[QUOTE="AdmiralBison"]
[QUOTE="CreepyBacon"]
Thus the damage control begins. It's really really sad now guys:
You convinced yourselves it was a bad game due to GS score, fair enough. Go with your silly rule system, I don't care.
You convinced yourselves KZ2 was the best shooter ever to hit the gaming world. You're mistaken that title doesn't belong to KZ or Halo in my book but if it helps you sleep at night, go on beliving that.
You convinced yourselves it was the game that'll wipe the 360 off the face of the planet. Getting a bit stupid now.
And finally, you're now resorting to "WELL MOST OF THEM THOUGHT IT WAS A SHOOTER AND THEY'LL RETURN IT."
:|
Really? Seriously?!
![](http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b24/Nightmare30/Funny%20stuff/facepalm.jpg)
I can say no more, I'd get banned for pointing out how silly you are.
WAIW
I agree.
This just smack of desperation from Cows.
I've been hearing in and out for months of how great KZ2 is going to be- Comparing it to Crysis graphics, it's gameplay better the CoD 4, and being a Halo Killer.
Then there's the pre-emptive strike on HaloWarsThe RTS is being lambasted for being on a console (with some hermits joining into), but as well as having the Halo name on it as well and then every hater completely relies onGamespot's assesment to justify not having an RTS game on a console.
Now that we're here. KZ2 that's been hyped and well known for what 3-4 years? Can't even eclipse a game that's taken all kinds of criticism- It's a console rts. It has Halo on it, It's too simple, Gamespot reviewed it bad.... and the best that it can do is be on par with it?
Then there's all the other excuses on top that.
"It's the lazy developers, The economy, The console is more expensive PS3/Xbox360( I don't know anymore which is more expensive-Sony says it's the Xbox- Cows say it's because of the PS3's price), It's the Casuals, MS buys DLC, ...What other complaints and excuses are there?
So what's the actual problem? How therecome there arn't thatmany Cows buying KZ2? Isn't KZ2 meant to be Sony's "Halo"?
I mean the graphics are Wow!!!!! so ...what's the deal?
There's definately something wrong here
Because I don't see
Do you really believe games won't sell on name alone?
There are tons of examples in history. Bad Mario/Pokemon/etc. spin-offs, the 50 cent game, the crappy Guitar Hero DS games... Educated consumers tended to stay away from these because they sucked, but they still sold well because not everyone is an educated consumer.
Those examples fail because there has never been a Mario demo, a Pokemon demo, there was never a 50 Cent demo (I don't even think there was one for BoTS even with demos almost becoming the norm) and there was never a demo for GH DS. The reason these games sold well is because of name, but also because nobody had anything to go on. There wasn't a whole month dedicated to news for these games on their systems and they certainly didn't have a demo that broke records for downloads.
Stop making excuses. Like I said early, probably 98% of the people, if not all, who bought it, knew what they were getting.
Log in to comment