@lexxluger: the demo was only available for a few days last week. It's offline now unfortunately.
They need to hurry up and patch an offline career mode, I know it's coming and I need to get my hands on it before I can make my own evaluation on it, but I know the driving is going to be fantastic.
GT has always had one of the best driving physics simulations in the industry.
Gamespot will show its PS preference once again, 9/10
I voted 8 and honestly think it will be an 8.0 quality game (great).
GT has always been one of the best driving simulators and if that holds true this will no doubt be a great driving experience.
I do think not having a dedicated offline career mode with hurt it critically and that also hurt it in my own personal criteria so no I don't think it will get a 9.0 missing a feature that has been established as standard unless it's EXTREMELY polished in every area and executes everything it set out to do flawlessly.
............................................
ALSO
On the PS preference thing, there is not such phenomenon.
Great games score great and not so great games score less than that. The thing is PS has had a lot of great games this gen (lol like every gen but a highlight in 2017)
So the only preference you can accuse someone of having is liking great games and reporting that experience. Not all "PS" games score great
The Order 1886, Drive Club, Knack, Little Big Planet 3, The Tomorrow Children, Godzilla, Berserk, Natural Doctrine, Drawn to Death, Star Ocean: Integrity and faithlessness ect all kind if cripple that half baked theory
So you need to reevaluate your conspiracy theory on PS games because it's far from an accurate perspective.
The definitive racer returns with a 9
Flopza crys in the corner as another Xbox exclusive becomes irrelevant.
@lexxluger: Yeah because cows don't inflate Xbox game's scores. There were cows calling for Halo Wars 2 to get a 9/10 in that hype thread in Feb knowing full well the first was underscored here and the second probably would be, and it was. Spare me the shock at a lem doing this non sense.
@lexxluger: Yeah because cows don't inflate Xbox game's scores. There were cows calling for Halo Wars 2 to get a 9/10 in that hype thread in Feb knowing full well the first was underscored here and the second probably would be, and it was. Spare me the shock at a lem doing this non sense.
lol, I'm not "shocked" at anything here, just having convo.
I haven't visited the Halo Wars 2 thread but I don't doubt some might have voted 9.0 but I doubt many PS fans seriously voted a 9 knowing the score of the first game even if to oversell it's reception. Do you have a link?
That said, if you're trying to inflate your own personal expectation of GTSport in an effort to hope if flops and then go on to use disclaimers that undermine the 9.0 score in the same breath then you've accomplished to fanboy tactics in a single action.
lol I will give you props for properly calling it "non sense" in your response to me.
So what do you actually think GTSport will score (without the fanboy mumbo jumbo)?
@lexxluger: Yeah because cows don't inflate Xbox game's scores. There were cows calling for Halo Wars 2 to get a 9/10 in that hype thread in Feb knowing full well the first was underscored here and the second probably would be, and it was. Spare me the shock at a lem doing this non sense.
lol, I'm not "shocked" at anything here, just having convo.
I haven't visited the Halo Wars 2 thread but I don't doubt some might have voted 9.0 but I doubt many PS fans seriously voted a 9 knowing the score of the first game even if to oversell it's reception. Do you have a link?
That said, if you're trying to inflate your own personal expectation of GTSport in an effort to hope if flops and then go on to use disclaimers that undermine the 9.0 score in the same breath then you've accomplished to fanboy tactics in a single action.
lol I will give you props for properly calling it "non sense" in your response to me.
So what do you actually think GTSport will score (without the fanboy mumbo jumbo)?
Read the thread.
You doubt PS fans did that? LOL sure, it was all integrity by them. LMAO
I think it will score an 8-9/10 at gamespot.
Read the thread.
You doubt PS fans did that? LOL sure, it was all integrity by them. LMAO
I think it will score an 8-9/10 at gamespot.
@ The bold, looking at the thread, for the most part yeah that's what it seems!
I'm pulling this from a post you made by the way...
GarGx1-7/10
charizard1605-8/10
mjorh-8/10
GoldenElementXL-8/10
silversix_-7/10
nathanbats-8/10
mems_1224-6/10
cainetao11-6/10
speedfog-7/10
Zero_epyon-8/10
hrt_rulz01-8/10
DaVillain-7/10
svaubel-7/10
i_p_daily-7/10
the_master_race-7/10
adsparky-7/10
R4gn4r0k-7/10
Alucard_Prime-8/10
KEND0_KAP0NI-7/10
lundy86_4-8/10
zeeshanhaider-7/10
SecretPolice-6/10
kvally-6/10
PAL360-8/10
getyeryayasout-7/10
jg4xchamp-7/10
iambatman7986-8/10
webhead921-6/10
dynamitecop-8/10
Heil68-8/10
madrocketeer-7/10
Comduter-10/10
zassimick-7/10
FLOPPAGE_50-7/10
RageQuit4Life-8/10
Daredevil2k-8/10
carlquincy-8/10
PopGotcha-8/10
ConanTheStoner-7/10
CroidX-8/10
dakur-9/10*
DeathLordCrime-8/10
0flow-8/10
blackace-7/10
me2002-8/10
tormentos-8/10
NathanDrakeSwag-9/10*
I_P_Daily-7/10
Antwan3K-7/10
Sorry but for your accusation of what "cows" were doing you have a whopping 2 poster known as a sony fans to vote 9.0 in that thread.
That's a fail on your argument about "cows" inflating xbox game scores using the very example that you choose.
Most Sony fans actually voted realistically and well within expectations for the game...even tormentos only voted 8.0. Speaking on integrity, you're going to have to own your own actions here because you didn't really make a good case for the "because cows did it" excuse.
lol so unless you're response here is that you're just lashing out at a PS exclusive because of 1 or 2 specific posters, then your perspective still doesn't reflect the sony fan community or "cows" as you like to refer to them.
The vast majority of "cows" voted the SAME as xbox fans did and the game still didn't live up to the expectation :/. This is not "cows" fault nor an act of "cows" to over rate the game as you suggested, so yeah "LMAO".
Read the thread.
You doubt PS fans did that? LOL sure, it was all integrity by them. LMAO
I think it will score an 8-9/10 at gamespot.
@ The bold, looking at the thread, for the most part yeah that's what it seems!
I'm pulling this from a post you made by the way...
GarGx1-7/10
charizard1605-8/10
mjorh-8/10
GoldenElementXL-8/10
silversix_-7/10
nathanbats-8/10
mems_1224-6/10
cainetao11-6/10
speedfog-7/10
Zero_epyon-8/10
hrt_rulz01-8/10
DaVillain-7/10
svaubel-7/10
i_p_daily-7/10
the_master_race-7/10
adsparky-7/10
R4gn4r0k-7/10
Alucard_Prime-8/10
KEND0_KAP0NI-7/10
lundy86_4-8/10
zeeshanhaider-7/10
SecretPolice-6/10
kvally-6/10
PAL360-8/10
getyeryayasout-7/10
jg4xchamp-7/10
iambatman7986-8/10
webhead921-6/10
dynamitecop-8/10
Heil68-8/10
madrocketeer-7/10
Comduter-10/10
zassimick-7/10
FLOPPAGE_50-7/10
RageQuit4Life-8/10
Daredevil2k-8/10
carlquincy-8/10
PopGotcha-8/10
ConanTheStoner-7/10
CroidX-8/10
dakur-9/10*
DeathLordCrime-8/10
0flow-8/10
blackace-7/10
me2002-8/10
tormentos-8/10
NathanDrakeSwag-9/10*
I_P_Daily-7/10
Antwan3K-7/10
Sorry but for your accusation of what "cows" were doing you have a whopping 2 poster known as a sony fans to vote 9.0 in that thread.
That's a fail on your argument about "cows" inflating xbox game scores using the very example that you choose.
Most Sony fans actually voted realistically and well within expectations for the game...even tormentos only voted 8.0. Speaking on integrity, you're going to have to own your own actions here because you didn't really make a good case for the "because cows did it" excuse.
lol so unless you're response here is that you're just lashing out at a PS exclusive because of 1 or 2 specific posters, then your perspective still doesn't reflect the sony fan community or "cows" as you like to refer to them.
The vast majority of "cows" voted the SAME as xbox fans did and the game still didn't live up to the expectation :/. This is not "cows" fault nor an act of "cows" to over rate the game as you suggested, so yeah "LMAO".
