GOW III gets 4/5 at Giant Bomb

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gmc2u_64
gmc2u_64

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#101 gmc2u_64
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

Well, considering that GB gave GTA TBOGT a 3/5 & B-K N&B a 5/5 AND Xbox-360 GOTY, this site really holds no credibility for me.

Anyway, I would LOVE to play this and the GOW Collection, but I don't have a PS3. Don't get me wrong, I would like to get one, but my home is lacking the space necessary to play a PS3 (I mean, my entertainment center has a Nintendo 64, Nintendo Wii, Xbox, and Xbox-360, so there's hardly any space).

Avatar image for XboximusPrime
XboximusPrime

5405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 XboximusPrime
Member since 2009 • 5405 Posts

Hmm, seems about right for them. You could even tell from there Podcast they werent TOO pumped for it. Jeff (he didnt review it) even said that while it looks very very pretty, he really had no interest in it. Im not really sure Ryans (who did review it) hype for it was.

Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#103 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts
I think it's accurate. Really God of War III is just as much of a linear, more-of-the-same sequel as FFXIII, it's just that people still happen to find it fun.cutmaclass1
Also GOW 3 isn't a 40+ hour long game. It's a lot easier to take a linear, no variety game when the mechanics are good and you're not forced to do the same stuff for DAYS of gameplay time.
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#105 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Good. Sooo not a 5/5 game.

This equates to an 80 on Metacritic. That's around what it should be. 8.0-8.5.

BioShockOwnz

i always knew you were biased towards the 360 but for the past few days youve become a full blown lemming.

It's not about the system. It's about the game. Don't hate the playa, hate the game. ;)

Then why did you accuse me in another thread of hating the 360?
Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#106 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

Never liked giant bomb so why should I care what score they give God of war 3? Its not a bad score anyways so why moan about it?

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#107 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

Save the faux-flower-child thing pleaseHahadouken

I was clearly stating an irrefutable fact. Save the petty insults, bud. I don't want to hear it. Let's be friendly.

Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

So much seriousness in this thread... it's just a game. :|

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#110 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Save the faux-flower-child thing pleaseBioShockOwnz

I was clearly stating an irrefutable fact. Save the petty insults, bud. I don't want to hear it.

How is that a petty insult? Are you saying flower children are bad? I'm just saying I don't believe you are one anymore.
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#111 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
BSO, why you ignoring me, man?! Duder! What's up?
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#112 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Save the faux-flower-child thing pleaseHahadouken

I was clearly stating an irrefutable fact. Save the petty insults, bud. I don't want to hear it.

How is that a petty insult? Are you saying flower children are bad? I'm just saying I don't believe you are one anymore.

But, but... I wanted to respond to your deleted comment. You were well aware, as your deleted comment mentioned it. ;)

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#114 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

I was clearly stating an irrefutable fact. Save the petty insults, bud. I don't want to hear it.

BioShockOwnz

How is that a petty insult? Are you saying flower children are bad? I'm just saying I don't believe you are one anymore.

But, but... I wanted to respond to your deleted comment. You were well aware, as your deleted comment mentioned it. ;)

Hey, while I've got you here, I notice you slandered my name yesterday by claiming that I had called unreleased PS3 games "the graphics king", then you failed to provide any evidence. Care to respond?
Avatar image for solidgamer
solidgamer

7542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 solidgamer
Member since 2005 • 7542 Posts
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

[QUOTE="alextherussian"]

This really needs some serious explanation

..

4/5 = 0.8 (80%)

5/5 = 1.0 (100%)

mythrol

Im sorry but that type of ranking just seems retarted then. I mean wheres the 90%. You just cant skip that.

I think you miss the entire point of the GB ranking system. GB scores =/= GS scores. Here people think 80% means it' sa bad game. At GB 4 out of 5 stars means that it's a really good game that just had a few things holding it back from being an AMAZING game. That might be technical problems, or in some cases like it seems like it was with GOW3, the game simply didn't offer enough new things to warrant a higher score. I personally think GB's scoring system is far better than GS. What's the true difference between an 8.5 and 9.0 anyway? How about the difference from 9.0 to 9.5? No one really knows because there's no clear way to explain the differences. Instead of going by an insane ranking system where really doesn't have meaning and only serves to increase fanboy wars; GB instead using a simple 5 point scale. 5 means it's awesome. 4 means it's great with a few flaws or things holding it back. 3 means it's a decent game but has some issues that shouldn't be ignore. 2 means the flaws outweigh the good and you should think about avoiding the game unless a hardcore fan. 1 means don't touch it with a 10ft pole. 4 is a good score at GB, and GOW3 deserves it (even if it wasn't my kind of game). Please don't try and convert different scoring systems to GS's because like in the case of GB's the translation is not an accurate one.

I agree with you. People need to stop thinking that 4/5= 80%. Yes it does mathematically but in terms of a review GB Cleary states and i quote for the 4/5 "Still very good and easy to recommend, though it doesn't quite live up to its full potential." which I think GOW3 deserves
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#116 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

It's not about the system. It's about the game. Don't hate the playa, hate the game. ;)

aaronmullan

Then why did you accuse me in another thread of hating the 360?

BSO, why you not replying me for, dudemanbrodawg?

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#117 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Save the faux-flower-child thing pleaseHahadouken

I was clearly stating an irrefutable fact. Save the petty insults, bud. I don't want to hear it.

How is that a petty insult? Are you saying flower children are bad? I'm just saying I don't believe you are one anymore.

What exactly do you mean by flower children?

I think I know what you mean, but I just want to confirm it.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#118 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

It's right in their tag line: "Sony delivers a fittingly epic and savage PlayStation 3 debut for God of War, even if it does little to evolve the formula established by its predecessors."

That's a euphemism for "lack of innovation".

Hahadouken

Is it?

From reading the body of the review, it seems to be a euphemism for "redoing the same experience with marginal refinements".

While the technology has advanced, the relative shortage of meaningful changes and refinements to God of War's vivisecting gameplay formula means that it's not quite as thrilling as the first (or second) go 'round. Some of these last-gen holdovers make the experience feel less cutting-edge than it might otherwise, though it's still plenty brutal enough to earn the God of War name.

...

It's all the stuff that you expect from a God of War game, which I suspect is the very reason why parts of the game feel kind of perfunctory. It's like the developers had a mechanical understanding of the beats they were expected to hit, and focused more on nailing that stuff than pushing the experience somewhere new.Review

Innovation doesn't mean "making changes". Innovation means doing something entirely new that hasn't been seen before. What he's trying to say is that GoW 3 could have been much more if the developers had built on the formula they had rather than refining it.

Maybe the formula they have is perfect, but that doesn't mean it can't be expanded on. SMB 1 was just about perfect, but Nintendo didn't go on to make two more games that were just like it. They took it to a completely different level with Mario 3, and they didn't even have to change the genre or even the core mechanics to do so. To use a more recent example: you mentioned MW2? It built on CoD 4. People like to say it's the same game, rehash, etc., but you'll find no shortage of people complaining about how much they changed the multiplayer. They did more than just add a few guns and some perks, and that's why it got 5 stars.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#119 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

Hmmm,you guys might want to stop this childish behaviour,ok? It´s getting ridiculous.

Avatar image for Axelander999
Axelander999

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#120 Axelander999
Member since 2008 • 431 Posts

Another overrated game flops?

Not surpised.

Wonder whats next.

Instashot

Don't know... Probably Halo Reach?

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#121 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
Jack... "redoing the same experience with marginal refinements" sounds like another euphemism for lack of innovation. Anyway I've said my piece about this, I don't have anything else to add to it and arguing semantics like this is unproductive.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#122 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
And Cherokee? You break my heart. Un-friended. Just be straight up if you want to discuss something, don't try and lead me with "innocent" questions.Hahadouken
I'm sorry. I shouldn't have acted like that. It's easy to forget how to be civil in these kinds of discussions.
Avatar image for PatchMaster
PatchMaster

6013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#123 PatchMaster
Member since 2003 • 6013 Posts

This pretty much sums up why Giant Bomb and X-Play need to adopt "half star" systems. In the age of Metacritic / Gamerankings scoring things either 100%, 80% or60%is pretty bad.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#124 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts

Hmmm,you guys might want to stop this childish behaviour,ok? It´s getting ridiculous.

Arach666
Hey man I'm just looking for a response. Don't want to go thinking BSO is being a hypocrite.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#125 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]And Cherokee? You break my heart. Un-friended. Just be straight up if you want to discuss something, don't try and lead me with "innocent" questions.Cherokee_Jack
I'm sorry. I shouldn't have acted like that. It's easy to forget how to be civil in these kinds of discussions.

Unexpected. Truly a genuine apology. I'm sorry for overreacting. /kodak
Avatar image for solidgamer
solidgamer

7542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 solidgamer
Member since 2005 • 7542 Posts

This pretty much sums up why Giant Bomb and X-Play need to adopt "half star" systems. In the age of Metacritic / Gamerankings scoring things either 100%, 80% or60%is pretty bad.

PatchMaster
I think the problem is when you start turning 5 star scales into numerical values. People freak out and think 4/5 is a bad score. GB clearly states that 4 out of 5 stars "Still very good and easy to recommend, though it doesn't quite live up to its full potential."
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#127 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts
[QUOTE="Arach666"]

Hmmm,you guys might want to stop this childish behaviour,ok? It´s getting ridiculous.

aaronmullan
Hey man I'm just looking for a response. Don't want to go thinking BSO is being a hypocrite.

Yeah,I know.
Avatar image for tarzanell
tarzanell

1503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 tarzanell
Member since 2006 • 1503 Posts
Mentioned already in this thread, but who the hell cares about Giant Bomb? As far as I'm concerned, they sit at the bottom of the video game reviewer heap with 1up and the New York Times, regardless of whether it's made up of numerous ex-GS employees. I suppose it's worth reporting alongside the other GoW reviews, but it really seems unremarkable.
Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#129 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

That review was spot on but no GoW3 isn't a flop and it should easily be on the top spot in sales at least in one region like NPD for March.

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#130 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

Considering GB rates a lot of decent games 5/5 I'm totally surprised they gave GoW3 4 out of 5 stars. Don't really care however since I already bought and beat the game and it's easily one of the best single player games I've played this gen.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#131 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

Mentioned already in this thread, but who the hell cares about Giant Bomb? As far as I'm concerned, they sit at the bottom of the video game reviewer heap with 1up and the New York Times, regardless of whether it's made up of numerous ex-GS employees. I suppose it's worth reporting alongside the other GoW reviews, but it really seems unremarkable.tarzanell

They offer way better content than the competition. They have personality.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#132 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

[QUOTE="tarzanell"]Mentioned already in this thread, but who the hell cares about Giant Bomb? As far as I'm concerned, they sit at the bottom of the video game reviewer heap with 1up and the New York Times, regardless of whether it's made up of numerous ex-GS employees. I suppose it's worth reporting alongside the other GoW reviews, but it really seems unremarkable.BioShockOwnz

They offer way better content than the competition. They have personality.

Yes, but they don't give the correct scores to the correct games, so they're irrelevant.
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#133 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts

[QUOTE="tarzanell"]Mentioned already in this thread, but who the hell cares about Giant Bomb? As far as I'm concerned, they sit at the bottom of the video game reviewer heap with 1up and the New York Times, regardless of whether it's made up of numerous ex-GS employees. I suppose it's worth reporting alongside the other GoW reviews, but it really seems unremarkable.BioShockOwnz

They offer way better content than the competition. They have personality.

Y u ignore me? :(
Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#134 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

[QUOTE="tarzanell"]Mentioned already in this thread, but who the hell cares about Giant Bomb? As far as I'm concerned, they sit at the bottom of the video game reviewer heap with 1up and the New York Times, regardless of whether it's made up of numerous ex-GS employees. I suppose it's worth reporting alongside the other GoW reviews, but it really seems unremarkable.BioShockOwnz

They offer way better content than the competition. They have personality.

I like GB ... listen to their Bombcast all the time, and one of the few websites that I feel I can trust. Also I expect FF to a 3/5 from them ... Brad seems to be hating it.

Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#135 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts

Well, I haven't played it yet. It didn't flop on this site. I loved the first 2 games, so I'm sure I'm going to love the final chapter. I hate STAR ratings for games. It's lame. Games should be rated 1 - 10 using decimal points (i.e. 7.7 or 8.4).

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#136 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="tarzanell"]Mentioned already in this thread, but who the hell cares about Giant Bomb? As far as I'm concerned, they sit at the bottom of the video game reviewer heap with 1up and the New York Times, regardless of whether it's made up of numerous ex-GS employees. I suppose it's worth reporting alongside the other GoW reviews, but it really seems unremarkable.W1NGMAN-

They offer way better content than the competition. They have personality.

I like GB ... listen to their Bombcast all the time, and one of the few websites that I feel I can trust. Also I expect FF to a 3/5 from them ... Brad seems to be hating it.

He said recently that he's starting to like it as he gets past the initial crap. I hope it's a 4 for him, because I'm tired of defending GB scores on here.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#137 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="tarzanell"]Mentioned already in this thread, but who the hell cares about Giant Bomb? As far as I'm concerned, they sit at the bottom of the video game reviewer heap with 1up and the New York Times, regardless of whether it's made up of numerous ex-GS employees. I suppose it's worth reporting alongside the other GoW reviews, but it really seems unremarkable.W1NGMAN-

They offer way better content than the competition. They have personality.

I like GB ... listen to their Bombcast all the time, and one of the few websites that I feel I can trust. Also I expect FF to a 3/5 from them ... Brad seems to be hating it.

Yeah, I can see both sides when it comes to FFXIII. It's a very odd beast. Some love it, some hate it, some think it's meh. I felt all 3 during my playthrough, but when I look back on the experience, I can say I loved it despite some annoyances.

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
Cows really shouldn't be angry, they gave Dante's Inferno a 2/5. http://www.giantbomb.com/dantes-inferno/61-24827/reviews/ It got a bad score for the same reasons, but to a greater degree. If anything they kissed up to Sony fanboys with the GOW 3 review. :P
Avatar image for carlisledavid79
carlisledavid79

10522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 carlisledavid79
Member since 2006 • 10522 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Good. Sooo not a 5/5 game.

This equates to an 80 on Metacritic. That's around what it should be. 8.0-8.5.

BioShockOwnz

i always knew you were biased towards the 360 but for the past few days youve become a full blown lemming.

It's not about the system. It's about the game. Don't hate the playa, hate the game. ;)

We only go by gamespot score here my friend (hmm i think you've said that yourself many times) So yeah brah not a flop. 9 here at 90+ at metacritic. Brah Brah ro ma ma
Avatar image for IppoTenma
IppoTenma

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 IppoTenma
Member since 2009 • 2972 Posts
good. not hating on the game, but this is what i expected.
Avatar image for C-Lee
C-Lee

5838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#141 C-Lee
Member since 2008 • 5838 Posts
Best review for the game.
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#142 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"] i always knew you were biased towards the 360 but for the past few days youve become a full blown lemming.carlisledavid79

It's not about the system. It's about the game. Don't hate the playa, hate the game. ;)

We only go by gamespot score here my friend (hmm i think you've said that yourself many times) So yeah brah not a flop. 9 here at 90+ at metacritic. Brah Brah ro ma ma

I think he may ignore you like he is with me. I tried responding to that one and he's ignoring me :(
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#143 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"] i always knew you were biased towards the 360 but for the past few days youve become a full blown lemming.carlisledavid79

It's not about the system. It's about the game. Don't hate the playa, hate the game. ;)

We only go by gamespot score here my friend (hmm i think you've said that yourself many times) So yeah brah not a flop. 9 here at 90+ at metacritic. Brah Brah ro ma ma

I didn't call it a flop or anything. I was simply stating what I thought. JC! :lol:

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#144 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts

[QUOTE="carlisledavid79"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

It's not about the system. It's about the game. Don't hate the playa, hate the game. ;)

BioShockOwnz

We only go by gamespot score here my friend (hmm i think you've said that yourself many times) So yeah brah not a flop. 9 here at 90+ at metacritic. Brah Brah ro ma ma

I didn't call it a flop or anything. I was simply stating what I thought. JC! :lol:

Are you going to reply or not? :(
Avatar image for C-Lee
C-Lee

5838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#145 C-Lee
Member since 2008 • 5838 Posts

[QUOTE="carlisledavid79"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

It's not about the system. It's about the game. Don't hate the playa, hate the game. ;)

aaronmullan

We only go by gamespot score here my friend (hmm i think you've said that yourself many times) So yeah brah not a flop. 9 here at 90+ at metacritic. Brah Brah ro ma ma

I think he may ignore you like he is with me. I tried responding to that one and he's ignoring me :(

Don't expect him to, man. He probably knows he lost the argument, and he will just ignore you.

Avatar image for carlisledavid79
carlisledavid79

10522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 carlisledavid79
Member since 2006 • 10522 Posts

[QUOTE="carlisledavid79"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

It's not about the system. It's about the game. Don't hate the playa, hate the game. ;)

BioShockOwnz

We only go by gamespot score here my friend (hmm i think you've said that yourself many times) So yeah brah not a flop. 9 here at 90+ at metacritic. Brah Brah ro ma ma

I didn't call it a flop or anything. I was simply stating what I thought. JC! :lol:

Point out in my post where I was accusing you of caling the game a flop. As you were im just stating my own opinion. Bro! Just another sweet AAA god sim
Avatar image for oajlu
oajlu

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#147 oajlu
Member since 2006 • 2652 Posts

they just want to get ppl attention cuz giant bomb is a small website, and all other major gaming website already have post their review score + video review.

If Giant Bomb gave it 5/5, would you talk about it in here? no rite, they gave it lower score, so youcan talk about itand you are giving them a free ad.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#148 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"][QUOTE="carlisledavid79"] We only go by gamespot score here my friend (hmm i think you've said that yourself many times) So yeah brah not a flop. 9 here at 90+ at metacritic. Brah Brah ro ma maC-Lee

I think he may ignore you like he is with me. I tried responding to that one and he's ignoring me :(

Don't expect him to, man. He probably knows he lost the argument, and he will just ignore you.

There's no argument to be made. It's clear as day.

I say more good things about both the playa and the games on the Playstation side than someone else does about both the playa and the games on the Xbox side.

I haven't seen one good thing said about anything 360 in ages.

Avatar image for C-Lee
C-Lee

5838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#149 C-Lee
Member since 2008 • 5838 Posts

[QUOTE="C-Lee"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"] I think he may ignore you like he is with me. I tried responding to that one and he's ignoring me :(BioShockOwnz

Don't expect him to, man. He probably knows he lost the argument, and he will just ignore you.

There's no argument to be made. It's clear as day.

I say more good things about both the playa and the games on the Playstation side than someone else does about both the playa and the games on the Xbox side.

I haven't seen one good about about anything 360 in ages.

Alright man. The only thing I have against you is that you are very hypocritical. A couple days ago, you were all, "We only count Gamespot here", but now you continue to talk about this Giant Bomb review.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#150 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="C-Lee"] Don't expect him to, man. He probably knows he lost the argument, and he will just ignore you.

C-Lee

There's no argument to be made. It's clear as day.

I say more good things about both the playa and the games on the Playstation side than someone else does about both the playa and the games on the Xbox side.

I haven't seen one good about about anything 360 in ages.

Alright man. The only thing I have against you is that you are very hypocritical. A couple days ago, you were all, "We only count Gamespot here", but now you continue to talk about this Giant Bomb review.

No, that's called my own opinion. Of course we only count Gamespot here. I didn't state otherwise.

It's not me being hypocritical, it's you making my posts into what they're not.

And GoW3 will always be a flop in my heart. My heart (my opinion).