Gears of War franchise coming to PS3?

[QUOTE="TheCoreGamer_"]

According to the official TGS 09 site, on september 25 there will be a special sessions going on entitled "Adapting the 'Gears of War' Franchise for Global Consumption" by Michael Capps, President, Epic Games, Inc.

Panosola

Since its rated higer than 95% of 360 games then yeah I'll take my dumb ass and go play it

truthfully I think Quantom will be much better.

simslifer

[QUOTE="Panosola"][QUOTE="De_Bears"]

The exclusive publishing rights ended with Gears2, unless I missed the renewal announcement. But, MS doesn't have the hubris of Sony to think they can survive without exclusivity of the key titles that define their system. Look to MS to shell out new cash to Epic, but Epic is definately free agent.

Epic is now in Konami's situation. How to procede without pissing off your base of support knowing that exclusivity can'texpand your market? I bet PS3 will get Gears of War: Dom stories (no Marcus Pheonix) or something like that.

STurn21

Did you just imply that the 360 is more powerful than the PS3? Don't make me laugh....

Triangle Setup

Xbox 360 - 500 Million Triangles/sec
PS3 - 250 Million Triangles/sec

Vertex Shader Processing
Xbox 360 - 6.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using all 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 2.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 16 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 1.5 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 12 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 1.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 8 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
PS3 - 1.0 Billion Vertices/sec

Vertex Texture Fetch
Xbox 360 - 8.0 Billion Texels/sec
PS3 - 4.0 Billion Texels/sec

Pixel Shader Processing with 16 Filtered Texels Per Cycle (Pixel ALU x Clock)
Xbox 360 - 24.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using all 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 20.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 40 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 18.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 36 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 16.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 32 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
PS3 - 16.0 Billion Pixels/sec

Multisample Fill Rate
Xbox 360 - 16.0 Billion Samples/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz)
PS3 - 8.0 Billion Samples/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz)

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Frame Buffer Bandwidth
Xbox 360 - 256.0 GB/sec (dedicated for frame buffer rendering)
PS3 - 20.8 GB/sec (shared with other graphics data: textures and vertices)
PS3 - 10.8 GB/sec (with 10.0 GB/sec subtracted for textures and vertices)
PS3 - 8.4 GB/sec (with 12.4 GB/sec subtracted for textures and vertices)

XBOX360 has better graphics with smoother frame rate and this is natural, because it has better graphics card.
PS3 has only a stronger CPU but the graphics doesn't depend much in the power of CPU rather than the power of GPU.

That is all and keep dreaming.:P

[QUOTE="Panosola"][QUOTE="TheCoreGamer_"]

According to the official TGS 09 site, on september 25 there will be a special sessions going on entitled "Adapting the 'Gears of War' Franchise for Global Consumption" by Michael Capps, President, Epic Games, Inc.

siLVURcross

You guys know LBP has a higher score then Gears 1 and 2 on Metacritic? Its a 95, thats higher than any exclusive on 360, although I would kill for Super Mario Galazxy (it has a 97).

Plus you know it isn't biased or hype, since its a collection of other people's scores.

Yay for LBP!

[QUOTE="simslifer"]

truthfully I think Quantom will be much better.

mitu123

[QUOTE="STurn21"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"] PS3 it will get Gears of War game only if XBOX 360 get MGS4,Ratchet & Clank and Resistance from PS3.Keep dreaming.After all PS3 it have not the power for Gears of War game.Panosola

Did you just imply that the 360 is more powerful than the PS3? Don't make me laugh....

Triangle Setup

Xbox 360 - 500 Million Triangles/sec
PS3 - 250 Million Triangles/sec

Vertex Shader Processing
Xbox 360 - 6.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using all 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 2.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 16 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 1.5 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 12 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 1.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 8 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
PS3 - 1.0 Billion Vertices/sec

Vertex Texture Fetch
Xbox 360 - 8.0 Billion Texels/sec
PS3 - 4.0 Billion Texels/sec

Pixel Shader Processing with 16 Filtered Texels Per Cycle (Pixel ALU x Clock)
Xbox 360 - 24.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using all 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 20.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 40 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 18.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 36 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 16.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 32 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
PS3 - 16.0 Billion Pixels/sec

Multisample Fill Rate
Xbox 360 - 16.0 Billion Samples/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz)
PS3 - 8.0 Billion Samples/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz)

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Frame Buffer Bandwidth
Xbox 360 - 256.0 GB/sec (dedicated for frame buffer rendering)
PS3 - 20.8 GB/sec (shared with other graphics data: textures and vertices)
PS3 - 10.8 GB/sec (with 10.0 GB/sec subtracted for textures and vertices)
PS3 - 8.4 GB/sec (with 12.4 GB/sec subtracted for textures and vertices)

XBOX360 has better graphics with smoother frame rate and this is natural, because it has better graphics card.
PS3 has only a stronger CPU but the graphics doesn't depend much in the power of CPU rather than the power of GPU.

That is all and keep dreaming.:P

Also I don't know about you, but Gears doesn't really compete with Killzone 2 or Uncharted, so this whole argument is pretty moot when PS3 currently has the best graphics in their games. ;)

Which one looks better ?

the answer is 10 to 5 Quantom...

simslifer

Looks better yes but funner? Who knows.

You can have it. I mean, the game's f***ing great, but by now it's nothing more than used toilet paper. Think of it this way.. we've had GoW games for around three years. If the PS3 were to get the GoW games, they'd start with the first THREE years after the release, and the second god knows when. Besides, it seems that they're developing a GoW 3, so I wouldn't keep my hopes high for the previous ones getting ported to the PS3 any time soon.

It'd be the way that it currently is with most games MS signs timed-exclusivities :lol:

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="simslifer"]

truthfully I think Quantom will be much better.

Giancar

no need to beat around the bush here guys, QT looks like crap, and i sure hope it even scores that high :P

No thanks, i have both for the 360 and dont really care for the series.djsifer01

Gears of War 3 "could" come to the PS3. Microsoft only owns 1 and 2.

What a dumb thread.

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

[QUOTE="STurn21"]

Did you just imply that the 360 is more powerful than the PS3? Don't make me laugh....

STurn21

Triangle Setup

Xbox 360 - 500 Million Triangles/sec
PS3 - 250 Million Triangles/sec

Vertex Shader Processing
Xbox 360 - 6.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using all 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 2.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 16 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 1.5 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 12 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 1.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 8 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
PS3 - 1.0 Billion Vertices/sec

Vertex Texture Fetch
Xbox 360 - 8.0 Billion Texels/sec
PS3 - 4.0 Billion Texels/sec

Pixel Shader Processing with 16 Filtered Texels Per Cycle (Pixel ALU x Clock)
Xbox 360 - 24.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using all 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 20.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 40 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 18.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 36 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 16.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 32 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
PS3 - 16.0 Billion Pixels/sec

Multisample Fill Rate
Xbox 360 - 16.0 Billion Samples/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz)
PS3 - 8.0 Billion Samples/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz)

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Frame Buffer Bandwidth
Xbox 360 - 256.0 GB/sec (dedicated for frame buffer rendering)
PS3 - 20.8 GB/sec (shared with other graphics data: textures and vertices)
PS3 - 10.8 GB/sec (with 10.0 GB/sec subtracted for textures and vertices)
PS3 - 8.4 GB/sec (with 12.4 GB/sec subtracted for textures and vertices)

XBOX360 has better graphics with smoother frame rate and this is natural, because it has better graphics card.
PS3 has only a stronger CPU but the graphics doesn't depend much in the power of CPU rather than the power of GPU.

That is all and keep dreaming.:P

Do you have any idea what 90% of the things you just listed mean? Thought so...

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Do you know what that mean little kid...?:roll:

According to the official TGS 09 site, on september 25 there will be a special sessions going on entitled "Adapting the 'Gears of War' Franchise for Global Consumption" by Michael Capps, President, Epic Games, Inc.

TheCoreGamer_

I think they are reffering to trying to make it more marketable to places like Asia and Europe. Gears of War isn't exactly popular in Japan.

Quantom has potential bt i think it will fall short jst like every other ps3 games that tries to be (the H3 or GearsKiller) :P.

[QUOTE="STurn21"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

Triangle Setup

Xbox 360 - 500 Million Triangles/sec
PS3 - 250 Million Triangles/sec

Vertex Shader Processing
Xbox 360 - 6.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using all 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 2.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 16 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 1.5 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 12 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 1.0 Billion Vertices/sec (using only 8 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
PS3 - 1.0 Billion Vertices/sec

Vertex Texture Fetch
Xbox 360 - 8.0 Billion Texels/sec
PS3 - 4.0 Billion Texels/sec

Pixel Shader Processing with 16 Filtered Texels Per Cycle (Pixel ALU x Clock)
Xbox 360 - 24.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using all 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 20.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 40 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 18.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 36 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
Xbox 360 - 16.0 Billion Pixels/sec (using 32 of the 48 Unified Pipelines)
PS3 - 16.0 Billion Pixels/sec

Multisample Fill Rate
Xbox 360 - 16.0 Billion Samples/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz)
PS3 - 8.0 Billion Samples/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz)

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Frame Buffer Bandwidth
Xbox 360 - 256.0 GB/sec (dedicated for frame buffer rendering)
PS3 - 20.8 GB/sec (shared with other graphics data: textures and vertices)
PS3 - 10.8 GB/sec (with 10.0 GB/sec subtracted for textures and vertices)
PS3 - 8.4 GB/sec (with 12.4 GB/sec subtracted for textures and vertices)

XBOX360 has better graphics with smoother frame rate and this is natural, because it has better graphics card.
PS3 has only a stronger CPU but the graphics doesn't depend much in the power of CPU rather than the power of GPU.

That is all and keep dreaming.:P

Panosola

Do you have any idea what 90% of the things you just listed mean? Thought so...

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Do you know what that mean little kid...?:roll:

Yep, but we're pretty sure you don't

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

[QUOTE="STurn21"]

Do you have any idea what 90% of the things you just listed mean? Thought so...

SPYDER0416

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Do you know what that mean little kid...?:roll:

Yep, but we're pretty sure you don't

I am happy that all the PS3 fankids know what that mean.Keep dreaming for GOW and Halo games on the poor PS3.:P

Some one needs to take some english classes. My friend has anyone ever told you that reading is good for your brain?

[QUOTE="djsifer01"]No thanks, i have both for the 360 and dont really care for the series.Racer850

My thoughts exactly. Im not sure about QT. Cows are no doubt praising it but still doesnt seem that good.

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Do you know what that mean little kid...?:roll:

Panosola

Yep, but we're pretty sure you don't

I am happy that all the PS3 fans Kids know what that mean.Keep dreaming for GOW and Halo games on the poor PS3.:P

Why are you posting M$ Bull from IGN?:lol:

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

[QUOTE="STurn21"]

Do you have any idea what 90% of the things you just listed mean? Thought so...

SPYDER0416

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Do you know what that mean little kid...?:roll:

Yep, but we're pretty sure you don't

No he doesn't. Many of those numbers are theoretical maximums that are taken with the GPU doing nothing other than that function (essentially useless).

The Pixel and Multi Sample fill rates are computed with the 360@4 samples and the PS3@2 samples, of course there is a 2x discrepancy.

The 256GB/s is pure tripe, that is on chip bandwidth compared to bus bandwidth. It makes me think that these numbers came from that Major Nelson idiot.

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

Pixel Fill Rate with 4x Multisampled Anti-Aliasing
Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samples x 500MHz / 4)
PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samples x 500MHz / 4)

Do you know what that mean little kid...?:roll:

skektek

Yep, but we're pretty sure you don't

No he doesn't. Many of those numbers are theoretical maximums that are taken with the GPU doing nothing other than that function (essentially useless).

The Pixel and Multi Sample fill rates are computed with the 360@4 samples and the PS3@2 samples, of course there is a 2x discrepancy.

The 256GB/s is pure tripe, that is on chip bandwidth compared to bus bandwidth. It makes me think that these numbers came from that Major Nelson idiot.

Keep Dreaming....The XBOX 360 is more powerful.The number are very real and if you can't accept the truth that is your problem.

Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samplesx 500MHz / 4)

PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samplesx 500MHz / 4):roll:

let's just face the facts if gears 2 comes out for PS3 it will devastate microsoft it will be major Pwnage microsoft can't survive without one ofit's two game series halo and gears.

let's just face the facts if gears 2 comes out for PS3 it will devastate microsoft it will be major Pwnage microsoft can't survive without one ofit's two game series halo and gears.

simslifer

let's just face the facts if gears 2 comes out for PS3 it will devastate microsoft it will be major Pwnage microsoft can't survive without one ofit's two game series halo and gears.

simslifer

[QUOTE="simslifer"]

let's just face the facts if gears 2 comes out for PS3 it will devastate microsoft it will be major Pwnage microsoft can't survive without one ofit's two game series halo and gears.

Giancar

lol pretty well microsoft lost billions and was forced to abandon the Xbox.

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

[QUOTE="skektek"]

No he doesn't. Many of those numbers are theoretical maximums that are taken with the GPU doing nothing other than that function (essentially useless).

The Pixel and Multi Sample fill rates are computed with the 360@4 samples and the PS3@2 samples, of course there is a 2x discrepancy.

The 256GB/s is pure tripe, that is on chip bandwidth compared to bus bandwidth. It makes me think that these numbers came from that Major Nelson idiot.

STurn21

Keep Dreaming....The XBOX 360 is more powerful.The number are very real and if you can't accept the truth that is your problem.

Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samplesx 500MHz / 4)

PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samplesx 500MHz / 4):roll:

Again .Please explain what that all means.

my cow impression:

"gearssux gearsux, gearsux OMG IT'S COMING OUT FOR PS3 YAAAYYYYYYYY!!!!"

[QUOTE="djsifer01"]No thanks, i have both for the 360 and dont really care for the series.Racer850

microsoft only paid for gears 1,2 exclusive

gears 3 is a different story

[QUOTE="Syferonik"]Has as much chances as Halo going to ps3 or GoW rolling to 360....NONEskektek

No, Halo and GoW are both first party franchises.

The GeoW franchise is thrid party built on a multiple platform engine with one of the games already released on another platform. It is entirely possible, however unlikely, that GeoW could be released on the PS3.

Has as much chances as Halo going to ps3 or GoW rolling to 360....NONESyferonik

[QUOTE="STurn21"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

Keep Dreaming....The XBOX 360 is more powerful.The number are very real and if you can't accept the truth that is your problem.

Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samplesx 500MHz / 4)

PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samplesx 500MHz / 4):roll:

Panosola

Again .Please explain what that all means.

The numbers you are posting have already been proven as MS propaganda. That test was done by MS in case you didn't care to read the words preceding those false specs you keep posting from IGN. It is all abunch of crap, and only there to fuel MS fanboys.

[QUOTE="STurn21"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

Keep Dreaming....The XBOX 360 is more powerful.The number are very real and if you can't accept the truth that is your problem.

Xbox 360 - 4.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 4 Samplesx 500MHz / 4)

PS3 - 2.0 Billion Pixels/sec (8 ROPS x 2 Samplesx 500MHz / 4):roll:

Panosola

Again .Please explain what that all means.

That is marketing tripe, if you feed 4 samples to the raster units vs 2 samples you are going to get twice the product. You are a fool if you buy that crap. But we will set that aside for a moment and assume that the 360 is the stronger console. Where are all the 360 "Graphic Kings"? The PS3 has Drake's Fortune, Among Thieves, KZ2, MGS4, GT5, and Heavy Rain while the 360 has only produced GeoW2 and maybe Alan Wake.

These are two games of the same genre developed exclusively for their respective platforms. Why is there such a large descrepency in favor of the supposed "weaker" console?

[QUOTE="skektek"]

[QUOTE="Syferonik"]Has as much chances as Halo going to ps3 or GoW rolling to 360....NONEdelta3074

No, Halo and GoW are both first party franchises.

The GeoW franchise is thrid party built on a multiple platform engine with one of the games already released on another platform. It is entirely possible, however unlikely, that GeoW could be released on the PS3.

so was NG2, and look how that turned out. they'll call it Gears Sigma and add a few things.

[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="simslifer"]

let's just face the facts if gears 2 comes out for PS3 it will devastate microsoft it will be major Pwnage microsoft can't survive without one ofit's two game series halo and gears.

lol pretty well microsoft lost billions and was forced to abandon the Xbox.

I've already played them and couldnt care less if it went ot ps3 even thoguh i sold my 360 for a PS3, co-op was fun and never played the multiplayer much but its no big loss.