Halo 3 had 4 player online coop and forge. KZ2 doesnt.

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="Lewisite"]

Its still not 100%.

Will probably be more considered depending on how big of a desire there is for the option.

Anyways if your curious as to what hes talking about...

http://tinyurl.com/9ze3w4

Giancar

No it is very real:P

. you're my favorite poster here and this is coming from a proud PS3 fan. Keep up the good work!theSADmafioso

link?lawlessx

Its still not 100%.

Will probably be more considered depending on how big of a desire there is for the option.

Anyways if your curious as to what hes talking about...

http://tinyurl.com/9ze3w4

TC is probably SSCyborg in disguise :P

on topic though, a game doesn't need co-op to be good. CS1.6 and CSS have no co-op and are literally the worldstwo most popular/played shooters

and isn't KZ2 getting co-op in a patch?

Am I the only one that knows that Co Op will be patched in soon after release ???Nonstop-Madness

I dont really care if it doesn't have co-op. I like playing on my 46' XBR be myself online. you can see a lot more.

GG is probably going to patch it after launch anyways.

[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]Am I the only one that knows that Co Op will be patched in soon after release ???PapaJohn24

[QUOTE="PapaJohn24"][QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]Am I the only one that knows that Co Op will be patched in soon after release ???Panther501

lets just hope the review suffers casue the retail copy wont have it right away.

If Hlo 3 can do it day 1 in 2007.....then a 2009 fps not having it shoudl hurt it.

[QUOTE="Panther501"][QUOTE="PapaJohn24"] No, but you're the only one to believe it. Marketing my friend, they'll do anything to get you to buy it. And if it flops like the first one, the developers won't even bother.Cole-Protocal

lets just hope the review suffers casue the retail copy wont have it right away.

If Hlo 3 can do it day 1 in 2007.....then a 2009 fps not having it shoudl hurt it.

[QUOTE="Panther501"][QUOTE="PapaJohn24"] No, but you're the only one to believe it. Marketing my friend, they'll do anything to get you to buy it. And if it flops like the first one, the developers won't even bother.Cole-Protocal

lets just hope the review suffers casue the retail copy wont have it right away.

If Hlo 3 can do it day 1 in 2007.....then a 2009 fps not having it shoudl hurt it.

All that matters to you is that every Sony exclusive fails horribly right?:lol:

This guy is way to much.

[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

[QUOTE="Panther501"] they comfired a patch, not a marketing scheme. FAILURE!!! c1o2d3y

lets just hope the review suffers casue the retail copy wont have it right away.

If Hlo 3 can do it day 1 in 2007.....then a 2009 fps not having it shoudl hurt it.

ok ok, i admit it. but it wont be there day 1.....which I pray will hurt the review.

[QUOTE="Panther501"][QUOTE="PapaJohn24"] No, but you're the only one to believe it. Marketing my friend, they'll do anything to get you to buy it. And if it flops like the first one, the developers won't even bother.Cole-Protocal

lets just hope the review suffers casue the retail copy wont have it right away.

If Hlo 3 can do it day 1 in 2007.....then a 2009 fps not having it shoudl hurt it.

Well, there is a biased statement, like a announcement to how you want this game to flop, probably the PS3 as well. Guess I am not surprised though. As long as the game is out I don't want anymore delays for it.

If it takes a month later to get co-op that's fine with me cause I will be busy playing the campaign and online to be to worried about whether coop is in there yet or not.

Can't wait for vehicle's in online though, the Mech looks a heck of a lot more fun then any vehicle on other games.

so .cod4 didnt and was a better experience than halo 3silverammo

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Gamespot

Halo 3 > COPD4 on LIVE top ten.

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Metacritic.

sorry, ur opinion is a minority.

[QUOTE="silverammo"]so .cod4 didnt and was a better experience than halo 3Cole-Protocal

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Gamespot

Halo 3 > COPD4 on LIVE top ten.

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Metacritic.

sorry, ur opinion is a minority.

I think COD4 got shooter of the year here at gamespot didnt it.

[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

[QUOTE="silverammo"]so .cod4 didnt and was a better experience than halo 3tmntPunchout

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Gamespot

Halo 3 > COPD4 on LIVE top ten.

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Metacritic.

sorry, ur opinion is a minority.

I think COD4 got shooter of the year here at gamestop didnt it.

[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

[QUOTE="silverammo"]so .cod4 didnt and was a better experience than halo 3tmntPunchout

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Gamespot

Halo 3 > COPD4 on LIVE top ten.

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Metacritic.

sorry, ur opinion is a minority.

I think COD4 got shooter of the year here at gamespot didnt it.

[QUOTE="tmntPunchout"][QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Gamespot

Halo 3 > COPD4 on LIVE top ten.

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Metacritic.

sorry, ur opinion is a minority.

Cole-Protocal

I think COD4 got shooter of the year here at gamestop didnt it.

my points supercede it....especially the one about being #1 on LIVE TODAY. COD4 is currently behind COD WAW.

[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"][QUOTE="tmntPunchout"]

I think COD4 got shooter of the year here at gamestop didnt it.

Cole-Protocal

my points supercede it....especially the one about being #1 on LIVE TODAY. COD4 is currently behind COD WAW.

You act like I care, I actually own all 3 of the formentioned games. I was just saying you're wrong about that.

[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"][QUOTE="tmntPunchout"]

I think COD4 got shooter of the year here at gamestop didnt it.

Cole-Protocal

my points supercede it....especially the one about being #1 on LIVE TODAY. COD4 is currently behind COD WAW.

You know, maybe GG decided to idk...make the single-player campaign just that. Something extremely good and balanced that was created and paced and designed for one-player.ultima-flare

[QUOTE="c1o2d3y"][QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

lets just hope the review suffers casue the retail copy wont have it right away.

If Hlo 3 can do it day 1 in 2007.....then a 2009 fps not having it shoudl hurt it.

Cole-Protocal

ok ok, i admit it. but it wont be there day 1.....which I pray will hurt the review.

1. Forge is absolute TRASH. anyone who has ever played a pc game can tell you that. 2. video playback isn't anything special. it's nice to have, but doesn't really add that much to the game... it's not really a big factor. 3. online co-op is not a problem... devs just don't do it with most games because it doesn't logistically work. none of these points are game-breaking. mistervengeance

Forge has spawned tons of game variants like Zombie vs soldiers, Griffball, and altered maps as the player sees fit.

Video playback saves your best games and keeps them. it also spawned extremely funny machinima on youtube. Check Digital Ph33r on youtube.

And co=op always helps. It adds to the social aspect of the games appeal and is a factor....albiet a small one.

[QUOTE="tmntPunchout"][QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Gamespot

Halo 3 > COPD4 on LIVE top ten.

Halo 3 > COD 4 on Metacritic.

sorry, ur opinion is a minority.

Ps2stony

I think COD4 got shooter of the year here at gamespot didnt it.

Forge allowed for nearly endless replay value in all multiplayer maps.

The video playback feature allowed for some ridiculously fun machinima. Check Digital Ph33r and Rooster Teeth on youtube.

Most importantly....Halo 3, a september 07 game, pulled off 4 player online coop. Modern fps of today have online coop, its an accepted feature. If KZ2 doesnt have this....what makes you think itll get a 9.5 or a 10?

The lack of online coop will hurt this game, making it possibly a 8.5 - 9.0. There is no excuse for no online coop.

[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] :lol: That link was awesome.Lewisite

No it is very real:P

I see what you did there :lol: That link is epic

Who cares?

Stop with these threads already.

8.5 is very good... But anyways Co-op is not necessary, it's just a feature. To be honest the only co-op I played (liked) was on Resistance 2, and that didn't really have anything to do with the story.TheOddQuantum

...there was a better story in the co-op then there was in the main campaign. didn't you read the intel?

Forge allowed for nearly endless replay value in all multiplayer maps.

The video playback feature allowed for some ridiculously fun machinima. Check Digital Ph33r and Rooster Teeth on youtube.

Most importantly....Halo 3, a september 07 game, pulled off 4 player online coop. Modern fps of today have online coop, its an accepted feature. If KZ2 doesnt have this....what makes you think itll get a 9.5 or a 10?

The lack of online coop will hurt this game, making it possibly a 8.5 - 9.0. There is no excuse for no online coop.

Cole-Protocal

you alwayes try to show that 360 and its games are better than ps3 and its games and you alwayes fail

can't you understand that killzone looks better than halo?

[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

Forge allowed for nearly endless replay value in all multiplayer maps.

The video playback feature allowed for some ridiculously fun machinima. Check Digital Ph33r and Rooster Teeth on youtube.

Most importantly....Halo 3, a september 07 game, pulled off 4 player online coop. Modern fps of today have online coop, its an accepted feature. If KZ2 doesnt have this....what makes you think itll get a 9.5 or a 10?

The lack of online coop will hurt this game, making it possibly a 8.5 - 9.0. There is no excuse for no online coop.

sasapac

you alwayes try to show that 360 and its games are better than ps3 and its games and you alwayes fail

can't you understand that killzone looks better than halo?

Bioshock: No multiplayer 9.0

Double Fail

ur argument is fail

Killzone 2 doesnt half half the inovation that bioshock had.

And that was 2007......this is 2009........expectations have changed since then.

[QUOTE="TheOddQuantum"]8.5 is very good... But anyways Co-op is not necessary, it's just a feature. To be honest the only co-op I played (liked) was on Resistance 2, and that didn't really have anything to do with the story.enygma500

...there was a better story in the co-op then there was in the main campaign. didn't you read the intel?

[QUOTE="sasapac"][QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

Forge allowed for nearly endless replay value in all multiplayer maps.

The video playback feature allowed for some ridiculously fun machinima. Check Digital Ph33r and Rooster Teeth on youtube.

Most importantly....Halo 3, a september 07 game, pulled off 4 player online coop. Modern fps of today have online coop, its an accepted feature. If KZ2 doesnt have this....what makes you think itll get a 9.5 or a 10?

The lack of online coop will hurt this game, making it possibly a 8.5 - 9.0. There is no excuse for no online coop.

OhSnapitz

you alwayes try to show that 360 and its games are better than ps3 and its games and you alwayes fail

can't you understand that killzone looks better than halo?

i can't say that killzone 2 is better than halo because killzone 2 hasn't come yet but i have seen a lot of killzone 2 video and i have to say that killzone 2 looks better to me (at graphics and at gameplay). is a game need co-op to be success? (don't forget that cryces and biosock haven't got co-op)

[QUOTE="TheOddQuantum"]8.5 is very good... But anyways Co-op is not necessary, it's just a feature. To be honest the only co-op I played (liked) was on Resistance 2, and that didn't really have anything to do with the story.enygma500

...there was a better story in the co-op then there was in the main campaign. didn't you read the intel?