http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-11-11-halo-5-guardians-multiplayer-beta-is-720p-60fps
Uh oh, Spaghettios
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-11-11-halo-5-guardians-multiplayer-beta-is-720p-60fps
Uh oh, Spaghettios
Great, the funnest FPS game will look better than all the there Halo's before it. Weren't they all 30 fps? 60 is great.
And? The game is over a year away from launch. It's clearly a beta test at this point. 720p at 60 fps. The key is to keep it at 60fps as that's what the game is going to be at when it launches. 1080p was probably not stable enough at 60 fps and they probably didn't want to bother trying to find some intermediate resolution that would be stable at 60 fps as it's just a beta.
They'll hit 1080p60 for the launch. They already set themselves to it. They'll mold the renderer around 1080p60 and will take a detail hit to hit that mark. For the early beta it doesn't matter.
I can't run Star Citizen at 1080p60 stable all of the time either even on my GTX 780. Is that's a problem of the consoles or the game as well? Hell no, it's still being developed.
I would only be concerned with Halo 5 if it was 2-3 months until launch and they weren't hitting their graphic marks.
Did anyone say it's a beta yet?
They will probably hit 900p like the rest of the game coming out. /maybe
They said they'll be at 1080p60 a long time ago. They'll hit that. 343 are damn good at graphics. Halo 4 was some how 720p30 despite being one of the best looking console games of last gen. If any dev on the Xbox front of things can do 1080p60, it's 343.
Did anyone say it's a beta yet?
They will probably hit 900p like the rest of the game coming out. /maybe
They said they'll be at 1080p60 a long time ago. They'll hit that. 343 are damn good at graphics. Halo 4 was some how 720p30 despite being one of the best looking console games of last gen. If any dev on the Xbox front of things can do 1080p60, it's 343.
I hear ya.. They definitely don't lack the resources. That's for sure.
They will push the limits... If anyone can.
Should be great to see where they end up next Nov. .
Its a shooter and as we all know FPS is king with regards to shooters. The 720p is irrelevant as others have already said....BETA.
This thread is a prime example of how damaging 1080 wars can be, pretty soon we will be funding and industry that cant even release BETA versions without fear of backlash. Play games people not resolution.
TitanFall devs said the same thing, but yeah they only got to 792p. Whoever expecting 1080/60 for final is in for a HUGE disappointment. Give XBone 50% more gpu power and some faster ram maybe it would hit 1080p.
Halo 4 in 720p at 30fps must have been a miracle in your eyes.
See this is not some pr "beta" (read demo) but an actual beta test prioritizing actually testing gameplay, net code and such. There is PLENTY of time for visual refinements and optimization. Most visual assets at this point are likely placeholders. Game is a long ways away from dropping; A LOT can get done in one year. If they truly wanted to show off gfx they would have done so much closer to completion.
Sucks, but i'm happy to see them put 60fps above all else. Final game will probably be 900p.
Meh, i'll take 60fps over resolution. Thankfully, has a pc gamer, i don't have to compromise
This thread is proof that the Cows have nothing to hang their hat on gaming wise. All we EVER hear from them is resolution this and resolution that! Don't be mad because the X1 has all of the best games and the PS4 has...??? Well....????
Sucks, but i'm happy to see them put 60fps above all else. Final game will probably be 900p.
Meh, i'll take 60fps over resolution. Thankfully, has a pc gamer, i don't have to compromise
you won't have to compromise cause it's not on PC LOL
I agree with Wasdie, Halo 4 might not of been the best halo game but 343 know how to push a system to its limits in the graphics departure.
Sucks, but i'm happy to see them put 60fps above all else. Final game will probably be 900p.
Meh, i'll take 60fps over resolution. Thankfully, has a pc gamer, i don't have to compromise
you won't have to compromise cause it's not on PC LOL
i meant for other games. In a general sense.
ut like i said, 720p, 900p, etc don't bother me if the game is a rock solid 60fps, even in campaign. Because, you know, consoles work via compromise.
lol Solid
It's a yearaway from launch, and it's a beta.
Seconded, jeeezzz people, get a grip.
So when the beta is on PS4 and has frames problems that is indicative how bad frames will be like on Evolve.? But when the beta is on xbox one and is 720p some how that isn't a sign of bad things.?
Not one of the Halo remakes is 60FPS lock some are not even 1080p,Halo 5 is suppose to look better because it build from ground up for xbox one,so if they chose great looking graphics what make any of you think that it will be 1080p 60FPS.?
Now i am not saying it will be 720p but man depending on what 343 is targeting you should not spec 1080p 60FPS.
You know when a game passes its Alpha stage and reaches Beta stage usually it means it has finished all its features, so whatever left is bug fixing and balancing. If you're expecting a massive resolution bump it's pretty much impossible since they have to reprogram the engine or cut down on other graphical effects, the former takes hellava long time and the latter makes the res bump redundant. I believe 900p is out of reach, the best you can hope for is 792p. Lots of console games hit beta a year before release or earlier but never got a 40% resolution bump in the end. Sorry to break it to you lemmings.
TitanFall devs said the same thing, but yeah they only got to 792p. Whoever expecting 1080/60 for final is in for a HUGE disappointment. Give XBone 50% more gpu power and some faster ram maybe it would hit 1080p.
Titanfall was made a a time when all the games were struggling around 720p. Also what will a 50% more powerful GPU and faster ram do? It'll still be shit hardware. While consoles struggle above 30fps, lets not pretend they're powerful.
@gpuking: @tormentos:
Over a year left before the game launches, Cmon mang... Keep the dream alive fellas, you can wish in one hand and poo in the other and tell me which hand fill up first. :P
TitanFall devs said the same thing, but yeah they only got to 792p. Whoever expecting 1080/60 for final is in for a HUGE disappointment. Give XBone 50% more gpu power and some faster ram maybe it would hit 1080p.
Titanfall was made a a time when all the games were struggling around 720p. Also what will a 50% more powerful GPU and faster ram do? It'll still be shit hardware. While consoles struggle above 30fps, lets not pretend they're powerful.
Few games on launch of the xbox one were 720p.
Ghost.
BF4 and Killer Instinct that i know off the res were 900p or higher.
So not even close to all games.
And you ask what 50% more power will do.? Allow for higher res or faster frames or both.
@gpuking: @tormentos:
Over a year left before the game launches, Cmon mang... Keep the dream alive fellas, you can wish in one hand and poo in the other and tell me which hand fill up first. :P
Dude i am not saying it will be 720p but lemming were saying the PS4 version of Evolve which is months away would carry frame problems because of a beta..
720p is to distant from 1080p even on this stage,i think the game will be at most 1360x1080p like Halo 2.
Did anyone say it's a beta yet?
They will probably hit 900p like the rest of the game coming out. /maybe
They said they'll be at 1080p60 a long time ago. They'll hit that. 343 are damn good at graphics. Halo 4 was some how 720p30 despite being one of the best looking console games of last gen. If any dev on the Xbox front of things can do 1080p60, it's 343.
I wouldn't rely so much on f faith there dude. I respect your love for this Dev team... but if they said it would hit 1080p60 over a year ago.... where is it?
They wouldn't have said that if they hadn't got it running at that rate/res (because it would be stupid if they did without knowing they could)
They mostly likely got it running in a test environment with crap lighting and very little AA. gonna look crap if its at 1080. expect 900p at best
@tormentos:
K but consider that MS/343 may also not want to show all it's cards this early. It's like the old but wise saying; promise only half the world but then deliver the whole world ya know, instead of promising the whole world then only deliver half...
man, there's a company near and dear to your heart that does the latter on an almost regular basis but the name escapes me atm. :P
graphics look good but seriously can anyone see a real difference between halo 5 beta and h2a? it looks a little better but not too much difference
TitanFall devs said the same thing, but yeah they only got to 792p. Whoever expecting 1080/60 for final is in for a HUGE disappointment. Give XBone 50% more gpu power and some faster ram maybe it would hit 1080p.
Titanfall was made a a time when all the games were struggling around 720p. Also what will a 50% more powerful GPU and faster ram do? It'll still be shit hardware. While consoles struggle above 30fps, lets not pretend they're powerful.
Few games on launch of the xbox one were 720p.
Ghost.
BF4 and Killer Instinct that i know off the res were 900p or higher.
So not even close to all games.
And you ask what 50% more power will do.? Allow for higher res or faster frames or both.
What you mean the games were lower than 720p?
Also KI was 720p, it just got bumped to 900p.
Right now, PS4 is getting higher res. Frame rate seems the same and still isn't doing great above 30fps.
Did anyone say it's a beta yet?
They will probably hit 900p like the rest of the game coming out. /maybe
They said they'll be at 1080p60 a long time ago. They'll hit that. 343 are damn good at graphics. Halo 4 was some how 720p30 despite being one of the best looking console games of last gen. If any dev on the Xbox front of things can do 1080p60, it's 343.
I wouldn't rely so much on f faith there dude. I respect your love for this Dev team... but if they said it would hit 1080p60 over a year ago.... where is it?
They wouldn't have said that if they hadn't got it running at that rate/res (because it would be stupid if they did without knowing they could)
They mostly likely got it running in a test environment with crap lighting and very little AA. gonna look crap if its at 1080. expect 900p at best
I don't think you realize how much optimization and whatnot happens in the last 6 months of development on a game. The game is still a year away. Entire graphic renderers are written in under that time.
There is no telling at all what kind of graphic quality the beta has nor is there any way to know how high they could push it until framerate starts dropping. They could be intentionally keeping the graphics back just so when the game does finally release, it looks/feels even better than the beta people will most likely play extensively.
So when the beta is on PS4 and has frames problems that is indicative how bad frames will be like on Evolve.? But when the beta is on xbox one and is 720p some how that isn't a sign of bad things.?
Not one of the Halo remakes is 60FPS lock some are not even 1080p,Halo 5 is suppose to look better because it build from ground up for xbox one,so if they chose great looking graphics what make any of you think that it will be 1080p 60FPS.?
Now i am not saying it will be 720p but man depending on what 343 is targeting you should not spec 1080p 60FPS.
Playing the victim role again El Tormented?
Why do you even care since you won't be playing any of the XOne games. Just concentrate on your PS4 games you won't be playing yet will be hyping up to kingdom come.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment