Graphical settings for console games?

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51  Edited By AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

@04dcarraher: lmao are we talking about PS3/360 ?.. that happened the last year's of the consoles life cycle. The fact is currently there are very few settings set to low which is exactly What I stated.

Nothing I said was incorrect because I'm referring to current console's. Why would I be talking about hardware that's 10 years old?

Avatar image for deactivated-5920bf77daa85
deactivated-5920bf77daa85

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 3

#52  Edited By deactivated-5920bf77daa85
Member since 2004 • 3270 Posts

Developers have a hard enough time trying to "optimize" their games on low-end years-old hardware. Having to add scalable graphics on CPU-bottlenecked systems for a small percentage that might potentially want it in certain situations isn't something they are going to be considering.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@-God- said:

The only setting PS4 needs is self destruct.

That was pretty funny :)

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#54 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

It's quite sad when people, in 2015, are talking about scaling graphics to 1080/30 or 720/60.

I actually had a similar choice for The Witcher 3, run the game on Ultra settings at 1440p and get 40ish fps or drop the res to 1080p and get 60ish fps.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

@GarGx1: Whats sad? Do you want consoles with dual gpus?

Avatar image for deactivated-5920bf77daa85
deactivated-5920bf77daa85

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 3

#56 deactivated-5920bf77daa85
Member since 2004 • 3270 Posts
@GarGx1 said:

It's quite sad when people, in 2015, are talking about scaling graphics to 1080/30 or 720/60.

I actually had a similar choice for The Witcher 3, run the game on Ultra settings at 1440p and get 40ish fps or drop the res to 1080p and get 60ish fps.

We are nowhere near the point where Graphics can't be pushed farther. As long as people buy games based on screenshots and not gameplay demos, frame rates and resolutions will always be sacrificed.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

@AM-Gamer said:

@04dcarraher: lmao are we talking about PS3/360 ?.. that happened the last year's of the consoles life cycle. The fact is currently there are very few settings set to low which is exactly What I stated.

Nothing I said was incorrect because I'm referring to current console's. Why would I be talking about hardware that's 10 years old?

You said console's, didn't specificity state the current ones. But as time goes on more and more settings and quality will be compromised.

Avatar image for tushar172787
tushar172787

2561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#58 tushar172787
Member since 2015 • 2561 Posts

@MonsieurX said:

1- Why isn't it available or why devs won't do it?

2- Would you like to have the option? Let's say a game is 1080p 30fps, tone down the stupid foliage and voila, 60fps! Or tune up some settings to go from 60 to 30?

inb4 "but games have already a hard time at 1080p30"

wont it make the devs much harder to develop the game? just assuming, i dont know much about programming.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@AM-Gamer said:

@GarGx1: Whats sad? Do you want consoles with dual gpus?

Why would dual GPU's be needed? The consoles don't come close to a decent single card.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

@GarGx1: And no single GPU comes close to maxing witcher 3 at 1440p and 40fps.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

I actually would really like this. Doesn't need to be sliders or a bunch of settings. Simply an option for reduced settings and 60 FPS, versus higher settings and 30 FPS. Why not?

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

@AM-Gamer said:

@GarGx1: And no single GPU comes close to maxing witcher 3 at 1440p and 40fps.

You know this from?

I know it does because I can.

(Open in new tab or window, expand to full screen, the reason it doesn't fit on your screen is because they are 2k screenshots)

Do you want more screenshots, taken on my PC of the Witcher 3 running at 1440p and 40fps on Ultra? It's also running some SweetFX tweaks as well.

My specs are i7 4770k, GTX 780ti, 16Gb RAM, Asus Rog Swift

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

Choices would be

No AA, FXAA
Low shaders, Medium shaders
Low textures, Medium textures
720p, 792p (Xbone's exclusive dynamic resolution)
X2 AF, X8 AF

Would be funny because those choices are all crap

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65  Edited By RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

@GarGx1 said:
@AM-Gamer said:

@GarGx1: And no single GPU comes close to maxing witcher 3 at 1440p and 40fps.

You know this from?

I know it does because I can.

(Open in new tab or window, expand to full screen, the reason it doesn't fit on your screen is because they are 2k screenshots)

Do you want more screenshots, taken on my PC of the Witcher 3 running at 1440p and 40fps on Ultra? It's also running some SweetFX tweaks as well.

My specs are i7 4770k, GTX 780ti, 16Gb RAM, Asus Rog Swift

Is that with Hairworks enabled for all?

Also the parts in your screenshot are not exactly the most demanding.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

@GarGx1: No hairworks , that's not max . Look at the benchmarks of a 780ti it gets raped once you turn on hairworks.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#67  Edited By GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@AM-Gamer said:

@GarGx1: No hairworks , that's not max . Look at the benchmarks of a 780ti it gets raped once you turn on hairworks.

Yes Hairworks, for all, is enabled, did you even look at the screenshots. It's plainly obvious that it is

Internet benchmark rig - thrown together to run some figures off before changing card and going again

My rig, finely tuned and overclocked, by an engineer with 25 years experience of building and tuning PC's (me) to get the best performance I can from it.

Do you understand the difference?

I'll be honest, it does have dips into mid 30's on the other hand it has peaks in the high 40's as well. 40fps is more of an average.

Have another couple

@RyviusARC Where do you want screenshots from?

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

@GarGx1: Yes I did and hair works is hard to notice on humans in screenshots. I did however look at multiple 780ti benchmarks with it consistently dipping into the low 30s at 1080p with hair works off. So in not seeing how you are getting into the 40s in 1440p with it turned on.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#69 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

@AM-Gamer said:

@GarGx1: Yes I did and hair works is hard to notice on humans in screenshots. I did however look at multiple 780ti benchmarks with it consistently dipping into the low 30s at 1080p with hair works off. So in not seeing how you are getting into the 40s in 1440p with it turned on.

Apparently, according to internet benchmarks, I can't get over 60fps in GTA V either maxed out as much as my RAM will allow at 1440p (AA switched off)