Halo 3 or Killzone 2..which looks better?

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="Toriko42"][QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="Zassimick"][QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="angelkimne"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]

angelkimne

um, halo has no AA at ALL.- case closed:)

what is your point? Halo has NOTHING!!!!!

what is your point? Halo has NOTHING!!!!!

killzowned24

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

what is your point? Halo has NOTHING!!!!!

angelkimne

Or at least it can be void of jaggies. For not having AA like you (killzowned) say, the game still does look beautiful.

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

what is your point? Halo has NOTHING!!!!!

angelkimne

It can but its very hard. halo just doesnt have jaggies but some of the worst seen this gen so its very hard to look at anything and say it looks great.

The question is what LOOKS BETTER not what's graphically better and Halo 3 wins hands down. :|

Greyzone is just..dull looking.

Eyezonmii

See the difference.

[QUOTE="angelkimne"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]

what is your point? Halo has NOTHING!!!!!

killzowned24

It can but its very hard. halo just doesnt have jaggies but some of the worst seen this gen so its very hard to look at anything and say it looks great.

OMG is it just me or is this guy the worst fanboy this site has ever seen. its obviouse that kill zone 2 looks better. U have never siad anythin good about 360. everything 360 exclusive is **** to u. Halo 3 Graphics are awsum some places are bad but most of the time they are outstanding.

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="angelkimne"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]

what is your point? Halo has NOTHING!!!!!

loomlumloom

It can but its very hard. halo just doesnt have jaggies but some of the worst seen this gen so its very hard to look at anything and say it looks great.

OMG is it just me or is this guy the worst fanboy this site has ever seen. its obviouse that kill zone 2 looks better. U have never siad anythin good about 360. everything 360 exclusive is **** to u. Halo 3 Graphics are awsum some places are bad but most of the time they are outstanding.

He is so much of a fanboy I question if he is really a fakeboy, no one is biased that much, and if he is a real cow and truly belives the bs he posts, I feel sorry for him.

[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"]

again, another doesn't listen, the 2007/2009 excuse doesn't work. the 360 was out in 05, it's been in devs hand for almost the same ammount of time, the k2 trailer wasn't even real and the 360 hardware is much more friendlier to work with, giving bungie an upper hand and the fact that the GPU is somewhat more advance.

it equals out. with minor differences. that shows with Halo 3 having what looks to be superior textures, etc. Halo 3 looks great.

opex07

Devs can and do start working on there games before they have a Dev Kit. Just because the PS3 didn't launch when it was originally intended to doesnt mean all game development stopped as well. It Also doesn't matter how hard or friendly the hardware is both guerrilla and bungie have access to the programmers and members who helped create the hardware.

Im not arguing if one is better than the other. but your reasoning on why its fair to compare them doesn't hold much weight, especiialy since we are all aware that Killzone 2 has been in development far longer than 2 years.

but so has Halo 3. What you said apply's to Halo 3 aswell, in 05, there was NO killzone 2, just a cgi trailer, nothing had started. Halo 3 started right after the 2nd one. how long is that? lol

Killzone 2 looks better imo.

As for which is the better game, lets wait and see.

angelkimne

[QUOTE="Zassimick"][QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="angelkimne"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]

Here is a real halo3 pic from gamersyde with no tricks like replay.

killzowned24

anyone who has played knows halo3 is a jaggie mess.

If there are jaggies, there are no where as many as that screenshot has. Not even on my SDTV does it look near that bad.

Don't cry now, because Halo 3 is compared to Killzone 2.

actually it is. the moment you start playing you can see how bad it is, I lol when I try for the 1st time.

People really need to get a 1080p set....you wouldn't be saying Halo 3 looks bad.

On my Sony x-series, the game barely has noticable jaggies and looks very detailed.

KZ2 obviously. Halo3 was never an impressive looking game to begin with.mr_mozilla

Yes, it was graphically impressive.

Two Options:

•1) You have not played Halo 3.

•2) You have played Halo but lie because you're a fanboy.

People really need to get a 1080p set....you wouldn't be saying Halo 3 looks bad.

On my Sony x-series, the game barely has noticable jaggies and looks very detailed.

Eyezonmii

It's also technically impressive. Very detailed textures and good physics and the frame-rate never drops even with extreme action going on.

[QUOTE="woobabooba"]halo 3 models look crap...but overall environmental texture detail >>>killzone2 JangoWuzHere

since when?

and overall I like halo 3's graphics better as their very colorful and look nice:)

I agree that Halo3 models doesnt look great! But imo everything else in the game looks fantastic....some of the best textures this gen.

thats a shame that Halo3s graphics have so bad reputation by the fanboys´!

[QUOTE="mr_mozilla"]KZ2 obviously. Halo3 was never an impressive looking game to begin with.WhenTheTwoFace

Yes, it was graphically impressive.

Two Options:

•1) You have not played Halo 3.

•2) You have played Halo but lie because you're a fanboy.

I agree that Halo3 models doesnt look great! But imo everything else in the game looks fantastic....some of the best textures this gen.

thats a shame that Halo3s graphics have so bad reputation by the fanboys´!

PAL360

In singleplayer its a mixed bag... there can be some shocking textures and woeful player models (of course there is the AA issue), however in multiplayer the visuals are very consistent, textures, player models ect. - and quite good at that.

I think that overall Killzone is a better looking game.

Halo 3 has some amazing lighting and a vast color pallet, though. Almost all of the textures in Halo 3 are awesome, too. You can really zoom up on everything in the saved films and it still looks great.

[QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"]

[QUOTE="mr_mozilla"]KZ2 obviously. Halo3 was never an impressive looking game to begin with.mr_mozilla

Yes, it was graphically impressive.

Two Options:

•1) You have not played Halo 3.

•2) You have played Halo but lie because you're a fanboy.

you never played the game and you came here to say halo3 is not an impressive looking game!!!

thats the bad reputation i was talking about

The absolute insult of even mentioning Blurzone 2 in the same sentence with the Great one :)

On topic, Halo 3

Killzone definatly looks better in terms of graphics detail and realism, but Halo has alot more colour.Better game? just have to wait and see.

The absolute insult of even mentioning Blurzone 2 in the same sentence with the Great one :)

On topic, Halo 3

SecretPolice

you know, real life blurs, right?

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

The absolute insult of even mentioning Blurzone 2 in the same sentence with the Great one :)

On topic, Halo 3

Eyezonmii

you know, real life blurs, right?

Don't take it all too seriously as I'm just teasing a little about the blur.

you never played the game and you came here to say halo3 is not an impressive looking game!!!

thats the bad reputation i was talking about

PAL360

And saying you can't judge graphics if you haven't played a game is a fanboy myth, of course you can, as long as you don't make the mistake of comparing a memory of a game you played to a screenshot of another game. Screenshot vs screenshot and hd gameplay video vs hd gameplay video are valid comparisons. Unless there's some epic "Halo-effect" that only reveals itself when you're actually holding the controller, which I doubt.

why must we compare to killzone 2 all the time crysis,gears,resistance2,gears2,and halo

just stop we all know killzone 2 looks better.

All this topic proves is the PS3 isn't the powerhouse cows like to think it is, comparing an 2007(360) game to a 2009(ps3) game

on DAY ONE xbox proved it had better tech than ps2, now 2 years latter cows are still trying to prove ps3 is the powerhouse they say it is

All this topic proves is the PS3 isn't the powerhouse cows like to think it is, comparing an 2007(360) game to a 2009(ps3) game

on DAY ONE xbox proved it had better tech than ps2, now 2 years latter cows are still trying to prove ps3 is the powerhouse they say it is

onewiththegame

the ps3 holds the graphics king where have you been a lemming made this thread.

All this topic proves is the PS3 isn't the powerhouse cows like to think it is, comparing an 2007(360) game to a 2009(ps3) game

on DAY ONE xbox proved it had better tech than ps2, now 2 years latter cows are still trying to prove ps3 is the powerhouse they say it is

onewiththegame

by....one game? Sorry, but certain games on ps2 did look better then some on Xbox(GT5, Shadow Of Collosus, MGS3, Zone OF Enders),but that doesnt prove ps2 is more powerful now does it? Your argument is complete invalid cuz certain games like Burnout and DMC4 look better on Ps3 than 360. You cant compare eachothers power of console until its been completely taken to its limits, and neither console has been taken to its limit as of yet.

[QUOTE="onewiththegame"]

All this topic proves is the PS3 isn't the powerhouse cows like to think it is, comparing an 2007(360) game to a 2009(ps3) game

on DAY ONE xbox proved it had better tech than ps2, now 2 years latter cows are still trying to prove ps3 is the powerhouse they say it is

RazMaTaz-1

by....one game? Sorry, but certain games on ps2 did look better then some on Xbox(GT5, Shadow Of Collosus, MGS3, Zone OF Enders),but that doesnt prove ps2 is more powerful now does it? Your argument is complete invalid cuz certain games like Burnout and DMC4 look better on Ps3 than 360. You cant compare eachothers power of console until its been completely taken to its limits, and neither console has been taken to its limit as of yet.

they look better than some xbox game like ports, but compare any ps2 game to NGB, Doom3, Halo2

its was clear on day one the xbox was the powerhouse of that gen,

1.) The gun models (design and textures) looks so much better in KZ2.

2.) The environment textures in Halo 3 look better.

3.) Character models look better in KZ2

4.) Lighting looks better in KZ2 (H3 is still great)

5.) Animations and physics are better in KZ2

6.) KZ2 has more outstanding post processing effects and blur

1.) The gun models (design and textures) looks so much better in KZ2.

2.) The environment textures in Halo 3 look better.

3.) Character models look better in KZ2

4.) Lighting looks better in KZ2 (H3 is still great)

5.) Animations and physics are better in KZ2

6.) KZ2 has more outstanding post processing effects and blur

TREAL_Since

I agree with all of this. But even though the some environment textures in H3 are better (as in higher-res), the design and art in KZ2 environmets surpass it.

Halo 3 was NEVER.. i mean NEVER an impressive looking game. Everything from the textures to lighting in this game is just GOOD. Killzone 2 on the other hand is pushing boundaries. So no, that wasn't even a logical question. AA was horrid though... i mean just bad, Character models also were not very good. Everything else was solid.Adrian_Cloud

Actually H3 is known for it's really hi-res textures. Everything else KZ2 demolishes.

All this topic proves is the PS3 isn't the powerhouse cows like to think it is, comparing an 2007(360) game to a 2009(ps3) game

on DAY ONE xbox proved it had better tech than ps2, now 2 years latter cows are still trying to prove ps3 is the powerhouse they say it is

onewiththegame

completely agree!! Halo1 is still one of the best looking games of last gen. PS2 have great games but not at that level...

and yes....every multiplat looked better on xbox1. this gen most multiplats still look better on the older system!!! odd

[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"]

1.) The gun models (design and textures) looks so much better in KZ2.

2.) The environment textures in Halo 3 look better.

3.) Character models look better in KZ2

4.) Lighting looks better in KZ2 (H3 is still great)

5.) Animations and physics are better in KZ2

6.) KZ2 has more outstanding post processing effects and blur

Episode_Eve

I agree with all of this. But even though the some environment textures in H3 are better (as in higher-res), the design and art in KZ2 environmets surpass it.

not at all....design and art is exactely where halo3 rules!!!