This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="musicalmac"]You could put any game up in that poll, I'd pick Diablo 3.blue_hazy_basicWhat about Diablo 2? :P *applauds* u may have him .... :lol:
You sneaky devils... :evil:
It's too hard to choose!! :cry:
[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]B/C it's a rarity when all three other factions ( Lems, Herms & Sheep ) get together to equal and or in rare cases outnumber the cows. :P And not everyone votes down party lines either! I doubt many people who have played Diablo would consider this a contest. Closer to the truth this, I have cow leanings, but mild fanboyism is a bit of fun - Saying GoW3 is > Diablo 3 is straight up crazy.[QUOTE="Nerkcon"]How is Diablo 3 winning; I thought system wars was filled with Cows?! :|blue_hazy_basic
Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol:isnt Diablo an RPG?
gillri
[QUOTE="gillri"]Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol:isnt Diablo an RPG?
Hahadouken
you might as well compare Bayonetta then as well, hey what about Darksider and dante inferno?
[QUOTE="gillri"]Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol: No amount of combos can make up for the multi-player friendliness of Diablo. It'll be difficult finding someone who got more hours out of God of War 3 than they did out of Diablo 2/3. Like hunting a snipe, if you know what I mean.isnt Diablo an RPG?
Hahadouken
[QUOTE="gillri"]Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol: This isn't a comparison of the better game, but rather which one the user would prefer to play...isnt Diablo an RPG?
Hahadouken
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="gillri"]Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol: No amount of combos can make up for the multi-player friendliness of Diablo. It'll be difficult finding someone who got more hours out of God of War 3 than they did out of Diablo 2/3. Like hunting a snipe, if you know what I mean. THEY. AREN'T. THE. SAME. GENRE. You might as well compare Bayonetta to Sacred 2. "Amount of playing time" isn't the factor here. Nobody is debating that. The fact that the question posed is "Which is a better SLASHER" is the issue, it implies that it's the same genre, and that couldn't be farther from the truth. Which will be a better game? Sure, it makes sense, if that's what the question asked, but you still might as well be comparing steak to cake. Both are good but one of these things is not like the other.isnt Diablo an RPG?
musicalmac
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="gillri"]Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol: This isn't a comparison of the better game, but rather which one the user would prefer to play... No, it clearly asks "which is the better slasher" which is a joke, because even if "slasher" was a genre, Diablo III is an action-RPG, God of War III is an action ADVENTURE. I have a hard time believing you'd accept the comparison at face value if it was "Which is a better shooty game, Company of Heroes or Halo 3?"isnt Diablo an RPG?
Lethalhazard
So? :lol:
All I know is that I'd rather play Diablo 3. But rest assured, I see how passionate you are about this issue.
So? :lol:
All I know is that I'd rather play Diablo 3. But rest assured, I see how passionate you are about this issue.
What do you mean "So"? You're willfully misinterpreting information for teh lulz? Yeah I am pretty "passionate" about unbelievable amounts of hypocrisy on SW, sure. I have a PC and will be playing Diablo III, so beyond my "passion" for attacking hypocrisy, I don't know what else you're trying to imply. ;)That I'd rather play Diablo 3, and that more people are going to get more hours out of Diablo 3 than they will out of God of War 3.
And I was just noting your personal investment in SW issues such as this. YOU. DO. THIS. THING.
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]What do you mean "So"? You're willfully misinterpreting information for teh lulz? Yeah I am pretty "passionate" about unbelievable amounts of hypocrisy on SW, sure. I have a PC and will be playing Diablo III, so beyond my "passion" for attacking hypocrisy, I don't know what else you're trying to imply. ;)musicalmac
That I'd rather play Diablo 3, and that more people are going to get more hours out of Diablo 3 than they will out of God of War 3.
And I was just noting your personal investment in SW issues such as this. YOU. DO. THIS. THING.
Should he even try to dismiss... Ohh, my... :evil:That I'd rather play Diablo 3, and that more people are going to get more hours out of Diablo 3 than they will out of God of War 3.
And I was just noting your personal investment in SW issues such as this. YOU. DO. THIS. THING.
