Cows would praise a Turd Bowl Mania as long as its 1080p.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Typical for the xbone at this point.
Yikes. Getting low again.
Yes, the resolution just keeps getting lower.
It's a beta.
You think the resolution will get upscaled?
I don't think so.
After betas you don't usually see any visual upgrades, you see performance (optimization) and balance upgrades.
XBone is a beta..
For people inevitably switching to the PS4 this gen.
What do you think the B in Bone stands for.
It's a beta.
So?
Beta is not final product, but typically it's extremely representative of the final product.
That being said, isn't this game still a year (or more) away? I'd give them slack because it's not just a beta, but a very early beta. 720p is not a good sign, but final product I"m sure will at least be 900p.
It's a beta.
You think the resolution will get upscaled?
I don't think so.
After betas you don't usually see any visual upgrades, you see performance (optimization) and balance upgrades.
Except Halo 5 isn't likely to come out till November next year.
Also Destiny had a beta on Xbox One and it was at 900p. The final release was 1080p.
You guys are right, it's beta. This means don't expect to much of a jump come full release if at all. Definitely not 1080p
It's a beta.
You think the resolution will get upscaled?
I don't think so.
After betas you don't usually see any visual upgrades, you see performance (optimization) and balance upgrades.
Except Halo 5 isn't likely to come out till November next year.
Also Destiny had a beta on Xbox One and it was at 900p. The final release was 1080p.
Think about it though, if they make it 1080p, they'll have to sacrifice the framerate. The framerate is 60 during the beta, the balance will be tailored towards that amount of responsiveness... I don't know how they could upgrade the resolution without significantly changing EVERYTHING. In which case: Why is this being called a beta this early, and not an alpha?
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-11-11-halo-5-guardians-multiplayer-beta-is-720p-60fps
Uh oh, Spaghettios
Uh-oh. Unoptimized beta with still 8-10 months to go. Devs already said this won't be the resolution of the game when its complete. lol!!
You know when a game passes its Alpha stage and reaches Beta stage usually it means it has finished all its features, so whatever left is bug fixing and balancing. If you're expecting a massive resolution bump it's pretty much impossible since they have to reprogram the engine or cut down on other graphical effects, the former takes hellava long time and the latter makes the res bump redundant. I believe 900p is out of reach, the best you can hope for is 792p. Lots of console games hit beta a year before release or earlier but never got a 40% resolution bump in the end. Sorry to break it to you lemmings.
What's sorry is your post, since you don't have a clue. They haven't even started optimizing the game yet. They still have at least 10 months to make changes and get the game up to 1080P. Go troll somewhere else.
It's a beta.
You think the resolution will get upscaled?
I don't think so.
After betas you don't usually see any visual upgrades, you see performance (optimization) and balance upgrades.
Except Halo 5 isn't likely to come out till November next year.
Also Destiny had a beta on Xbox One and it was at 900p. The final release was 1080p.
Think about it though, if they make it 1080p, they'll have to sacrifice the framerate. The framerate is 60 during the beta, the balance will be tailored towards that amount of responsiveness... I don't know how they could upgrade the resolution without significantly changing EVERYTHING. In which case: Why is this being called a beta this early, and not an alpha?
I think the beta looks sharp, but nothing about seems like a graphical power house. I think they can easily output 1080p 60 fps with the multiplayer.
Maybe the campaign will be different.
lmao @ creating a thread to bash a Beta.
Didnt think this through did you TC?
Been happening a lot round here lately, just check out Eddie vedders thread, people just getting random thoughts in there head and posting threads without thinking things through.
Some people just love ANY kind of attention.
So when the beta is on PS4 and has frames problems that is indicative how bad frames will be like on Evolve.? But when the beta is on xbox one and is 720p some how that isn't a sign of bad things.?
Not one of the Halo remakes is 60FPS lock some are not even 1080p,Halo 5 is suppose to look better because it build from ground up for xbox one,so if they chose great looking graphics what make any of you think that it will be 1080p 60FPS.?
Now i am not saying it will be 720p but man depending on what 343 is targeting you should not spec 1080p 60FPS.
'So when the beta is on PS4 and has frames problems that is indicative how bad frames will be like on Evolve.? But when the beta is on xbox one and is 720p some how that isn't a sign of bad things.?'
Most people say the same thing, that it's a Beta and not indicitive of the final product, an argument thats Valid then and is Valid now.
You use that argument so why is it wrong for other people to?
@Wasdie: Well use the scientific method for anything like that.
What is the Hypothosis? The game will be at 1080
What is the evidence? the game is at 720
Is it repeatable? yes at 720
Right now.. its looking like it will be 720. Can really argue against this
Don't mean to rain on your "Hypothsis" however, Hypothetically the game could run at 1080p, 720p or in between. I would suggest (scientific as your have done) the game will be 1080p 60fps based on this 1080p60. I realise that its not as proven theory(scientific) like your "hypothosis) but I feel it may have some credibility to it.
@tormentos: well 1st of all evolve comes out in a couple months, halo 5 at least a year. 2nd of all 343 only has to develop on 1 platform, not multiple like turtle rock. 3rd of all MCC wasnt developed by 343, it was outsourced to multiple developers, so judging 1080p 60fps from MCC is irrelevant, and lastly microsoft and 343 will have all the engineers available to push the game as far as it can.
@Wasdie: Well use the scientific method for anything like that.
What is the Hypothosis? The game will be at 1080
What is the evidence? the game is at 720
Is it repeatable? yes at 720
Right now.. its looking like it will be 720. Can really argue against this
Don't mean to rain on your "Hypothsis" however, Hypothetically the game could run at 1080p, 720p or in between. I would suggest (scientific as your have done) the game will be 1080p 60fps based on this 1080p60. I realise that its not as proven theory(scientific) like your "hypothosis) but I feel it may have some creU nfdibility to it.
Unfortunatly ... science works on hard facts not guesses or promises. so as of right now, scince is firmly on the 720 side. otherwise we could just say "god says it will be at 1080 so its the truth" ....... yeah, thats a good plan
I sure hope most here are just playing SW ( like I do all the time :P ) and don't seriously think Halo 5 will ship at 720P cuz yikes, 343 made Halo 4 on 360, a much, much weaker console with only 513 mb of memory look almost, almost like a next gen game so c'mon guys lets get realzzz.
@RedentSC
All I can say is wow, you get a link to the developer saying 1080p 60fps, yet you start babbling about hard facts when you have none of your own. Your only fact is that the beta test is in 720p so you presume the full game will be, despite being over 1 year away. Why can't it be in 1080p, what fact do you have to say it won't be? They could easily make the game with assets from Halo 4 and it would be 1080p 60fps as in the MCC bundle.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment