God of War III or Diablo III?

  • 120 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
Why was this thread brought back from the dead??? Do people search for this crap??? Honestly. Ill say D3 though.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#53 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="musicalmac"]You could put any game up in that poll, I'd pick Diablo 3.blue_hazy_basic
What about Diablo 2? :P

*applauds* u may have him .... :lol:

You sneaky devils... :evil:

It's too hard to choose!! :cry:

Avatar image for Crimsader
Crimsader

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Crimsader
Member since 2008 • 11672 Posts
I'm a hermit... so Diablo 3 :)
Avatar image for SamiRDuran
SamiRDuran

2758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 SamiRDuran
Member since 2005 • 2758 Posts
god of war 3 is just another good game but diablo 3 is you know... DIABLO 3!!!!
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts
[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"]How is Diablo 3 winning; I thought system wars was filled with Cows?! :|blue_hazy_basic

B/C it's a rarity when all three other factions ( Lems, Herms & Sheep ) get together to equal and or in rare cases outnumber the cows. :P

And not everyone votes down party lines either! I doubt many people who have played Diablo would consider this a contest.

Closer to the truth this, I have cow leanings, but mild fanboyism is a bit of fun - Saying GoW3 is > Diablo 3 is straight up crazy.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#57 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
They are nothing alike whatsoever. Calling them a "slasher" doesn't make them remotely the same genre.
Avatar image for gillri
gillri

5926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 gillri
Member since 2004 • 5926 Posts

isnt Diablo an RPG?

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#59 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

isnt Diablo an RPG?

gillri
Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol:
Avatar image for gillri
gillri

5926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 gillri
Member since 2004 • 5926 Posts

[QUOTE="gillri"]

isnt Diablo an RPG?

Hahadouken

Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol:

you might as well compare Bayonetta then as well, hey what about Darksider and dante inferno?

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#61 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="gillri"]

isnt Diablo an RPG?

Hahadouken
Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol:

No amount of combos can make up for the multi-player friendliness of Diablo. It'll be difficult finding someone who got more hours out of God of War 3 than they did out of Diablo 2/3. Like hunting a snipe, if you know what I mean.
Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#62 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts
[QUOTE="gillri"]

isnt Diablo an RPG?

Hahadouken
Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol:

This isn't a comparison of the better game, but rather which one the user would prefer to play...
Avatar image for Fumpa
Fumpa

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Fumpa
Member since 2003 • 3307 Posts
Diablo III by far in my opinion. But, it is a strange comparison.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#64 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="gillri"]

isnt Diablo an RPG?

musicalmac
Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol:

No amount of combos can make up for the multi-player friendliness of Diablo. It'll be difficult finding someone who got more hours out of God of War 3 than they did out of Diablo 2/3. Like hunting a snipe, if you know what I mean.

THEY. AREN'T. THE. SAME. GENRE. You might as well compare Bayonetta to Sacred 2. "Amount of playing time" isn't the factor here. Nobody is debating that. The fact that the question posed is "Which is a better SLASHER" is the issue, it implies that it's the same genre, and that couldn't be farther from the truth. Which will be a better game? Sure, it makes sense, if that's what the question asked, but you still might as well be comparing steak to cake. Both are good but one of these things is not like the other.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#65 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="gillri"]

isnt Diablo an RPG?

Lethalhazard
Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol:

This isn't a comparison of the better game, but rather which one the user would prefer to play...

No, it clearly asks "which is the better slasher" which is a joke, because even if "slasher" was a genre, Diablo III is an action-RPG, God of War III is an action ADVENTURE. I have a hard time believing you'd accept the comparison at face value if it was "Which is a better shooty game, Company of Heroes or Halo 3?"
Avatar image for mgkennedy5
mgkennedy5

1501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#66 mgkennedy5
Member since 2005 • 1501 Posts
Diablo III will last SSSOOOO much longer, I love God of War but if I had to choose one just out of value alone Diablo wins
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="Lethalhazard"][QUOTE="Hahadouken"] Yet it hasn't stopped high-level posters from going "DIABLO YAY!" It's a weak comparison, to say the least. As a better "slasher", and slasher-only, I don't see how spamming 1 mouse button > 4 styles of combat and a plethora of combos. As a better overall game, who knows, funny that Diablo has no release date and it's probably winning the poll for "better game". :lol:

This isn't a comparison of the better game, but rather which one the user would prefer to play...

No, it clearly asks "which is the better slasher" which is a joke, because even if "slasher" was a genre, Diablo III is an action-RPG, God of War III is an action ADVENTURE. I have a hard time believing you'd accept the comparison at face value if it was "Which is a better shooty game, Company of Heroes or Halo 3?"

You're missing the point, everyone here is just saying which game they'd rather play - which is fair enough right? so to answer your question...Company of Heroes way more than Halo 3.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#68 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
And if the question posed really is "which is a better SLASHER" meaning which is better at slashing things, then again, I fail to see how simplistic clicky combat makes for better slashy-slash than blades literally ripping bodies apart and requiring multiple buttons to achieve. At BEST I can see this comparison comparing one aspect of the game, which if I'm interpreting "slasher" correctly, refers to the combat. I am a HUGE, HUGE Diablo fan and always have been (check my ratings), but they aren't even remotely close to the same experience, and if "slasher" is merely a question of the combat system, the comparison is again laughable. Fighting "system" in Diablo? :roll:
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#69 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]THEY. AREN'T. THE. SAME. GENRE. You might as well compare Bayonetta to Sacred 2. "Amount of playing time" isn't the factor here. Nobody is debating that. The fact that the question posed is "Which is a better SLASHER" is the issue, it implies that it's the same genre, and that couldn't be farther from the truth. Which will be a better game? Sure, it makes sense, if that's what the question asked, but you still might as well be comparing steak to cake. Both are good but one of these things is not like the other.

So? :lol:

All I know is that I'd rather play Diablo 3. But rest assured, I see how passionate you are about this issue.

Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

Don't tear yourself apart, just get both. :)

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#71 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Hahadouken"]THEY. AREN'T. THE. SAME. GENRE. You might as well compare Bayonetta to Sacred 2. "Amount of playing time" isn't the factor here. Nobody is debating that. The fact that the question posed is "Which is a better SLASHER" is the issue, it implies that it's the same genre, and that couldn't be farther from the truth. Which will be a better game? Sure, it makes sense, if that's what the question asked, but you still might as well be comparing steak to cake. Both are good but one of these things is not like the other.

So? :lol:

All I know is that I'd rather play Diablo 3. But rest assured, I see how passionate you are about this issue.

What do you mean "So"? You're willfully misinterpreting information for teh lulz? Yeah I am pretty "passionate" about unbelievable amounts of hypocrisy on SW, sure. I have a PC and will be playing Diablo III, so beyond my "passion" for attacking hypocrisy, I don't know what else you're trying to imply. ;)
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#72 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]What do you mean "So"? You're willfully misinterpreting information for teh lulz? Yeah I am pretty "passionate" about unbelievable amounts of hypocrisy on SW, sure. I have a PC and will be playing Diablo III, so beyond my "passion" for attacking hypocrisy, I don't know what else you're trying to imply. ;)

That I'd rather play Diablo 3, and that more people are going to get more hours out of Diablo 3 than they will out of God of War 3.

And I was just noting your personal investment in SW issues such as this. YOU. DO. THIS. THING.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45609 Posts

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]What do you mean "So"? You're willfully misinterpreting information for teh lulz? Yeah I am pretty "passionate" about unbelievable amounts of hypocrisy on SW, sure. I have a PC and will be playing Diablo III, so beyond my "passion" for attacking hypocrisy, I don't know what else you're trying to imply. ;)musicalmac

That I'd rather play Diablo 3, and that more people are going to get more hours out of Diablo 3 than they will out of God of War 3.

And I was just noting your personal investment in SW issues such as this. YOU. DO. THIS. THING.

Should he even try to dismiss... Ohh, my... :evil:

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#74 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Hahadouken"]What do you mean "So"? You're willfully misinterpreting information for teh lulz? Yeah I am pretty "passionate" about unbelievable amounts of hypocrisy on SW, sure. I have a PC and will be playing Diablo III, so beyond my "passion" for attacking hypocrisy, I don't know what else you're trying to imply. ;)

That I'd rather play Diablo 3, and that more people are going to get more hours out of Diablo 3 than they will out of God of War 3.

And I was just noting your personal investment in SW issues such as this. YOU. DO. THIS. THING.

Right on, I am sure I'll get more hours out of Diablo III as well. As long as we're clear that we're discussing completely different genres that have no business being compared, great. As far as me DOING. THIS. THING. I can count on one hand (two TOPS) the amount of times I've done it, most of them being today. I'm sorry it irritates you enough to associate it with me.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#75 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Right on, I am sure I'll get more hours out of Diablo III as well. As long as we're clear that we're discussing completely different genres that have no business being compared, great. As far as me DOING. THIS. THING. I can count on one hand (two TOPS) the amount of times I've done it, most of them being today. I'm sorry it irritates you enough to associate it with me.

It doesn't irritate me, it's just a thing you do. :P

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#76 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

One of them is a Blizzard game and I don't play them, so GOW 3 for me.

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#78 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Right on, I am sure I'll get more hours out of Diablo III as well. As long as we're clear that we're discussing completely different genres that have no business being compared, great. As far as me DOING. THIS. THING. I can count on one hand (two TOPS) the amount of times I've done it, most of them being today. I'm sorry it irritates you enough to associate it with me.

It doesn't irritate me, it's just a thing you do. :P

... very rarely. Seriously. I've done it a couple of times today and it's the most I have done it in a one-hour space, probably in my entire life. :P Anyway I'm annoyed by the disparate comparison, I have no qualms with Diablo III and, despite the troll post above me, this has nothing to do with anyone being a "Cow". These comparisons are nonsensical.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

Hahadouken
In response to your D2 vs Reach, are you comparing a 10 yr old PC game vs a flagship game for MS's console? That hardly seems fair as we all know D2 crushes it :P

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#80 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

One of them is a Blizzard game and I don't play them, so GOW 3 for me.

mitu123

:o

Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#81 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
Anyway I'm annoyed by the disparate comparison, I have no qualms with Diablo III and, despite the troll post above me, this has nothing to do with anyone being a "Cow". These comparisons are nonsensical.Hahadouken

I guess if you can't beat them, join them? That's why you made that other thread? Maybe I'm confused. I thought it was that kind of hypocrisy that upset you? :?

Nothing good comes from being too serious business in SW. That's why I threw my name into the Diablo 3 camp, because it's going to rule all!! :o

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#82 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

One of them is a Blizzard game and I don't play them, so GOW 3 for me.

Arach666

:o

Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?

They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

One of them is a Blizzard game and I don't play them, so GOW 3 for me.

mitu123

:o

Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?

They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is.

Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

:o

Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?

Birdy09

They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is.

Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.

Yes, Im sure it has nothing to do with the fact that people are still playing Diablo 2 to this day.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#85 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts
[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

:o

Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?

Birdy09

They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is.

Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.

Surely you´re not implying that I like Diablo and Starcraft just because they are Blizzard´s games?
Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

:o

Why don´t you play Blizzard games mitu?

Birdy09

They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is.

Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.

So wait, the games are only considered good because people are deceived or deluded into thinking they are? Wut?

Avatar image for PPresentFortune
PPresentFortune

981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 PPresentFortune
Member since 2007 • 981 Posts

I went with God of War III but that's just because I haven't played Diablo III before, I'm still pretty sure that God of War III would still take the win though even if I had played both.

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts

Oh, and Diablo 3 isn't even out and isn't even in the same genre. Bad thread.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="mitu123"] They don't seem to interest me, plus I'm not big on RTSs and MMOs, so I'm left with Diablo, which I'm still not convinced on how good it is.

Arach666

Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.

Surely you´re not implying that I like Diablo and Starcraft just because they are Blizzard´s games?

No not at all, but I'm willing to bet nostalgia plays a very heavy role for ALOT of people in hyping blizzard games up to high heaven, even though its sequals to 10 year old games, of which alot of the studios have changed since then.... hell WoW is not what it was originally intended to be either. I know I know, Blizzard like to make sure thier products are quality "when its done its done" PR rubbish, yet they take so long for these graphically outdated games that the bulk of its content wouldnt take as long as some already existing games this generation. I could write an essay on why this applies to WoW heavily. but no. and how thier marketing works wonders on the "Halo 3 fans, MW2 Fans, Apple Fans" equivilants, you know, those people that most PC Gamers scoff at for liking "these casual trashy games" ... and yet Diablo and WoW get a free pass despite being incredible casual in thier genres. Not aimed at you, since I havnt seen you do it, but I love the free passes Blizzard and Valve get in the PC community. Valve... ok alittle more justified... Blizzard are just pretty much "Activision" (not litterally, metaphorically).

Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#90 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts

Old thread. Seriously though, GOW3 doesn't stand a chance against Diablo 3. Hell, Diablo 2 is still a better game than GOW3.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

Old thread. Seriously though, GOW3 doesn't stand a chance against Diablo 3. Hell, Diablo 2 is still a better game than GOW3.

sleepingzzz
Oh I dont know, I see Diablo II for what it is NOW, not what it was back then, because I once loved it. now its an effortless Pinnatta grind RPG which is done better in MMOs, an old retro game, easily exploitable, very short (unless your an item perfectionist) and some of the worst RPG PvP known to man. Amazing for its time, claiming its amazing now though.... ye... im not seeing it, theres much better out there.
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] Nobody without rose-tinted glasses are convinced its that good either, same with Starcraft II. but you know how much brand loyalty seems to effect people.Birdy09

Surely you´re not implying that I like Diablo and Starcraft just because they are Blizzard´s games?

No not at all, but I'm willing to bet nostalgia plays a very heavy role for ALOT of people in hyping blizzard games up to high heaven, even though its sequals to 10 year old games, of which alot of the studios have changed since then.... hell WoW is not what it was originally intended to be either. I know I know, Blizzard like to make sure thier products are quality "when its done its done" PR rubbish, yet they take so long for these graphically outdated games that the bulk of its content wouldnt take as long as some already existing games this generation. I could write an essay on why this applies to WoW heavily. but no. and how thier marketing works wonders on the "Halo 3 fans, MW2 Fans, Apple Fans" equivilants, you know, those people that most PC Gamers scoff at for liking "these casual trashy games" ... and yet Diablo and WoW get a free pass despite being incredible casual in thier genres. Not aimed at you, since I havnt seen you do it, but I love the free passes Blizzard and Valve get in the PC community. Valve... ok alittle more justified... Blizzard are just pretty much "Activision" (not litterally, metaphorically).

Diablo and WOW are casual games in an extreamly hardcore genre...especially WOW. Nor would I even begin to call such a complex game as WOW ever "casual." And Diablo pretty much invented the genre its in.

There is a reason that people still play all the blizzard games today, because Blizzard's game are more then flashy graphics

Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts
[QUOTE="jonnyt61"]What? Diablo 3 and God of War aren't the same type of game. One is an RPG, with heavy emphasis on loot collection and character progression. The other is an action-adventure title, with emphasis on story, and visuals. I'm getting both, though.

And Diablo has bad visuals :roll: Yeah right :P
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18255 Posts
two very differemt games. all i will say is that i will be putting alot more time into diablo compared to GOW3.
Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"] Surely you´re not implying that I like Diablo and Starcraft just because they are Blizzard´s games?cobrax25

No not at all, but I'm willing to bet nostalgia plays a very heavy role for ALOT of people in hyping blizzard games up to high heaven, even though its sequals to 10 year old games, of which alot of the studios have changed since then.... hell WoW is not what it was originally intended to be either. I know I know, Blizzard like to make sure thier products are quality "when its done its done" PR rubbish, yet they take so long for these graphically outdated games that the bulk of its content wouldnt take as long as some already existing games this generation. I could write an essay on why this applies to WoW heavily. but no. and how thier marketing works wonders on the "Halo 3 fans, MW2 Fans, Apple Fans" equivilants, you know, those people that most PC Gamers scoff at for liking "these casual trashy games" ... and yet Diablo and WoW get a free pass despite being incredible casual in thier genres. Not aimed at you, since I havnt seen you do it, but I love the free passes Blizzard and Valve get in the PC community. Valve... ok alittle more justified... Blizzard are just pretty much "Activision" (not litterally, metaphorically).

Diablo and WOW are casual games in an extreamly hardcore genre...especially WOW. Nor would I even begin to call such a complex game as WOW ever "casual." And Diablo pretty much invented the genre its in.

There is a reason that people still play all the blizzard games today, because Blizzard's game are more then flashy graphics

WoW is in a very "Hardcore" genre (im not labeling it a niche genre, since its the most popular and played in the world but still.) ... but its the "Halo" or "MW2 or "Wii" of its genre.... the streamlined to the point where its more about instant gratification than a challenging achievement that apperently everyone around here craves so much. Hell you just have to see the difference between Classic WoW and WOTLK... or if youve been keeping up to make it even worse Catacalysm.... everything mainstreamed to a ridiculous level. I bet they will have Miyimatos approach soon ... "Virtual Level Selection Hub is too difficult for some users" yup, im honestly suprized you cant purchase a lvl 80 character yet, or just select what level your character creates at.... its nearly sunk that low, but not quite there yet huh Blizzard? In WOTLK theyve removed any kind of ladder in PvE.... at least the difficulty ladder, the pinnata ladder is there in full swing.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#96 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] No not at all, but I'm willing to bet nostalgia plays a very heavy role for ALOT of people in hyping blizzard games up to high heaven, even though its sequals to 10 year old games, of which alot of the studios have changed since then.... hell WoW is not what it was originally intended to be either. I know I know, Blizzard like to make sure thier products are quality "when its done its done" PR rubbish, yet they take so long for these graphically outdated games that the bulk of its content wouldnt take as long as some already existing games this generation. I could write an essay on why this applies to WoW heavily. but no. and how thier marketing works wonders on the "Halo 3 fans, MW2 Fans, Apple Fans" equivilants, you know, those people that most PC Gamers scoff at for liking "these casual trashy games" ... and yet Diablo and WoW get a free pass despite being incredible casual in thier genres. Not aimed at you, since I havnt seen you do it, but I love the free passes Blizzard and Valve get in the PC community. Valve... ok alittle more justified... Blizzard are just pretty much "Activision" (not litterally, metaphorically).

Birdy09

Diablo and WOW are casual games in an extreamly hardcore genre...especially WOW. Nor would I even begin to call such a complex game as WOW ever "casual." And Diablo pretty much invented the genre its in.

There is a reason that people still play all the blizzard games today, because Blizzard's game are more then flashy graphics

WoW is in a very "Hardcore" genre (im not labeling it a niche genre, since its the most popular and played in the world but still.) ... but its the "Halo" or "MW2 or "Wii" of its genre.... the streamlined to the point where its more about instant gratification than a challenging achievement that apperently everyone around here craves so much. Hell you just have to see the difference between Classic WoW and WOTLK... or if youve been keeping up to make it even worse Catacalysm.... everything mainstreamed to a ridiculous level. I bet they will have Miyimatos approach soon ... "Virtual Level Selection Hub is too difficult for some users" yup, im honestly suprized you cant purchase a lvl 80 character yet, or just select what level your character creates at.... its nearly sunk that low, but not quite there yet huh Blizzard? In WOTLK theyve removed any kind of ladder in PvE.... at least the difficulty ladder, the pinnata ladder is there in full swing.

By reading the info on cataclysm they are actually making the game more challenging because WOTLK was just simply easy mode (especially in the healing department) except for Heroic lich king, which I haven't done but I've done him normal and even that in itself is a challenge. Wow is still pretty hard, but the non heroic/heroic versions of instances make it seem not so. Before everyone had to do heroic mode, blizzard has just given an easier setting for the less skilled, all they have done is expanded the demograph and allowed more people to play. I agree this is caused the trend of instant gratification and people don't want to put effort into doing anything but hopefully from the changes I've seen from a design standpoint cataclysm should be alot more of a challenge.

Avatar image for LenGen
LenGen

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 LenGen
Member since 2010 • 317 Posts
WAY different genres, Diablo is action RPG and gow3 is hack and slack, diablo 3 will have more replayability but gow3 has "oh s***" moments.
Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

Diablo and WOW are casual games in an extreamly hardcore genre...especially WOW. Nor would I even begin to call such a complex game as WOW ever "casual." And Diablo pretty much invented the genre its in.

There is a reason that people still play all the blizzard games today, because Blizzard's game are more then flashy graphics

Espada12

WoW is in a very "Hardcore" genre (im not labeling it a niche genre, since its the most popular and played in the world but still.) ... but its the "Halo" or "MW2 or "Wii" of its genre.... the streamlined to the point where its more about instant gratification than a challenging achievement that apperently everyone around here craves so much. Hell you just have to see the difference between Classic WoW and WOTLK... or if youve been keeping up to make it even worse Catacalysm.... everything mainstreamed to a ridiculous level. I bet they will have Miyimatos approach soon ... "Virtual Level Selection Hub is too difficult for some users" yup, im honestly suprized you cant purchase a lvl 80 character yet, or just select what level your character creates at.... its nearly sunk that low, but not quite there yet huh Blizzard? In WOTLK theyve removed any kind of ladder in PvE.... at least the difficulty ladder, the pinnata ladder is there in full swing.

By reading the info on cataclysm they are actually making the game more challenging because WOTLK was just simply easy mode (especially in the healing department) except for Heroic lich king, which I haven't done but I've done him normal and even that in itself is a challenge. Wow is still pretty hard, but the non heroic/heroic versions of instances make it seem not so. Before everyone had to do heroic mode, blizzard has just given an easier setting for the less skilled, all they have done is expanded the demograph and allowed more people to play. I agree this is caused the trend of instant gratification and people don't want to put effort into doing anything but hopefully from the changes I've seen from a design standpoint cataclysm should be alot more of a challenge.

Mainstreaming the stats even more? though dont get me wrong, many things blizzard do are good... theyve added nice extras to the genre... and WOTLKs presentation is far above classics in every way, even questing is more tolerable in its presentation.... but at the same time, the world itself has become so streamlined its beggining to feel like the expansions are just prettier Guild Wars Hubs. In classic... getting anywhere close, let alone killing Cthune or Kel Thuzad was a HUGE deal. these areas of the game were a pinnicale, a ladder of achievement.... in a Massive Player Based world. Yet, WoW somehow had to be the one that caved into the crap excuse of "we are paying the same game, we should get everything those that actual try, and are good get... without any effort" because thats the way the world works right? =/ Nothing personal to you Espada.... but I remember Vandalvideo claiming the very same thing about Wrath of the Lich King..... yet its a joke compared to Classic and Burning Crusade. Hell this time they even made Heroics easy, to top it off everyone who plays the game is tier 9 and above.... another ladderless system of mediocrity.... which makes all the heroics a joke.... everything except Icecrown and Ulduar a joke infact. Theyve butchered the game... in the name of casual appeal.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

GOW3. I've never even played Diablo.

kingdre

This is amazing. I never thought there are gamers out there who have not played Diablo III. Anyways the two games are nothing alike so I really dont see how they can be compared.

Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#100 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

How can you vote for a game that isnt even out yet? THE GAME ISNT EVEN DATED FOR RELEASE YET. System wars fails me yet again with its lack of common sense.