Gears Vs R:FoM with video

Saw this on gametrailers.com. It is a pretty good video comparing the two games from a fewareas for both games. You can also vote for which one you think is better while watching the video. Sorry if this is old.

http://www.gametrailers.com/vs.php?ep=1&hd=1

Why would I need to waste a time watching a video for something everyone knows the answer to?DoctorBunny

i like resistance better was that the right answer?

[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]Why would I need to waste a time watching a video for something everyone knows the answer to?ANti_RiCeR

i like resistance better was that the right answer?

watching someone play resistance would be "tsukuyomi" to me.

Yeah, I think it's a bit old...but it gives newer SWers to see which one's better...I voted for Gears in pretty much everything, weapons was a tough one though.Saturos3091

Resistance's gameplay is stale compared to Gears, however the weapons are cooler.

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

Resistance's gameplay is stale compared to Gears, however the weapons are cooler.

djzootie

Gun with a chainsaw on it > all

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

GermanShepard06

very true LOL

ive experienced more lag in 8 player gears matches than i ever experience in 40 player resistance matches

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

GermanShepard06

Tactics + voice chat + better online gameplay

vs

Game that feels like all of the other 39 players are ai?

LOSER: Resistance

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

tidus222

very true LOL

ive experienced more lag in 8 player gears matches than i ever experience in 40 player resistance matches

just imagine now how Resistance would look like if they pulled 32 players off the screen...

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

DoctorBunny

Tactics + voice chat + better online gameplay

vs

Game that feels like all of the other 39 players are ai?

LOSER: Resistance

you make no sense, ZERO.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

tidus222

very true LOL

ive experienced more lag in 8 player gears matches than i ever experience in 40 player resistance matches

It's because you are paying $50 for XBL so Microsoft can let you HOST the games, LOL !

RFOM online USES DEDICATED SERVERS!!! Zero Lag baby!

Love 40 player matches with ZERO LAG!

[QUOTE="tidus222"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

GermanShepard06

very true LOL

ive experienced more lag in 8 player gears matches than i ever experience in 40 player resistance matches

just imagine now what Resistancewould look like if they pulled 32 players off the screen...

not to mention the maps in resistance are tons bigger than the tiny gears of war maps

of course lemmings wont hear of it LOL

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="tidus222"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

tidus222

very true LOL

ive experienced more lag in 8 player gears matches than i ever experience in 40 player resistance matches

just imagine now what Resistancewould look like if they pulled 32 players off the screen...

not to mention the maps in resistance are tons bigger than the tiny gears of war maps

of course lemmings wont hear of it LOL

I still cant believe GS flopped Resistance and gave PDZ a superb score, lol

After now watching it the second time. Gives me even more respect for Gears graphics. That is the one thing that jumps out the most for me just how much better gears looked. R:FoM reminded me a lot of CoD2 in areas as far as graphic wise.Eltroz

graphics r not only about textures, its the only thing Geow has advantage over Resistance. Think of it this way, lets say the devs wanted Geow to have 40players on screen at once like in Resistance the graphicswould take a HUGE dive.

[QUOTE="tidus222"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

WalterPaladines

very true LOL

ive experienced more lag in 8 player gears matches than i ever experience in 40 player resistance matches

It's because you are paying $50 for XBL so Microsoft can let you HOST the games, LOL !

RFOM online USES DEDICATED SERVERS!!! Zero Lag baby!

Love 40 player matches with ZERO LAG!

Did i mention this "innovation" that we call DEDICATED SERVERS is FREE on the PSN!!

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]After now watching it the second time. Gives me even more respect for Gears graphics. That is the one thing that jumps out the most for me just how much better gears looked. R:FoM reminded me a lot of CoD2 in areas as far as graphic wise.GermanShepard06

graphics r not only about textures, its the only thing Geow has advantage over Resistance. Think of it this way, lets say the devs wanted Geow to have 40 enemies on screen at once the graphics would take a HUGE dive.

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]After now watching it the second time. Gives me even more respect for Gears graphics. That is the one thing that jumps out the most for me just how much better gears looked. R:FoM reminded me a lot of CoD2 in areas as far as graphic wise.GermanShepard06

graphics r not only about textures, its the only thing Geow has advantage over Resistance. Think of it this way, lets say the devs wanted Geow to have 40players on screen at once like in Resistance the graphicswould take a HUGE dive.

its just like that in the single player of gears of war too

you have your squad (4 people) and about 4 locusts on screen at once)

thats why you never get in any all out war situations in gears and stick to close quarters combat cause they cant put more enemies on screen without downgrading the graphics..

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]After now watching it the second time. Gives me even more respect for Gears graphics. That is the one thing that jumps out the most for me just how much better gears looked. R:FoM reminded me a lot of CoD2 in areas as far as graphic wise.Eltroz

graphics r not only about textures, its the only thing Geow has advantage over Resistance. Think of it this way, lets say the devs wanted Geow to have 40 enemies on screen at once the graphics would take a HUGE dive.

Your wrong my friend, "RUN AND GUN" will get you owned in two seconds online, good players are stealthy.

[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]After now watching it the second time. Gives me even more respect for Gears graphics. That is the one thing that jumps out the most for me just how much better gears looked. R:FoM reminded me a lot of CoD2 in areas as far as graphic wise.WalterPaladines

graphics r not only about textures, its the only thing Geow has advantage over Resistance. Think of it this way, lets say the devs wanted Geow to have 40 enemies on screen at once the graphics would take a HUGE dive.

Your wrong my friend, "RUN AND GUN" will get you owned in two seconds online, good players are stealthy.

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

GermanShepard06

Ninty Nine Nights had 5,000 enemys on screen..:|

9.6>8.6

/thread

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

Pro_wrestler

Ninty Nine Nights had 5,000 enemys on screen..:|

[QUOTE="tidus222"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

WalterPaladines

very true LOL

ive experienced more lag in 8 player gears matches than i ever experience in 40 player resistance matches

It's because you are paying $50 for XBL so Microsoft can let you HOST the games, LOL !

RFOM online USES DEDICATED SERVERS!!! Zero Lag baby!

Love 40 player matches with ZERO LAG!

We have 5 computers on my network, I experience very little lag when I play online on a miniscule 512k connection..O.o You should'nt critique something you know nothing about though, it makes you look like a fool.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

40 players on screen at once VS 8 players on screen in Geow?

WINNER: Resistance.

Pro_wrestler

Ninty Nine Nights had 5,000 enemys on screen..:|

Wow did those cows leave faster then a fat kid can eat a cake

Nice post. First time I've seen this. RFOM is a good game by itself but when you compare it to a game like Gears Of War, RFOM looks below average. But like the majority of people say, Gears Of War is just the better game than RFOM, RFOM doesn't even come close. RFOM may have 40 players on the multiplayer, but how many of those have mics? It's just a bunch of wild lunatics shooting each other. So if you have A.D.D, that kind of game is good for you, but if you like to play with real skills and tactics, Gears is the winner.

Gears of War Resistance

Weapons

55.9% 44%

Vehicles

25.2% 74.7%

Enemies

80.7% 19.2%

AI

77.2% 22.7%

Art Direction

80.3% 19.6%

Multiplayer

71.2% 28.7%

Graphics

87.4% 12.5%

Overall

78.4% 21.5%

gears multiplayer absolutely destroys RFOM.

gears multiplayer absolutely destroys RFOM.

jessesalinas

Yeah you know this because you've played RFOM!! right..and your not a blind 360 fanboy

/sarcasm

RFOM online = 40 player madness

Theres whole clans that use mics, they work together like clockwork and own most teams that have people that play alone. Do not talk about things you dont know, leave the dumb fanboyism aside.

[QUOTE="jessesalinas"]

gears multiplayer absolutely destroys RFOM.

WalterPaladines

Yeah you know this because you've played RFOM!! right..and your not a blind 360 fanboy

/sarcasm

RFOM online = 40 player madness

Theres whole clans that use mics, they work together like clockwork and own most teams that have people that play alone. Do not talk about things you dont know, leave the dumb fanboyism aside.

Multiplayer

71.2% 28.7%

/end

[QUOTE="jessesalinas"]

gears multiplayer absolutely destroys RFOM.

WalterPaladines

Yeah you know this because you've played RFOM!! right..and your not a blind 360 fanboy

/sarcasm

RFOM online = 40 player madness

Theres whole clans that use mics, they work together like clockwork and own most teams that have people that play alone. Do not talk about things you dont know, leave the dumb fanboyism aside.

but you wouldnt know anything about that.

9.6 > 8.6

well, played both, and although resistance is really good, it's old gameplay with dated graphics.

Gears was the first true next gen experience in my opinion, and it's just the beginning. Look at the CoD4 video's.... they are allready getting really close to the chaos in the killzone2 trailer.

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="jessesalinas"]

gears multiplayer absolutely destroys RFOM.

DoctorBunny

Yeah you know this because you've played RFOM!! right..and your not a blind 360 fanboy

/sarcasm

RFOM online = 40 player madness

Theres whole clans that use mics, they work together like clockwork and own most teams that have people that play alone. Do not talk about things you dont know, leave the dumb fanboyism aside.

Multiplayer

71.2% 28.7%

/end

What are your percentages trying to say? RFOM has 30 levels for the Single player game, huge maps with lots of enemies and weapons. Also online is more addictive than crack!

Sometimes I go play RFOM with the intention of playing online for 2 hours, then I see the clock and it's 6 am!!I say to myself: "wth happenned i been playing7 hours!" that's how fun it is.

[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="jessesalinas"]

gears multiplayer absolutely destroys RFOM.

WalterPaladines

Yeah you know this because you've played RFOM!! right..and your not a blind 360 fanboy

/sarcasm

RFOM online = 40 player madness

Theres whole clans that use mics, they work together like clockwork and own most teams that have people that play alone. Do not talk about things you dont know, leave the dumb fanboyism aside.

Multiplayer

71.2% 28.7%

/end

What are your percentages trying to say? RFOM has 30 levels for the Single player game, huge maps with lots of enemies and weapons. Also online is more addictive than crack!

Sometimes I go play RFOM with the intention of playing online for 2 hours, then I see the clock and it's 6 am!!I say to myself: "wth happenned i been playing7 hours!" that's how fun it is.

It's saying you are in the vast minority. Too bad if everyone had such low standards im sure superman 64 would of been a hit!

well, played both, and although resistance is really good, it's old gameplay with dated graphics.

Gears was the first true next gen experience in my opinion, and it's just the beginning. Look at the CoD4 video's.... they are allready getting really close to the chaos in the killzone2 trailer.

danneswegman

Reisistance didnt aim at the graphics much, it was the action.

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="jessesalinas"]

gears multiplayer absolutely destroys RFOM.

jessesalinas

Yeah you know this because you've played RFOM!! right..and your not a blind 360 fanboy

/sarcasm

RFOM online = 40 player madness

Theres whole clans that use mics, they work together like clockwork and own most teams that have people that play alone. Do not talk about things you dont know, leave the dumb fanboyism aside.

but you wouldnt know anything about that.

9.6 > 8.6

Again, you are the one who has no idea what he's talking about, RFOM online is all about stealth, getting the drop on your enemies and teamwork, no matter how good you are if you have two decent players against you alone 95% you will die.

Leave the fanboyism aside, blind lemmings are not cool.

[QUOTE="jessesalinas"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="jessesalinas"]

gears multiplayer absolutely destroys RFOM.

WalterPaladines

Yeah you know this because you've played RFOM!! right..and your not a blind 360 fanboy

/sarcasm

RFOM online = 40 player madness

Theres whole clans that use mics, they work together like clockwork and own most teams that have people that play alone. Do not talk about things you dont know, leave the dumb fanboyism aside.

but you wouldnt know anything about that.

9.6 > 8.6

Again, you are the one who has no idea what he's talking about, RFOM online is all about stealth, getting the drop on your enemies and teamwork, no matter how good you are if you have two decent players against you alone 95% you will die.

Leave the fanboyism aside, blind lemmings are not cool.

ya,you're right,resistance is the first of its kind..no wonder it got such a high score..oh wait! :?

DoctorBunny seeing as how you posted 30 posts in this topic. We already know your opinion. You don't need to post another 100 in this topic in order to make it comprehendable. In my opinion, which is the minority, I think geow graphics are much more superior (much more then rfom). But I have spent more time on the multiplayer in rfom,then gears of war. I enjoyed rfom multiplayer more then gears of war. I don't care if I'm part of teh 21%, it doesn't matter, 21% of the gamers believe that rfom is a better game. nhh12345

So you said thinking GeOW is the minority, then go on to how liking RFOM is the minority?

teh logic?!?!?!?

[QUOTE="danneswegman"]

well, played both, and although resistance is really good, it's old gameplay with dated graphics.

Gears was the first true next gen experience in my opinion, and it's just the beginning. Look at the CoD4 video's.... they are allready getting really close to the chaos in the killzone2 trailer.

GermanShepard06

Reisistance didnt aim at the graphics much, it was the action.

oh, i have no doubt resistance 2 will look better. There was no time for texture streaming because of the launch date, and the game allready looked really great i think. The gameplay was too much like CoD3 though... although better.

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="jessesalinas"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="jessesalinas"]

gears multiplayer absolutely destroys RFOM.

jessesalinas

Yeah you know this because you've played RFOM!! right..and your not a blind 360 fanboy

/sarcasm

RFOM online = 40 player madness

Theres whole clans that use mics, they work together like clockwork and own most teams that have people that play alone. Do not talk about things you dont know, leave the dumb fanboyism aside.

but you wouldnt know anything about that.

9.6 > 8.6

Again, you are the one who has no idea what he's talking about, RFOM online is all about stealth, getting the drop on your enemies and teamwork, no matter how good you are if you have two decent players against you alone 95% you will die.

Leave the fanboyism aside, blind lemmings are not cool.

ya,you're right,resistance is the first of its kind..no wonder it got such a high score..oh wait! :?

Nice damage control, you try to block my argument with your defensive shield(the score), point is your fanboyism is out of control, yeah talking about games you never played might be cool in LEMMING LAND, but not here in reality. So far all you "arguments" if we can call them that are assanine.

/ownage

[QUOTE="nhh12345"]DoctorBunny seeing as how you posted 30 posts in this topic. We already know your opinion. You don't need to post another 100 in this topic in order to make it comprehendable. In my opinion, which is the minority, I think geow graphics are much more superior (much more then rfom). But I have spent more time on the multiplayer in rfom,then gears of war. I enjoyed rfom multiplayer more then gears of war. I don't care if I'm part of teh 21%, it doesn't matter, 21% of the gamers believe that rfom is a better game. DoctorBunny

So you said thinking GeOW is the minority, then go on to how liking RFOM is the minority?

teh logic?!?!?!?

Gears has a 93.8% at gamerankings, R:FOM has a 87.4%.

Edit: But wait, if a few cows at system wars says R:FOM is better, I guess that pretty much means it's the better game. How silly of me to post these numbers.