Right on, I am sure I'll get more hours out of Diablo III as well. As long as we're clear that we're discussing completely different genres that have no business being compared, great. As far as me DOING. THIS. THING. I can count on one hand (two TOPS) the amount of times I've done it, most of them being today. I'm sorry it irritates you enough to associate it with me.It doesn't irritate me, it's just a thing you do. :P
It doesn't irritate me, it's just a thing you do. :P
... very rarely. Seriously. I've done it a couple of times today and it's the most I have done it in a one-hour space, probably in my entire life. :P Anyway I'm annoyed by the disparate comparison, I have no qualms with Diablo III and, despite the troll post above me, this has nothing to do with anyone being a "Cow". These comparisons are nonsensical.HahadoukenIn response to your D2 vs Reach, are you comparing a 10 yr old PC game vs a flagship game for MS's console? That hardly seems fair as we all know D2 crushes it :P
Anyway I'm annoyed by the disparate comparison, I have no qualms with Diablo III and, despite the troll post above me, this has nothing to do with anyone being a "Cow". These comparisons are nonsensical.Hahadouken
I guess if you can't beat them, join them? That's why you made that other thread? Maybe I'm confused. I thought it was that kind of hypocrisy that upset you? :?
Nothing good comes from being too serious business in SW. That's why I threw my name into the Diablo 3 camp, because it's going to rule all!! :o
[QUOTE="mitu123"]
One of them is a Blizzard game and I don't play them, so GOW 3 for me.
Arach666
:o
Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?
They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is.[QUOTE="Arach666"]
[QUOTE="mitu123"]
One of them is a Blizzard game and I don't play them, so GOW 3 for me.
mitu123
:o
Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?
They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is. Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.[QUOTE="mitu123"]They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is. Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.[QUOTE="Arach666"]
:o
Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?
Birdy09
Yes, Im sure it has nothing to do with the fact that people are still playing Diablo 2 to this day.
[QUOTE="mitu123"]They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is. Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people. Surely you´re not implying that I like Diablo and Starcraft just because they are Blizzard´s games?[QUOTE="Arach666"]
:o
Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?
Birdy09
[QUOTE="mitu123"]They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is. Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.[QUOTE="Arach666"]
:o
Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?
Birdy09
So wait, the games are only considered good because people are deceived or deluded into thinking they are? Wut?
I went with God of War III but that's just because I haven't played Diablo III before, I'm still pretty sure that God of War III would still take the win though even if I had played both.
[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="mitu123"] They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is.Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people. Surely you´re not implying that I like Diablo and Starcraft just because they are Blizzard´s games? No not at all, but I'm willing to bet nostalgia plays a very heavy role for ALOT of people in hyping blizzard games up to high heaven, even though its sequals to 10 year old games, of which alot of the studios have changed since then.... hell WoW is not what it was originally intended to be either. I know I know, Blizzard like to make sure thier products are quality "when its done its done" PR rubbish, yet they take so long for these graphically outdated games that the bulk of its content wouldnt take as long as some already existing games this generation. I could write an essay on why this applies to WoW heavily. but no. and how thier marketing works wonders on the "Halo 3 fans, MW2 Fans, Apple Fans" equivilants, you know, those people that most PC Gamers scoff at for liking "these casual trashy games" ... and yet Diablo and WoW get a free pass despite being incredible casual in thier genres. Not aimed at you, since I havnt seen you do it, but I love the free passes Blizzard and Valve get in the PC community. Valve... ok alittle more justified... Blizzard are just pretty much "Activision" (not litterally, metaphorically).Arach666
Old thread. Seriously though, GOW3 doesn't stand a chance against Diablo 3. Hell, Diablo 2 is still a better game than GOW3.
Oh I dont know, I see Diablo II for what it is NOW, not what it was back then, because I once loved it. now its an effortless Pinnatta grind RPG which is done better in MMOs, an old retro game, easily exploitable, very short (unless your an item perfectionist) and some of the worst RPG PvP known to man. Amazing for its time, claiming its amazing now though.... ye... im not seeing it, theres much better out there.Old thread. Seriously though, GOW3 doesn't stand a chance against Diablo 3. Hell, Diablo 2 is still a better game than GOW3.
sleepingzzz
Surely you´re not implying that I like Diablo and Starcraft just because they are Blizzard´s games? No not at all, but I'm willing to bet nostalgia plays a very heavy role for ALOT of people in hyping blizzard games up to high heaven, even though its sequals to 10 year old games, of which alot of the studios have changed since then.... hell WoW is not what it was originally intended to be either. I know I know, Blizzard like to make sure thier products are quality "when its done its done" PR rubbish, yet they take so long for these graphically outdated games that the bulk of its content wouldnt take as long as some already existing games this generation. I could write an essay on why this applies to WoW heavily. but no. and how thier marketing works wonders on the "Halo 3 fans, MW2 Fans, Apple Fans" equivilants, you know, those people that most PC Gamers scoff at for liking "these casual trashy games" ... and yet Diablo and WoW get a free pass despite being incredible casual in thier genres. Not aimed at you, since I havnt seen you do it, but I love the free passes Blizzard and Valve get in the PC community. Valve... ok alittle more justified... Blizzard are just pretty much "Activision" (not litterally, metaphorically).[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.Birdy09
Diablo and WOW are casual games in an extreamly hardcore genre...especially WOW. Nor would I even begin to call such a complex game as WOW ever "casual." And Diablo pretty much invented the genre its in.
There is a reason that people still play all the blizzard games today, because Blizzard's game are more then flashy graphics
No not at all, but I'm willing to bet nostalgia plays a very heavy role for ALOT of people in hyping blizzard games up to high heaven, even though its sequals to 10 year old games, of which alot of the studios have changed since then.... hell WoW is not what it was originally intended to be either. I know I know, Blizzard like to make sure thier products are quality "when its done its done" PR rubbish, yet they take so long for these graphically outdated games that the bulk of its content wouldnt take as long as some already existing games this generation. I could write an essay on why this applies to WoW heavily. but no. and how thier marketing works wonders on the "Halo 3 fans, MW2 Fans, Apple Fans" equivilants, you know, those people that most PC Gamers scoff at for liking "these casual trashy games" ... and yet Diablo and WoW get a free pass despite being incredible casual in thier genres. Not aimed at you, since I havnt seen you do it, but I love the free passes Blizzard and Valve get in the PC community. Valve... ok alittle more justified... Blizzard are just pretty much "Activision" (not litterally, metaphorically).[QUOTE="Birdy09"]
[QUOTE="Arach666"] Surely you´re not implying that I like Diablo and Starcraft just because they are Blizzard´s games?cobrax25
Diablo and WOW are casual games in an extreamly hardcore genre...especially WOW. Nor would I even begin to call such a complex game as WOW ever "casual." And Diablo pretty much invented the genre its in.
There is a reason that people still play all the blizzard games today, because Blizzard's game are more then flashy graphics
WoW is in a very "Hardcore" genre (im not labeling it a niche genre, since its the most popular and played in the world but still.) ... but its the "Halo" or "MW2 or "Wii" of its genre.... the streamlined to the point where its more about instant gratification than a challenging achievement that apperently everyone around here craves so much. Hell you just have to see the difference between Classic WoW and WOTLK... or if youve been keeping up to make it even worse Catacalysm.... everything mainstreamed to a ridiculous level. I bet they will have Miyimatos approach soon ... "Virtual Level Selection Hub is too difficult for some users" yup, im honestly suprized you cant purchase a lvl 80 character yet, or just select what level your character creates at.... its nearly sunk that low, but not quite there yet huh Blizzard? In WOTLK theyve removed any kind of ladder in PvE.... at least the difficulty ladder, the pinnata ladder is there in full swing.[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] No not at all, but I'm willing to bet nostalgia plays a very heavy role for ALOT of people in hyping blizzard games up to high heaven, even though its sequals to 10 year old games, of which alot of the studios have changed since then.... hell WoW is not what it was originally intended to be either. I know I know, Blizzard like to make sure thier products are quality "when its done its done" PR rubbish, yet they take so long for these graphically outdated games that the bulk of its content wouldnt take as long as some already existing games this generation. I could write an essay on why this applies to WoW heavily. but no. and how thier marketing works wonders on the "Halo 3 fans, MW2 Fans, Apple Fans" equivilants, you know, those people that most PC Gamers scoff at for liking "these casual trashy games" ... and yet Diablo and WoW get a free pass despite being incredible casual in thier genres. Not aimed at you, since I havnt seen you do it, but I love the free passes Blizzard and Valve get in the PC community. Valve... ok alittle more justified... Blizzard are just pretty much "Activision" (not litterally, metaphorically).
Birdy09
Diablo and WOW are casual games in an extreamly hardcore genre...especially WOW. Nor would I even begin to call such a complex game as WOW ever "casual." And Diablo pretty much invented the genre its in.