Lemmings and their hypocrisy... they keep claiming cows are the worst and they keep acting the same or worse even. This whole gen has been this way. They just see what they want to see that's why they're so paranoid over conspiracy theories.
AAA hype? Not that it matters, but i think you guys are asking this game to flop here.
I loved the demo and will buy the game tomorrow, but you can't forget that Forza 7 offers the same quality and much, much more content. I hope i'm wrong, but i can see GTS getting a 8 or even a 7 here easily.
@reduc_ab_: That is a straight up bug/glitch with the shadows. I remember similar issues with the original Project Cars and Assetto Corsa on PC when using VR. They got fixed after.
Could be. But I've definitely seen something like that on the TV screen, but not on the headset screens, when using other PSVR games. At any rate, if it is a bug of some sort it will definitely get patched.
@Zero_epyon: The PSVR compatibility looks awesome! Very nice visuals. As for stomaching it, it just takes a little getting used to. Unless you're really, really susceptible to motion sickness.
Well damn, i'm never getting a VR set ever then.
One thing to note. I myself am susceptible to motion sickness (I can't even spin around twice without getting a little nauseous), yet I've found that in VR, usually, if I find myself feeling uncomfortable while playing a game, meaning cold sweats and all that good stuff, after a couple gaming sessions I get used to it and the discomfort goes away. "VR legs" is a real thing, in other words. Having said that, though, some people just can't play in VR.
@lexxluger: WRONG. That's why my link said "read the thread". There is a cow in that thread that claims any game with Halo in the title should be no les than a 9/10. You read the first page obviously. Nice bullshit try. Do you really believe NathanDrakeSwag a cow believed this was going to be an elite RTS?
Read the thread.
You doubt PS fans did that? LOL sure, it was all integrity by them. LMAO
I think it will score an 8-9/10 at gamespot.
@ The bold, looking at the thread, for the most part yeah that's what it seems!
I'm pulling this from a post you made by the way...
GarGx1-7/10
charizard1605-8/10
mjorh-8/10
GoldenElementXL-8/10
silversix_-7/10
nathanbats-8/10
mems_1224-6/10
cainetao11-6/10
speedfog-7/10
Zero_epyon-8/10
hrt_rulz01-8/10
DaVillain-7/10
svaubel-7/10
i_p_daily-7/10
the_master_race-7/10
adsparky-7/10
R4gn4r0k-7/10
Alucard_Prime-8/10
KEND0_KAP0NI-7/10
lundy86_4-8/10
zeeshanhaider-7/10
SecretPolice-6/10
kvally-6/10
PAL360-8/10
getyeryayasout-7/10
jg4xchamp-7/10
iambatman7986-8/10
webhead921-6/10
dynamitecop-8/10
Heil68-8/10
madrocketeer-7/10
Comduter-10/10
zassimick-7/10
FLOPPAGE_50-7/10
RageQuit4Life-8/10
Daredevil2k-8/10
carlquincy-8/10
PopGotcha-8/10
ConanTheStoner-7/10
CroidX-8/10
dakur-9/10*
DeathLordCrime-8/10
0flow-8/10
blackace-7/10
me2002-8/10
tormentos-8/10
NathanDrakeSwag-9/10*
I_P_Daily-7/10
Antwan3K-7/10
Sorry but for your accusation of what "cows" were doing you have a whopping 2 poster known as a sony fans to vote 9.0 in that thread.
That's a fail on your argument about "cows" inflating xbox game scores using the very example that you choose.
Most Sony fans actually voted realistically and well within expectations for the game...even tormentos only voted 8.0. Speaking on integrity, you're going to have to own your own actions here because you didn't really make a good case for the "because cows did it" excuse.
lol so unless you're response here is that you're just lashing out at a PS exclusive because of 1 or 2 specific posters, then your perspective still doesn't reflect the sony fan community or "cows" as you like to refer to them.
The vast majority of "cows" voted the SAME as xbox fans did and the game still didn't live up to the expectation :/. This is not "cows" fault nor an act of "cows" to over rate the game as you suggested, so yeah "LMAO".
Lemmings and their hypocrisy... they keep claiming cows are the worst and they keep acting the same or worse even. This whole gen has been this way. They just see what they want to see that's why they're so paranoid over conspiracy theories.
No clue what the the point was. He called out a lem for voting an inflated score for GT Sport iu pointed out cows do the same, its non sense from either. You put your hand where you like it, in your anus, and chime in with shit.
So here's my score prediction. I'm going for a 9. What a 9? Well this game is focusing on online competitive racing. It's not a single player game, even though it still offers some offline features. I don't think this will impact the score as much as some people think. If this is what they set out to do and they execute it well, then there's no reason to fault them for it.
From the demo previews, the game is fun to play, is good looking and is stable. Car dlc will be free and no microtransactions. Believe it or not, Gt Sport has a lot going for it.
See Titanfall, for example. No campaign, some offline training and challenges. Most content was online, but the execution was good enough to get a 9, despite missing features other shooters had.
So here's my score prediction. I'm going for a 9. What a 9? Well this game is focusing on online competitive racing. It's not a single player game, even though it still offers some offline features. I don't think this will impact the score as much as some people think. If this is what they set out to do and they execute it well, then there's no reason to fault them for it.
From the demo previews, the game is fun to play, is good looking and is stable. Car dlc will be free and no microtransactions. Believe it or not, Gt Sport has a lot going for it.
See Titanfall, for example. No campaign, some offline training and challenges. Most content was online, but the execution was good enough to get a 9, despite missing features other shooters had.
While I understand the general logic of what you're saying I don't agree with the impact you're expecting. The competition against this game is heavily stacked, they offer substantially more content and features across the board, have huge single player experiences and what's worse is they also have competitive online features and communities.
What GT Sport is doing is not something good or something to praise. You're getting not even half of what is on offer elsewhere and are locked into an online environment entirely for FIA synchronization. I understand that you're saying that PD is going for something different and should be judged based upon that, but the reality is they're really not and inevitable comparatives are going to crucify their omissions and questionable online requirements.
I think, from what I understand, you are getting the same as the others only there's one version of a career instead of two. An offline career and an online career. Instead you have one career that's online. This isn't new. Take a look at PC's iRacing. There's no offline component whatsoever. Everything is online and it's a popular racing sim on PC. Gran Turismo is aiming for that experience, not the traditional console racing game. If it's going to be compared to anything, it would be games like iRacing. It's not like it's missing tracks or race types. And cars are going to be updated for free as time goes by.
@lexxluger: WRONG. That's why my link said "read the thread". There is a cow in that thread that claims any game with Halo in the title should be no les than a 9/10. You read the first page obviously. Nice bullshit try. Do you really believe NathanDrakeSwag a cow believed this was going to be an elite RTS?
So it's "a cow" now?
@lexxluger: Yeah because cows don't inflate Xbox game's scores. There were cows calling for Halo Wars 2 to get a 9/10 in that hype thread in Feb knowing full well the first was underscored here and the second probably would be, and it was. Spare me the shock at a lem doing this non sense.
What happened to the "cows" theory?
GarGx1-7/10
charizard1605-8/10
mjorh-8/10
GoldenElementXL-8/10
silversix_-7/10
nathanbats-8/10
mems_1224-6/10
cainetao11-6/10
speedfog-7/10
Zero_epyon-8/10
hrt_rulz01-8/10
DaVillain-7/10
svaubel-7/10
i_p_daily-7/10
the_master_race-7/10
adsparky-7/10
R4gn4r0k-7/10
Alucard_Prime-8/10
KEND0_KAP0NI-7/10
lundy86_4-8/10
zeeshanhaider-7/10
SecretPolice-6/10
kvally-6/10
PAL360-8/10
getyeryayasout-7/10
jg4xchamp-7/10
iambatman7986-8/10
webhead921-6/10
dynamitecop-8/10
Heil68-8/10
madrocketeer-7/10
Comduter-10/10
zassimick-7/10
FLOPPAGE_50-7/10
RageQuit4Life-8/10
Daredevil2k-8/10
carlquincy-8/10
PopGotcha-8/10
ConanTheStoner-7/10
CroidX-8/10
dakur-9/10
DeathLordCrime-8/10
0flow-8/10
blackace-7/10
me2002-8/10
tormentos-8/10
NathanDrakeSwag-9/10
I_P_Daily-7/10
Antwan3K-7/10
That thread you linked actually proves you wrong lol.
As I state before the vast majority of Sony fans voted exactly the same as xbox fans and the fact that you're still trying to argue after that point is clear for ANYONE to see shows you have a problem with reality.
So uhh yeah you're pretty much confirming what I said in my previous post. You trying to single out one or 2 sony fans in a group of 15 or 20 to make a generalized statement about "cows" makes you look extremely desperate and petty.
There is no need for me to "bullshit try" when I'm not the one trying to push a fallacy that was proven false...using your own "evidence" no less lol.
lol you haven't proven anything except that you use made up actions of "the cows" as a free license for all the fanboy actions you make here on this board...GG.
@lexxluger: Nope it confirms I'm right. There's 2 on that list, dakur and nateswag, making it COWS. You called out a lem I merely pointed out fanboys of another ilk do this nonsense as well. The proof is right where you claim I'm wrong. There's more than one making it cows. I never once said it was a group of 15 or 20 people. Please show me where I did. I am not guilty because you jumped to a conclusion buddy, that's on you. Or as I said, show us all where I am guilty of saying it was 15 or 20 people as you allude to me doing so.
So here's my score prediction. I'm going for a 9. What a 9? Well this game is focusing on online competitive racing. It's not a single player game, even though it still offers some offline features. I don't think this will impact the score as much as some people think. If this is what they set out to do and they execute it well, then there's no reason to fault them for it.
From the demo previews, the game is fun to play, is good looking and is stable. Car dlc will be free and no microtransactions. Believe it or not, Gt Sport has a lot going for it.
See Titanfall, for example. No campaign, some offline training and challenges. Most content was online, but the execution was good enough to get a 9, despite missing features other shooters had.
This is strongly dependent on a reviewers expectation and perspective. There were a lot of reviewers that didn't think that was enough for a 9 and there will also be those that feel the same for GTSport.
E Sports or not, there are a lot of long time GT fans that just expect an offline campaign mode to be there and will feel that if it's lacking it is a diminished experience (I tend to lean this way as well). This feeling will likely be held among gamers and reviewers regardless of GTS's quality.
So I expect the community to be split on the whole competitive online narrative; Some will fully embrace the "Esports" promotion and judge it based off that premise but others will fall back on GT's legacy and say it's a compromised experience compared to prior games, but we don't know which perspective the GS reviewer will have until they release the review.
@lexxluger: Nope it confirms I'm right. There's 2 on that list, dakur and nateswag, making it COWS. You called out a lem I merely pointed out fanboys of another ilk do this nonsense as well. The proof is right where you claim I'm wrong. There's more than one making it cows. I never once said it was a group of 15 or 20 people. Please show me where I did. I am not guilty because you jumped to a conclusion buddy, that's on you. Or as I said, show us all where I am guilty of saying it was 15 or 20 people as you allude to me doing so.
lol then maybe you should have said dakur and NathanDrakeSwag instead of blaming "the cows" as if there was a mass or majority of Sony fans exhibiting the behavior you claim.
But no you wanted to say "cows" which was a generalization of Sony fans overall. The fact is, your statement doesn't represent Sony fans (cows as you say) at all *refer back to my last post*.
So seeing that you tried to use a blanket statement about "cows" to justify your actions here only to find out it actually only applied to like 2 dudes from a big group of Sony fans using "evidence" you choose is pretty revealing.
You're doing a great job of promoting this "because the cows did it.." argument by the way...
So here's my score prediction. I'm going for a 9. What a 9? Well this game is focusing on online competitive racing. It's not a single player game, even though it still offers some offline features. I don't think this will impact the score as much as some people think. If this is what they set out to do and they execute it well, then there's no reason to fault them for it.
From the demo previews, the game is fun to play, is good looking and is stable. Car dlc will be free and no microtransactions. Believe it or not, Gt Sport has a lot going for it.
See Titanfall, for example. No campaign, some offline training and challenges. Most content was online, but the execution was good enough to get a 9, despite missing features other shooters had.
This is strongly dependent on a reviewers expectation and perspective. There were a lot of reviewers that didn't think that was enough for a 9 and there will also be those that feel the same for GTSport.
E Sports or not, there are a lot of long time GT fans that just expect an offline campaign mode to be there and will feel that if it's lacking it is a diminished experience (I tend to lean this way as well). This feeling will likely be held among gamers and reviewers regardless of GTS's quality.
So I expect the community to be split on the whole competitive online narrative; Some will fully embrace the "Esports" promotion and judge it based off that premise but others will fall back on GT's legacy and say it's a compromised experience compared to prior games, but we don't know which perspective the GS reviewer will have until they release the review.
Of course. My post was in the context of a Gamespot review. I honestly expect GT Sport to especially be torn to shreds by sim racing sites.
@sirdad:
That's a great point.
I hope to see a patch for offline campaign in the future, I didn't give Titan fall a free pass for providing less of what I expect for a shooter and I really can't do that for GTSport either even though it does look really tempting.
I must resit the urge to jump on the GTSport train due to my principals but I am hopeful for a patch from PD, hopefully sooner than later. This would have been a day one otherwise.
@lexxluger: Ooohh poor baby, generalizations hurt? That's not done here constantly right? Pinkanimal claims "lems" whenever he points out negatives on the board so does Quadknight and mgowly. They dont single out users, why am i expected to? Furthermore why dont you bitch at them? Lol Spare me.
Again, please show us all where and when I said 15 or 20 people as you allude to me meaning. Why dodge this? Why not prove it or be a man and admit you pulled this out of your anus? Fact is on page one of that HW2 hype thread, Dakar shits on the game, but later in the thread goes on to vote 9/10. Nathandrakeswag, another cow with no X1 or desire to play HW2 also votes 9/10. Hhmm, wonder why?
@lexxluger: 9 months have passed since I said a 7/10 Hale Wars 2, damn time flies!
I forgot about that hype thread but the reason why I even said 7/10 (before GS review scored it) was the fact that no one ask for another Halo Wars game, RTS just aren't suited for consoles and even the first Halo Wars wasn't all that popular which is why I gave it a 7/10.
I really don't get this whole Cows issue what Cainetao11 is all over this. Point is, Halo Wars 2 wasn't gonna be something special but I do understand it has it's own fan base so there's that.
I've been away for hours getting blown away by this game in 4K and playing it in VR! Hot damn, it's amazing in VR!
The cars are insanely detailed and the handling is great. Completely destroys Driveclub VR in immersion. It sucks we can't play VR online but what's here is top-notch stuff. PD took their time and created the best VR driving experience on consoles and maybe even PC (I haven't played PC2 in VR yet but if it's like PC1 then GTS surpasses it).
@quadknight: Great to hear! I'm primarily interested in the VR aspect, even though I know it's limited. I don't expect it to beat Dirt Rally on PSVR, but I'm sure I'll like it.
I've been away getting blown away by this game in 4K and playing it in VR! Hot damn, it's amazing in VR!
The cars are insanely detailed and the handling is great. Completely destroys Driveclub VR in immersion. It sucks we can't play VR online but what's here is top-notch stuff. PD took their time and created the best VR driving experience on consoles and maybe even PC (I haven't played PC2 in VR yet but if it's like PC1 then GTS surpasses it).
I know it drives well, no one is in contention about that, but how shit is everything else because even PlayStation lifestyle is tearing this game a new one.
What are you smoking dude? The game plays and looks great, I dunno what you're talking about.
@quadknight: Great to hear! I'm primarily interested in the VR aspect, even though I know it's limited. I don't expect it to beat Dirt Rally on PSVR, but I'm sure I'll like it.
You'll definitely enjoy it. I've put in hundreds of hours into Driveclub VR already and I like this even better.
EG gave it a ‘Recommended’ same as Forza.
Yup, I was just gonna post that.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-10-17-gran-turismo-sport-review
Sorry NyaDC, I know you want the game to suck but it doesn't, it's actually really good.
When GTS was first announced, Eurogamer has gave negative criticism towards GTS. It's interesting that they're giving a positive impression towards the game after the final build.
@sirdad:
That's a great point.
I hope to see a patch for offline campaign in the future, I didn't give Titan fall a free pass for providing less of what I expect for a shooter and I really can't do that for GTSport either even though it does look really tempting.
I must resit the urge to jump on the GTSport train due to my principals but I am hopeful for a patch from PD, hopefully sooner than later. This would have been a day one otherwise.
Yea, they recently announced that they're going to add events into the offline campaign in a patch. I just hope that the patch gets added sooner than expected.
Trying to find out how to download the demo. I go to the GTSport page in the PS Store but when I scroll down I don't see any demo section :x.
@Zero_epyon: Congrats Zero on showing some balls as the hardcore cows are to scared to put up the hype thread lol.
Put me down for a 10, anything less is a flop. I've been told that EVERYONE who's played the demo said it was great, I've also been told that EVERY preview has been positive, so this is an easy 10.
So you're voting PS4 exclusive GTSport to be 20% better than what you voted your most hyped game of the year to be; that being the latest game from your favorite franchise (Forza) on your favorite platform (xbox)?
So you vote an 8 for your most hyped game Forza 7 in it's hype thread but a 10 here for GTSport a serise you don't play and are known say is worse than Forza? lol talk about "showing balls".
lol someone should really have a discussion about xbox fans having higher expectations and standards for Sony games than their own games they praise as the best ever, now this is some serious pre-emptive damage control if I've ever seen it.
You just don't see posts that are any more ironic or hypocritical than @i_p_daily
https://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/forza-motorsport-7-hype-thread-33406123/?page=1
then in GTSport Hype
@Zero_epyon: Congrats Zero on showing some balls as the hardcore cows are to scared to put up the hype thread lol.
Put me down for a 10, anything less is a flop...
....and then goes on to talk about showing balls LMAO
Man funny stuff
Ooh I got a stalker yeah lol.
I'm playing the system wars game, check the Forza 7 hype thread since you have it saved under favourites, and you will see a similar post from cows who says it's a 10 anything else is a flop.
I'm just returning the favour & having fun here, so it's a 10 or a flop, can't deal with that then that's your problem mr cow.
Oh and here's the difference I don't hype ANY game, I didn't say every preview for Forza was positive or post that everyone who played the demo liked it, unlike what the cows have been posting about GT, so i'm throwing it back in their face because for all the talk they did for the game they wouldn't post a hype thread.
Toughen up princess, play the game and have fun.
EG gave it a ‘Recommended’ same as Forza.
Yup, I was just gonna post that.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-10-17-gran-turismo-sport-review
Sorry NyaDC, I know you want the game to suck but it doesn't, it's actually really good.
That's a nice review. Seems as though GT is moving more towards the sim genre while Forza more towards the simcade genre. I guess it is a valid move for both and differentiates them further and both can be good in their own place. I'm just glad Polyphony finally chose a direction and I hope they stick with it and I think it is the right one for the GT series.
GS pre-review doesnt look good. And I'm glad it doesnt. GT Sport is a shell of a proper GT game. I really hope it fails so that Polyphony Digital gets its priorities right. Always online, no career mode, lack of offline activities and progression and lackluster car list is a no-no for me
6/10
Not even AE
edit: And I say this as someone who actually liked the driving in the demo but, as games such as SFV have taught us, sometimes only gameplay isnt enough. Hoping GT7 actually fixes most of my gripes with this glorified demo game
Rut row raggy..
"Gran Turismo games are always little offbeat, but bewildering trysts with non-racing subjects in GT Sport feel like misguided attempts to create the country club of racing games. It's amusing at first when the game's menu backdrop fades from an interesting event in racing history to, say, the date that Celine Dion won her first grammy, or the discovery of the neutrino, but over time these flourishes start to leave a bad taste in your mouth as you discover how little racing content there is to explore--even when servers are up and running. Don't get me started on the inclusion of fashion label (and GT Sport sponsor) Tag Heuer next to car manufacturers in "Brand Central," the place you go to buy cars and explore the history behind them. Seeing a watchmaker get the same treatment as a car designer in a racing game isn't harmful, but it makes you question where its priorities lie"
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/gran-turismo-sport-is-a-strange-game-tuned-for-a-v/1100-6454117/
GTS = lol :P
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment