GT5>>>>>then Forza 3

  • 61 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Shenmue_Jehuty
Shenmue_Jehuty

5211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 Shenmue_Jehuty
Member since 2007 • 5211 Posts
I think the GT series has always had way better racing sims then the forza series, and I think the next installments of each respective series will be no different. The cars handle better, the graphics are better, the physics are more realistic, the car lineups are better. Forza is only a little better then arcade racers in its realism. Forza might as well be an arcade racer because of it excess focus on customization( not the performace tune-ups but the physical customizations). It would be great if GT5 added crashes, and if it did, the case would be closed if it already wasn't; GT>>>>>Forza.
Avatar image for jeffdoomsday
jeffdoomsday

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 jeffdoomsday
Member since 2008 • 1023 Posts
Diddy Kong Racing>Gran Turismo 5
Avatar image for coldsteel321
coldsteel321

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 coldsteel321
Member since 2007 • 350 Posts
Forza doesn't even deserve to be mentioned on a same sentence with Gran Turismo. Forza just sucks, GT is better in everyway. For that reason it is one of the most succesful franchises and only possible on PS3. Enjoy your 3-5 discs game.:lol:
Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

GT has only had one AAA game and that was 7 years ago with no other sim racers to go against. The last GT game was GT:5P and it only scored 7.5.

On the other hand Forza has had two games and both were AAA.

If Forza 3 comes out before GT5 then that means 3 Forza games were released in the time Poly took to release GT5 since Forza 1 was released after GT4.

Avatar image for -Mad_Rhetoric-
-Mad_Rhetoric-

1765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 -Mad_Rhetoric-
Member since 2008 • 1765 Posts
thank you captain obvious
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Although Forza's a good game, it's missing that extra something that GT possesses. It's quite obvious the series just isn't recognized like GT is by Media or fans.

The Gran Turismo Prologue Series is a nice taste, but fans shouldn't use it as a scale when talking GT. The Prologue's have been around A LONG WHILE, but they are new to the WEST.

Avatar image for Stoner-Pimp
Stoner-Pimp

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Stoner-Pimp
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts
How on earth can you go on about how GT is a good sim and has better this that and the other and then say Forza is only a little better than an arcade game in it's realism?, Forza has far more realism than GT in terms of racing.
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

If Forza 3 comes out before GT5 then that means 3 Forza games were released in the time Poly took to release GT5 since Forza 1 was released after GT4.

Eltroz

Tells you something, doesn't it. It speaks volumes about the level of commitment from both SONY and M$, and ESPECIALLy from the Developers.

Heck, UBISOFT managed to SQUEEZEpoop out as many Splinter Cell's as Kojima has had Metal Gear Solid's.

Avatar image for -Mad_Rhetoric-
-Mad_Rhetoric-

1765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 -Mad_Rhetoric-
Member since 2008 • 1765 Posts
How on earth can you go on about how GT is a good sim and has better this that and the other and then say Forza is only a little better than an arcade game in it's realism?, Forza has far more realism than GT in terms of racing.Stoner-Pimp
no
Avatar image for Stoner-Pimp
Stoner-Pimp

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Stoner-Pimp
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts

[QUOTE="Stoner-Pimp"]How on earth can you go on about how GT is a good sim and has better this that and the other and then say Forza is only a little better than an arcade game in it's realism?, Forza has far more realism than GT in terms of racing.-Mad_Rhetoric-
no

Yes, GT's racing isn't anything like real life whatsoever, until it get's a working damage model and you can't win races by simple bouncing of other cars/walls etc then Forza is by far and away more realistic than it therefor in terms of realistic gameplay Forza is far far better.

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If Forza 3 comes out before GT5 then that means 3 Forza games were released in the time Poly took to release GT5 since Forza 1 was released after GT4.

SolidTy

Tells you something, doesn't it. It speaks volumes about the level of commitment from both SONY and M$, and ESPECIALLy from the Developers.

Heck, UBISOFT managed to SQUEEZEpoop out as many Splinter Cell's as Kojima has had Metal Gear Solid's.

Would say something if both Forza games were crap but since both are AAA games then I do not understand the point? With just 2 games Forza already has more AAA games then GT does.
Avatar image for -Mad_Rhetoric-
-Mad_Rhetoric-

1765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 -Mad_Rhetoric-
Member since 2008 • 1765 Posts

[QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"][QUOTE="Stoner-Pimp"]How on earth can you go on about how GT is a good sim and has better this that and the other and then say Forza is only a little better than an arcade game in it's realism?, Forza has far more realism than GT in terms of racing.Stoner-Pimp

no

Yes, GT's racing isn't anything like real life whatsoever, until it get's a working damage model and you can't win races by simple bouncing of other cars/walls etc then Forza is by far and away more realistic than it therefor in terms of realistic gameplay Forza is far far better.

:lol: a guy called "stoner-pimp" knows more about which game is more realistic than the entire game industry
Avatar image for jeffdoomsday
jeffdoomsday

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 jeffdoomsday
Member since 2008 • 1023 Posts
Realism is boring. Give me Mario Kart.
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If Forza 3 comes out before GT5 then that means 3 Forza games were released in the time Poly took to release GT5 since Forza 1 was released after GT4.

Eltroz

Tells you something, doesn't it. It speaks volumes about the level of commitment from both SONY and M$, and ESPECIALLy from the Developers.

Heck, UBISOFT managed to SQUEEZEpoop out as many Splinter Cell's as Kojima has had Metal Gear Solid's.

Would say something if both Forza games were crap but since both are AAA games then I do not understand the point? With just 2 games Forza already has more AAA games then GT does.

Splinter Cell's not crap either, and Forza is a better series, my point is some Dev's VISION take longer to implement. When we look at GT's Reputation vs. Forza's Reputation, there is something GT is doing that FORZA isn't doing. I would ask the hardcore SIM fans to quantify that, because there's something there.

Avatar image for Stoner-Pimp
Stoner-Pimp

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Stoner-Pimp
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts

:lol: a guy called "stoner-pimp" knows more about which game is more realistic than the entire game industry -Mad_Rhetoric-

Well actully no i'm not a guy called Stoner-Pimp, i'm a guy with an ingame handle of Stoner-Pimp (there is a difference), as for what i posted, dispute it if you can, explain how GT has a better and more realistic racing damage model (hence more realistic gameplay) than Forza?.

Avatar image for Blinblingthing
Blinblingthing

6943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Blinblingthing
Member since 2005 • 6943 Posts

Diddy Kong Racing>Gran Turismo 5jeffdoomsday

Well that does add to your post count, So I guess that statement does serve a purpose

Avatar image for Stoner-Pimp
Stoner-Pimp

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Stoner-Pimp
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts

Diddy Kong Racing>Gran Turismo 5jeffdoomsday

Super Nintendo Mario Kart > All other Racing games :D

Avatar image for -Mad_Rhetoric-
-Mad_Rhetoric-

1765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 -Mad_Rhetoric-
Member since 2008 • 1765 Posts

[QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"]:lol: a guy called "stoner-pimp" knows more about which game is more realistic than the entire game industry Stoner-Pimp

Well actully no i'm not a guy called Stoner-Pimp, i'm a guy with an ingame handle of Stoner-Pimp (there is a difference), as for what i posted, dispute it if you can, explain how GT has a better and more realistic racing damage model (hence more realistic gameplay) than Forza?.

for one its has more slower more accurate track lap times than forza, more realistic sound, more cars, hell of alot better graphics, better physics, the GT5 racer wheel is better

the only con about GT was its AI but thats improved in GT5P

Avatar image for Cpt__Spaulding
Cpt__Spaulding

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Cpt__Spaulding
Member since 2008 • 32 Posts
people that think GT is even REMOTELY close to Forza's caliber of racing make me LMFAO
Avatar image for box0rocks
box0rocks

1006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 box0rocks
Member since 2008 • 1006 Posts

Realism is boring. Give me Mario Kart.jeffdoomsday

this= WIN

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
[QUOTE="Stoner-Pimp"]

explain how GT has a better and more realistic racing damage model (hence more realistic gameplay) than Forza?.

-Mad_Rhetoric-

better physics

How so? Higher tick rate, better tire model? Turn 10 is pretty open about what goes into their physics model, but we know absolutely nothing about Polyphony's. Without proper technical specs or significant on-track experience, how can you judge which one is better?

That said, I have yet to find a sim on any platform to equal iRacing. The laser-scanned tracks are absolutely unmatched. I wish they'd port it to PS3 so I could play it from my living room (no, I am NOT hauling my PC out of the office), but they're rather reticent about being at all associated with video games.

Avatar image for KiddSushi
KiddSushi

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 KiddSushi
Member since 2008 • 118 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If Forza 3 comes out before GT5 then that means 3 Forza games were released in the time Poly took to release GT5 since Forza 1 was released after GT4.

SolidTy

Tells you something, doesn't it. It speaks volumes about the level of commitment from both SONY and M$, and ESPECIALLy from the Developers.

Heck, UBISOFT managed to SQUEEZEpoop out as many Splinter Cell's as Kojima has had Metal Gear Solid's.

Would say something if both Forza games were crap but since both are AAA games then I do not understand the point? With just 2 games Forza already has more AAA games then GT does.

Splinter Cell's not crap either, and Forza is a better series, my point is some Dev's VISION take longer to implement. When we look at GT's Reputation vs. Forza's Reputation, there is something GT is doing that FORZA isn't doing. I would ask the hardcore SIM fans to quantify that, because there's something there.

I would argue that it came out way before Forza and got the attention as the best racing sim on consoles. That's not the case anymore, but its reputation is still there.
Avatar image for Shattered007
Shattered007

3139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 Shattered007
Member since 2007 • 3139 Posts
I think the GT series has always had way better racing simsShenmue_Jehuty
Stoped reading there...
Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts

Although Forza's a good game, it's missing that extra something that GT possesses. It's quite obvious the series just isn't recognized like GT is by Media or fans.

The Gran Turismo Prologue Series is a nice taste, but fans shouldn't use it as a scale when talking GT. The Prologue's have been around A LONG WHILE, but they are new to the WEST.

SolidTy

Attachment to brand name is the least important thing to me, and I personally despise it.

Avatar image for RazMaTaz-1
RazMaTaz-1

2097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 RazMaTaz-1
Member since 2007 • 2097 Posts

i dont know why people think Forza is the God Of Damage. Any of you actually played Toca Race Driver? Thats how cars react when they are crashed, not forza, where you crash a ferrari at 100mph and only the paint job and front bumper go wrong.

http://www.wreckedexotics.com/newphotos/exotics/5skyline_20081016_001.shtml

THATS A REAL LIFE CRASH

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v30/Jase156/360crash.jpg

THIS IS A POOR EXCUSE OF A CRASH.

Avatar image for Zerual
Zerual

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Zerual
Member since 2008 • 379 Posts
How about we wait until both games come out eh?
Avatar image for AlphaGamer469
AlphaGamer469

1881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 AlphaGamer469
Member since 2008 • 1881 Posts
I'm beginning to think that people that love GT have never actually driven a car in real life. Sorry, but Forza is way ahead of GT. Just because Poly is lazy doesn't mean they are more dedicated...
Avatar image for TheOwnerOner
TheOwnerOner

2921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 TheOwnerOner
Member since 2007 • 2921 Posts
GT5 has already flop for being so long to develope.
Avatar image for -DrRobotnik-
-DrRobotnik-

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -DrRobotnik-
Member since 2008 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If Forza 3 comes out before GT5 then that means 3 Forza games were released in the time Poly took to release GT5 since Forza 1 was released after GT4.

SolidTy

Tells you something, doesn't it. It speaks volumes about the level of commitment from both SONY and M$, and ESPECIALLy from the Developers.

Heck, UBISOFT managed to SQUEEZEpoop out as many Splinter Cell's as Kojima has had Metal Gear Solid's.

Would say something if both Forza games were crap but since both are AAA games then I do not understand the point? With just 2 games Forza already has more AAA games then GT does.

Splinter Cell's not crap either, and Forza is a better series, my point is some Dev's VISION take longer to implement. When we look at GT's Reputation vs. Forza's Reputation, there is something GT is doing that FORZA isn't doing. I would ask the hardcore SIM fans to quantify that, because there's something there.

They take longer because they spend 200 days modelling each car so that it looks right. Now GT games have amazing graphics, i was blown away by the cockpit view in GT5: Prologue. But you have to think, is the extra attention to detail on the dashboard, wheels, bumpers etc worth the extra few years wait?

Avatar image for pi3m4ster
pi3m4ster

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 pi3m4ster
Member since 2008 • 522 Posts

people saying gt>>>>>>>forza don't realize how incredible forzas physics really are - like for ewxample drifting: the devs didn't intend for you to do it, but people found out how to tune each and every car for optimum drifting. plus go for a test drive you can instantly feel how the car changes depending on what slide you slid, and how everything from tyre compound to weight disribution goes into the mix to make endless possiblities... and it's all magnified a thousand times with the wheel. and heck, go to the forzamotorsport.net forums and marvel at the THOUSANDS of pages of tips and info and everything about everything in foza. it's truly incredible.

i think GTs popularity is due to it being much "easier" - you don't need to do dozens of practice laps to get the right settings nor do you have to spend hours and hours making an amazing design on a car (well you can't even do that at all :P) nor do you have to figure out the best braking distance taking into account your car for each and eveyr corner then remember it for the following laps, NOR do you have to be careful so as not to cripple your vehicle.

forza>>>gt no matter what.

Avatar image for Notrelevant
Notrelevant

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Notrelevant
Member since 2007 • 82 Posts

Next year's Super Bowl winner is better than the Super Bowl winner 3 years from now.

Avatar image for BIOWAREISKING
BIOWAREISKING

568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 BIOWAREISKING
Member since 2008 • 568 Posts
the forza series has always been better than gt.
Avatar image for Innovazero2000
Innovazero2000

3159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 Innovazero2000
Member since 2006 • 3159 Posts
[QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"][QUOTE="Stoner-Pimp"]

explain how GT has a better and more realistic racing damage model (hence more realistic gameplay) than Forza?.

lowe0

better physics

How so? Higher tick rate, better tire model? Turn 10 is pretty open about what goes into their physics model, but we know absolutely nothing about Polyphony's. Without proper technical specs or significant on-track experience, how can you judge which one is better?

That said, I have yet to find a sim on any platform to equal iRacing. The laser-scanned tracks are absolutely unmatched. I wish they'd port it to PS3 so I could play it from my living room (no, I am NOT hauling my PC out of the office), but they're rather reticent about being at all associated with video games.

the like of Corvette racing, Toyo tires, etc had nothing but praise for Forza's physics model. Much so for suspension/tire models.

That being said regaurdless. Race Pro is going to blow both out of the water in terms of car physics and tire/road handling.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

the like of Corvette racing, Toyo tires, etc had nothing but praise for Forza's physics model. Much so for suspension/tire models.

That being said regaurdless. Race Pro is going to blow both out of the water in terms of car physics and tire/road handling.

Innovazero2000
But what about for street-legal cars? Forza and GT at least have those (and it's tough to get permission to do damage modeling on street cars since the manufacturers feel it'll affect their sales).
Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
GT wins when it comes to sales since it was ranked up to the first three highest selling games in the ps1 and ps2 so it'll win since polyphony take their time to deliver.
Avatar image for nethernova
nethernova

5721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 nethernova
Member since 2008 • 5721 Posts
Yes, many people will enjoy GT5 when it finally releases in 2015.
Avatar image for l34052
l34052

3906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 l34052
Member since 2005 • 3906 Posts

The only reason i think most GT fans say its the best racer is beacause for years it was the only racer of its type so gamers became accustomed to it and thought this was the only way a sim (i use that term very loosely) should be.

Anyone who has actually driven a car in anger on a track will clearly see that Forza is vastly superior in everyway apart from the graphics to GT.

A car feels very dynamic at speed which forza does exceptionally well with even the flex of the tires being felt by the player, GT is not even close to this feel in my opinion.

Im not a pro racing driver at all but i do have a very nice car and i do drive track days so know how a car feels on track and its not like GT im afraid.

All this is moot anyway cause GT fans dogmatically stick to their 'GT is best no matter what' ideas so it doesnt really matter what i or anyone else says, it wont matter at all to these people.

Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#38 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts

eh?? better phys the cars in gt look as though they are skating about the track!

its the same as the other games which is very bland these days..and the graphics are nothing either sure they are 1080p but theres nothing else there...its a snore fest...

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts

The only reason i think most GT fans say its the best racer is beacause for years it was the only racer of its type so gamers became accustomed to it and thought this was the only way a sim (i use that term very loosely) should be.

Anyone who has actually driven a car in anger on a track will clearly see that Forza is vastly superior in everyway apart from the graphics to GT.

A car feels very dynamic at speed which forza does exceptionally well with even the flex of the tires being felt by the player, GT is not even close to this feel in my opinion.

Im not a pro racing driver at all but i do have a very nice car and i do drive track days so know how a car feels on track and its not like GT im afraid.

All this is moot anyway cause GT fans dogmatically stick to their 'GT is best no matter what' ideas so it doesnt really matter what i or anyone else says, it wont matter at all to these people.

l34052
ding ding DING. i've said this every time the debate comes up, and so far i've found -one- person that does trackdays (or maybe it was autox) and still says GT is more realistic. most of the people saying GT is more realistic have no idea what realism is, since they've never tracked their car. (edit: this is just talking about the actual driving + physics - GT has pretty consistently smacked around Forza in terms of looks and always will, IMO)
Although Forza's a good game, it's missing that extra something that GT possesses. It's quite obvious the series just isn't recognized like GT is by Media or fans.SolidTy
The reason is marketing, pure and simple. Sony's good at it, and bundling GT3 with the PS2 got the game out to a metric ton of new people for which GT is all they know. It's the same deal with GH and RB. RB is just plain better at what both games are trying to do, but most people grew up with the GH 'name.' It's not going to matter about who's actually making the game, they'll just see the name and assume it's better. And GH has crazy, crazy brand recognition.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

Although Forza's a good game, it's missing that extra something that GT possesses. It's quite obvious the series just isn't recognized like GT is by Media or fans.

SolidTy

really? Forza was on Top Gear, Forza was featured in Car & Driver, Forza has been acclaimed by professional racers in EU and Japan as the most realistic racing sim ever.

just because you were'nt exposed to it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. i don't recall GT:P being featured anywhere or praised for it's realism - all i saw were Cow threads on how good it looks.

Avatar image for -Mad_Rhetoric-
-Mad_Rhetoric-

1765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 -Mad_Rhetoric-
Member since 2008 • 1765 Posts
I'm beginning to think that people that love GT have never actually driven a car in real life. Sorry, but Forza is way ahead of GT. Just because Poly is lazy doesn't mean they are more dedicated...AlphaGamer469
no, all car enthusiast chose GT over all else, car companies beg to be in GT
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"] I'm beginning to think that people that love GT have never actually driven a car in real life. Sorry, but Forza is way ahead of GT. Just because Poly is lazy doesn't mean they are more dedicated...-Mad_Rhetoric-
no, all car enthusiast chose GT over all else, car companies beg to be in GT

car companies' marketing departments beg to be in GT, you mean.
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Although Forza's a good game, it's missing that extra something that GT possesses. It's quite obvious the series just isn't recognized like GT is by Media or fans.

3picuri3

really? Forza was on Top Gear, Forza was featured in Car & Driver, Forza has been acclaimed by professional racers in EU and Japan as the most realistic racing sim ever.

just because you were'nt exposed to it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. i don't recall GT:P being featured anywhere or praised for it's realism - all i saw were Cow threads on how good it looks.

GT4 was in Top Gear, IIRC - when Clarkson took the NSX on Laguna Seca in GT a bunch of times, then drove a real car on the same track and tried to match it. he wasn't able to come close to the time he got in GT4, it was much faster than the RL track. that pretty much matches up with what i've been told by the people who've raced on that track vs. GT, too. edit: like here on a race sim fansite, talking about the episode when it happened.. he got a 1:41 in GT4, and a 1:57 in real life with the same car. as comparison, other people were able to knock the time down to 1:36-1:37 with the NSX-R in GT4, some of the guys in the forum with the same car in a PC-based race sim got a best of 1:55 in the sim with the same car.
Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#43 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

Forza doesn't even deserve to be mentioned on a same sentence with Gran Turismo. Forza just sucks, GT is better in everyway. For that reason it is one of the most succesful franchises and only possible on PS3. Enjoy your 3-5 discs game.:lol:coldsteel321

You obviously haven't played both games. I've played them all and Forza is easily the most realistic of between the two. The fact that the first 4 GT games didn't even have damage and still used the lame rubberband A.I., tell us that the game is far from realistic and has been using the same A.I. engine since the original GT. Considering all the extra stuff Forza 3 is going to have compared to Forza 2, there's no doubt it'll blow GT5 away in gameplay quality. The only thing GT5 has going for it is it's graphics and we can only pray that the online is good.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#44 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
The only people who can say "Gran Turismo is a better racing sim than Forza Motorsport" with a straight face are those who have never even played Forza Motorsport. Compared to Forza, GT is an arcade racer.
Avatar image for RazMaTaz-1
RazMaTaz-1

2097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 RazMaTaz-1
Member since 2007 • 2097 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Although Forza's a good game, it's missing that extra something that GT possesses. It's quite obvious the series just isn't recognized like GT is by Media or fans.

3picuri3

really? Forza was on Top Gear

WOW, Wrong wrong wrong!!

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=sIzlmr3VuF8

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#46 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
no, all car enthusiast chose GT over all else, car companies beg to be in GT-Mad_Rhetoric-

Because Gran Turismo is one of Sony's cash-cows and is extremely popular. Just because a game is popular doesn't make it a good racing sim.

Anyone who has actually driven a car in real life, then played both Forza and GT will tell you that Forza recreates the physics of a moving car far better than Gran Turismo.
Avatar image for NinjaMunkey01
NinjaMunkey01

7485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 NinjaMunkey01
Member since 2007 • 7485 Posts

Yes, many people will enjoy GT5 when it finally releases in 2015.nethernova

Actually I think it releases in 2009. At least thats what the devs are saying :)

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If Forza 3 comes out before GT5 then that means 3 Forza games were released in the time Poly took to release GT5 since Forza 1 was released after GT4.

SolidTy

Tells you something, doesn't it. It speaks volumes about the level of commitment from both SONY and M$, and ESPECIALLy from the Developers.

Heck, UBISOFT managed to SQUEEZEpoop out as many Splinter Cell's as Kojima has had Metal Gear Solid's.

No! It tell us that it took Polophony over 3 years to figure out the PS3 architecture and software tools. :lol: They made the previous GT games a lot quicker and I'm sure GT 5 will be more of the same, but now include damage and online, which Forza has include since day one. :roll: GT5 is playing catch up to the Forza series. Only thing Forza needs to improve is the graphic quality, but the gameplay, features and online support is so good that graphics aren't as important.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#49 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

i dont know why people think Forza is the God Of Damage. Any of you actually played Toca Race Driver? Thats how cars react when they are crashed, not forza, where you crash a ferrari at 100mph and only the paint job and front bumper go wrong.

http://www.wreckedexotics.com/newphotos/exotics/5skyline_20081016_001.shtml

THATS A REAL LIFE CRASH

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v30/Jase156/360crash.jpg

THIS IS A POOR EXCUSE OF A CRASH.

RazMaTaz-1

The fact that GT5 crashing nothing like either of those is what makes it even less realistic. You run into a wall going 130mph in GT5: Prologue and bounce of the wall and continue at close to the same speed. That's realistic? What a joke!! :lol:

Also, there are different levels of damage in Forza 2.

Avatar image for GnR-SLaSh
GnR-SLaSh

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 GnR-SLaSh
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts

GT has only had one AAA game and that was 7 years ago with no other sim racers to go against. The last GT game was GT:5P and it only scored 7.5.

On the other hand Forza has had two games and both were AAA.

If Forza 3 comes out before GT5 then that means 3 Forza games were released in the time Poly took to release GT5 since Forza 1 was released after GT4.

Eltroz

The only factor which has put GT series behind Forza is lack of customisation and damage, both of which have been confirmed for GT5. GT5P was a demo, would you expect a game to get more than a 7.5 with only FIVE tracks?

Stop kidding yourself, the racing aspect of GT has always >>>> Forza, it just lacked the damage and customisation...