do you think that? i heard assassins creed 3 had 2 disks. It almost sounds guaranteed to me that GTA 5 would be two disks...what do you think?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
do you think that? i heard assassins creed 3 had 2 disks. It almost sounds guaranteed to me that GTA 5 would be two disks...what do you think?
Will it change the experience of the game for me? No
Do i really care if it has two discs? Hell no
Lol, i don't think it will but even if it does it won't mean a thing. A few games have already done this.
Definitely. The 360 always limits the content of the games because of that restriction.kuraimenIs that why the PS3 versions of RDR and GTA IV are inferior to the 360 version?
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Definitely. The 360 always limits the content of the games because of that restriction.princeofshapeirIs that why the PS3 versions of RDR and GTA IV are inferior to the 360 version? They use the 360 as lead platform which is logical since it's the lowest common denominator. Sadly the PS3 has to afterwards deal with the inferior design. In a Bluray you could fit like 4 times the content and all PCs have HDD. The 360 is the weakest link.
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]Definitely. The 360 always limits the content of the games because of that restriction.kuraimenIs that why the PS3 versions of RDR and GTA IV are inferior to the 360 version? They use the 360 as lead platform which is logical since it's the lowest common denominator. Sadly the PS3 has to afterwards deal with the inferior design. In a Bluray you could fit like 4 times the content and all PCs have HDD. The 360 is the weakest link. I don't think the 360 being the "lead platform" excuses the PS3 versions of GTA IV and RDR being notably inferior. Even with Max Payne 3, a game where both of the console versions and the PC version were developed and optimized independently, the 360 version pulled ahead of the PS3 version marginally with regards to performance and visuals (both console versions are still very impressive and far more equal than the PS3/360 versions of RDR or GTA IV). The PS3's insufficient RAM is a big headache for a lot of developers. It's one reason why Skyrim on PS3 was such a mess.
Definitely. The 360 always limits the content of the games because of that restriction.kuraimenI can't wait to see which version of the two will be better. :o
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]Definitely. The 360 always limits the content of the games because of that restriction.kuraimenIs that why the PS3 versions of RDR and GTA IV are inferior to the 360 version? They use the 360 as lead platform which is logical since it's the lowest common denominator. Sadly the PS3 has to afterwards deal with the inferior design. In a Bluray you could fit like 4 times the content and all PCs have HDD. The 360 is the weakest link. That sad thing is you are such a Sony drone you probably believe the stuff you say.
as you will drive inside the city suddenly the game will stop and ask you to insert the second disk :lol::lol::lol:
[QUOTE="sts106mat"]At least 2 discs, still at least it'll be HD.Salt_The_FriesAnd will still sell better.
no it won't
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Is that why the PS3 versions of RDR and GTA IV are inferior to the 360 version?princeofshapeirThey use the 360 as lead platform which is logical since it's the lowest common denominator. Sadly the PS3 has to afterwards deal with the inferior design. In a Bluray you could fit like 4 times the content and all PCs have HDD. The 360 is the weakest link. I don't think the 360 being the "lead platform" excuses the PS3 versions of GTA IV and RDR being notably inferior. Even with Max Payne 3, a game where both of the console versions and the PC version were developed and optimized independently, the 360 version pulled ahead of the PS3 version marginally with regards to performance and visuals (both console versions are still very impressive and far more equal than the PS3/360 versions of RDR or GTA IV). The PS3's insufficient RAM is a big headache for a lot of developers. It's one reason why Skyrim on PS3 was such a mess.
So you're just making stuff up now? because max payne wasn't better on 360
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Is that why the PS3 versions of RDR and GTA IV are inferior to the 360 version?CanYouDigltThey use the 360 as lead platform which is logical since it's the lowest common denominator. Sadly the PS3 has to afterwards deal with the inferior design. In a Bluray you could fit like 4 times the content and all PCs have HDD. The 360 is the weakest link. That sad thing is you are such a Sony drone you probably believe the stuff you say. The 360 is the only HD capable system that; Has SKU's with no HDD Still uses DVD You could get around it if you made mandatory installs on the 360, but since there are HDD-less SKU's, Microsoft policy forbids that. When it comes to technology standards, the 360 would not be even up to snuff in 2000.
Who cares?
^this. have you no compassion? feelings? do you even care about anyone? cant you see lemmings are dealing with this sh!t, try showing some care for them too!![QUOTE="kuraimen"]Definitely. The 360 always limits the content of the games because of that restriction.princeofshapeirIs that why the PS3 versions of RDR and GTA IV are inferior to the 360 version? GTA4 was a bad example to use cause it runs better on the PS3, but I still understand what you were trying to say even though you used a bad example.
I would be ok with it, but probably wont be necessary! Skyrim is the biggest and most content packed game this gen, and fits in less than 4gb!PAL360as much as your diagnostic is respected professor, you need to keep in mind GTA is not a bunch of empty land with a whole bunch of nothing filled with nothing loot.
I don't think the 360 being the "lead platform" excuses the PS3 versions of GTA IV and RDR being notably inferior. Even with Max Payne 3, a game where both of the console versions and the PC version were developed and optimized independently, the 360 version pulled ahead of the PS3 version marginally with regards to performance and visuals (both console versions are still very impressive and far more equal than the PS3/360 versions of RDR or GTA IV). The PS3's insufficient RAM is a big headache for a lot of developers. It's one reason why Skyrim on PS3 was such a mess.[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] They use the 360 as lead platform which is logical since it's the lowest common denominator. Sadly the PS3 has to afterwards deal with the inferior design. In a Bluray you could fit like 4 times the content and all PCs have HDD. The 360 is the weakest link.Meeeper282
So you're just making stuff up now? because max payne wasn't better on 360
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-max-payne-3-face-off There is a marginal difference. Why can't you just admit that the 360 is easier to develop for?Who cares?
^this. have you no compassion? feelings? do you even care about anyone? cant you see lemmings are dealing with this sh!t, try showing some care for them too!! Try making some damn sense when you respond to me instead of a bunch of jibberish that doesn't even make any sense. If through all that jibberish you are trying to claim ownage over how many disk the 360 version will have, I feel very sad for you. The only people I see having an issue with this are 400lbs fat kids who have a hell of a time just getting off their ass to switch disk and then need an inhaler just to breath once they have sat back down.[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"][QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"] ^this. AmazonTreeBoahave you no compassion? feelings? do you even care about anyone? cant you see lemmings are dealing with this sh!t, try showing some care for them too!! Try making some damn sense when you respond to me instead of a bunch of jibberish that doesn't even make any sense. If through all that jibberish you are trying to claim ownage over how many disk the 360 version will have, I feel very sad for you. The only people I see having an issue with this are 400lbs fat kids who have a hell of a time just getting off their ass to switch disk and then need an inhaler just to breath once they have sat back down. its not the point bro!!! 360 has no games what you fail to realize is microsoft thinks this counts as 2 games for their system!!!
[QUOTE="Meeeper282"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] I don't think the 360 being the "lead platform" excuses the PS3 versions of GTA IV and RDR being notably inferior. Even with Max Payne 3, a game where both of the console versions and the PC version were developed and optimized independently, the 360 version pulled ahead of the PS3 version marginally with regards to performance and visuals (both console versions are still very impressive and far more equal than the PS3/360 versions of RDR or GTA IV). The PS3's insufficient RAM is a big headache for a lot of developers. It's one reason why Skyrim on PS3 was such a mess. princeofshapeir
So you're just making stuff up now? because max payne wasn't better on 360
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-max-payne-3-face-off There is a marginal difference. Why can't you just admit that the 360 is easier to develop for?Lems of truth thinks otherwise, they are identical, even rockstar stated they were identical, so fail
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-max-payne-3-screenshot-comparison/2/
[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"] have you no compassion? feelings? do you even care about anyone? cant you see lemmings are dealing with this sh!t, try showing some care for them too!!PinnacleGamingPTry making some damn sense when you respond to me instead of a bunch of jibberish that doesn't even make any sense. If through all that jibberish you are trying to claim ownage over how many disk the 360 version will have, I feel very sad for you. The only people I see having an issue with this are 400lbs fat kids who have a hell of a time just getting off their ass to switch disk and then need an inhaler just to breath once they have sat back down. its not the point bro!!! 360 has no games what you fail to realize is microsoft thinks this counts as 2 games for their system!!! The 360 has games, they count it as one, and you look/sound like an idiot. And here I was thinking that at this hour, I would be able to have an intelligent conversation in SW, but clearly childish fanboy responses come at all hours off the night. When you decide you want to have a real conversation instead of your fanboyish childish responses, I will bother with responding to you again.
