This topic is locked from further discussion.
Statistically, you could still make the case, regardless of the number of reviews.Resistance 2 average 88% at gamerankings based on 47 media outlets.
Gears of war 2 average 94% at gamerankings based on 64 media outlets.
Ah so notice the incredible flaw in this whole analogy?Gears 2 has 40% more reviews than R2.Thinker_reborn
Dude get over it
Gears 2 killed Resistance 2
If you wanna blame someone blame insomniac for making a flop
sorry but resistance 2 never stood a chance against gears 2
Ridlyz
Dude, get over it. R2 and Gears 2 are equal.
If you wanna blame someone blame Cliffy B and Epic for making a game worse than the original.
Where do I get to that conclusion?
Gears 1=9.6 RFOM=8.6
G2=9.0 R2=9.0
"Standards change over time" is not a good argument because that allows R2 to reach higher standards than it normally would. G2's quality would have went down.
"The rating system is different!" That's even worse. Why not just give G2 a 9.5?
[QUOTE="Ridlyz"]Dude get over it
Gears 2 killed Resistance 2
If you wanna blame someone blame insomniac for making a flop
sorry but resistance 2 never stood a chance against gears 2
Silverbond
Dude, get over it. R2 and Gears 2 are equal.
If you wanna blame someone blame Cliffy B and Epic for making a game worse than the original.
Where do I get to that conclusion?
Gears 1=9.6 RFOM=8.6
G2=9.0 R2=9.0
"Standards change over time" is not a good argument because that allows R2 to reach higher standards than it normally would. G2's quality would have went down.
"The rating system is different!" That's even worse. Why not just give G2 a 9.5?
No they arent equal not even close Last I checked 94% does not = 87% All your moaning and crying wont change the fact that Resistance 2 flopped and its not even in Gears 2 league[QUOTE="Silverbond"][QUOTE="Ridlyz"]Dude get over it
Gears 2 killed Resistance 2
If you wanna blame someone blame insomniac for making a flop
sorry but resistance 2 never stood a chance against gears 2
Ridlyz
Dude, get over it. R2 and Gears 2 are equal.
If you wanna blame someone blame Cliffy B and Epic for making a game worse than the original.
Where do I get to that conclusion?
Gears 1=9.6 RFOM=8.6
G2=9.0 R2=9.0
"Standards change over time" is not a good argument because that allows R2 to reach higher standards than it normally would. G2's quality would have went down.
"The rating system is different!" That's even worse. Why not just give G2 a 9.5?
No they arent equal not even close Last I checked 94% does not = 87% All your moaning and crying wont change the fact that Resistance 2 flopped and its not even in Gears 2 leagueLast I checked, this is Gamespot. Accept it and move on. ;)
then go over there your such a baby you go cry over there i think you hate metal gear solid 4 for getting a 10 and your gear could not dont cryYou can hide behind GS all you want but face it
Resistance 2 was a failure
All your crying wont change that fact
Ridlyz
You can hide behind GS all you want but face it
Resistance 2 was a failure
All your crying wont change that fact
Ridlyz
Either you don't know what the definition of failure is, or you are a troll. My guess is the latter.
To be fair, i think it's very reasonable to say Gears 2 is better than Resistance 2. I dont want to say "only fanboys would say otherwise" because obviously everyone has their own opinions, but i'd say there's no contest, really. Gears 2 is a better game overall but a decent margin.Ninja-Hippo
I disagree. I felt Resistance 2 had a greater variety of enviroments, set peices and weapons. On top of that the multiplayer component is in my opinion is alot better. Besides, Chicago level > All. The only things I felt gears had over R2 were the graphics, length and the characters.
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]To be fair, i think it's very reasonable to say Gears 2 is better than Resistance 2. I dont want to say "only fanboys would say otherwise" because obviously everyone has their own opinions, but i'd say there's no contest, really. Gears 2 is a better game overall but a decent margin.WasntAvailable
I disagree. I felt Resistance 2 had a greater variety of enviroments, set peices and weapons. On top of that the multiplayer component is in my opinion is alot better. Besides, Chicago level > All. The only things I felt gears had over R2 were the graphics, length and the characters.
They are equal in terms of quality and fun factor IMO. Both have pros over the other. In the long run R2 has more content. But it's down to preference for most of us. Some sites have been very critical of R2 for no legitimate reason. I don't know why though. Gamepsot, IGN, and GT laid it down though (review wise)![QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="WasntAvailable"]Halo 2 received a 9.4 and Half Life 2 received a 9.2. Which do you think is better?PC has higher standards.I don't agree, and neither does Gamespot.
hopesfall2own
PS3/360 have pretty much the same.
Why all the sudden do hermits keep bringing this up? :roll:[/QUOTE And why must you console gamers ignore this fact?Resistance 2 average 88% at gamerankings based on 47 media outlets.
Gears of war 2 average 94% at gamerankings based on 64 media outlets.Thinker_reborn
Resistance 2 average 87% at Metacriticbased on 64 media outlets.
Happy?
the more reviews you have, the more difficult it is to maintain a high score. having more scores has always been a bad thing for a game aspiring to score really high. Resistance 2 will probably go LOWER with more reviews counted; not higher. I would have left this issue alone, as fewer review scores are actually helping R2's score more than hurting it. I will say this, though: *biased scoring* represents one of the reasons I've always been a staunch opponent of using GR scores for "which game is better than which" debates, because they include so many reviews...some of which may be biased. then again, I think the impact of certain scores is less than other, major sites and magazines...so I think they actually take that issue into account. Bottom line: stop whining. R2's scoring is probably higher now than it will be 2 months from now. and when we revisit this thread, Gears of War 2 will still be several points ahead of R2. and Cows will have to make due with the popular consensus being that Gears is a better, more polished, better presented product. Take heart. KillZone 2 cometh.Resistance 2 average 88% at gamerankings based on 47 media outlets.
Gears of war 2 average 94% at gamerankings based on 64 media outlets.
Ah so notice the incredible flaw in this whole analogy?Gears 2 has 40% more reviews than R2.Whether having more reviews is an advantage or disadvantage is irrelavent.Fact is that with that much disparity in the no. of reviews,it is simply illogical to directly compare the 2 averages and then declare the winner.
Going deeper in the reviews,it seems like using gamerankings for comparing games in general is just pointless.Let's see the no. of review outlets for gears that are instantly recognisable as biased.
X360 Magazine UK
Planet Xbox 360
TeamXbox
Official Xbox Magazine
XboxZone
Xbox Addict
MS Xbox World
Talk Xbox
Xbox World 360 Magazine UK
Xbox World Australia
Official Xbox Magazine UK
Totally360
So ya 12 reviews out of the 64 comprise of these sites/magazines.:|
Now lets look at R2 reviews.
PSX Extreme
Playstation Offcial Magazine UK
Playstation Offcial Magazine AU
PSM3 Magazine UK
So ya only 4 for R2.
So ya lemmings,gears 2 is not better in your "real world" as you think it is cuz gamerankings is no real world.
The only thing gears 2 tops R2 is sales and you can say gears 2 is more popular all you want but to say that it has been percieved as better by the overall media is laughable and just grasping for staws.
Thinker_reborn
[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Resistance 2 average 88% at gamerankings based on 47 media outlets.
Gears of war 2 average 94% at gamerankings based on 64 media outlets.InsaneBasura
Resistance 2 average 87% at Metacriticbased on 64 media outlets.
Happy?
they'll find out the hard way that it will get WORSE...not better.[QUOTE="3picuri3"]have you played them both? i'm not a gears fan - but it blows R2 out of the water imho. Ren_ekoHave you played them both? I think R2's weapons alone blow Gears out of the water. weapons don't make a game for me. and yes, unlike some people around here i play things before saying i have... R2 had potential with the massive multiplayer matches, the concept was neat, but it didn't pan out as well as they'd planned imho.
[QUOTE="3picuri3"]have you played them both? i'm not a gears fan - but it blows R2 out of the water imho. Ren_ekoHave you played them both? I think R2's weapons alone blow Gears out of the water.Have you played on an XBOX 360? You are a known Cow...:|
[QUOTE="Ren_eko"][QUOTE="3picuri3"]have you played them both? i'm not a gears fan - but it blows R2 out of the water imho. FirstDiscoveryHave you played them both? I think R2's weapons alone blow Gears out of the water.Have you played on an XBOX 360? You are a known Cow...:| I have played Gears2 on my cousins place(not that much though) and i played Gears1 when i owned a 360(i owned a 360 from release date until the release of MGS4), like you say i have no problem admiting i have bias in favour of Sony , but i am not anti-360 or anti-anything else for that matter.
[QUOTE="Ren_eko"][QUOTE="3picuri3"]have you played them both? i'm not a gears fan - but it blows R2 out of the water imho. 3picuri3Have you played them both? I think R2's weapons alone blow Gears out of the water. weapons don't make a game for me. and yes, unlike some people around here i play things before saying i have... R2 had potential with the massive multiplayer matches, the concept was neat, but it didn't pan out as well as they'd planned imho. I disagree in shooters weapons matter a lot , but like i said i think weapons alone make R2 better , add the game itself and in my eyes Gears has no chance.
Ren_eko
You do realize that 5 of those 12 XBOX only sources rated GEOW2 below the average, while 3/4 of those PS sources rated R2 above the average, right?Shafftehr
More reviews LOWER the score:?FirstDiscoveryAll of this plus the fact that these are averages. The more data in your sample set, the less each individual point affects the average.
Cows are reaching. If Gamespot is really God to you guys, bowdown and admit that the crapfest known as Perfect Dark Zero = Resistance 2
/thread
[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]More reviews LOWER the score:?heretrix
LOL. Beat me to it. More scores increase the chances of it skewing lower. It seems like the Gamerankings argument isn't the only one that's flawed.
"Hey, let's assume R2 will score higher than its percentage, that means it will increase" Disclaimer: TC did not actually say that.[QUOTE="Ren_eko"] [QUOTE="Shafftehr"]You do realize that 5 of those 12 XBOX only sources rated GEOW2 below the average, while 3/4 of those PS sources rated R2 above the average, right?Senor_Kami
More reviews LOWER the score:?FirstDiscoveryAll of this plus the fact that these are averages. The more data in your sample set, the less each individual point affects the average.
Cows are reaching. If Gamespot is really God to you guys, bowdown and admit that the crapfest known as Perfect Dark Zero = Resistance 2
/thread
well played well playedWell I just made some calculations. I took the average of the scores from places that only reviewed both games and here is what I got:
Based on 38 reviews:
Gears of War 2: 9.4
Resistance 2: 8.76
I may have missed a couple but I doubt it will make too much of a difference. In fact, to compensate I took out a very low score given to Resistance 2. You can do it yourself if you wish.
Yep, and that's exactly why we use Gamespot here. Floppy_Jim
LMFAO.
Cows love to live on planet Gamespot right now...but there will be an exodus of galactic proportions from the tiny planet when some anticipated PS3 game receives a low score in GS, but the combined scores from different sites add up to a higher and more palatable score.
Yeah, cows will journey to either Spacestation Metacritic or Starship Gamerankings faster than you can say "Ratchet and Clank".[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Yep, and that's exactly why we use Gamespot here. Pimpshigity21
LMFAO.
Cows love to live on planet Gamespot right now...but there will be an exodus of galactic proportions from the tiny planet when some anticipated PS3 game receives a low score in GS, but the combined scores from different sites add up to a higher and more palatable score.
Yeah, cows will journey to either Spacestation Metacritic or Starship Gamerankings faster than you can say "Ratchet and Clank". Both si....hell all sides do that (cows,lemmings,hermits and even....sheep?).[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Yep, and that's exactly why we use Gamespot here. Pimpshigity21
LMFAO.
Cows love to live on planet Gamespot right now...but there will be an exodus of galactic proportions from the tiny planet when some anticipated PS3 game receives a low score in GS, but the combined scores from different sites add up to a higher and more palatable score.
Yeah, cows will journey to either Spacestation Metacritic or Starship Gamerankings faster than you can say "Ratchet and Clank".
I've just realized that you're completely right. After MGS4's 10 and Resistance 2 matching Gears of War 2, I did not see ANY Xbox fans try to downplay the scores or mention Gamerankings instead. And I mean NONE whatsoever, it's a fact. If you compare that to the Ratchet and Lair situations, it really shows us that there is only 1 group in here that act like hypocrites.
Honestly, I don't know what the hell is wrong with Cows. Why can't they be more like the Xbox fans? Like you, Mr Pimpshigity, you're a shining example of how people on this site should act.
Gears of War 2: 9.0
Resistance 2: 9.0
And gamerankings SUCKS.
Find the first two Fallouts and Planescape: Torment and Baldurs Gate 2. Where are they?
[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Yep, and that's exactly why we use Gamespot here. Pimpshigity21
LMFAO.
Cows love to live on planet Gamespot right now...but there will be an exodus of galactic proportions from the tiny planet when some anticipated PS3 game receives a low score in GS, but the combined scores from different sites add up to a higher and more palatable score.
Yeah, cows will journey to either Spacestation Metacritic or Starship Gamerankings faster than you can say "Ratchet and Clank".
Like how lemmings did when MGS 4 outscored Halo 3? It doesn't matter. Either way we only use GS.
[QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Yep, and that's exactly why we use Gamespot here. Ren_eko
LMFAO.
Cows love to live on planet Gamespot right now...but there will be an exodus of galactic proportions from the tiny planet when some anticipated PS3 game receives a low score in GS, but the combined scores from different sites add up to a higher and more palatable score.
Yeah, cows will journey to either Spacestation Metacritic or Starship Gamerankings faster than you can say "Ratchet and Clank". Both si....hell all sides do that (cows,lemmings,hermits and even....sheep?). No no no, Lemmings and Sheep would NEVER do that. It's only Cows who do it and that is a FACT. Pimpshigity21 can prove this, I'm sure he has a lot of evidence and links he can show you.[QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Yep, and that's exactly why we use Gamespot here. Ren_eko
LMFAO.
Cows love to live on planet Gamespot right now...but there will be an exodus of galactic proportions from the tiny planet when some anticipated PS3 game receives a low score in GS, but the combined scores from different sites add up to a higher and more palatable score.
Yeah, cows will journey to either Spacestation Metacritic or Starship Gamerankings faster than you can say "Ratchet and Clank".
Both si....hell all sides do that (cows,lemmings,hermits and even....sheep?).True, but cows are more sensitive when it comes to scores. The 360 has so many AAA and AA titles available that a few lower than expected scores do not ruffle a lemming's feathers that much. Great titles are a dime a dozen on the PC, so Hermits just get all amused from any attemp to chest pound by console owners...and sheep, well, all they care about is waving their little controllers around.
[QUOTE="Ren_eko"][QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"]Both si....hell all sides do that (cows,lemmings,hermits and even....sheep?). No no no, Lemmings and Sheep would NEVER do that. It's only Cows who do it and that is a FACT. Pimpshigity21 can prove this, I'm sure he has a lot of evidence and links he can show you. Damn youre right , im sorry for disturbing his pinnacle of righteousness that is pimpshigity21 , forgive for my ignorant comments , floppy_Jim lets praise this man who is a shining beacon for humanity.LMFAO.
Cows love to live on planet Gamespot right now...but there will be an exodus of galactic proportions from the tiny planet when some anticipated PS3 game receives a low score in GS, but the combined scores from different sites add up to a higher and more palatable score.
Yeah, cows will journey to either Spacestation Metacritic or Starship Gamerankings faster than you can say "Ratchet and Clank".Floppy_Jim
Like you, Mr Pimpshigity, you're a shining example of how people on this site should act.
Floppy_Jim
Oh no, you've hurt my feelers. If I go out and buy 20 copies of LBP and Resistance2...you know, to pad the embarasing sales figures a little bit...will you promise to love me again?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment