Guerrilla: Killzone 2 ready to take on Call of Duty 4

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]lol at the people jealous of kilzone 2.. don't worry. gears 2 will be great.dhjohns

lol at TC who takes every critique of KZ2 as if his very manhood was being challenged. Some I agree are just pure haters, but anyone with a valid complaint is immediately attacked. :roll:

yeah, so far it looks like an immersive shooter with great animations and great lighting, but it's also very unoriginal so far and there are big questions about variety... but we'll have to wait.. at the very least it will be a good looking immersive shooter...

i'm okay with that

[QUOTE="dhjohns"]

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]lol at the people jealous of kilzone 2.. don't worry. gears 2 will be great.Always-Honest

lol at TC who takes every critique of KZ2 as if his very manhood was being challenged. Some I agree are just pure haters, but anyone with a valid complaint is immediately attacked. :roll:

yeah, so far it looks like an immersive shooter with great animations and great lighting, but it's also very unoriginal so far and there are big questions about variety... but we'll have to wait.. at the very least it will be a good looking immersive shooter...

i'm okay with that

Me too. Every game doesn't have to be teh best. I love shooters and this will be a day one purchase for me. I expect a good game, just nothing groundbreaking. If I am wrong, all the better!

Killzone 2 developer Guerrilla Games has stated with confidence that it believes the highly anticipated First Person Shooter has lived up to the expectations of eager fans since the game debuted in trailer form at E3 2005.

"The level of anticipation for the 2005 trailer meant that people expected the biggest thing ever to materialize, and what we've shown so far, at last year's E3 and today means that we're living up to the expectation," commented Steven Ter Heide, Killzone 2's senior producer.

Graphically, Killzone 2 has surpassed anything delivered on a console yet, with lifelike animations, facial expressions, and spectacular lighting and smoke effects. This combined with gameplay mechanics such as the "lean and peek" system, Killzone 2 looks set to deliver more than just a rudimentary FPS experience.

The firm also acknowledges the comparisons observed between Infinity Ward's highly successful Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and virtually every new FPS on the market, though remains confident the studio can step up a gear when Killzone 2 hits shelves in February 2009.

"I'm not going to sit here and talk about the competition," said Guerrilla Games' Hermen Hulst. "COD is a game that virtually everybody in the office has played through and completed. We know where our game stands, and we're up for it, definitely."

With over eight months left for development, Guerilla Games has plenty of time to ensure the title lives up to expectations when it releases exclusively for the PS3 early next year.

Stay tuned to PSU.com for more information as Sony reveals more on the title later this year.

Forensic-Klown

there u see, killzone 2 DOES NOT HAVE A CHANCE AGAINST CRYSIS

[QUOTE="horrowhip"]You want to know what the people who played it had to say about it?

It felt like an amalgamation of things that have been done.

The FP cover system adds little because it is hardly any different from the typical FPS tactic of standing behind cover and then popping out to shoot then going behind cover... they are just locking you onto that cover.

The Buddy System is ripped straight from Army of Two and it just feels like them tacking it on.

The environments are filled with the old cliched Red Exploding Barrels.

Everything is really scripted and predetermined.

It does NOTHING to set itself apart. NOTHING.

All it really has going for it is tech related stuff with lighting, graphics, and animation all looking great. Now, that doesn't prevent it from being a great game but don't try to say it is doing anything to set itself apart. And unless they come up with a good story or have some way better action sequences than what was shown in the gameplay so far, this game won't end up AAA. Either that or they will need to have a fantastic MP.

Forensic-Klown

So, who cares if it works and its fun, because the idea was ripped off it, so it must suck? LMFAO! come on, EDGE arn't credible with there previews, there laughable.

look at gears of War, heavily ripped of RE4 and killswitches cover, but did it work? YES! its fun YES!

impressions and previews (most) claim its an incredible experience and a overall great game. COD4 was great gameplay wise, so why not use it and add to it?

What game now days, adds its own or sets itself apart, without using others ideas?

Its all about the fun factor, and if it works, it'll be good.

Killzone's unique animations, destructable enviroments and overall effects..will play a big part in the gameplay.

YOU HAVEN'T PLAYED IT, WE have barley seen much of it. Reserve your judgement and wait and see.

notice what I bolded....

I am not saying it is going to suck but it needs something to set itself apart.

Gears set itself apart with the feel of the gameplay. It was tactical yet also very deliberate and arcadey.

And FYI, I am going by Garnett Lee's preview in addition to various other comments on various podcasts. This is LOTS of people feeling this way.

I am not saying it is going to suck, just that according to most of the press that played it, it felt a bit stale and old. It felt a bit "been there, done that." There was nothing that stood out. And you can't be a AAA game unless you have something that stands out from the crowd a bit. Gears had its action and pacing. It felt like no other game out on the market when it came out. It probably shouldn't have been a 9.6 but it was AAA. CoD4 had the multiplayer and "action movie" pacing of the SP. Crysis had the open levels, nanosuit and customizability. Halo 3 had Forge and Saved Films, in addition to the quality SP and MP experiences.

All those games had something to hold above the rest. Killzone 2 doesn't appear to have that. It falls into a RFOM catagory of, "yeah it is fun and yes it is good but it does nothing to stand above the crowd. It does nothing to make me think, yes this is a AAA game."

Do you understand what I am saying or will you just be a fanboy and not read my comments?

it'll barely be able to take on hazevicmackey39

Haze is cool, But I think KZ2 will be better.

[QUOTE="vicmackey39"]it'll barely be able to take on hazepatriots7672

Haze is cool, But I think KZ2 will be better.

If not, SW will be quite an amusing place.

[QUOTE="Forensic-Klown"][QUOTE="horrowhip"]You want to know what the people who played it had to say about it?

It felt like an amalgamation of things that have been done.

The FP cover system adds little because it is hardly any different from the typical FPS tactic of standing behind cover and then popping out to shoot then going behind cover... they are just locking you onto that cover.

The Buddy System is ripped straight from Army of Two and it just feels like them tacking it on.

The environments are filled with the old cliched Red Exploding Barrels.

Everything is really scripted and predetermined.

It does NOTHING to set itself apart. NOTHING.

All it really has going for it is tech related stuff with lighting, graphics, and animation all looking great. Now, that doesn't prevent it from being a great game but don't try to say it is doing anything to set itself apart. And unless they come up with a good story or have some way better action sequences than what was shown in the gameplay so far, this game won't end up AAA. Either that or they will need to have a fantastic MP.

horrowhip

So, who cares if it works and its fun, because the idea was ripped off it, so it must suck? LMFAO! come on, EDGE arn't credible with there previews, there laughable.

look at gears of War, heavily ripped of RE4 and killswitches cover, but did it work? YES! its fun YES!

impressions and previews (most) claim its an incredible experience and a overall great game. COD4 was great gameplay wise, so why not use it and add to it?

What game now days, adds its own or sets itself apart, without using others ideas?

Its all about the fun factor, and if it works, it'll be good.

Killzone's unique animations, destructable enviroments and overall effects..will play a big part in the gameplay.

YOU HAVEN'T PLAYED IT, WE have barley seen much of it. Reserve your judgement and wait and see.

notice what I bolded....

I am not saying it is going to suck but it needs something to set itself apart.

Gears set itself apart with the feel of the gameplay. It was tactical yet also very deliberate and arcadey.

And FYI, I am going by Garnett Lee's preview in addition to various other comments on various podcasts. This is LOTS of people feeling this way.

I am not saying it is going to suck, just that according to most of the press that played it, it felt a bit stale and old. It felt a bit "been there, done that." There was nothing that stood out. And you can't be a AAA game unless you have something that stands out from the crowd a bit. Gears had its action and pacing. It felt like no other game out on the market when it came out. It probably shouldn't have been a 9.6 but it was AAA. CoD4 had the multiplayer and "action movie" pacing of the SP. Crysis had the open levels, nanosuit and customizability. Halo 3 had Forge and Saved Films, in addition to the quality SP and MP experiences.

All those games had something to hold above the rest. Killzone 2 doesn't appear to have that. It falls into a RFOM catagory of, "yeah it is fun and yes it is good but it does nothing to stand above the crowd. It does nothing to make me think, yes this is a AAA game."

Do you understand what I am saying or will you just be a fanboy and not read my comments?

Halo 3 did tho? Come on.

I understand and respect your opinion, but your first reply was just plain silly..but you've better explained it, fair enough.

but its a wait and see approach. we haven't seen enough, to start comparing it to tittles already out.

The game is far from finished, we'll see what GG cooks up.

:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.Gh0st_Of_0nyx

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

Halo 3 did tho? Come on.

I understand and respect your opinion, but your first reply was just plain silly..but you've better explained it, fair enough.

but its a wait and see approach. we haven't seen enough, to start comparing it to tittles already out.

The game is far from finished, we'll see what GG cooks up.

Forensic-Klown

I already explained Halo 3. IMO it was an 8.5 game but it did set itself apart a little. It had Forge and Saved Films which set it apart a little.

And I only make comments based on what I have seen. Going JUST by the stuff they have shown. 8.5 max. Sorry but it isn't anything out of the ordinary aside from the graphics. It will fall into the same catagory that RFOM did of "What makes you a AAA game and not merely a AA game? Nothing? Well, you are a AA game then." Both are good games but not AAA games. And AA is still "Great" just not "Amazing." To be "Amazing" you need set yourself apart in some way.

If something else comes out that does stand apart then it may very well end up AAA but until then, I am going to say AA. And I think cows should do that same...

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.Always-Honest

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

oh, so rather than allowing the player to do it himself, they lock on to the cover?

People have been doing "FP Cover" for a decade in FPS games...

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

[QUOTE="vicmackey39"]it'll barely be able to take on hazeDivergeUnify

new crystal ball?

what could i possibly say? its not like i have the game so i cant really agree or disagree with them. In the absence of any evidence, i find its better to just wait till there is more information in stead of making unfounded assumptions. And yes, his assumptions are unfounded, since every preview of the game so far has been positive, thus the logical conclusion would be that this game will fair better than Haze.

I'd hope so. Almost a year and a half after CoD4 came out, it would be a major disappointment if it doesn't, since CoD6 should be about ready by KZ2's launch.SpruceCaboose

Seriously, though, you hit the nail on the head. i was saying that after the last KZ2 delay. They are really setting themselves up to have no grey. Either it has to be banging all around or a complete flop.

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.Always-Honest

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.horrowhip

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

oh, so rather than allowing the player to do it himself, they lock on to the cover?

People have been doing "FP Cover" for a decade in FPS games...

since when can one blind fire in first person view? Killzone 2 is the first to adopt a first person view cover system.

NO game b4 killzone 2 has the player in first person mode, lock onto cover..FACT!

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.Gh0st_Of_0nyx

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

buddy system, being able to lift one another in first person to higher areas?

a cover system all done in the first person perspective?

rotataing valves via the Sixaxis.

Plz sit down.

Guerilla already had it chance to make a good first impression, but they did not. It's already to late to change minds. Killzone 2 will just be another first person shooter and it will borrow things from COD4 to make their game noticable. It will just be your average first person shooter. So how about footage on that multiplayer aye? Oh yeah, we still have 2009 for that.

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.Forensic-Klown

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

buddy system, being able to lift one another in first person to higher areas?

a cover system all done in the first person perspective?

rotataing valves via the Sixaxis.

Plz sit down.

that sounds like a rip off of what they did in army of two

a first person cover system ?Please thats a ridiculous feature that really isnt needed in a FPS.

Rotating valves via sixaxis :lol: Reaching at straws are we ?

All those "features" that set it apart from anything are laughble and wont do anything to reinvent anything.

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.Gh0st_Of_0nyx

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

listen, i know Killzone 2 has almost nothing original as far as we know, but surely you know that most fps games have NO cover system.. and none have a FIrst person cover system. or don't you know what a cover sytem is?. think rainbow six vegas.. but now you remain in first person instead of going in to third person like in R6:vegas.

it's okay to be criticall, but keep it real.

Killzone 2 definitely has potential to compete with COD4

Here come the Hermits to tell everyone that PC is, and always will be, the god of FPSs, and that Killzone 2 can't compare to Half-Life 2 or Counter Strike: Source.

This isn't going to get AAA. I don't think it will. I'm really not impressed with it so far.

people are under the impression guerrilla are bad devs? even though there last game (killzone liberation) got a 8.5 here I think it was? and a 9 at ign and that was before they put online into it and a extra chapter so basically there last killone game was AAA qaulity

people are under the impression guerrilla are bad devs? even though there last game (killzone liberation) got a 8.5 here I think it was? and a 9 at ign and that was before they put online into it and a extra chapter so basically there last killone game was AAA qaulity

bigLLL

Standards are lower with handhelds, and standards become higher when its on consoles, Killzone 1 didn't meet that standard.

Well, considering Guerilla has been on the rise in terms of game quality (they went from bad to mediocre to average to good) I'm pretty sure they can beat IW.

Not that beating IW is as much of an achievement as.. say, Valve (SP/MP), DiCE (MP) or GSC Game World (SP). Beating any one of those FPS devs in their categories is certainly going to be very damn hard.

aliblabla2007

[QUOTE="Forensic-Klown"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.Gh0st_Of_0nyx

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

buddy system, being able to lift one another in first person to higher areas?

a cover system all done in the first person perspective?

rotataing valves via the Sixaxis.

Plz sit down.

that sounds like a rip off of what they did in army of two

a first person cover system ?Please thats a ridiculous feature that really isnt needed in a FPS.

Rotating valves via sixaxis :lol: Reaching at straws are we ?

All those "features" that set it apart from anything are laughble and wont do anything to reinvent anything.

I cant name one thing that sets it apart from any other shooter Ive played or seen.

I answered that, simple..don't get all scratchy with me young man.

i didn't say they were going to be good or even work well..geezus.

people are under the impression guerrilla are bad devs? even though there last game (killzone liberation) got a 8.5 here I think it was? and a 9 at ign and that was before they put online into it and a extra chapter so basically there last killone game was AAA qaulity

bigLLL

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.Always-Honest

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

listen, i know Killzone 2 has almost nothing original as far as we know, but surely you know that most fps games have NO cover system.. and none have a FIrst person cover system. or don't you know what a cover sytem is?. think rainbow six vegas.. but now you remain in first person instead of going in to third person like in R6:vegas.

it's okay to be criticall, but keep it real.

they did it great in RB6 vegas I really dont see why they just couldnt emulate the system. I dont see a point in a First person cover system other FPS have done fine without one. (halo 3, Cod4, CS ect ect)

Why question my knowlede of a cover system ?

they did it great in RB6 vegas I really dont see why they just couldnt emulate the system. I dont see a point in a First person cover system other FPS have done fine without one. (halo 3, Cod4, CS ect ect)

Gh0st_Of_0nyx

that's not the point here. it's different from other FPS games. THAt was the point. it's very tiresome when you think you are having a discussion and it turns out you were just talking with a fanboy that just wants to bash things.

just say "killzone 2 sucks, cause it sucks.."and don't act like you're in for a normal discussion, cause you're obviously either not capable or you just want to bash.

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]

Why question my knowlede of a cover system ?

they did it great in RB6 vegas I really dont see why they just couldnt emulate the system. I dont see a point in a First person cover system other FPS have done fine without one. (halo 3, Cod4, CS ect ect)

Always-Honest

that's not the point here. it's different from other FPS games. THAt was the point. it's very tiresome when you think you are having a discussion and it turns out you were just talking with a fanboy that just wants to bash things.

just say "killzone 2 sucks, cause it sucks.."and don't act like you're in for a normal discussion, cause you're obviously either not capable or you just want to bash.

[QUOTE="horrowhip"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.Forensic-Klown

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

oh, so rather than allowing the player to do it himself, they lock on to the cover?

People have been doing "FP Cover" for a decade in FPS games...

since when can one blind fire in first person view? Killzone 2 is the first to adopt a first person view cover system.

NO game b4 killzone 2 has the player in first person mode, lock onto cover..FACT!

woopy-do.....

That is a pointless feature.

I have been doing First Person Cover forever in FPS's. The only difference is that I am not locking onto the cover. I just look around the corner of a wall, pop out and shoot. Blind fire is pointless in first person because you will end up missing most of the time and waste ammo... How is it EVER going to be practical to blind fire in first person? Never.

And what I saw of the cover system... It looked like EXACTLY what I do, only now instead of being free to get off the cover immediately, now I am locked onto the cover and need to unlock myself. Blind fire my ***, you are still looking forward and can see over the top of the cover. You SHOULD be exposed but it appears that you weren't... The cover system looks like them trying to come up with something to hype when in reality, it is the same thing people have been doing in FPS's for a decade, only now you actually lock onto the cover...

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]

Why question my knowlede of a cover system ?

they did it great in RB6 vegas I really dont see why they just couldnt emulate the system. I dont see a point in a First person cover system other FPS have done fine without one. (halo 3, Cod4, CS ect ect)

HuusAsking

that's not the point here. it's different from other FPS games. THAt was the point. it's very tiresome when you think you are having a discussion and it turns out you were just talking with a fanboy that just wants to bash things.

just say "killzone 2 sucks, cause it sucks.."and don't act like you're in for a normal discussion, cause you're obviously either not capable or you just want to bash.

no. i don't mind any critisism, cause i'm criticall to. he asked for something different, i answered.

is it different, YES... is it better, we don't know yet.

oh, and the difference of a cover system: a cover system is more immersive imo. more real

no. i don't mind any critisism, cause i'm criticall to. he asked for something different, i answered.

is it different, YES... is it better, we don't know yet.

Always-Honest

but from what I have seen, it isn't different.

It is just them putting a name on something that has been done for a decade and making people lock onto the cover. It isn't special, it is just hype.

And if people want to believe their BS hype about it being "new" fine but in the end, people will realize that it is the no different from how they would normally play an FPS that isn't a complete run and gun shooter.

[QUOTE="Forensic-Klown"][QUOTE="horrowhip"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]:lol: lean and peak isnt new at all so its nt setting killzone 2 apart from anything.horrowhip

no, but a first person cover lean and peak is i think..

oh, so rather than allowing the player to do it himself, they lock on to the cover?

People have been doing "FP Cover" for a decade in FPS games...

since when can one blind fire in first person view? Killzone 2 is the first to adopt a first person view cover system.

NO game b4 killzone 2 has the player in first person mode, lock onto cover..FACT!

woopy-do.....

That is a pointless feature.

I have been doing First Person Cover forever in FPS's. The only difference is that I am not locking onto the cover. I just look around the corner of a wall, pop out and shoot. Blind fire is pointless in first person because you will end up missing most of the time and waste ammo... How is it EVER going to be practical to blind fire in first person? Never.

And what I saw of the cover system... It looked like EXACTLY what I do, only now instead of being free to get off the cover immediately, now I am locked onto the cover and need to unlock myself. Blind fire my ***, you are still looking forward and can see over the top of the cover. You SHOULD be exposed but it appears that you weren't... The cover system looks like them trying to come up with something to hype when in reality, it is the same thing people have been doing in FPS's for a decade, only now you actually lock onto the cover...

okay, you don't want a cover system, you like run and gun. fair enough.. no cover system games for you.

well...what else do you expect from Guerilla? To say their game WON'T stack up to the current standard?Dreams-Visions

That's a good point. Killzone 2 will definately be a Halo killer, that's if they compare Killzone 2 to Halo 1, that's the only way.

well...what else do you expect from Guerilla? To say their game WON'T stack up to the current standard?Dreams-Visions

okay, you don't want a cover system, you like run and gun. fair enough.. no cover system games for you.

Always-Honest

okay, you don't want a cover system, you like run and gun. fair enough.. no cover system games for you.Always-Honest

No... I like games that are more tactical.

But this "cover system" is no different from how I play FPS's normally.

I stand behind cover, and then I peak out, shoot and then go behind cover again. They are just making it more rigid and stiff than what I NATURALLY do. I wouldn't blindfire because that wastes ammo. But locking me onto the cover makes it so I can't be a free to move as I wish.

Understand? This is the same thing people ALWAYS do, they just decided to put a name on it and call it a feature.

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]no. i don't mind any critisism, cause i'm criticall to. he asked for something different, i answered.

is it different, YES... is it better, we don't know yet.

horrowhip

but from what I have seen, it isn't different.

It is just them putting a name on something that has been done for a decade and making people lock onto the cover. It isn't special, it is just hype.

And if people want to believe their BS hype about it being "new" fine but in the end, people will realize that it is the no different from how they would normally play an FPS that isn't a complete run and gun shooter.

what isn't different?... the cover system is like in rainbow 6 vegas, you lean against something (find cover) and you peak to shoot or you shoot with blind fire. in the other games you stand behind a wall and keep walking to shoot..

there is a difference.. surely you played either gears or rainbow six vegas..?

and i'm not HYPING it to be new.. it IS new.. that's all... and i THINK it makes the gameplay more immersive.

what isn't different?... the cover system is like in rainbow 6 vegas, you lean against something (find cover) and you peak to shoot or you shoot with blind fire. in the other games you stand behind a wall and keep walking to shoot..

there is a difference.. surely you played either gears or rainbow six vegas..?

Always-Honest

you have no ****ing clue what I am trying to say so I won't even argue with you.

[QUOTE="cosmostein77"]

Guerrilla has little creditability with me,

Killzone was suppose to be ready to take on Halo last generation,

Forensic-Klown

Said the media, back then...how do you expect killzone with PS2 hardware to battle Halo 2, with Xbox's superior hardware?

its was more media BS.

Its kind of late for Killzone damage control.

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]well...what else do you expect from Guerilla? To say their game WON'T stack up to the current standard?ReverseCycology

That's a good point. Killzone 2 will definately be a Halo killer, that's if they compare Killzone 2 to Halo 1, that's the only way.

No! It won't be Halo Killer or COD4 killer... or any other FPS killer. When the time comes, KillZone2 will set apart from all other FPS... making all other FPS games in a position to be called KillZone 2 killer.

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]what isn't different?... the cover system is like in rainbow 6 vegas, you lean against something (find cover) and you peak to shoot or you shoot with blind fire. in the other games you stand behind a wall and keep walking to shoot..

there is a difference.. surely you played either gears or rainbow six vegas..?

horrowhip

you have no ****ing clue what I am trying to say so I won't even argue with you.

don't worry, you can still run from left to right like you always did. have fun with that.

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]well...what else do you expect from Guerilla? To say their game WON'T stack up to the current standard?Eltroz

We'll see what happens soon enough, I guess.

[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]well...what else do you expect from Guerilla? To say their game WON'T stack up to the current standard?aka_aj03

That's a good point. Killzone 2 will definately be a Halo killer, that's if they compare Killzone 2 to Halo 1, that's the only way.

No! It won't be Halo Killer or COD4 killer... or any other FPS killer. When the time comes, KillZone2 will set apart from all other FPS... making all other FPS games in a position to be called KillZone 2 killer.

[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]well...what else do you expect from Guerilla? To say their game WON'T stack up to the current standard?aka_aj03

That's a good point. Killzone 2 will definately be a Halo killer, that's if they compare Killzone 2 to Halo 1, that's the only way.

No! It won't be Halo Killer or COD4 killer... or any other FPS killer. When the time comes, KillZone2 will set apart from all other FPS... making all other FPS games in a position to be called KillZone 2 killer.

So are you hyping it AAAA?