[QUOTE="SuperKnightX"]End of credibility. You are now officially a gullible fanboy. How come Gears can't run on PS3 but UT3, a more technically impressive and larger game in terms of environment and just EVERYTHING run on the PS3??[QUOTE="Radeon_X1950XTX"]cell>xenon xenos>rsx-proven PS3 has 256mb System ram, and 256 graphics ram, this will be the bottleneck, ps3 has a FIXED memory archetechure,(its faster but limited) RSX can write on System ram, but Cell cannot write on RSX therfore limited,(thats why gears cannot run on pos3) 360 has slower ram, but flexible, it can go either way, as long as it doesnt exeed 512, mb ram, +(10 mb EDRAM) 360 and ps3 power will all come down to ram, and 360 is supirior in that area*especailly in the long run*KodiakGTS
Self-ownage complete dude, you are done.
Actually UT3 isn't really technically more impressive than gears, they are running on essentially the same engine, although UT3 is obviously going to push that engine further, because of more development time. But yes, Gears would be possible on PS3. I do believe there will eventually be certain games for each system that could not run on the other. On the one hand, the Cell is a very powerful processing system, allowing PS3 to have certain advantages over X360, yet on the other, the drawbacks of the RSX when compared to the Xenos are both real and obvious, particularly in the implementation and use of RAM.Thanks, thats what I should have said.
Log in to comment