Gears of War not possible on PS3

  • 123 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xgraderx
xgraderx

2395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#101 xgraderx
Member since 2008 • 2395 Posts
[QUOTE="-General_Ram-"]

Gears of War isnt possible on PS3 not because of the graphics.....but because MS wont let Epic make a PS3 version.

Just trying to prove a point....since certain PS3 games arent possible on 360 due to graphics. Well 360 games, while certainly possible on PS3 graphically, are impossibly gonna show up due to business agreements.

Each company secures games their own way.

jazuzu13

are you on crack? lol you do know that blu ray is better than hd dvd and dvd right. gears of war would be alot better if it was a ps3 exclusive. it would be longer and the graphics would be nicer. microsoft doesn't own anybody. Epic can do what they want.

Lol at you.Theres plenty more room on a dvd to make gears longer.OMG teh blu ray!!!LOL,and no there wouldnt be any graphical improvements.
Avatar image for AlphaGamer469
AlphaGamer469

1881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 AlphaGamer469
Member since 2008 • 1881 Posts
[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"][QUOTE="joopyme"][QUOTE="WillieBeamish"]

UT3 doesn't have half the texture detail or geometry of Gears, specifically to maintain a silky smooth framerate because its a fast-twitch shooter. Gears runs at a slightly slower (but still mostly smooth) framerate because of the much higher detail and because the game pacing allows for the trade-off. PS3 can't be done on Gears because it simply doesn't have the required texture memory. This is why all PS3 games have worse textures than 360 games when it comes to multiplats.

joopyme

wuht?

I guess cows just can't grasp the difference between game physics and graphics.

i guess lems dont know how to read BOLDED statements. effin lems.

So, you own both dev kits and know the difference between game physics and graphics? You can't even grasp the simple concepts. BTW, if you read Mark Reins comments, he obviously doesn't know what he's talking about: "People are going to be pleasantly surprised. It's a really high end experience that pushes the graphics bar up even higher than Gears of War. There's more polygons, there's more stuff going on, there's more explosions and there's more things happening, so we're just really pleased with the way the game runs on the PS3."

Stuff? The guy's using PR buzz and obviously doesn't know what he's talking about.

Avatar image for AlphaGamer469
AlphaGamer469

1881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 AlphaGamer469
Member since 2008 • 1881 Posts

dude... i never said anything of what you are saying now.

please just poof and vanish. cause you are official no. 4 on the craziest lem in SW.

and again, learn to read BOLDED statement. i think your fanboy glasses are making it hard for you to read.

joopyme

In other words, you lost the argument and know have to resort to name calling. The devs that DESIGNED Gears of War, while having both dev kits in their pocession said, from a technical standpoint, that Gears of War is not possible. The VP of the company, speaking PR babble, said the graphics of UT3 on PS3 were better then GeOW, so suddenly that somehow means the GeOW is possible on the PS3? I'll take the word of the ACTUAL programmers over the word of the marketing guy anyday. I guess to you cows it is hard to imagine...

Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts
i find it very funny to see lems very afraid of LBP as to making so much fuss as to making a thread with no brains... and by the way...... general ram might be the biggest lem....... next to when the two face....... and the champion erik leshner...joopyme
Reread the first post VERY slowly, and see if you still think General Ram is a lemming. He states 360 games are exclusive due to business decisions, and PS3 games are exclusive because the 360 can't handle them...statements like that would make him a cow.
Avatar image for BoD_GOA_French
BoD_GOA_French

971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#106 BoD_GOA_French
Member since 2006 • 971 Posts
[QUOTE="joopyme"]

dude... i never said anything of what you are saying now.

please just poof and vanish. cause you are official no. 4 on the craziest lem in SW.

and again, learn to read BOLDED statement. i think your fanboy glasses are making it hard for you to read.

AlphaGamer469

In other words, you lost the argument and know have to resort to name calling. The devs that DESIGNED Gears of War, while having both dev kits in their pocession said, from a technical standpoint, that Gears of War is not possible. The VP of the company, speaking PR babble, said the graphics of UT3 on PS3 were better then GeOW, so suddenly that somehow means the GeOW is possible on the PS3? I'll take the word of the ACTUAL programmers over the word of the marketing guy anyday. I guess to you cows it is hard to imagine...

Like the other guy said, LEARN TO READ BOLDED STATEMENT! I will underline it for you aswell >"PS3 can't be done on Gears" Thats what started your epic fanboy rant. You sure are up there on the fanboy list!

Avatar image for joopyme
joopyme

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 joopyme
Member since 2008 • 2598 Posts
[QUOTE="joopyme"][QUOTE="WillieBeamish"]

UT3 doesn't have half the texture detail or geometry of Gears, specifically to maintain a silky smooth framerate because its a fast-twitch shooter. Gears runs at a slightly slower (but still mostly smooth) framerate because of the much higher detail and because the game pacing allows for the trade-off. PS3 can't be done on Gears because it simply doesn't have the required texture memory. This is why all PS3 games have worse textures than 360 games when it comes to multiplats.

AlphaGamer469

wuht?

I guess cows just can't grasp the difference between game physics and graphics.

and HE tells im resulting to NAME-CALLING.

pathetic.

and again... LEARN TO EFFIN READ BOLD statements... please just leave before you realize you sound deluded and downright absurd.

Avatar image for joopyme
joopyme

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 joopyme
Member since 2008 • 2598 Posts

Does it matter, if you want those games buy a 360 if not than shut up(pointless babble).kinjo13

CLEARLY, you are new in SW.

Avatar image for BoD_GOA_French
BoD_GOA_French

971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#111 BoD_GOA_French
Member since 2006 • 971 Posts
[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"][QUOTE="joopyme"][QUOTE="WillieBeamish"]

UT3 doesn't have half the texture detail or geometry of Gears, specifically to maintain a silky smooth framerate because its a fast-twitch shooter. Gears runs at a slightly slower (but still mostly smooth) framerate because of the much higher detail and because the game pacing allows for the trade-off. PS3 can't be done on Gears because it simply doesn't have the required texture memory. This is why all PS3 games have worse textures than 360 games when it comes to multiplats.

joopyme

wuht?

I guess cows just can't grasp the difference between game physics and graphics.

and HE tells im resulting to NAME-CALLING.

pathetic.

and again... LEARN TO EFFIN READ BOLD statements... please just leave before you realize you sound deluded and downright absurd.

I also underlined and italisized it. I hate fanboys...

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#112 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]Link to ownage, www.Videogamer.com......plz stop williebeamish....plzpseudocaesar

Wow, never seen that article before. Talk about owned.

This entire thread was taken down by this final chop. I thought this was killed a year ago, but new posters are always showing up.

FOR THOSE TOO LAZY TO SIMPLY CLICK :

EPIC HEAD HONCHO, Mark Rein, says PS3 Unreal Tournament 3 (UT3) Graphics BETTER than Gears of War(GeoW).

Avatar image for joopyme
joopyme

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 joopyme
Member since 2008 • 2598 Posts
[QUOTE="joopyme"][QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"][QUOTE="joopyme"][QUOTE="WillieBeamish"]

UT3 doesn't have half the texture detail or geometry of Gears, specifically to maintain a silky smooth framerate because its a fast-twitch shooter. Gears runs at a slightly slower (but still mostly smooth) framerate because of the much higher detail and because the game pacing allows for the trade-off. PS3 can't be done on Gears because it simply doesn't have the required texture memory. This is why all PS3 games have worse textures than 360 games when it comes to multiplats.

BoD_GOA_French

wuht?

I guess cows just can't grasp the difference between game physics and graphics.

and HE tells im resulting to NAME-CALLING.

pathetic.

and again... LEARN TO EFFIN READ BOLD statements... please just leave before you realize you sound deluded and downright absurd.

I also underlined and italisized it. I hate fanboys...

nice. i just hope HE can read what you posted.

Avatar image for kinjo13
kinjo13

183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 kinjo13
Member since 2008 • 183 Posts
That is so untrue, you people look at numbers don't know what they mean. Both systems can handle gears just fine. I hate to break all your fanboy hearts here but even though the 360 has 512 ram it only has 350 allowable for textures. The ps3 has a 256/256 setup but has allowance for higher if programed to feed more off the processor, yes the processor handles graphics. Also when you look a certain games you have to be careful with compression because running a compressed image will reduce quality. The xbox can run at 720p, the ps3 at 1080p, the human eye does not pick up 1080p until your at least 10 feet from the screen. They are both very capable systems.
Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts
[QUOTE="kinjo13"]That is so untrue, you people look at numbers don't know what they mean. Both systems can handle gears just fine. Probably, though contrary to what you believe, the PS3 would probably need the texture quality reduced or different caching techniques to keep the framerate up. I hate to break all your fanboy hearts here but even though the 360 has 512 ram it only has 350 allowable for textures. I'd like to see a link to this, as I've never seen a hard limit assigned to texture/GPU memory. Though I can't see any modern game using less than 100 meg of memory so that is probably a "practical limit" even if it isn't truly a hard limit. The ps3 has a 256/256 setup but has allowance for higher if programed to feed more off the processorwith a performance penalty having the GPU access the main memory, yes the processor handles graphics Yes it does, but this has zero to do with what you're arguing. Also when you look a certain games you have to be careful with compression because running a compressed image will reduce quality. The xbox can run at 720p(no, 1080p just like the PS3, and with the scaling chip in the 360 EVERY game can be upconverted to 1080p), the ps3 at 1080p, the human eye does not pick up 1080p until your at least 10 feet from the screen. Actually, the closer you are, the more apparent extra resolution is. They are both very capable systems.This I can agree with.[/QUOTE]While I disagree with your reasoning, I do agree with your overall idea. I don't believe there is a game on either system that the other system couldn't duplicate.
Avatar image for Oblivion2500
Oblivion2500

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Oblivion2500
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Gears of war is possible on the PS3. The PS3 have better graphics then the 360. It have enough RAM to play Gears. If PS3 can play CoD 3, 4,and World at War. And Killzone 2 which have very good graphic even better than any 360 or PS3 games right now. It just that Microsoft won't let Epic make it for PS3. But maybe Gears of War 3 will be on PS3.
Avatar image for L30KinG
L30KinG

1893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 L30KinG
Member since 2009 • 1893 Posts

:o if i only knew that :o

Avatar image for nZiFFLe
nZiFFLe

1481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 nZiFFLe
Member since 2009 • 1481 Posts

Isn't this common knowledge?:|

Avatar image for redskins2156
redskins2156

2553

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 redskins2156
Member since 2007 • 2553 Posts
Why would we want to play cod2, when we can play cod3, cod MW1, cod WAW, cod MW2 (soon)? You just sound like an upset lem.
[QUOTE="-General_Ram-"]

Gears of War isnt possible on PS3 not because of the graphics.....but because MS wont let Epic make a PS3 version.

Just trying to prove a point....since certain PS3 games arent possible on 360 due to graphics. Well 360 games, while certainly possible on PS3 graphically, are impossibly gonna show up due to business agreements.

Each company secures games their own way.

lesner87

Similarly MGS4,KZ2,Little Big planet,Resistance,Grand Turismo,Heavy rain and ALOT more not possible on the 360 !

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#120 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Gears of war is possible on the PS3. The PS3 have better graphics then the 360. It have enough RAM to play Gears. If PS3 can play CoD 3, 4,and World at War. And Killzone 2 which have very good graphic even better than any 360 or PS3 games right now. It just that Microsoft won't let Epic make it for PS3. But maybe Gears of War 3 will be on PS3.Oblivion2500
How many threads are you going to bump?

Avatar image for GodofBigMacs
GodofBigMacs

6440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#121 GodofBigMacs
Member since 2008 • 6440 Posts
What was the point of this?
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#122 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Mods, lock this before it gets out of hand.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#123 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
Just like all exclusives then. Well, unless they become multiplat.