Halo series is declining

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

Probably not. I just have my own reasons for disliking them.

Master_ShakeXXX

Pretty much.

I get people liking Reach, as it's atleast a full fledged game. ODST is $60 DLC.

I remember when my buddies got ODST and we assembled together the Halo bro squad to relive the glory days. We played Firefight for a couple hours and they're all just like "you f*cking kidding me? That's it" and I was laughing at them so hard for getting robbed. Seriously, ODST is a bigger crime than anything commited by Activision.

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] I'm not the one who derailed the subject dumbass. If you want to complain about cowards avoiding arguments look at your own faction or just look in a mirror.Master_ShakeXXX

And? You were presented with a question and deflected. You can try to worm your way out of it but the fact is that you're as guilty of derailing the thread as you claim Lemmings are.

Not to mention the fact that you brought up the indefensible Killzone 2 and Resistance 2 > Halo 3 argument (considering Halo 3 scored higher than both of them and little over a year/year and a half separates them), which is largely irrelevant to the topic at hand, another deflection.

And you're telling me to look in the mirror?

Pfft, I could defend that with my eyes closed. Resistance 2 is quality. Pure, masterful, quality.

I've done it many a time before.

I'm talking a purely objective (or as objective as one can get) "standards" argument based on GS scores.

Personally, I've never been more bored playing a shooter campaign in my life playing Resistance 1 and 2 but that's just me. :P

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

And? You were presented with a question and deflected. You can try to worm your way out of it but the fact is that you're as guilty of derailing the thread as you claim Lemmings are.

Not to mention the fact that you brought up the indefensible Killzone 2 and Resistance 2 > Halo 3 argument (considering Halo 3 scored higher than both of them and little over a year/year and a half separates them), which is largely irrelevant to the topic at hand, another deflection.

And you're telling me to look in the mirror?

The_Game21x

Pfft, I could defend that with my eyes closed. Resistance 2 is quality. Pure, masterful, quality.

I've done it many a time before.

I'm talking a purely objective (or as objective as one can get) "standards" argument based on GS scores.

Personally, I've never been more bored playing a shooter campaign in my life playing Resistance 1 and 2 but that's just me. :P

But that's no fun :o

[QUOTE="dommeus"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]a couple reviews on metacritic are really questionable.kuraimen

Where's ODST and Wars?

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="dommeus"] Quarter to Three(?!) gave it 2/10, lol. I haven't played it, but 2/10 is pretty hilariously low considering the average.mitu123

Halo 5 will score higher than 4 ;)RR360DD

agree higher than 4/10 :P

I managed to play the game at a friends house a couple of days ago and I can honestly say its the best Halo game I played...

It has always been an overhyped but mediocre series. The only thing keeping it alive now is Doritos and Mountain Dew. It's even copying COD now.kuraimen

Ratings should just be called CoD match, look at what happend to zombiu, he should have just said, Not CoD, that pretty much summed up that review

9 pages, hmm. How's the jelly around here?

Oh no... fun is terrible.

All I saw was a bunch of super high metacritic scores.

All I saw was a bunch of super high metacritic scores.

xOMGITSJASONx