Halo Reach actually had me in awe (Post your Reach GIFS!)

I am not the type who will blindedly tell you that something looks as good as the other if its really not.You seriously have to be brainwashed to think that Reach does not compare to KZ2.No body said it surpasses it,only that it looks just as good,it really does,just look at the damn footage.KZ2 to me has better artstyle for gfx,very gritty,industrious and dark,where great lightning can come to expression and also bit motion blur and post processing can cover textures.It has great post processing,lightning,motion blur,animations,particles effects...BUT Reach also has it all with considerably bigger scale,co op and better textures.I would be really thankful if some of you would post some youtube HD KZ2 videos because they dont look as good as those downsampled gifs.

You know what, I've covered KZ2 already...let's move onto GOW3 just for further ownage...

urdead18

God of War 3 has the most inconsistent graphics I have ever seen this gen so far...

Not that it has anything to do with this thread at all...

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

You know what, I've covered KZ2 already...let's move onto GOW3 just for further ownage...

JMR09

God of War 3 has the most inconsistent graphics I have ever seen this gen so far...

Not that it has anything to do with this thread at all...

TC's .gif....... he takes like 30 bullets but a punch kills him? casual arcade games at its best

CSS plz thx bye

TC's .gif....... he takes like 30 bullets but a punch kills him? casual arcade games at its best

CSS plz thx bye

sillaris

[QUOTE="JMR09"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

You know what, I've covered KZ2 already...let's move onto GOW3 just for further ownage...

TheDogout

God of War 3 has the most inconsistent graphics I have ever seen this gen so far...

Not that it has anything to do with this thread at all...

Crysis looks better than any ps3 game on medium. Ownage?

TC's .gif....... he takes like 30 bullets but a punch kills him? casual arcade games at its best

CSS plz thx bye

sillaris

I love CSS as much as the next guy, but there is something called innovation, and playing something new.

Also, a punch from a supersoldier who is 7 feet tall, and having titanium armour on him, as well as physical augmentations which improve bone density, muscle growth, and overall strength, is going to basically be like a big bullet.

The shield is what is responsible for taking those 30 bullets.

Weeeee!!!

TC's .gif....... he takes like 30 bullets but a punch kills him? casual arcade games at its best

CSS plz thx bye

sillaris

I thought that part was awesome. Th strength and agility of an Elite with the intelligence and trickery of a human player...

I'd sh*t bricks if I ran into an Elite without back up.

TC's .gif....... he takes like 30 bullets but a punch kills him? casual arcade games at its best

CSS plz thx bye

sillaris

more to kill = more skill. MW or CS its too easy to kill. shouldn't be who see's who first, it should be who has the better aim in general.

/p>

more to kill = more skill.lespaul1919

[QUOTE="lespaul1919"]/p>

more to kill = more skill.millerlight89

hrm, a short burst into the body to kill vs 5 perfect headshots. don't see how that's hard to understand.

[QUOTE="sillaris"]

TC's .gif....... he takes like 30 bullets but a punch kills him? casual arcade games at its best

CSS plz thx bye

lespaul1919

more to kill = more skill. MW or CS its too easy to kill. shouldn't be who see's who first, it should be who has the better aim in general.

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

[QUOTE="lespaul1919"]/p>

more to kill = more skill.lespaul1919

hrm, a short burst into the body to kill vs 5 perfect headshots. don't see how that's hard to understand.

[QUOTE="sillaris"]

TC's .gif....... he takes like 30 bullets but a punch kills him? casual arcade games at its best

CSS plz thx bye

lespaul1919

more to kill = more skill. MW or CS its too easy to kill. shouldn't be who see's who first, it should be who has the better aim in general.

any noob can kill in css. a bullet from any gun can kill. I've seen my nephew do GOOD in css servers.....yet can't kill me once in halo. ONCE.

[QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

[QUOTE="sillaris"]

TC's .gif....... he takes like 30 bullets but a punch kills him? casual arcade games at its best

CSS plz thx bye

sillaris

more to kill = more skill. MW or CS its too easy to kill. shouldn't be who see's who first, it should be who has the better aim in general.

1v1? see if you can kill me one time.

Too funny, halo is a good. However saying it takes more skill to play is well..... funny.millerlight89

1v1?

In CS its easier to kill,but MUCH easier to get killed.

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]Too funny, halo is a good. However saying it takes more skill to play is well..... funny.lespaul1919

1v1?

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]Too funny, halo is a good. However saying it takes more skill to play is well..... funny.lespaul1919

1v1?

[QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]Too funny, halo is a good. However saying it takes more skill to play is well..... funny.sillaris

1v1?

I'm talking halo PC at this point. I won't need to shoot 20 times. You'd have fun watching the respawn screen though.

I'm talking halo PC at this point.lespaul1919

[QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]Too funny, halo is a good. However saying it takes more skill to play is well..... funny.millerlight89

1v1?

unlike you, I play both regularly.....so I would have a more fair opinion.

plus you don't have to win. just get ONE kill....lol.

You claim to know BF2/TF2... yet you still get excited about Halo and defensive when someone posts a little mild hate :lol:

Kan0nF0dder

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

1v1?

lespaul1919

unlike you, I play both regularly.....so I would have a more fair opinion.

[QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]Too funny, halo is a good. However saying it takes more skill to play is well..... funny.millerlight89

1v1?

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

1v1?

Ninja-Hippo

lol yeah...Halo takes a lot of skill. Has anyone ever heard of MLG?

[QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]What does me playing you have to do with anything? That in no way proves Halo takes more skill. That just proves you are good at the game. dgsag

unlike you, I play both regularly.....so I would have a more fair opinion.

bet I could beat him. i don't play it enough to put up a fight against a cs pro, nor a halo pro.

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

1v1?

Ninja-Hippo

you have too much sense for SW. :P

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

unlike you, I play both regularly.....so I would have a more fair opinion.

lespaul1919

bet I could beat him. i don't play it enough to put up a fight against a cs pro, nor a halo pro.

well, it's just as easy for the other player too. but it's easier to get lucky with one bullet than 5. :)

and who said it was easy??? thats why it takes more skill, it's HARD.

[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

unlike you, I play both regularly.....so I would have a more fair opinion.

lespaul1919

bet I could beat him. i don't play it enough to put up a fight against a cs pro, nor a halo pro.

TC's .gif....... he takes like 30 bullets but a punch kills him? casual arcade games at its best

CSS plz thx bye

sillaris

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

1v1?

Ninja-Hippo

[QUOTE="lespaul1919"]

[QUOTE="dgsag"] In that case, you should be able to 1v1 any CS pro easily and win. ;)millerlight89

bet I could beat him. i don't play it enough to put up a fight against a cs pro, nor a halo pro.

cs is more about strat skills and halo is more about aiming skills. but I dunno, the skill gap in halo is the biggest ive ever seen with the exception of quake 3. in css,my first dayi could do decent. in halo....after 7 years the truely good players still completely destroy me. yet, I make 80% of the players look like total noobs.

I dont understand all this hype for its graphics. its a big improvement over halo 3 but there are much better looking games

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]

I dont understand all this hype for its graphics. its a big improvement over halo 3 but there are much better looking games

Disturbed123

QFT. Graphics are good but nothing spectacular.

The graphics look good for halo becaue of the clean colors and textures on everything and the fluid animations. Its no graphics king, but it is still looking fine.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="millerlight89"]What does me playing you have to do with anything? That in no way proves Halo takes more skill. That just proves you are good at the game. millerlight89

that is the most true post in this section of the forums.......

I dont understand all this hype for its graphics. its a big improvement over halo 3 but there are much better looking games

[QUOTE="Disturbed123"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"] I am also confused over the hype for the graphics.Sully28

QFT. Graphics are good but nothing spectacular.

The graphics look good for halo becaue of the clean colors and textures on everything and the fluid animations. Its no graphics king, but it is still looking fine.

[QUOTE="racing1750"][QUOTE="millerlight89"] I am also confused over the hype for the graphics.millerlight89

graphics don't mean much to me, I like the crispness and fliudness. looks very polished and has that weight that a good game should.

lespaul i think you're a tad bit confused he's not saying halo: reach won't be fun because it doesn't take much skill he's just saying halo: reach looks more fun than CSS even tho CSS takes more skill

o and btw CS 1.6 > CSS :P

1.6 is better for sure. but I still feel halo has the greater skill gap.

[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]

Yeah it looks so much better:

REACH!

HALO 3 :roll:

Man you are pathetic,you are posting old ass pre alpha shoots.Look at the newest GTTV footage.