Ghostbusters PC to be one of the worst ports of this gen?

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#51 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts
the game is also $30 bucks on PC, vs. $60 on 360/PS3.. guess that makes sense now
Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts

I don't think it will be poorly optimized.

http://www.hardocp.com/news.html?news=MzkwMjUsLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdCwsLDE=

http://www.viddler.com/explore/HardOCP/videos/36/

Avatar image for VitunLehmat
VitunLehmat

419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 VitunLehmat
Member since 2009 • 419 Posts
don't worry the ps3 version is worse it runs at 960 x 540 :lol:,has less effects on screen,low re textures and less shadows effects.
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48994 Posts

It doesn't matter: thanks to Sony this isn't getting released for PC in Europe until the end of the year. By then there will be way, WAY better games.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

I think may actually top GTA4 for worst PC port this gen, because this is just down right disgraceful, taking away the multiplayer, having stupid requirements to play and then to top it off wanting full price for it, but then again at least its playable unlike GTA4 PC port.

St_muscat

GTA4 is perfectly playable.

Avatar image for raynimrod
raynimrod

6862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 raynimrod
Member since 2005 • 6862 Posts

Recommended System Requirements:

* Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista
* Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 or equivalent
* 4GB RAM
* ATI Radeon HD 4800 series, NVIDIA GTX 260 series or higher video card

Note: Dual core processors such as the Intel Pentium D805 are not supported, Video cards that have only 256MB of RAM are not supported.


YouGamers News



What in the hell kind of game is this???

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[quote="YouGamers News"]Recommended System Requirements:

* Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista
* Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 or equivalent
* 4GB RAM
* ATI Radeon HD 4800 series, NVIDIA GTX 260 series or higher video card

Note: Dual core processors such as the Intel Pentium D805 are not supported, Video cards that have only 256MB of RAM are not supported.


raynimrod



What in the hell kind of game is this???

With those kind of requirements it better be the best looking game in the world for PC. But we all know its not going to be like that.

Avatar image for glenn2709
glenn2709

1719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 glenn2709
Member since 2005 • 1719 Posts

They reccomend 4 gigs of ram!?

Holy what the hell :lol:

t3hTwinky
The same reaction from me as well :lol:
Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts

[QUOTE="raynimrod"]

[quote="YouGamers News"]Recommended System Requirements:

* Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista
* Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 or equivalent
* 4GB RAM
* ATI Radeon HD 4800 series, NVIDIA GTX 260 series or higher video card

Note: Dual core processors such as the Intel Pentium D805 are not supported, Video cards that have only 256MB of RAM are not supported.


JangoWuzHere



What in the hell kind of game is this???

With those kind of requirements it better be the best looking game in the world for PC. But we all know its not going to be like that.

Watch the videos I posted above. The graphics are pretty awesome.

Avatar image for raynimrod
raynimrod

6862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 raynimrod
Member since 2005 • 6862 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

[QUOTE="raynimrod"]

[quote="YouGamers News"]Recommended System Requirements:

* Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista
* Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 or equivalent
* 4GB RAM
* ATI Radeon HD 4800 series, NVIDIA GTX 260 series or higher video card

Note: Dual core processors such as the Intel Pentium D805 are not supported, Video cards that have only 256MB of RAM are not supported.


Einhanderkiller



What in the hell kind of game is this???

With those kind of requirements it better be the best looking game in the world for PC. But we all know its not going to be like that.

Watch the videos I posted above. The graphics are pretty awesome.



Look at the games list from 2007. Crysis was there, these ridiculous requirements were not lol.

Avatar image for zarshack
zarshack

9936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 0

#61 zarshack
Member since 2009 • 9936 Posts

Thats really dumb.

Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#62 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts
The game is supposed to far more technically advanced the the console versions although these insane requirements still scream unoptimized POS
Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#63 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I'm a PC gamer first. They should support all the consoles equally. Same goes for any mulitplat game (like Fallout 3 on the PS3). If your going to support the system, do it right.

I don't want to buy the 360 version when there is a PC version. My 360 is for 360 games and games that just wont work well without a controller (like SFIV). If you got a mulitplat thats on the PC, thats the version I buy. Why? I'm a PC gamer. Do I have to explain why I am a PC gamer who has a console for the games I just can't get on the PC?

Wasdie

So you openly accept inferiority in your gaming products because of system allegiance?

If thats how you want to look at it... sure.

Its more that if your going to do it, do it right. That kind of point. I have bought a few games for my 360 that are on the PC cause I am huge fan of matchmaking (dedicated server browsing blows), but the PC is always my first choice. If a developer refuses to support all of the platforms equally, unless its a game I really want, I don't think it deserves to be bought. Sure my PC can easily play the game on the max settings, but thats not the point.

Its more of just who I am. If you do things, do it right or don't do it at all.

i hate match making the only pc game i can tolerate it in is l4d due to the nature of the mp it works the best for that game everything else having a deciated server browser is the best i especially like the source engine browser :D
Avatar image for Mckenna1845
Mckenna1845

4410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Mckenna1845
Member since 2005 • 4410 Posts
crap, i'm going to have to wait until november or whenever it comes out on 360 if the ps3 version is shoddy too. damn timed exclusivity! if the ps3 port isn't too bad i'll get it for ps3, but if it sucks with so many games coming out near christmas i'm not sure i'll buy it at all.
Avatar image for Wanderer5
Wanderer5

25727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#65 Wanderer5
Member since 2006 • 25727 Posts

WTF, are they serious? I used to want to get this game, but decided not to. I am now really glad that I decided that, because this is just ridiculous.

Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
Rainbow Six Vegas 2 anyone? But yeah that is terrible, boycott FTL.
Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#67 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
Requiring a 512Mb of vram and 2Gb of system Ram? :lol: Oh dear, consoles only have about 512mb in total so what on earth did they do to it, it's like they have it running on some emulator. And no multi...why even bother, anyone who's dumb enough to mistakenly get this on PC will not have a rig to run it.
Avatar image for Nokanhav
Nokanhav

520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Nokanhav
Member since 2009 • 520 Posts

In all fairness, there is a massive amount of physics and PhysX use so the requirements aren't as bad as a lot of people think.

Still, this crappy port is TERRIBLY optimized.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#69 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
hehe. i had no interest in the game to begin with. it's funny to see that they are practically driving away pc gamers from the game.
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#70 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

I don't think it will be poorly optimized.

http://www.hardocp.com/news.html?news=MzkwMjUsLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdCwsLDE=

http://www.viddler.com/explore/HardOCP/videos/36/

Einhanderkiller
a good physics engine doesn't mean it's optimized for pc.
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18257 Posts
so...are they porting it over or are they getting the PC to emulate a 360 playing the game? looks like the latter to me:P. seriously though....thats very poor. the game will be a sales disaster on the PC. they must have paid some monkeys about 3 bananas a week to port this over. its worse than crysis
Avatar image for Wootball
Wootball

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Wootball
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
How do people know the PS3 is a bad version too? Every review I have seen has failed to mention massive differences - just one or two graphical alterations.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
How do people know the PS3 is a bad version too? Every review I have seen has failed to mention massive differences - just one or two graphical alterations.Wootball
They take a few details and are blowing them out of proportion.
Avatar image for Wootball
Wootball

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Wootball
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="Wootball"]How do people know the PS3 is a bad version too? Every review I have seen has failed to mention massive differences - just one or two graphical alterations.Bread_or_Decide
They take a few details and are blowing them out of proportion.

Gotcha. All I have seen in reviews is the PS3 version missing the embers when the proton streams burn walls and on Stay Puft. Hardly a deal breaker. I'm new here but people are weird... They're just games right?
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
Rainbow Six Vegas 2 anyone? But yeah that is terrible, boycott FTL.clembo1990
What about vegas 2? Its a decent port.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#76 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Oh well, 360 version for me, seems to be the best so far, looks better than the PS3 version and has multiplayer unlike the PC version.

And LOL at those requirements.