[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"][QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"] Try making some damn sense when you respond to me instead of a bunch of jibberish that doesn't even make any sense. If through all that jibberish you are trying to claim ownage over how many disk the 360 version will have, I feel very sad for you. The only people I see having an issue with this are 400lbs fat kids who have a hell of a time just getting off their ass to switch disk and then need an inhaler just to breath once they have sat back down.AmazonTreeBoaits not the point bro!!! 360 has no games what you fail to realize is microsoft thinks this counts as 2 games for their system!!! The 360 has games, they count it as one, and you look/sound like an idiot. And here I was thinking that at this hour, I would be able to have an intelligent conversation in SW, but clearly childish fanboy responses come at all hours off the night. When you decide you want to have a real conversation instead of your fanboyish childish responses, I will bother with responding to you again. sounds like you had a long day bro, but their is a sticky for RROD issues in the 360 forums
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-max-payne-3-face-off There is a marginal difference. Why can't you just admit that the 360 is easier to develop for?[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Meeeper282"]
So you're just making stuff up now? because max payne wasn't better on 360
Meeeper282
Lems of truth thinks otherwise, they are identical, even rockstar stated they were identical, so fail
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-max-payne-3-screenshot-comparison/2/
The key word here is "marginal." And what makes you think Rockstar would ever admit one version of their game looks/performs better than another one, even if that was clearly the case? :|Its mainly just the younger people who have never played a game on PS1 complain about disc swapping. Let them see how it is to play Final Fantasy 9 with 4 discs. As long as the games is separated decently with no frequent disc swapping required it's fine. Plus any 360 owner who doesnt buy a decent HDD is just retarded. Give up on buying some games and save it for an HDD.mstrchf12the thing about FF games during ps1 era were they were games ahead of their time.......not this backward logic to try and keep up with gimped 360 system
[QUOTE="Meeeper282"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-max-payne-3-face-off There is a marginal difference. Why can't you just admit that the 360 is easier to develop for? princeofshapeir
Lems of truth thinks otherwise, they are identical, even rockstar stated they were identical, so fail
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-max-payne-3-screenshot-comparison/2/
The key word here is "marginal." And what makes you think Rockstar would ever admit one version of their game looks/performs better than another one, even if that was clearly the case? :|Because it was a twitter question that didn't need to be answered, yet they did.
Seriously trying to claim ownage because the 360 version has a bit more colour? pathetic, and show's how low lemmings have become, cows are not any better, but atleast they argue over things that matter.
The key word here is "marginal." And what makes you think Rockstar would ever admit one version of their game looks/performs better than another one, even if that was clearly the case? :|[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Meeeper282"]
Lems of truth thinks otherwise, they are identical, even rockstar stated they were identical, so fail
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-max-payne-3-screenshot-comparison/2/
Meeeper282
Because it was a twitter question that didn't need to be answered, yet they did.
Seriously trying to claim ownage because the 360 version has a bit more colour? pathetic, and show's how low lemmings have become, cows are not any better, but atleast they argue over things that matter.
Do you seriously believe answering Twitter questions is "off the cuff?" They give a very methodical PR response to any question they choose to answer on Twitter, just like they do on Newswire. And if you read the DF article that's not all of what they concluded.how so?mass effect 3 on 360 was a pain with all the disk changing. GTAV looks to be the same.
KillzoneSnake
[QUOTE="KillzoneSnake"]how so?mass effect 3 on 360 was a pain with all the disk changing. GTAV looks to be the same.
PinnacleGamingP
what? on me3 around the part where you go to grissom academy i usually had to disk change at least 3 times between missions. on gtav who know if u gotta change every time you cross the map or between missions lol
thank god ME trilogy coming to PS3 :D
[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"][QUOTE="KillzoneSnake"]
mass effect 3 on 360 was a pain with all the disk changing. GTAV looks to be the same.
how so?what? on me3 around the part where you go to grissom academy i usually had to disk change at least 3 times between missions. on gtav who know if u gotta change every time you cross the map or between missions lol
thank god ME trilogy coming to PS3 :D
excellent R&D, not a lemming confirmed. cows you should be ashamed....Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment