GTA V Graphics Comparison

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D39Vs2PFJws

http://imgur.com/a/EZh6d

this will go well

Anything surprising?

Meh, mods will do far better.

Oh, and look, more grass. I'm sure PS4 owners will quickly notice it like they did with the ps4 version.

There's grass

I've heard that is important

gta v on PC has been released on on another season, thats why the crops are much bigger

@godspellwh said:

@deadline-zero0 said:

Meh, mods will do far better.

Oh, and look, more grass. I'm sure PS4 owners will quickly notice it like they did with the ps4 version.

gta v on PC has been released on another season, thats why the crops are much bigger

This is pertaining to the grass density on Xbox One and PlayStation 4, this is something I posted shortly after the game came out.

I think I have figured out what is going on, the Xbox One does not have less vegetation than the PlayStation 4 from what I can tell, it's just dense in different places. It appears that the games both ran individual procedural generation. What this means is aside from manual placement for certain things like big plants, trees and so on; the grass density is different in different locations on both systems.

I went to several of these locations after painstakingly searching the map (and being mauled to death countless times) and came to find that in these specific locations shown the grass density on the Xbox One is low, but in many, many others it's JUST AS dense as on the PlayStation 4. This leads me back to my procedural generation line, I think when it comes to grass that each game was given its own independent grass generation.

Procedural generation is automatic placement of assets, the system runs on an algorithm and places objects (in this case grass) in locations which are suiting for it based upon the initial coding parameters. This video leads me to believe they did not properly check everywhere to confirm something like the above or intentionally went to the dry places on the Xbox One to start a controversy.

Here is an image from another comparison video, me going to the same location, and then going 50 feet to the left of it where the foliage is extremely thick just as it is on the PlayStation 4.

Sorry about the quality of the pictures, I have no capture device so a camera phone is the best I could do. If I can I'll rent the PlayStation 4 version and compare them directly, I own both systems, just got it on Xbox due to the network stability for GTA Online.

Cows made a huge deal of it when the ps4 had more grass, so yes, i believe it's very, very important.

Wow PC gamers are such shills. Having to pay 10,000$ a year on a PC to get games to show a couple more blades of grass or some more branches on a tree? lol

So how many hermits own a 4k screen?

At least it's cheaper than console gaming, since you'd have to pay $30,000 a year on new TVs and home theatres just to play with blurry inferior graphics on a 4K TV.

Am I doing this right?

@GhoX: Hahahaha. A ps4 only costs 400$ and its 4k compatible! Don't add tv costs it ain't fair. Everyone has a 4k tv monitor in every room anyways.

$450 = $10.000 ?

my peasant $350 PC has the HD7870 but not the FX-8350 (only a Phenom x4 3.3Ghz) , i guess i can run it maxed out @ PS4 framerates

GTA V Recommended specifications:

OS: Windows 8.1 64 Bit, Windows 8 64 Bit, Windows 7 64 Bit Service Pack 1

Processor: Intel Core i5 3470 @ 3.2GHZ (4 CPUs) / AMD X8 FX-8350 @ 4GHZ (8 CPUs)

Memory: 8GB

Video Card: NVIDIA GTX 660 2GB / AMD HD7870 2GB

Sound Card: 100% DirectX 10 compatible

HDD Space: 65GB

DVD Drive

But my PS4 gathered up so much dust, that it triggered my asthma, and I ended up having to undergo medical treatments costing up to $80,000. The cost of console gaming is high.

Am I doing this right?

Lemme guess.....the PC version looks better.

Am shocked. Much surprise.

recommended system is $482

http://pcpartpicker.com/user/leandrro/saved/#view=qKQgXL

played the game 2.5 years ago

Much better. I just hope it's a good performing port and not another GTAIV.

dont forget the extra $100000 console gamers pay when purchasing over priced games each year.

Dat grass!

You hear that sound?

Bought this game on PS3/PS4 and I'm still willing to buy it on PC. ****

It seems the most demanding part of GTA V on PC is the HDD space required.

HA!!!

I crack myself up.

Doesn't your PC only have 4gb of ram? Not even meeting recommended settings for a last gen game, tsk tsk.

still didnt found a single game that could not run, may be this will be the first, in this case it will make spend $25

Again with the hobo builds...

he just really wants to start some house fires

...are you serious?

No we will do like lemming did deny any difference...

And since YOU don't care about resolution the PS4 is the version to get either way who want to keep waiting...lol

yeah, developers recommendations are always hobo builds

yes, a system that requires 280W with a 80+ PSU of a very good brand that delivers (at least) 500W will make your house burn...

No, your build with its $20 PSU is a hobo build.

that's not what I was referring to

The video clearly said the footage was 4K. Obviously, a gaming PC built to the recommended spec will look nothing like it. A GTX 660 is roughly in parity with the PS4's GPU.

oh yeah, you seem to know a lot about PSUs

http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&file=print&reid=384

"Summary

EVGA's older and less efficient precursor to the 500B is no great gift to the world of power supplies. There are no new groundbreaking technologies in the housing. You don't get a bag full of stickers, zip ties, posters, or any other tomfoolery that you don't need. What you do get is quite possibly the most solid forty dollar unit on the market today. Would I buy it myself? If I was on that tight a budget, yes. I would. Again... you could do a heck of a lot worse, and not just at this price point."

its very clear even on a 480p video that the maximum textures and details are far beyond PS4, we only have to see if the recommended systems can run it ate least on 30fps 1080p

@leandrro: considering you couldn't figure out that this wasn't serious:

I don't think you should be handing out much advice/criticism

So you've listened to reason then. I remember your first hobo build and your resistance to swap that no name brand you had.

i have a $19 corsair 500W since 1,5 year, but my old no name build never got even mildly warm even with a 80mm fan running on 5v instead of 12v, because my old system was only 160W

Clearly ignoring my post about the grass generation.

PC Gamers - "bu..bu...but we can play in our living rooms on our lazy boys too peasants"

Uh Ohs.. better add that 30,000 to the PC side as well.. $40,000 to game on a PC..

don-t forget the $50000 of yearly maintenance, because why the fuk not.

Already played the crap out of this game almost 2 years ago. now i'm just waiting for the next R* game

Woah. I need to start adding /s at the end of posts now heh.

cool story bro

lmao consoles

@bldgirsh: LMFAO 4k compatible. Like really you gave me a good chuckle. Laptops come out with 4k screens with 750ti's(better then consoles GPU good for 720p or 1080p). Doesn't mean they can actually do anything outside a menu system, ui, streaming or bare bones games that are really easy to run at 4k. Good luck playing your games in 4k on your consoles. Please come back and let us know how it went.