do there games. What they say is meaningless and shows they are not talented enough to develop for the PS3.djsifer01
I don't think their games suck but they suck. Not being able to develop for a console just tells me one thing, they don't have the skill to do so. It makes them pathetic.
Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#37 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts
Always abondon a fanbase, right Valve?
Avatar image for johnlennon28
johnlennon28

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 johnlennon28
Member since 2008 • 2158 Posts
[QUOTE="johnlennon28"]who cares, valve can do whatever they want, I just dont get why they have to basically imply to the public that they hate the ps3cainetao11
There is obviously some drama queen at Valve and they like to stir stuff up.

or maybe that drama queen is a SW poster, lol
Avatar image for HOMIE_G64
HOMIE_G64

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#39 HOMIE_G64
Member since 2005 • 1482 Posts
Always abondon a fanbase, right Valve?RadecSupreme
What fanbase? VALVe knows that the best community they have is right at the PC. To me, people are just jealous that VALVe will not bring their stellar support to their favorite consoles.

Yeah! How dare they run their business the way they want!

This made me lol. Pitchford is, for the most part, right. They do make fanboyish comments and they are very reliant on others, all the while becoming more and more arrogant. However, they are becoming more and more arrogant because a very large amount of developers are reliant on VALVe as well. PC gaming would arguably be nowhere near the position it is in now if it wasn't for Steam and VALVe. However, the PS3 fanboy backlash is extremely stupid and takes Pitchford's comments way out of context.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

boo frickin hoo pitchford, maybe there should be a little less crying about other devs decisions and a little more wondering why the hell borderlands was outsold on the ps3 by 3 to 1

you would think job one for any exec these days would be trying to max out profit and expand your brand not worry about somebody elses profitability stratagy

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

I'm sure Valve cares deeply (not really). I feel as though the fanbase that isn't interested makes more stink and conflict than the devs do themselves.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
It's upto valve as to which all platforms they want to put their games on -- if they don't want to make games on PS 3 for whatever reason , I doubt whatever mr. randy pitchfork is anything to take seriously
Avatar image for Microdevine
Microdevine

1126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Microdevine
Member since 2008 • 1126 Posts

Well, while I do think it'd be nice to see Valve develop for the ps3. It's not that big a deal. They can do what they want. And wtf is up with Pitchford all up on Valves case. I mean seriously. What is the connection? It seems he is mentioned in every Valve topic ever talked about for the past year. IMO Pitchford can talk trash when he makes a co-op 4 player game nearly as good as L4D. Personally, L4D(2) >>>>>>>>> Borderlands.

Avatar image for Revolution316
Revolution316

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Revolution316
Member since 2009 • 2877 Posts

ya you tell em pitchford or who ever you are. left for dead sucks.

Avatar image for NeonNinja
NeonNinja

17318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 115

User Lists: 0

#46 NeonNinja
Member since 2005 • 17318 Posts

lol sony is bigger then valve, just because sony doesnt let them into the loop valve keeps hating, they are just small time a couple of college students that made only 1 thing.Casual_Gamer_

:shock:

Please tell me your knowledge of Valve extends beyond what you may or may not have heard about Portal's original dev team before Valve hired them.... They practically saved the FPS genre from stagnation back in the 90's have put out some of the best campaigns, competitive multiplayer and co-op experiences along with one of the best puzzle experiences ever and you say that?

It is Gabe Newell's business if he doesn't want to develop on PS3 but saying things that aren't true is just as bad.

Avatar image for jakarai
jakarai

4289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 jakarai
Member since 2008 • 4289 Posts
Let Valve keep hating while they watch everyone else pile up on money because of PS3 software sales. :wink:
Avatar image for TREY_FOR_LI4E
TREY_FOR_LI4E

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 TREY_FOR_LI4E
Member since 2009 • 714 Posts

Valve wouldn't know how to make a good game for the PS3 if Naught Gods gave Valve the Uncharted 2 game engine itself.

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#49 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

yeah it really sucks that Naughty Dog won't make games for the 360....er...wait...wrong discussion;)

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts
Let Valve keep hating while they watch everyone else pile up on money because of PS3 software sales. :wink:jakarai
Right, Valve doesn't make money. All they have is their pride. Also lol at PS3 software sales