I've enjoyed both MW1 and MW2, putting in over 22 days and 7 days for them online. That still doesn't take away the fact that it is stuffed full of bad design choices in all aspects of the game. I could go into detail but I would waste my time as few would read it and fewer would grasp what I was talking about. In the end game-design should be left to artists with both knowledge and imagination. Sadly most of them only posses one of them.
[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"] Um thats EXACTLY what a review is for.Skittles_McGee
no it's an unbiased analysis of the game, a breakdown of how it works
Uh, no. A review is a written expression of what a game is like and what the person thought of it. Reviews are opinions, that's why they differ. Really, its pretty basic.
I'm sorry, but even a GCSE english student will tell you a review is based on unbiased analysis and constructive criticism on the composition of a video game, as a product.
The ''enjoyment'' part is subjective opinion. That's called a reviewers tilt and is the only thing that's likely to sway a conclusion in any major way.
it's pretty good, but the pc multiplayer's step back is really unfortunate. we have to deal with all the crap associated with p2p play like lag, host migration, failure to join games etc.
Log in to comment