Guerrilla: 'We can get more out of the PS3 in future projects'

Let's see if they can pull it off.Lto_thaG

They should have asked them how much it cost to develop for the PS3, especially with KZ2 :lol:

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]Let's see if they can pull it off.krp008

They should have asked them how much it cost to develop for the PS3, especially with KZ2 :lol:

see thats the problem it either costs alot or take alot of time to make, which im sure GG ouldnt be willing to fully dsclose or w/e reasons (which btw future games wouldnt cost nearly as much time or money since now they have a ton of assests that can be used in future games)

Developers really shouldn't feed the supercomputer hype, it just adds fuel to the fanboys everyone has to put up with.

PS3 has gone on about it's superiority for years, it very rarely demonstrates it. It goes with John Carmack's criticism of the console, given an unlimited development time you can utilize some of that theoretical performance, but in most cases PS3 is just twice as much effort for the same results as 360.

Why would any 3rd party want to develop exclusively for PS3? They are really better off elsewhere.

since i wont be playing kz2 right off the bat since my roomate PS3 is busted i am anxious to see if it gets the proper boost from sony to be the ps gears or halo and be a 5 million+ seller

after resistance 2 i kind of doubt it but we'll see

since i wont be playing kz2 right off the bat since my roomate PS3 is busted i am anxious to see if it gets the proper boost from sony to be the ps gears or halo and be a 5 million+ seller

after resistance 2 i kind of doubt it but we'll see

johnnyblazed88

Maybe it might sell more because its a 1st party game, sony should shell out a lot of money to market it

Developers really shouldn't feed the supercomputer hype, it just adds fuel to the fanboys everyone has to put up with.

PS3 has gone on about it's superiority for years, it very rarely demonstrates it. It goes with John Carmack's criticism of the console, given an unlimited development time you can utilize some of that theoretical performance, but in most cases PS3 is just twice as much effort for the same results as 360.

Why would any 3rd party want to develop exclusively for PS3? They are really better off elsewhere.

AnnoyedDragon

Nice to see someone who actually knows this stuff, happens so rarely. We hear almost every developer who churns out hyped games always dishing out the "we still haven't utilized all its power yet" lines to the point, for me personally, it no longer really means anything. If the industry has this scenario where each platform wil garner them the same amount of money regardless of popularity, everyone would develop for the PC.