I just love the story pacing in VC city before. I loved the part where you killed the main drug lord in his own "Scarface" type mansion and you became the new druglord, awesome awesome game
the story and atmosphere of san andreas was garbage. the whole dialogue was lets go kill some f***ing ballaz. and the county hills you drive through are so boring, the whole game just got annoying. and all the new aspects were poorly implemented SIMS knockoffs.
vice city with its scarface, and goodfellas influence was great and the characters were much better.
3 baby. vice city and san andreas were just better with the extra options and stuff. personaly i like the gta 3 storyline more. not that the gta storline is great(personally its not gtas selling point). and second as a New Yorker with a New AYorker bias (i might want the NYC version of the game) so yep i liked 3 more. Vice City was really good to. personally i thought san andreas was overrated. it really didnt stick out like GTA3 and GTAVC. for me atleast it didnt.
Umm well yeah actually all three (from GTA 3 to Vice City to SA) are awesome. Personally I would go with SA because excpect of the "story" its like GTA 3 and VC but with muuuuuch muuuch more stuff to do.
Is it just me or does Vice City seem smaller than Liberty City......? Anyways San Andreas was the best one IMO, San Andeas story was more in-depth and there was more things to do and see.
Log in to comment