GTA V PC will Have DX 11 Support, 64 Bit Memory, 2k Textures and more

  • 96 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

you know it's going to be the shyt on pc.

the mods alone will be worth it.

i won't buy it day one or anything because i have already been playing it but once a decent set of mods are out and it hits half price in a few months after release or so i'm there.

 

 

Avatar image for megaspiderweb09
megaspiderweb09

3686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 megaspiderweb09
Member since 2009 • 3686 Posts

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

Rockstar would release this game on next generation consoles before they even consider making it for PC

lostrib

what makes you say that?

The Economic side of it said so

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

Rockstar would release this game on next generation consoles before they even consider making it for PC

megaspiderweb09

what makes you say that?

The Economic side of it said so

Okay, show your evidence

Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

[QUOTE="FPSfan1985"][QUOTE="PSdual_wielder"]

It runs like shit?  We must have played a very different game.

Jankarcop

You honestly think sub 30 frames regularly is good?

He's a console fanboy, he'll lie and say yes and then fight about PS4/xboxone games being 60 fps the next day.

lolwut

Keep making your presumptions, bro.  I play on PS3 + PC and I'm enjoying it immensely.

Any sane person knows 60 fps > 30 fps, but stating 30 frames is unplayable or runs like shit is the most ridiculous statement you can make.  That's like saying you can't watch regular television because its 24 fps.  This pc master race thing is getting really stupid since its only a group of people thinking they're better than everyone else and the only people asserting anything except the PC is unplayable because of random spec reasons like lower texture resolution and less AA. 'owww my eyes!!' :cry:

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="FPSfan1985"] You honestly think sub 30 frames regularly is good?PSdual_wielder

He's a console fanboy, he'll lie and say yes and then fight about PS4/xboxone games being 60 fps the next day.

lolwut

Keep making your presumptions, bro.  I play on PS3 + PC and I'm enjoying it immensely.

Any sane person knows 60 fps > 30 fps, but stating 30 frames is unplayable or runs like shit is the most ridiculous statement you can make.  That's like saying you can't watch regular television because its 24 fps.  This pc master race thing is getting really stupid since its only a group of people thinking they're better than everyone else and the only people asserting anything except the PC is unplayable because of random spec reasons like lower texture resolution and less AA. 'owww my eyes!!' :cry:

didn't digital foundry find that GTA V often had frame rate drops.  It may not run like shit, but it does not seem to run well

Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

[QUOTE="PSdual_wielder"]

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

He's a console fanboy, he'll lie and say yes and then fight about PS4/xboxone games being 60 fps the next day.

lostrib

lolwut

Keep making your presumptions, bro.  I play on PS3 + PC and I'm enjoying it immensely.

Any sane person knows 60 fps > 30 fps, but stating 30 frames is unplayable or runs like shit is the most ridiculous statement you can make.  That's like saying you can't watch regular television because its 24 fps.  This pc master race thing is getting really stupid since its only a group of people thinking they're better than everyone else and the only people asserting anything except the PC is unplayable because of random spec reasons like lower texture resolution and less AA. 'owww my eyes!!' :cry:

didn't digital foundry find that GTA V often had frame rate drops.  It may not run like shit, but it does not seem to run well

Yeah there are some dips once in a while, especially during chaotic sequences such as when a lot of cars blow up at the same time or something.  However it is far from being unplayable which the hermits are using as an excuse to blow out of the proportions.  And as far as claiming the PC version will be far superior to the point where it is pointless to play the console versions, especially when it haven't even been announced yet, and far into the horizon, is absolutely childish.

Avatar image for megaspiderweb09
megaspiderweb09

3686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 megaspiderweb09
Member since 2009 • 3686 Posts

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

what makes you say that?

lostrib

The Economic side of it said so

Okay, show your evidence

Anyone who has been following the trend in the industry for the past five years should know that the business side isnt exactly as simple as it may sound, these are not a bunch of indie guys working in a basement. They have a bunch of business stats to cross before they consider it a worthwhile investments, so far Rockstars previous experience, the install base of a tech savy segmented market that isnt big enough blah blah blah blah blah. Just keep up with the petition, it may eventually work out

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

The Economic side of it said so

megaspiderweb09

Okay, show your evidence

Anyone who has been following the trend in the industry for the past five years should know that the business side isnt exactly as simple as it may sound, these are not a bunch of indie guys working in a basement. They have a bunch of business stats to cross before they consider it a worthwhile investments, so far Rockstars previous experience, the install base of a tech savy segmented market that isnt big enough blah blah blah blah blah. Just keep up with the petition, it may eventually work out

Sounds kind of like you're talking out your ass.  Or you haven't thought this through

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#59 uninspiredcup  Online
Member since 2013 • 62762 Posts

Pc version (superior version) is probably done. Only reason it is delayed is that they don't want non pc gamers stealing it effecting the bulk of console sales.

Avatar image for megaspiderweb09
megaspiderweb09

3686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 megaspiderweb09
Member since 2009 • 3686 Posts

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

Okay, show your evidence

lostrib

Anyone who has been following the trend in the industry for the past five years should know that the business side isnt exactly as simple as it may sound, these are not a bunch of indie guys working in a basement. They have a bunch of business stats to cross before they consider it a worthwhile investments, so far Rockstars previous experience, the install base of a tech savy segmented market that isnt big enough blah blah blah blah blah. Just keep up with the petition, it may eventually work out

Sounds kind of like you're talking out your ass.  Or you haven't thought this through

Sigh, system wars, how did i forget it is difficult to have a decent conversation without it diving into insults 

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

Anyone who has been following the trend in the industry for the past five years should know that the business side isnt exactly as simple as it may sound, these are not a bunch of indie guys working in a basement. They have a bunch of business stats to cross before they consider it a worthwhile investments, so far Rockstars previous experience, the install base of a tech savy segmented market that isnt big enough blah blah blah blah blah. Just keep up with the petition, it may eventually work out

megaspiderweb09

Sounds kind of like you're talking out your ass.  Or you haven't thought this through

Sigh, system wars, how did i forget it is difficult to have a decent conversation without it diving into insults 

But you have yet to provide any relevant data, you say the install base is small, yet you say that they'd bring it to next gen consoles first, which will have a much smaller install base than PCs capable of running GTAV currently. So what data do you have to back up your statement, or are you pulling this all from no where?
Avatar image for megaspiderweb09
megaspiderweb09

3686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 megaspiderweb09
Member since 2009 • 3686 Posts

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

Sounds kind of like you're talking out your ass.  Or you haven't thought this through

soulitane

Sigh, system wars, how did i forget it is difficult to have a decent conversation without it diving into insults 

But you have yet to provide any relevant data, you say the install base is small, yet you say that they'd bring it to next gen consoles first, which will have a much smaller install base than PCs capable of running GTAV currently. So what data do you have to back up your statement, or are you pulling this all from no where?

I am not one to run around posting Meta-data or LOL VGchartz of some sort, which is why i said anyone who follow the trend. NPD group has released several reports over the past five years, the PC market is not as large as the console market, even a baby gamer knows this. While PC market has grown given the attractiveness of the digital market which allows devs to break even, its still not as big as the console market. So asking Rockstar to invest into a market they are unsure of isnt exactly as easy as a bunch of indie guys putting their games on Steam. There is a corporate ladder that needs convincing that this would be a worth while investment hence why i also said they would put it on next gen even before PC, which isnt me saying it is going to next gen, but that Rockstar would rather do than first before considering PC

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#63 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Didn't Max Payne 3 have all of these things?

So it's pretty logical that by now their engine will have all of these things.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

Rockstar would release this game on next generation consoles before they even consider making it for PC

megaspiderweb09
:lol: no. They said no to a next gen port. They have said nothing about a PC port.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

Sigh, system wars, how did i forget it is difficult to have a decent conversation without it diving into insults 

megaspiderweb09

But you have yet to provide any relevant data, you say the install base is small, yet you say that they'd bring it to next gen consoles first, which will have a much smaller install base than PCs capable of running GTAV currently. So what data do you have to back up your statement, or are you pulling this all from no where?

I am not one to run around posting Meta-data or LOL VGchartz of some sort, which is why i said anyone who follow the trend. NPD group has released several reports over the past five years, the PC market is not as large as the console market, even a baby gamer knows this. While PC market has grown given the attractiveness of the digital market which allows devs to break even, its still not as big as the console market. So asking Rockstar to invest into a market they are unsure of isnt exactly as easy as a bunch of indie guys putting their games on Steam. There is a corporate ladder that needs convincing that this would be a worth while investment hence why i also said they would put it on next gen even before PC, which isnt me saying it is going to next gen, but that Rockstar would rather do than first before considering PC

So, talking out your ass. Good to know.
Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

Sigh, system wars, how did i forget it is difficult to have a decent conversation without it diving into insults 

megaspiderweb09

But you have yet to provide any relevant data, you say the install base is small, yet you say that they'd bring it to next gen consoles first, which will have a much smaller install base than PCs capable of running GTAV currently. So what data do you have to back up your statement, or are you pulling this all from no where?

I am not one to run around posting Meta-data or LOL VGchartz of some sort, which is why i said anyone who follow the trend. NPD group has released several reports over the past five years, the PC market is not as large as the console market, even a baby gamer knows this. While PC market has grown given the attractiveness of the digital market which allows devs to break even, its still not as big as the console market. So asking Rockstar to invest into a market they are unsure of isnt exactly as easy as a bunch of indie guys putting their games on Steam. There is a corporate ladder that needs convincing that this would be a worth while investment hence why i also said they would put it on next gen even before PC, which isnt me saying it is going to next gen, but that Rockstar would rather do than first before considering PC

and yet you haven't even bought up an argument for why they would go next gen before going to PC, you want a good discussion, provide an argument. Every single major GTA game has been gone to PC, basically, the one game of R*s that hasn't is RDR, other than that, all (or most at least) of their games go to PC. Your argument isn't logical, you've provided no reason for that they wouldn't port it to PC other than it's not as big as consoles, which isn't a very good reason when you later go and say that you think they're more likely to port to next gen when I don't know if you know this, that will have a smaller market than PCs capable of running a console port. The way you've worded your argument directly implies that they know nothing about the PC market and that big games which go to PC, make no money, which really explains the lack of big multiplats on PC currently, oh wait, that's right, there are a load of them, silly me.
Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"] So, talking out your ass. Good to know.

Pretty much, complains that the PC market is unproven and smaller than consoles and then says that they're more likely to port it to what is actually an unproven and smaller market. That really makes a lot of sense.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

Sigh, system wars, how did i forget it is difficult to have a decent conversation without it diving into insults 

megaspiderweb09

But you have yet to provide any relevant data, you say the install base is small, yet you say that they'd bring it to next gen consoles first, which will have a much smaller install base than PCs capable of running GTAV currently. So what data do you have to back up your statement, or are you pulling this all from no where?

I am not one to run around posting Meta-data or LOL VGchartz of some sort, which is why i said anyone who follow the trend. NPD group has released several reports over the past five years, the PC market is not as large as the console market, even a baby gamer knows this. While PC market has grown given the attractiveness of the digital market which allows devs to break even, its still not as big as the console market. So asking Rockstar to invest into a market they are unsure of isnt exactly as easy as a bunch of indie guys putting their games on Steam. There is a corporate ladder that needs convincing that this would be a worth while investment hence why i also said they would put it on next gen even before PC, which isnt me saying it is going to next gen, but that Rockstar would rather do than first before considering PC

there are so many things wrong here. For starters, release to a market they're unsure of?  Every other major GTA installment has been on PC, as well as all the Max Payne games, and a number of other Rockstar games.  Pretty sure they know the market.

And so they won't release to PC market because it's "smaller" than the console market, but they are going to release to the next gen console market which hasn't even been established yet?  And you think they will release a PS4/X1 version before a PC version?  Just about every other major release of GTA has released to PC in under a year (~8 months).  So you think they are going to release the same game to a small subset of the same audience, 6 months after the initial release?  All before releasing to PC, even though they had a job posting months ago for someone to help bring latest titles to PC.  Think it over.

Avatar image for Sollet
Sollet

8288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#69 Sollet
Member since 2003 • 8288 Posts
If true, consolites am owned. Not that I care though, not much of a GTA fan.
Avatar image for Netret0120
Netret0120

3594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 Netret0120
Member since 2013 • 3594 Posts
The way some hermits talk about graphics makes me really wonder if they are really stuck up snobs. How can you say the console version of gta5 is "unplayableo_O I can't imagine their reaction to playing a ps1 game again.
Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

The way some hermits talk about graphics makes me really wonder if they are really stuck up snobs. How can you say the console version of gta5 is "unplayableo_O I can't imagine their reaction to playing a ps1 game again.Netret0120

 

Stage 1: Denial.

Stage 2: Anger. <<========== You.

Stage 3: Bargaining.

Stage 4: Depression.

Stage 5: Acceptance.

Keep working on it, you'll get through this!

Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

wonder how big the game will be

DarthRamms

10+gb mostly

No sh*t. Max Payne 3 was 30gb on PC, I think GTA V will be at least that.

(It's not really an issue)

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

Console gamers are enjoying GTA V while hermits can only watch the game on youtube :lol:

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Console gamers are enjoying GTA V while hermits can only watch the game on youtube :lol:

NathanDrakeSwag

or just play it on consoles

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7971 Posts
GTA V looks great on my PS3... Its probably one of the best looking games on it, but the framerate is poor and it's pretty low res. I would gladly pay for the game again for PC just so I can play it with better textures with more AA at 2560x1080 with a stable framerate... I look forward to cyclying around the city with that game played the way its meant to be played.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d7fb49ded561
deactivated-5d7fb49ded561

4019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 deactivated-5d7fb49ded561
Member since 2010 • 4019 Posts

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

Console gamers are enjoying GTA V while hermits can only watch the game on youtube :lol:

lostrib

or just play it on consoles


Hermits hiding behind consoles confirmed

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

Eat that, consolites!

MonsieurX
Eat what? Rumors :|

Not only that, by the time it comes out on PC (like GTAIV) consolites have already moved on to something else. We have already beat the game and played it to death. So while PC gamers are circle jerking over the new improvements console gamers are just like "lol....ok....."
Avatar image for megaspiderweb09
megaspiderweb09

3686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 megaspiderweb09
Member since 2009 • 3686 Posts

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

[QUOTE="soulitane"] But you have yet to provide any relevant data, you say the install base is small, yet you say that they'd bring it to next gen consoles first, which will have a much smaller install base than PCs capable of running GTAV currently. So what data do you have to back up your statement, or are you pulling this all from no where?lostrib

I am not one to run around posting Meta-data or LOL VGchartz of some sort, which is why i said anyone who follow the trend. NPD group has released several reports over the past five years, the PC market is not as large as the console market, even a baby gamer knows this. While PC market has grown given the attractiveness of the digital market which allows devs to break even, its still not as big as the console market. So asking Rockstar to invest into a market they are unsure of isnt exactly as easy as a bunch of indie guys putting their games on Steam. There is a corporate ladder that needs convincing that this would be a worth while investment hence why i also said they would put it on next gen even before PC, which isnt me saying it is going to next gen, but that Rockstar would rather do than first before considering PC

there are so many things wrong here. For starters, release to a market they're unsure of?  Every other major GTA installment has been on PC, as well as all the Max Payne games, and a number of other Rockstar games.  Pretty sure they know the market.

And so they won't release to PC market because it's "smaller" than the console market, but they are going to release to the next gen console market which hasn't even been established yet?  And you think they will release a PS4/X1 version before a PC version?  Just about every other major release of GTA has released to PC in under a year (~8 months).  So you think they are going to release the same game to a small subset of the same audience, 6 months after the initial release?  All before releasing to PC, even though they had a job posting months ago for someone to help bring latest titles to PC.  Think it over.

Ok, maybe i exagerated the situation right, but do you think that the suits up at Take Two would would agree to spend money into bringing the game to PC and can you say with confidence that they would recoup their money back?. Again, im not going by whatever meta-number seem to be famous around here, i am going by the trend cause your theory is that they would release the PC version in 8months time right, can you give with confidence valid point as to why the suits up at Take Two would be convinced that investing in the PC version would yield [Console install base at 200million+, duno what install base numbers for PC is]. I mean we all are smart people on the forums but sometimes our educated guess does not actually translate into the reality of what is  going on, i mean we heard the same thing for RDR for a while right, the game never made it to PC and then you cannot deny that a lota dudes in Brazil or something would put it up on Torrent or something. 

Avatar image for KillzoneSnake
KillzoneSnake

2761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#79 KillzoneSnake
Member since 2012 • 2761 Posts

Eat that, consolites!

BluRayHiDef

Eat what? PS4 version running at 1080/60. Should be out next year. Not sure if you ever get it on PC though xD

Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#80 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

I'll double dip

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#81 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

I bought GTA V for the 360 and while the game is very fun and looks decent considering the hardware it's running on, I know the PC version is going to be the complete GTA V experience.  M/KB support fo shooting and an Xbox One controller for driving will be heaven.  Throw in the 1080p resolution (2560x1440 for me) and the 60+FPS and you are going to get an amazing experience.  

AM-Gamer

If you have to switch controllers based off what you are doing that doesnt sound like a very good expereince.  Who the  F wants to play GTA with a KB+M

 

Me, the precision of a mouse in a 3D game that has freelook is second to none. Controller is better for 2d games, racing games and beatemups. Mouse/kb is better for everything else.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

I am not one to run around posting Meta-data or LOL VGchartz of some sort, which is why i said anyone who follow the trend. NPD group has released several reports over the past five years, the PC market is not as large as the console market, even a baby gamer knows this. While PC market has grown given the attractiveness of the digital market which allows devs to break even, its still not as big as the console market. So asking Rockstar to invest into a market they are unsure of isnt exactly as easy as a bunch of indie guys putting their games on Steam. There is a corporate ladder that needs convincing that this would be a worth while investment hence why i also said they would put it on next gen even before PC, which isnt me saying it is going to next gen, but that Rockstar would rather do than first before considering PC

megaspiderweb09

there are so many things wrong here. For starters, release to a market they're unsure of?  Every other major GTA installment has been on PC, as well as all the Max Payne games, and a number of other Rockstar games.  Pretty sure they know the market.

And so they won't release to PC market because it's "smaller" than the console market, but they are going to release to the next gen console market which hasn't even been established yet?  And you think they will release a PS4/X1 version before a PC version?  Just about every other major release of GTA has released to PC in under a year (~8 months).  So you think they are going to release the same game to a small subset of the same audience, 6 months after the initial release?  All before releasing to PC, even though they had a job posting months ago for someone to help bring latest titles to PC.  Think it over.

Ok, maybe i exagerated the situation right, but do you think that the suits up at Take Two would would agree to spend money into bringing the game to PC and can you say with confidence that they would recoup their money back?. Again, im not going by whatever meta-number seem to be famous around here, i am going by the trend cause your theory is that they would release the PC version in 8months time right, can you give with confidence valid point as to why the suits up at Take Two would be convinced that investing in the PC version would yield [Console install base at 200million+, duno what install base numbers for PC is]. I mean we all are smart people on the forums but sometimes our educated guess does not actually translate into the reality of what is  going on, i mean we heard the same thing for RDR for a while right, the game never made it to PC and then you cannot deny that a lota dudes in Brazil or something would put it up on Torrent or something. 

You've literally said nothing as to why it wouldn't, other than the suits up top may not let it happen, which is obvious. Other than that, you've given no solid reason for it to not occur. You bring up piracy, which is also quite rampant especially on the 360 in a lot of 3rd and 1st world countries, obviously there will be people pirating it. He bought up the fact that all GTA games have come to PC and even the fact that they've hired people to port games to PC. Where is your data or whatever argument you want to use to say it won't come to PC. At the moment, it seems you have quite the eloquent way of saying nothing.
Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6663 Posts
I hope this is true. DX11 support would be great, but what gets me most excited is the possibility of it being a 64bit game, that would be awesome.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52551 Posts
That's one of these threads done for the week.
Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

Will definitely rebuy the PC version when it's released.

First mod has to remove that godawful turbalance when piloting helicopters though. 

Avatar image for darksusperia
darksusperia

6945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 darksusperia
Member since 2004 • 6945 Posts

[QUOTE="DarthRamms"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

wonder how big the game will be

silversix_

 

10+gb mostly

max pain was what? 17-20? this is probably 30gb or maybe more

max payne 3 was ~28GB
Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

[QUOTE="silversix_"]

[QUOTE="DarthRamms"]

 

10+gb mostly

darksusperia

max pain was what? 17-20? this is probably 30gb or maybe more

max payne 3 was ~28GB

Well GTAV was what 16gb on consoles (on PSN it was atleast) so add in better textures and you're probably looking at 20gig ish. Think MP3 used alot of pre-recorded cutscenes.

Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

This is not a surprise. It´s more than expected as it´s a PC standard by now. They can not release a game that would look worse than, say, Sleeping Dogs or Max Payne 3.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

lol megaspiderweb, there's a reason he got banned from GAF. 

also they very clearly said no to doing a next gen port 

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#91 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

I think there will be a very similar looking version of GTAV for PC, PS4 and X1, next year. If it runs at 1080p and 60fps, i'll get the game again for PS4.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

I just want it to be more optimized than GTA 4.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Looks like this game was a PC port from the start.

Gaming-Planet
honestly, the way some devs are doing things lately, like DICE, I would not be surprised
Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

lol megaspiderweb, there's a reason he got banned from GAF. 

also they very clearly said no to doing a next gen port 

seanmcloughlin

Well, it is an impressive post, so much written, yet nothing meaningful said, just the usual "R* hates PC pirates, you didn't get RDR, you won't get GTA V", with a lot more words.

Conviniently, it also refuses to acknowledge the existence of LA Noire and Max Payne 3, two R* titles that came after RDR, yet are availible on the PC.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#95 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

I am not one to run around posting Meta-data or LOL VGchartz of some sort, which is why i said anyone who follow the trend. NPD group has released several reports over the past five years, the PC market is not as large as the console market, even a baby gamer knows this. While PC market has grown given the attractiveness of the digital market which allows devs to break even, its still not as big as the console market. So asking Rockstar to invest into a market they are unsure of isnt exactly as easy as a bunch of indie guys putting their games on Steam. There is a corporate ladder that needs convincing that this would be a worth while investment hence why i also said they would put it on next gen even before PC, which isnt me saying it is going to next gen, but that Rockstar would rather do than first before considering PC

megaspiderweb09

there are so many things wrong here. For starters, release to a market they're unsure of?  Every other major GTA installment has been on PC, as well as all the Max Payne games, and a number of other Rockstar games.  Pretty sure they know the market.

And so they won't release to PC market because it's "smaller" than the console market, but they are going to release to the next gen console market which hasn't even been established yet?  And you think they will release a PS4/X1 version before a PC version?  Just about every other major release of GTA has released to PC in under a year (~8 months).  So you think they are going to release the same game to a small subset of the same audience, 6 months after the initial release?  All before releasing to PC, even though they had a job posting months ago for someone to help bring latest titles to PC.  Think it over.

Ok, maybe i exagerated the situation right, but do you think that the suits up at Take Two would would agree to spend money into bringing the game to PC and can you say with confidence that they would recoup their money back?. Again, im not going by whatever meta-number seem to be famous around here, i am going by the trend cause your theory is that they would release the PC version in 8months time right, can you give with confidence valid point as to why the suits up at Take Two would be convinced that investing in the PC version would yield [Console install base at 200million+, duno what install base numbers for PC is]. I mean we all are smart people on the forums but sometimes our educated guess does not actually translate into the reality of what is  going on, i mean we heard the same thing for RDR for a while right, the game never made it to PC and then you cannot deny that a lota dudes in Brazil or something would put it up on Torrent or something. 

Once again, they have released every other major GTA installment on PC, what is going to change with this one? Or the trends: like the trends of increasing profit of PC gaming? or the ever increasing user base of Steam alone?

And the "suits" at Take Two? you mean the company that owns 2K games who have released every Borderlands games on PC.  And also owns firaxis which releases Civilization, a PC exclusive.  

And if install base is the issue,  why would they pick next gen over PC right now? It doesn't have an established install base. not to mention rockstar saying they don't have an interest in next gen for GTA at this time.

 

Almost nothing you have said is correct, let alone would point to GTAV not being released on PC.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="megaspiderweb09"]

I am not one to run around posting Meta-data or LOL VGchartz of some sort, which is why i said anyone who follow the trend. NPD group has released several reports over the past five years, the PC market is not as large as the console market, even a baby gamer knows this. While PC market has grown given the attractiveness of the digital market which allows devs to break even, its still not as big as the console market. So asking Rockstar to invest into a market they are unsure of isnt exactly as easy as a bunch of indie guys putting their games on Steam. There is a corporate ladder that needs convincing that this would be a worth while investment hence why i also said they would put it on next gen even before PC, which isnt me saying it is going to next gen, but that Rockstar would rather do than first before considering PC

megaspiderweb09

there are so many things wrong here. For starters, release to a market they're unsure of?  Every other major GTA installment has been on PC, as well as all the Max Payne games, and a number of other Rockstar games.  Pretty sure they know the market.

And so they won't release to PC market because it's "smaller" than the console market, but they are going to release to the next gen console market which hasn't even been established yet?  And you think they will release a PS4/X1 version before a PC version?  Just about every other major release of GTA has released to PC in under a year (~8 months).  So you think they are going to release the same game to a small subset of the same audience, 6 months after the initial release?  All before releasing to PC, even though they had a job posting months ago for someone to help bring latest titles to PC.  Think it over.

Ok, maybe i exagerated the situation right, but do you think that the suits up at Take Two would would agree to spend money into bringing the game to PC and can you say with confidence that they would recoup their money back?. Again, im not going by whatever meta-number seem to be famous around here, i am going by the trend cause your theory is that they would release the PC version in 8months time right, can you give with confidence valid point as to why the suits up at Take Two would be convinced that investing in the PC version would yield [Console install base at 200million+, duno what install base numbers for PC is]. I mean we all are smart people on the forums but sometimes our educated guess does not actually translate into the reality of what is  going on, i mean we heard the same thing for RDR for a while right, the game never made it to PC and then you cannot deny that a lota dudes in Brazil or something would put it up on Torrent or something. 

Wait, wait, wait.... You saying that a next gen port is on the cards when the install base for next gen is a big fat ZERO and yet you are questioning putting GTA 5 on PC? Man you dumb.