So, recently there's been the discussion that Halo is simply a casual game designed for casual gamers.
There's also been claims that MW2 is a much more 'core' game.
But what does SW think?
Is Halo a casual game?
Is MW2 a casual game?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
So, recently there's been the discussion that Halo is simply a casual game designed for casual gamers.
There's also been claims that MW2 is a much more 'core' game.
But what does SW think?
Is Halo a casual game?
Is MW2 a casual game?
It was being discussed in the Halo Reach coming to PC thread, and I felt it was cluttering too much of the actual topic.who called MW2 a core game?
Silverbond
[QUOTE="Silverbond"]It was being discussed in the Halo Reach coming to PC thread, and I felt it was cluttering too much of the actual topic.who called MW2 a core game?
Ravensmash
Oh... must have missed it. *leaves to find thread*
You should be modded for lieing... Halo does not take more skill then MW2, it's takes different skill. MW2 is reflexes, precision, timing. Halo is accuracy and team work... You Halo fans are form another planet...no point in making thread responses, TC.
but Halo takes more skill by miles. most people choosing 2nd/3rd are probably trying to sabotage the poll. good luck to them.
HavocV3
The discussion was if Halo was Casual or not... SOmeone said MW2 was Casual but Halo wasn't... Your poll doesn't really reflect that discusion. And we already know every Halo Fanboy will vote in Halo's favor no matter what.. And by the looks of it SW is FULL of them... I fyou don't think Halo is casual friendly your simply wrong and a small internet minority.FriendlyGaimz
just like every anti-Halo person will vote the other two options, and there's probably more of those people.
casual friendly? I wouldn't say that, but it appeals to every crowd. and it does it 'right'
it's at least a step above that, because casuals will be punished by the game. more-so than MW2.
The discussion was if Halo was Casual or not... SOmeone said MW2 was Casual but Halo wasn't... Your poll doesn't really reflect that discusion. And we already know every Halo Fanboy will vote in Halo's favor no matter what.. And by the looks of it SW is FULL of them... I fyou don't think Halo is casual friendly your simply wrong and a small internet minority.FriendlyGaimzYou said that it's much easier to spot a pro in MW2 than Halo 3, so it's obviously related to the poll. Saying that would indicate that MW2 had a higher skill curve.
[QUOTE="FriendlyGaimz"]The discussion was if Halo was Casual or not... SOmeone said MW2 was Casual but Halo wasn't... Your poll doesn't really reflect that discusion. And we already know every Halo Fanboy will vote in Halo's favor no matter what.. And by the looks of it SW is FULL of them... I fyou don't think Halo is casual friendly your simply wrong and a small internet minority.HavocV3
just like every anti-Halo person will vote the other two options, and there's probably more of those people.
casual friendly? I wouldn't say that, but it appeals to every crowd. and it does it 'right'
it's at least a step above that, because casuals will be punished by the game. more-so than MW2.
I never said casual was bad. Halo fanboys assumed that and fought against the label even though it a widely accepted lable for the halo franchise. That's all there is to it. Defensive fans...[QUOTE="HavocV3"]You should be modded for lieing... Halo does not take more skill then MW2, it's takes different skill. MW2 is reflexes, precision, timing. Halo is accuracy and team work... You Halo fans are form another planet... Halo also relies on precision and timing.no point in making thread responses, TC.
but Halo takes more skill by miles. most people choosing 2nd/3rd are probably trying to sabotage the poll. good luck to them.
FriendlyGaimz
[QUOTE="FriendlyGaimz"]The discussion was if Halo was Casual or not... SOmeone said MW2 was Casual but Halo wasn't... Your poll doesn't really reflect that discusion. And we already know every Halo Fanboy will vote in Halo's favor no matter what.. And by the looks of it SW is FULL of them... I fyou don't think Halo is casual friendly your simply wrong and a small internet minority.RavensmashYou said that it's much easier to spot a pro in MW2 than Halo 3, so it's obviously related to the poll. Saying that would indicate that MW2 had a higher skill curve.Well you have to take into account MW2 is a game with a lot more kills, you cna't tell me "it's easier to get a kill in MW2 then in Halo so Halo is more skilled"... It doesn't work like that. A pro in MW2 does get 10 or 20 kills, they completly tear the other team a new one, they're able to spawn trap by themselves... It's very easy to spot a pro in MW2...
[QUOTE="HavocV3"][QUOTE="FriendlyGaimz"]The discussion was if Halo was Casual or not... SOmeone said MW2 was Casual but Halo wasn't... Your poll doesn't really reflect that discusion. And we already know every Halo Fanboy will vote in Halo's favor no matter what.. And by the looks of it SW is FULL of them... I fyou don't think Halo is casual friendly your simply wrong and a small internet minority.FriendlyGaimz
just like every anti-Halo person will vote the other two options, and there's probably more of those people.
casual friendly? I wouldn't say that, but it appeals to every crowd. and it does it 'right'
it's at least a step above that, because casuals will be punished by the game. more-so than MW2.
I never said casual was bad. Halo fanboys assumed that and fought against the label even though it a widely accepted lable for the halo franchise. That's all there is to it. Defensive fans... Define casual?[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="FriendlyGaimz"]The discussion was if Halo was Casual or not... SOmeone said MW2 was Casual but Halo wasn't... Your poll doesn't really reflect that discusion. And we already know every Halo Fanboy will vote in Halo's favor no matter what.. And by the looks of it SW is FULL of them... I fyou don't think Halo is casual friendly your simply wrong and a small internet minority.FriendlyGaimzYou said that it's much easier to spot a pro in MW2 than Halo 3, so it's obviously related to the poll. Saying that would indicate that MW2 had a higher skill curve.Well you have to take into account MW2 is a game with a lot more kills, you cna't tell me "it's easier to get a kill in MW2 then in Halo so Halo is more skilled"... It doesn't work like that. A pro in MW2 does get 10 or 20 kills, they completly tear the other team a new one, they're able to spawn trap by themselves... It's very easy to spot a pro in MW2... So why is the Halo series used by professional game tournaments, whilst (to my knowledge) MW2 isn't?
[QUOTE="HavocV3"]You should be modded for lieing... Halo does not take more skill then MW2, it's takes different skill. MW2 is reflexes, precision, timing. Halo is accuracy and team work... You Halo fans are form another planet...no point in making thread responses, TC.
but Halo takes more skill by miles. most people choosing 2nd/3rd are probably trying to sabotage the poll. good luck to them.
FriendlyGaimz
lol. how should I respond?
this is from personal experience, are you telling me I'm lying about my time spent playing both games? I'm not going to give you a biography on my experiences, but Halo was a more punishing game, and I'm nowhere close to having it mastered in any way, shape or form.
besides, I'm not saying it takes the most skill of any game(Shadowrun wins this, on consoles:D). it just takes A LOT more of everything compared to MW2;)
[QUOTE="FriendlyGaimz"][QUOTE="HavocV3"]just like every anti-Halo person will vote the other two options, and there's probably more of those people.casual friendly? I wouldn't say that, but it appeals to every crowd. and it does it 'right'it's at least a step above that, because casuals will be punished by the game. more-so than MW2.RavensmashI never said casual was bad. Halo fanboys assumed that and fought against the label even though it a widely accepted lable for the halo franchise. That's all there is to it. Defensive fans... Define casual? Easy to pick up and play, easy to play casually, art style and themed for all ages, auto aim, simple mechanics, simple rules straightforward gameplay that's easy to understand etc... Easy for newcommers to get into to, get the ropes of it all... If Halo isn't casual friendly neither is MW2. MW2 is a much more daunting experience, there is a lot more to "do" in that game, diferent guns, perks classes and setups... And noobs spend the whole game dead. But Imo MW2 is also casual, but les then Halo. So to claim MW2 is casual and Halo is not is delusional imo.
You should be modded for lieing... Halo does not take more skill then MW2, it's takes different skill. MW2 is reflexes, precision, timing. Halo is accuracy and team work... You Halo fans are form another planet...[QUOTE="FriendlyGaimz"][QUOTE="HavocV3"]
no point in making thread responses, TC.
but Halo takes more skill by miles. most people choosing 2nd/3rd are probably trying to sabotage the poll. good luck to them.
HavocV3
lol. how should I respond?
this is from personal experience, are you telling me I'm lying about my time spent playing both games? I'm not going to give you a biography on my experiences, but Halo was a more punishing game, and I'm nowhere close to having it mastered in any way, shape or form.
besides, I'm not saying it takes the most skill of any game. it just takes A LOT more of everything compared to MW2;)
Yes your lieing, I own both games... Your only fooling those that don't.[QUOTE="HavocV3"][QUOTE="FriendlyGaimz"] You should be modded for lieing... Halo does not take more skill then MW2, it's takes different skill. MW2 is reflexes, precision, timing. Halo is accuracy and team work... You Halo fans are form another planet...FriendlyGaimz
lol. how should I respond?
this is from personal experience, are you telling me I'm lying about my time spent playing both games? I'm not going to give you a biography on my experiences, but Halo was a more punishing game, and I'm nowhere close to having it mastered in any way, shape or form.
besides, I'm not saying it takes the most skill of any game. it just takes A LOT more of everything compared to MW2;)
Yes your lieing, I own both games... Your only fooling those that don't.I own both games as well.:|
I guess we're at a standstill.
Halo 3 is WAY better than Modern Warfare 2 in my opinion. Also it seems that all the 8 year olds have migrated from H3 to MW2, so its pretty safe to play now.
[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="FriendlyGaimz"] I never said casual was bad. Halo fanboys assumed that and fought against the label even though it a widely accepted lable for the halo franchise. That's all there is to it. Defensive fans...FriendlyGaimzDefine casual? Easy to pick up and play, easy to play casually, art style and themed for all ages, auto aim, simple mechanics, simple rules straightforward gameplay that's easy to understand etc... Easy for newcommers to get into to, get the ropes of it all... If Halo isn't casual friendly neither is MW2. MW2 is a much more daunting experience, there is a lot more to "do" in that game, diferent guns, perks classes and setups... And noobs spend the whole game dead. But Imo MW2 is also casual, but les then Halo. So to claim MW2 is casual and Halo is not is delusional imo.
connotations differ, and in the wondeful world of system wars, you never know what something might mean to another person.
I agree with your statement, but I stand by Halo taking more skill and it being a more punishing game, core vs. casual(the original topic, I'm not going to sift through the thread this is a response to). it doesn't cater to the casual crowd in ways that anyone can be good at it right off the bat.
that's what I can describe MW2 as....because I had no trouble mastering it and it was the first COD game I've ever owned/played. I'm stating my opinions based on my experiences, just not seeing how I'm a liar for doing so:?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment