why is this even an arguement when a multiplat in cod4 is the best console shooter so far. that being said Cod4> killzone 2> resistance 2> halo 3 imo
bokiloki
halo 3 >> cod 4. so you're simply wrong.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
why is this even an arguement when a multiplat in cod4 is the best console shooter so far. that being said Cod4> killzone 2> resistance 2> halo 3 imo
bokiloki
halo 3 >> cod 4. so you're simply wrong.
How is it a rip off?Halo 3, killzone 2 is - sadly - anoter rip off of the success that is halo franchise......
HistoricalSD
[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]How is it a rip off?Halo 3, killzone 2 is - sadly - anoter rip off of the success that is halo franchise......
Animal-Mother
play the both games throguly. if you dont' see, i feel sorry for you. not all we were born to "understand" the game
How is it a rip off?[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]
Halo 3, killzone 2 is - sadly - anoter rip off of the success that is halo franchise......
HistoricalSD
play the both games throguly. if you dont' see, i feel sorry for you. not all we were born to "understand" the game
I played both. Explain.[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"][QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] How is it a rip off?Animal-Mother
play the both games throguly. if you dont' see, i feel sorry for you. not all we were born to "understand" the game
I played both. Explain.I don't understand it either.
Both have very different play styles, and very different story arcs. So what is similar?
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]
Halo 3, killzone 2 is - sadly - anoter rip off of the success that is halo franchise......
How is it a rip off?play the both games throguly. if you dont' see, i feel sorry for you. not all we were born to "understand" the game
i get it, you make a false claim, without even false information to support it, and then when asked to explain you try to avoid the explanation. lol, typical.[QUOTE="bokiloki"]
why is this even an arguement when a multiplat in cod4 is the best console shooter so far. that being said Cod4> killzone 2> resistance 2> halo 3 imo
HistoricalSD
halo 3 >> cod 4. so you're simply wrong.
nah, even in GS Cod4 got the FPS GOTY over Halo 3 IIRC[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"][QUOTE="bokiloki"]
why is this even an arguement when a multiplat in cod4 is the best console shooter so far. that being said Cod4> killzone 2> resistance 2> halo 3 imo
Giancar
halo 3 >> cod 4. so you're simply wrong.
nah, even in GS Cod4 got the FPS GOTY over Halo 3 IIRCdoesnt change what i said.
[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"][QUOTE="Giancar"] nah, even in GS Cod4 got the FPS GOTY over Halo 3 IIRCGiancar
doesnt change what i said.
yeah, IYOprobably in the over-1 million-unique-players a-day opninions, too. and the ones that made Halo 3 last weeks most played Live game, over 1 and half year after release, and the ones that made it most played in 2007 and 2008. but you never know 4 sure..
[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]How is it a rip off? I think he is one of those people who can't understand games, like that guy who bashed Killzone 2 in a video saying it was a rip off of Gears of War! :lol: From what I seen, it is a rip off of Call of Duty if anything. Here are my points supporting this factor: Halo's health system is based on a energy shield, nothing like Killzone 2's or COD4's health system. Call of Duty 4 starting using a class and ranking system, and Killzone 2 uses it as well.Halo 3, killzone 2 is - sadly - anoter rip off of the success that is halo franchise......
Animal-Mother
GS sscore:
Halo 3: 9.5
killzone 2: 9.0
winner: halo 3
Metacritic score:
Halo 3: 94
killzone 2: 91
winner: Halo 3
Gamerankings score:
Halo 3: 93.33
killzone 2: 90.40
winner: Halo 3
Pre-orders:
Halo 3: 4 million globally
killzone 2: 1.1 million in europe. N/A in US and Japan
winner: Halo 3
Sales:
Halo 3: 2.4 million+ in just the US alone in 24 hours. >8 million lifetime.
killzone 2: 1.5 million global sales in 2 months (9weeks actually).
winner: Halo 3
Marketing:
Halo 3: Monday Night Football commercial, Mountain Dew Halo edition soda, toys, xbox 360 controllers designed by Art McFarland, a real life Warthog developed by Weta Studio, comic books, novels, an upcoming movie, etc.
killzone 2: one slow motion commercial...
winner: Halo 3
overall: Halo 3
edit:
f'ing glitchspot doesn't like space between paragraphs. all is now color-coded.
edit 2:i fixed the GS score for halo 3 from 9.8 to 9.5, i made one small but still quite large error.
cowgriller
If this isn't pownage at it's best, I really don't now what is anymore
the biggest reason for me why i prefer halo is just that theres nothing else like halo
when i play killzone i feel like im playing call of duty and battlefield and counterstrike and yadayadayada the gameplay is the furthest thing from unique
no other shooter is like halo, and again (personal preference of course) like some above me have stated, halo is just more fun more smiles more WHOOAAA
its not just about, alright cover....headshot....cover.....headshot....in really dark droll environments with limited weaponry and nay-vehicles
plus halo has every game mode known to man - killzone to me was just a very standard shooter but with godly graphics
Halo is the premier console FPS. 9.5 > 9.0. Guerrilla put in a good effort, no doubt, but couldn't match Bungie.
Half-Life kills all, though.
I don't mean to argue because your usually spot on. But if 9.5>then 9.0 wouldnt that make half life worse than halo 3? because Half life 2 scored a 9.2Halo is the premier console FPS. 9.5 > 9.0. Guerrilla put in a good effort, no doubt, but couldn't match Bungie.
Half-Life kills all, though.
BioShockOwnz
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I don't mean to argue because your usually spot on. But if 9.5>then 9.0 wouldnt that make half life worse than halo 3? because Half life 2 scored a 9.2Halo is the premier console FPS. 9.5 > 9.0. Guerrilla put in a good effort, no doubt, but couldn't match Bungie.
Half-Life kills all, though.
Animal-Mother
Consoles have lower standards, so that's not really a fair comparison.
I don't mean to argue because your usually spot on. But if 9.5>then 9.0 wouldnt that make half life worse than halo 3? because Half life 2 scored a 9.2[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]
Halo is the premier console FPS. 9.5 > 9.0. Guerrilla put in a good effort, no doubt, but couldn't match Bungie.
Half-Life kills all, though.
BioShockOwnz
Consoles have lower standards, so that's not really a fair comparison.
Meh, I think it all compares up I agree with you that half life kills all dont get me wrong. But I dont think consoles has such low standards with games like halo and Call of duty. Games like crysis and Half-life are extremely well done. But besides controls and graphics there's not much else..[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] I don't mean to argue because your usually spot on. But if 9.5>then 9.0 wouldnt that make half life worse than halo 3? because Half life 2 scored a 9.2Animal-Mother
Consoles have lower standards, so that's not really a fair comparison.
Meh, I think it all compares up I agree with you that half life kills all dont get me wrong. But I dont think consoles has such low standards with games like halo and Call of duty. Games like crysis and Half-life are extremely well done. But besides controls and graphics there's not much else..So the only outstanding shooters on PC are Crysis and Half-Life? Yeah, no. PC is the platform if you love FPS's. There's really no debate. It has higher standards and always will. Consoles and PC are seperate.
I don't mean to argue because your usually spot on. But if 9.5>then 9.0 wouldnt that make half life worse than halo 3? because Half life 2 scored a 9.2[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]
Halo is the premier console FPS. 9.5 > 9.0. Guerrilla put in a good effort, no doubt, but couldn't match Bungie.
Half-Life kills all, though.
BioShockOwnz
Consoles have lower standards, so that's not really a fair comparison.
That's not true anymore. GameSpot is now a console website and consoles and PCs have the same standard now, bud.Meh, I think it all compares up I agree with you that half life kills all dont get me wrong. But I dont think consoles has such low standards with games like halo and Call of duty. Games like crysis and Half-life are extremely well done. But besides controls and graphics there's not much else..[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]
Consoles have lower standards, so that's not really a fair comparison.
BioShockOwnz
So the only outstanding shooters on PC are Crysis and Half-Life? Yeah, no. PC is the platform if you love FPS's. There's really no debate. It has higher standards and always will. Consoles and PC are seperate.
I never said they were the only outsanding one's.. Where Did I say that? I just bring htem up because their extremely popular, and i've played them. But My opinion stands, by your theory Halo is still greater than half-life regardless of standards.I really don't get all the votes for Half-Life, I mean really... 1. The story was interesting but not really that epic. 2. The guns were the generic standard. 3. Half-Life 2 > Half-Life 4. No multilayer of any kind Honestly, Half-Life wasn't even the best shooter back when it came out. Maybe it had the best single player than any game other 3D shooter out, but system wars only cares about multiplayer shooters (which is why sheep stay out of most arguments).Anyone not voting a half life needs their opinions checked because they are wrong.
shakmaster13
[QUOTE="shakmaster13"]I really don't get all the votes for Half-Life, I mean really... 1. The story was interesting but not really that epic. 2. The guns were the generic standard. 3. Half-Life 2 > Half-Life 4. No multilayer of any kind Honestly, Half-Life wasn't even the best shooter back when it came out. Maybe it had the best single player than any game other 3D shooter out, but system wars only cares about multiplayer shooters (which is why sheep stay out of most arguments). Doesn't half life come with like 3 multiplayers>Anyone not voting a half life needs their opinions checked because they are wrong.
Nerkcon
[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="shakmaster13"]I really don't get all the votes for Half-Life, I mean really... 1. The story was interesting but not really that epic. 2. The guns were the generic standard. 3. Half-Life 2 > Half-Life 4. No multilayer of any kind Honestly, Half-Life wasn't even the best shooter back when it came out. Maybe it had the best single player than any game other 3D shooter out, but system wars only cares about multiplayer shooters (which is why sheep stay out of most arguments). Doesn't half life come with like 3 multiplayers> What the heck are you tlaking about, you mean Counter-Strike? No... 1. Counter-Strike is a MOD 2. You have to buy it separately from Half-Life to get it. 3. With the remake of Half-Life 1(known as Half-Life: Source) they came a little deathmatch component, but Half-Life 2: Deathmatch was better so almost no one plays HL1: DM anymore. (I haven't played it in two years, it's actually quite fun to be honest, but nonetheless was not part of Half-Life.)Anyone not voting a half life needs their opinions checked because they are wrong.
Animal-Mother
Halo 3 doesn't take any skill, and it's more an an arcade shooter, played it and thought the graphics were from the first xbox era, KZ2 takes skill and looks much better
KZ2 all the way
Plus if Halo 3 was released at the same time as KZ2, it would've got an 8.0, the game ain't no 9.7, maybe for 2007 standreds, but not 2009
halo 3 takes a lot of halo 3 skill lol
if you dropped me into killzone2 first time and then dropped me into halo3 first time i'd do a lot better in KZ 2 because its such a familiar gamestyle
i sucked balls at halo first while i played it but i was like semi-pro at games like counterstrike or call of duty
Funny it was the opposite for me.halo 3 takes a lot of halo 3 skill lol
if you dropped me into killzone2 first time and then dropped me into halo3 first time i'd do a lot better in KZ 2 because its such a familiar gamestyle
i sucked balls at halo first while i played it but i was like semi-pro at games like counterstrike or call of duty
BobSacamento
my rationalle being that halo has a completely different style of gameplay
i dont know why it would be easier
enemies take like 20 shots to go down and they recharge lol
not like it autoaims for you
You people need to stop with this. If the original Mario was released today it wouldn't score that high either, but it's still a class ic. If you think KZ2 is better than halo 3, which I do, just state your reasons and stop trying to hide behind that argument.Halo 3 doesn't take any skill, and it's more an an arcade shooter, played it and thought the graphics were from the first xbox era, KZ2 takes skill and looks much better
KZ2 all the way
Plus if Halo 3 was released at the same time as KZ2, it would've got an 8.0, the game ain't no 9.7, maybe for 2007 standreds, but not 2009
p2250
which one gamers prefer: halo 3 >>>>>>>>>killzone 2
kidonre
i dont think all gamers prefer the game. i personally like kz2 better than halo.
[QUOTE="shakmaster13"]I really don't get all the votes for Half-Life, I mean really... 1. The story was interesting but not really that epic. 2. The guns were the generic standard. 3. Half-Life 2 > Half-Life 4. No multilayer of any kind Honestly, Half-Life wasn't even the best shooter back when it came out. Maybe it had the best single player than any game other 3D shooter out, but system wars only cares about multiplayer shooters (which is why sheep stay out of most arguments).Anyone not voting a half life needs their opinions checked because they are wrong.
Nerkcon
It's true that HL2>HL, but in longevity and gameplay, HL>KZ2 and Halo3
and CS was a free-mod, and is probably the best online multiplayer component and mod ever made to date.
amen
i just played half-life 2 through a few months ago and it totally blew my mind
i still think its got the best physics and it came out in friggin 2004
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment