Ghostbusters Wii Gamespot Review: 8/10

Link

That's higher than the PS3, 360, PC, and DS versions.

Uh oh, I was not expecting that. This may not end well... :PStevo_the_gamer

Another AA for the Wii, LOL, the Wii does it again.

I like the other versions more because they feel more like a Ghostbusters video game.

I like the other versions more because they feel more like a Ghostbusters video game.

Avian005

oh boy.. :?

I like the other versions more because they feel more like a Ghostbusters video game.

Avian005

This thread is disappointing with the lack of systemwars esque comments. Time to spice it up. The only reason it scored higher was because of lower standards, obviously.Stevo_the_gamer

Well Kevin said yesterday that he like it so not a surprise lol. Anyway great score. Going to be getting this version in a little bit.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]This thread is disappointing with the lack of systemwars esque comments. Time to spice it up. The only reason it scored higher was because of lower standards, obviously.savebattery

A Wii multiplat better than the HD systems, oh snap!:o

just confirms the fact that wii has lower standards

just confirms the fact that wii has lower standards

sikanderahmed

hmm, well tbh I was kinda figuring motion would work to the advantage of this game, and not to sound a bit biased but I think you may have a slight point about the lower standarsds thing, the wii has been starving for good titles lately. This is just the first in a line of good games to feed it imho.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]This thread is disappointing with the lack of systemwars esque comments. Time to spice it up. The only reason it scored higher was because of lower standards, obviously.savebattery

hahaha system wars has a funny way of growin' on you.. great stuff! :)

hmm, well tbh I was kinda figuring motion would work to the advantage of this game, and not to sound a bit biased but I think you may have a slight point about the lower standarsds thing, the wii has been starving for good titles lately. This is just the first in a line of good games to feed it imho.

dragonfly110

This thread is disappointing with the lack of systemwars esque comments. Time to spice it up. The only reason it scored higher was because of lower standards, obviously.Stevo_the_gamer

You know a SW thread is disappointing when Stevo has to throw the first piece of bait :lol: :P

PS/360 COD WaW has the same core as the Wii version.....Wii's lower standards should've been confirmed when that happened.

PS/360 COD WaW has the same core as the Wii version.....Wii's lower standards should've been confirmed when that happened.

Ghoul_et_OMC

Quite honestly, I think that was more in line with a crappy review by gamespot more so than lower standards.

PS/360 COD WaW has the same core as the Wii version.....Wii's lower standards should've been confirmed when that happened.

Ghoul_et_OMC

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]This thread is disappointing with the lack of systemwars esque comments. Time to spice it up. The only reason it scored higher was because of lower standards, obviously.ActicEdge

You know a SW thread is disappointing when Stevo has to throw the first piece of bait :lol: :P

Link

That's higher than the PS3, 360, PC, and DS versions.

Link

That's higher than the PS3, 360, PC, and DS versions.

Link

That's higher than the PS3, 360, PC, and DS versions.

First Tiger Woods is better on Wii and now this.

Wii is becoming the king of multiplats as well as exclsuives.

This proves, irrefutably, that HD graphics mean nothing and the Wii-mote equals better gaming experience...67gt500

Great graphics improve an inferior game, don't they? Don't they? (LOL)

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]This thread is disappointing with the lack of systemwars esque comments. Time to spice it up. The only reason it scored higher was because of lower standards, obviously.Stevo_the_gamer

You know a SW thread is disappointing when Stevo has to throw the first piece of bait :lol: :P

lol I know, I was expecting all hell to break loose or something :P But yeah, I skimmed the reviews and they looked pretty similar though its obvious the reviewer played both fairly extensively. I wonder though, if I reviewed this I would have beaten it up for being so mediocore looking, its really plain and bleh. (yes, even for the wii) Still though, it seems like there is some competent design in there which is good.

It's not exclusive so whatever, even then the Wii has lower standards then all other consoles so whateverToriko42

So in theory the score means nothing and the wii game is indeed worse?

if there had have been a difference in scores between the hd consoles this thread would have exploded by now.carlisledavid79

ouch, lemmings got burnt with this one with all their parading yesterday. Doesnt matter, looks likea boring game on all platforms.

It's not exclusive so whatever, even then the Wii has lower standards then all other consoles so whateverToriko42

Well, it's not a port...

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]It's not exclusive so whatever, even then the Wii has lower standards then all other consoles so whateverActicEdge

So in theory the score means nothing and the wii game is indeed worse?

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]It's not exclusive so whatever, even then the Wii has lower standards then all other consoles so whateverToriko42

So in theory the score means nothing and the wii game is indeed worse?

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]It's not exclusive so whatever, even then the Wii has lower standards then all other consoles so whateverToriko42

So in theory the score means nothing and the wii game is indeed worse?

Would you be kind enough to explain the logic behind that?

[QUOTE="Toriko42"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

So in theory the score means nothing and the wii game is indeed worse?

ActicEdge

Would you be kind enough to explain the logic behind that?

That's my logic, I haven't played on my Wii since I got tired of Tatsunoko vs. Capcom (Imported, I have a PAL Wii)