There is a reason that people still play all the blizzard games today, because Blizzard's game are more then flashy graphics
WoW is in a very "Hardcore" genre (im not labeling it a niche genre, since its the most popular and played in the world but still.) ... but its the "Halo" or "MW2 or "Wii" of its genre.... the streamlined to the point where its more about instant gratification than a challenging achievement that apperently everyone around here craves so much. Hell you just have to see the difference between Classic WoW and WOTLK... or if youve been keeping up to make it even worse Catacalysm.... everything mainstreamed to a ridiculous level. I bet they will have Miyimatos approach soon ... "Virtual Level Selection Hub is too difficult for some users" yup, im honestly suprized you cant purchase a lvl 80 character yet, or just select what level your character creates at.... its nearly sunk that low, but not quite there yet huh Blizzard? In WOTLK theyve removed any kind of ladder in PvE.... at least the difficulty ladder, the pinnata ladder is there in full swing.By reading the info on cataclysm they are actually making the game more challenging because WOTLK was just simply easy mode (especially in the healing department) except for Heroic lich king, which I haven't done but I've done him normal and even that in itself is a challenge. Wow is still pretty hard, but the non heroic/heroic versions of instances make it seem not so. Before everyone had to do heroic mode, blizzard has just given an easier setting for the less skilled, all they have done is expanded the demograph and allowed more people to play. I agree this is caused the trend of instant gratification and people don't want to put effort into doing anything but hopefully from the changes I've seen from a design standpoint cataclysm should be alot more of a challenge.
WoW is in a very "Hardcore" genre (im not labeling it a niche genre, since its the most popular and played in the world but still.) ... but its the "Halo" or "MW2 or "Wii" of its genre.... the streamlined to the point where its more about instant gratification than a challenging achievement that apperently everyone around here craves so much. Hell you just have to see the difference between Classic WoW and WOTLK... or if youve been keeping up to make it even worse Catacalysm.... everything mainstreamed to a ridiculous level. I bet they will have Miyimatos approach soon ... "Virtual Level Selection Hub is too difficult for some users" yup, im honestly suprized you cant purchase a lvl 80 character yet, or just select what level your character creates at.... its nearly sunk that low, but not quite there yet huh Blizzard? In WOTLK theyve removed any kind of ladder in PvE.... at least the difficulty ladder, the pinnata ladder is there in full swing.[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]
Diablo and WOW are casual games in an extreamly hardcore genre...especially WOW. Nor would I even begin to call such a complex game as WOW ever "casual." And Diablo pretty much invented the genre its in.
There is a reason that people still play all the blizzard games today, because Blizzard's game are more then flashy graphics
Espada12
By reading the info on cataclysm they are actually making the game more challenging because WOTLK was just simply easy mode (especially in the healing department) except for Heroic lich king, which I haven't done but I've done him normal and even that in itself is a challenge. Wow is still pretty hard, but the non heroic/heroic versions of instances make it seem not so. Before everyone had to do heroic mode, blizzard has just given an easier setting for the less skilled, all they have done is expanded the demograph and allowed more people to play. I agree this is caused the trend of instant gratification and people don't want to put effort into doing anything but hopefully from the changes I've seen from a design standpoint cataclysm should be alot more of a challenge.
Mainstreaming the stats even more? though dont get me wrong, many things blizzard do are good... theyve added nice extras to the genre... and WOTLKs presentation is far above classics in every way, even questing is more tolerable in its presentation.... but at the same time, the world itself has become so streamlined its beggining to feel like the expansions are just prettier Guild Wars Hubs. In classic... getting anywhere close, let alone killing Cthune or Kel Thuzad was a HUGE deal. these areas of the game were a pinnicale, a ladder of achievement.... in a Massive Player Based world. Yet, WoW somehow had to be the one that caved into the crap excuse of "we are paying the same game, we should get everything those that actual try, and are good get... without any effort" because thats the way the world works right? =/ Nothing personal to you Espada.... but I remember Vandalvideo claiming the very same thing about Wrath of the Lich King..... yet its a joke compared to Classic and Burning Crusade. Hell this time they even made Heroics easy, to top it off everyone who plays the game is tier 9 and above.... another ladderless system of mediocrity.... which makes all the heroics a joke.... everything except Icecrown and Ulduar a joke infact. Theyve butchered the game... in the name of casual appeal.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment