Halo3 only 6.14 GB? Gawwwwww

  • 109 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#51 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts
[QUOTE="Willy105"]

6.14 GB is a lot!!!!

Mario 64 was only 9 MB!!!!!

What are developers wasting space on these days!?!

majadamus

Audio, better graphics, ya know? That extra 10 bucks for a game should mean something.

Yes. Inflation in the economy. Not extra junk.

Avatar image for wok7
wok7

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 wok7
Member since 2003 • 2034 Posts
lawl, the HS mention completely pwned this topic, size doesn't matter, Blu Ray failz
Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts

[QUOTE="DA_B0MB"]6.14 gigs = 6.0 on GS. Gigs determine the scores people. Willy105

MP3 is 4.2 GB X 2 = 8.5!!!!! :o It's true!!!!!

Conspirisy theory am confirmed.

Avatar image for jdc6305
jdc6305

5058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#54 jdc6305
Member since 2005 • 5058 Posts

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

Avatar image for THE_Rob_Himself
THE_Rob_Himself

942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 THE_Rob_Himself
Member since 2007 • 942 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]hmmm so its longer than HS, has multiplayer, looks just as good, and has more music, and sounds.

but its smaller.

bu but teh blu ray iz teh needdedz0rs!
AskForDetails

i stopped when you said looks just as good as HS, you are justasking to be flamed

10 mile draw distance, lotsa characters on screen, 30 FPS, HDR Lighting.

go ahead and flame me. HS is garbage.

Avatar image for MasterC5
MasterC5

2932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 MasterC5
Member since 2006 • 2932 Posts

lawl, the HS mention completely pwned this topic, size doesn't matter, Blu Ray failzwok7

I have to agre with you although I want a ps3 sony screwed up! blueray was not needed this gen

Avatar image for dracolich666
dracolich666

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 dracolich666
Member since 2005 • 4426 Posts
[QUOTE="dracolich666"][QUOTE="SillyManimal"]

[QUOTE="MoldOnHold"]Ugh, why do people keep thinking that:

more storage = better game? :?
SillyManimal

I don't think anyone believes that, it's justthat with more storage more things are possible. If DVD9 had more storage, Gears could have been longer.

Not really. What PS3 game is long? Please enlighten me.

Just re-read what I said.

Reread what you said: "If DVD9 had more storage, Gears could have been longer." WRONG. Isnt MassEffect 40-60hours or gameplay? Or heavenly sword or lair, on 25GB disks and not even 10hours of gameplay?
Avatar image for THE_Rob_Himself
THE_Rob_Himself

942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 THE_Rob_Himself
Member since 2007 • 942 Posts

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

jdc6305

its called multiplayer.

i have more than 700 hours on halo 2.

Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts

source o.O

although, if longer campains than PS3 can be stuck onto one disc...well :roll:

blu ray sucks xD Ok not really, i admit it pumps out some wicked sound thanks to the extra space...but unless you have it hooked into a surround system, 'Not many folk do' its wasted on them :P

Lucky i have one ^^

Avatar image for CrazyyyDylan
CrazyyyDylan

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 CrazyyyDylan
Member since 2007 • 726 Posts
Does it matter it will be the best game out this year and I'll be playing the multiplayer for years to come.
Avatar image for CocopuffsGM
CocopuffsGM

214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 CocopuffsGM
Member since 2007 • 214 Posts
Game length takes up very little space, this coming form a game programmer. Most of the space is for sounds and graphics. But if you reuse a lot of graphics and sounds (like most games do) you can easily squeeze 10 hours out of just 1 gb.
Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#62 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts
[QUOTE="flatline711"][QUOTE="Guess_With_ReX"]

size doesn't matter

Big_Red_Button

Keep telling yourself that tubby

Sony made their Blu-Ray disks so big to compensate for the lack of size in OTHER areas;)

bow chika bow wow :lol:
Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

jdc6305

Half a game?... Halo games are some of the longest lasting games ever due to excellent co-op play (4 player co-op now) and the endless fun online. A third of a million people still log onto Halo 2 everyday. You really need to look up the differences between Halo 2 and Halo 3. You don't want to miss this one.

Avatar image for jdc6305
jdc6305

5058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#64 jdc6305
Member since 2005 • 5058 Posts
[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

THE_Rob_Himself

its called multiplayer.

i have more than 700 hours on halo 2.

Multi player is a copout so studio's can save ondevelopment time and money. What you can't have a decent single player campain and multiplayer?
Avatar image for -R3Volation
-R3Volation

657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 -R3Volation
Member since 2007 • 657 Posts
[QUOTE="Guess_With_ReX"]

dammit : - ( Why couldn't they use all of it!

o yeah ,cause size doesn't matter

SillyManimal

6-8 hour campaign on Gears says otherwse

It takes you guys 6-8 hours to beat Gears? I could do it in 5, on Insane.

Avatar image for majadamus
majadamus

10292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#66 majadamus
Member since 2003 • 10292 Posts
[QUOTE="majadamus"][QUOTE="Willy105"]

6.14 GB is a lot!!!!

Mario 64 was only 9 MB!!!!!

What are developers wasting space on these days!?!

Willy105

Audio, better graphics, ya know? That extra 10 bucks for a game should mean something.

Yes. Inflation in the economy. Not extra junk.

Inflation?! Shouldn't the Wii and PS2 games gone up in price as well? And the audio in Heavely Sword is 10 gigs alone...

Avatar image for dracolich666
dracolich666

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 dracolich666
Member since 2005 • 4426 Posts
Does it matter it will be the best game out this year and I'll be playing the multiplayer for years to come.CrazyyyDylan
Remember cows dont care about replay value, they care about graphics and storage. :lol: :lol:
Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts
[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="jdc6305"]

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

jdc6305

its called multiplayer.

i have more than 700 hours on halo 2.

Multi player is a copout so studio's can save ondevelopment time and money. What you can't have a decent single player campain and multiplayer?

I can't take you seriously. 12-15 hours for a shooter is great. Multiplayer is what keeps a game alive. I can't stand single player only games because they all end up being returned for me. For example, Bioshock, great game. I haven't played it in a month. Halo 2... I played it for 2 hours yesterday.

Avatar image for thirstychainsaw
thirstychainsaw

3761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 thirstychainsaw
Member since 2007 • 3761 Posts

Inflation?! Shouldn't the Wii and PS2 games gone up in price as well? And the audio in Heavely Sword is 10 gigs alone...

majadamus

Thats because they dump every language under the sun onto the disc, Halo 3 has more lines of dialogue than Heavenly Sword.

Avatar image for jdc6305
jdc6305

5058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#70 jdc6305
Member since 2005 • 5058 Posts
to
[QUOTE="jdc6305"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="jdc6305"]

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

DA_B0MB

its called multiplayer.

i have more than 700 hours on halo 2.

Multi player is a copout so studio's can save ondevelopment time and money. What you can't have a decent single player campain and multiplayer?

I can't take you seriously. 12-15 hours for a shooter is great. Multiplayer is what keeps a game alive. I can't stand single player only games because they all end up being returned for me. For example, Bioshock, great game. I haven't played it in a month. Halo 2... I played it for 2 hours yesterday.

12-15 hours your dreaming more like 7
Avatar image for Apathetic-Irony
Apathetic-Irony

1391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Apathetic-Irony
Member since 2006 • 1391 Posts

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

jdc6305

Half a game? Yeah, okay buddy.

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#72 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts
[QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="majadamus"][QUOTE="Willy105"]

6.14 GB is a lot!!!!

Mario 64 was only 9 MB!!!!!

What are developers wasting space on these days!?!

majadamus

Audio, better graphics, ya know? That extra 10 bucks for a game should mean something.

Yes. Inflation in the economy. Not extra junk.

Inflation?! Shouldn't the Wii and PS2 games gone up in price as well? And the audio in Heavely Sword is 10 gigs alone...

Wii and PS2 games get cheaper to make, so they remain the same price due to inflation, instead of getting lower.

Avatar image for flatline711
flatline711

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 flatline711
Member since 2005 • 2015 Posts
[QUOTE="flatline711"][QUOTE="Guess_With_ReX"]

size doesn't matter

Big_Red_Button

Keep telling yourself that tubby

Sony made their Blu-Ray disks so big to compensate for the lack of size in OTHER areas;)

:O I R Canadian too eh! let's make teh sechs :D

Avatar image for majadamus
majadamus

10292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#74 majadamus
Member since 2003 • 10292 Posts
[QUOTE="jdc6305"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="jdc6305"]

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

DA_B0MB

its called multiplayer.

i have more than 700 hours on halo 2.

Multi player is a copout so studio's can save ondevelopment time and money. What you can't have a decent single player campain and multiplayer?

I can't take you seriously. 12-15 hours for a shooter is great. Multiplayer is what keeps a game alive. I can't stand single player only games because they all end up being returned for me. For example, Bioshock, great game. I haven't played it in a month. Halo 2... I played it for 2 hours yesterday.

Meh...you should probably try RPGs then. And if a game has different difficulty settings (Like an incredibly challenging unlockable setting like Master Ninja)..it'll be worth it.

Avatar image for Guess_With_ReX
Guess_With_ReX

1191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Guess_With_ReX
Member since 2007 • 1191 Posts

source o.O

although, if longer campains than PS3 can be stuck onto one disc...well :roll:

blu ray sucks xD Ok not really, i admit it pumps out some wicked sound thanks to the extra space...but unless you have it hooked into a surround system, 'Not many folk do' its wasted on them :P

Lucky i have one ^^

toxicmog

Source= b7

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#76 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts
[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

Apathetic-Irony

Half a game? Yeah, okay buddy.

Yeah. it's not half.

Just disappointingly short.

Avatar image for darkmagician06
darkmagician06

6060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 darkmagician06
Member since 2003 • 6060 Posts
LOL... im not surprised. watch mass effect take up like the same amount
Avatar image for Apathetic-Irony
Apathetic-Irony

1391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Apathetic-Irony
Member since 2006 • 1391 Posts
to [QUOTE="DA_B0MB"][QUOTE="jdc6305"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="jdc6305"]

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

jdc6305

its called multiplayer.

i have more than 700 hours on halo 2.

Multi player is a copout so studio's can save ondevelopment time and money. What you can't have a decent single player campain and multiplayer?

I can't take you seriously. 12-15 hours for a shooter is great. Multiplayer is what keeps a game alive. I can't stand single player only games because they all end up being returned for me. For example, Bioshock, great game. I haven't played it in a month. Halo 2... I played it for 2 hours yesterday.

12-15 hours your dreaming more like 7

No, he isn't. Stop being so blind: Halo 3 is not Halo 2, and even Halo 2 didn't take 7 hours (unless you did a speed run I guess. I played on Heroic and beat the game in 11). Millions enjoy Halo's campaign -- get over it.

Avatar image for MrEpyx
MrEpyx

716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 MrEpyx
Member since 2007 • 716 Posts

Multi player is a copout so studio's can save ondevelopment time and money. What you can't have a decent single player campain and multiplayer?jdc6305

Explain to me exactly how building essentialy two games and putting them on one disc is saving a development studio money? You DO realize developers usually hire an entire extra team just for multiplayer, right? Obviously not.

Avatar image for sportsdude206
sportsdude206

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 sportsdude206
Member since 2006 • 207 Posts
[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="RonnieLottinSF"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="RonnieLottinSF"][QUOTE="DuDisNow"][QUOTE="SillyManimal"][QUOTE="Guess_With_ReX"]

dammit : - ( Why couldn't they use all of it!

o yeah ,cause size doesn't matter

RonnieLottinSF

6-8 hour campaign on Gears says otherwse

Halo 3 is susposed to have a 12-15 hour campaign

OnHeroic that would be true. It is a 9 to 10 hour game on Normal. From what one guy has been saying on the IGN boards, Legendary seems impossible unless you are playing co-op. He has already beat the game on Normal and Heroic.

Link to 9-10 hours on normal?

Are you an IGN paying member?

no? but i think this would be all over the interwebz

Well then the link would useless because you have to pay to use their forums and other services. There are at least 4 or 5 threads with people giving impressions on IGN and all of them have said it is awesome and the game is 9 to 10 hours on Normal, 12 or more hours on Heroic and one guy has been playing Legendary and says it is hard as hell to the point where he is now only playing through it in co-op with his friend.

Oh and if you want to look all over the interwebz, as you put it :lol: , then go use this search tool called Google. It might help you out, but br prepared to get spoiled. ;)

Oh, well on gamespot, a guy said 5 hours on easy 7 on normal 8 1/2 on heroic and 10 1/2 on legendary.

But that's more than enough for me.

If halo was MP alone, it would be enough for me.

Avatar image for kimbokasteniv
kimbokasteniv

3892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#81 kimbokasteniv
Member since 2004 • 3892 Posts

Pointing out the size of Halo or any other game for that matter is some what irrelevant.

It would be similar to saying that only 5 cubic feet of a car's trunk was used when it could hold up to 7 cubic feet. Well of course less space than the max was used otherwise it would be impossible or two cars would be required.

I'd like to think we all agree that games are going to get bigger, and like most other things in computing, requirments increase exponentially. UT 2004 is 5.67 GB; I believe that game was released in 2003. So the fact that some games are still around the same range is rather surprising. Which would make me think that the lack of higher storage mediums is partially responsible for this odd trend.

Whether we need 50GB or more this gen is up in the air (although I'm leaning to yes). But one thing is for sure, the faster we get this technology out the cheaper it will be tomorrow. So why everyone is acting like it is a bad thing is beyond me.

Avatar image for Koolsen
Koolsen

8054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#82 Koolsen
Member since 2004 • 8054 Posts
6.14? Couldn't they have gone for aa even number? Like 6.20? Quick! Bungie! Add in a couple more maps!
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60831 Posts
I'm sure it will be awesome nonetheless. =)
Avatar image for MrEpyx
MrEpyx

716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 MrEpyx
Member since 2007 • 716 Posts
[QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="jdc6305"]

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

Willy105

Half a game? Yeah, okay buddy.

Yeah. it's not half.

Just disappointingly short.

Disappointingly short? Oh that's right... You Nintendo fanboys love those Metroid games where you have 3 hours of gameplay padded with 7 hours of backtracking.

Avatar image for pinkyfull
pinkyfull

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#85 pinkyfull
Member since 2006 • 206 Posts

really? well i guess it isn't hard i mean look at what some somputer games do with less...

anyway does it really matter what size it is as long as its a good game i dont think people will really care how big it is

Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#86 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts
Where did this number come from? I can confirm that the game is 7.30 gigs. There is an illegal compressed version out there that is 6.14 gigs, key word compressed...
Avatar image for MrEpyx
MrEpyx

716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 MrEpyx
Member since 2007 • 716 Posts
[QUOTE="SillyManimal"][QUOTE="Guess_With_ReX"]

dammit : - ( Why couldn't they use all of it!

o yeah ,cause size doesn't matter

-R3Volation

6-8 hour campaign on Gears says otherwse

It takes you guys 6-8 hours to beat Gears? I could do it in 5, on Insane.

Yeah ok...

Avatar image for pinkyfull
pinkyfull

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#88 pinkyfull
Member since 2006 • 206 Posts

Where did this number come from? I can confirm that the game is 7.30 gigs. There is an illegal compressed version out there that is 6.14 gigs, key word compressed...kevy619

what about illegal illegal and compressed means a seriosly comprimised game but hey if u wanna buy an illegal compressed version of a game cause its cheaper be my guest

Avatar image for SillyManimal
SillyManimal

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 SillyManimal
Member since 2007 • 774 Posts
[QUOTE="SillyManimal"][QUOTE="dracolich666"][QUOTE="SillyManimal"]

[QUOTE="MoldOnHold"]Ugh, why do people keep thinking that:

more storage = better game? :?
dracolich666

I don't think anyone believes that, it's justthat with more storage more things are possible. If DVD9 had more storage, Gears could have been longer.

Not really. What PS3 game is long? Please enlighten me.

Just re-read what I said.

Reread what you said: "If DVD9 had more storage, Gears could have been longer." WRONG. Isnt MassEffect 40-60hours or gameplay? Or heavenly sword or lair, on 25GB disks and not even 10hours of gameplay?

The part before it.

Oblivion, it's a 100+ hour game, yet you can beat it in less than a day. But, rpgs aren't fun if you don't do any side quests.

Avatar image for Cali3350
Cali3350

16134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Cali3350
Member since 2003 • 16134 Posts

If your talking about the CCLX release its 6.14gb compressed, 7.02gb uncompressed.

Oh and LOL at consoles not having piracy problems.

Avatar image for dracolich666
dracolich666

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 dracolich666
Member since 2005 • 4426 Posts
Oblivion, it's a 100+ hour game, yet you can beat it in less than a day. But, rpgs aren't fun if you don't do any side quests.SillyManimal
Agreed, sorry didnt understand where you were going with what you said. I usually enjoy the games as much as i can, bioshock on PC took me 30hours+, because i kept going back to the slots and getting more money. :D I had WAYYY too much ammo at the end boss, and sadly i didnt need it. :(
Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#92 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26209 Posts
[QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="jdc6305"]

I own a 360 and don't plan on buying Halo 3 I refuse to pay full price for half a game. After Halo2 and Fable being a rip off I'm done with both franchises.

I beat Zelda TP in about 50 hours I'd say I got my moneys worth.

MrEpyx

Half a game? Yeah, okay buddy.

Yeah. it's not half.

Just disappointingly short.

Disappointingly short? Oh that's right... You Nintendo fanboys love those Metroid games where you have 3 hours of gameplay padded with 7 hours of backtracking.

You bet we do!!!

:roll:

Metroid games are LONG.

Not because of backtracking. They just make it longer.

Avatar image for DSgamer64
DSgamer64

4449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#93 DSgamer64
Member since 2007 • 4449 Posts

hmmm so its longer than HS, has multiplayer, looks just as good, and has more music, and sounds.

but its smaller.

bu but teh blu ray iz teh needdedz0rs!
THE_Rob_Himself

:lol: Do not kid yourself, Halo 3 could be done on a computer with a P4 and a 7900 GS, the graphics are just that dated looking. Enjoy short horrid single player, which will kill the score like with Halo 2.

Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#94 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]hmmm so its longer than HS, has multiplayer, looks just as good, and has more music, and sounds.

but its smaller.

bu but teh blu ray iz teh needdedz0rs!
DSgamer64

:lol: Do not kid yourself, Halo 3 could be done on a computer with a P4 and a 7900 GS, the graphics are just that dated looking. Enjoy short horrid single player, which will kill the score like with Halo 2.

Halo 3 is a great game, dont kid yourself.

Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#95 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]hmmm so its longer than HS, has multiplayer, looks just as good, and has more music, and sounds.

but its smaller.

bu but teh blu ray iz teh needdedz0rs!
DSgamer64

:lol: Do not kid yourself, Halo 3 could be done on a computer with a P4 and a 7900 GS, the graphics are just that dated looking. Enjoy short horrid single player, which will kill the score like with Halo 2.

Have you learned that Halo was never about the graphics?
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#96 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]hmmm so its longer than HS, has multiplayer, looks just as good, and has more music, and sounds.

but its smaller.

bu but teh blu ray iz teh needdedz0rs!
DSgamer64

:lol: Do not kid yourself, Halo 3 could be done on a computer with a P4 and a 7900 GS, the graphics are just that dated looking. Enjoy short horrid single player, which will kill the score like with Halo 2.


1-HS=heavenly sword a PS3 game. and it does not look better than the Halo pics we have seen from the european convention and as for the games in motion. Well thats an even bigger gap.
2-Halo 3s single player has been confirmed to be in the range of 10-15 hours on normal which is about the average length of a great FPS single player anyway.
3- Halo 2 may have lost some points for its single player(a AAA game Oh by the way) but Halo Combat Evolved got famous of its single player alone.
4- How good was it, why Halo Combat Evolved for PC was AAA game across the board on many sites and mags. WHen Halo launched on the PC it stacked up against some of the best PC shooters when it came out, it wasnt the best but it did quite nicely for itslef.
5-Halo 3s campaign isnt rushed like Halo 2 was, Bungie has been on top of there game with Halo 3.
6- For a game that isnt filling up a whole DVD 9 thats a Great Single Player thats 10-15 hours(assuming it lives up to the quality of the first one), the best console shooter mp online and one that stacks up well against some of the better Shooters out there, great graphics, great music, forge, maps, online mp options including assault, ctf, infection, juggernaut,etc that supporets 1v1, 2v2, 4v4, 8v8, 16 man free for all, FOrge, splitescreeen coop, online coop, online 4 player coop,and thats not taking into account the scale of the game, the amount of AI on the battlefieelds in the game, the AI itself in the game, the draw distance in the game, etc

But go ahead keep hating.
Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts
devs compress the code during development, just so they don't hit the limit by surprise. how much time is consumed and money wasted on compressing information? just consider the question.
Avatar image for Cali3350
Cali3350

16134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Cali3350
Member since 2003 • 16134 Posts

devs compress the code during development, just so they don't hit the limit by surprise. how much time is consumed and money wasted on compressing information? just consider the question.Mordred19

None. Compression is free and can be done at any time, such as compile time. :|

Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#99 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts

devs compress the code during development, just so they don't hit the limit by surprise. how much time is consumed and money wasted on compressing information? just consider the question.Mordred19

Less then the money it takes to develop for the ps3. Hopefully they make the harddrives standard soon.

Avatar image for DHReese
DHReese

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#100 DHReese
Member since 2007 • 455 Posts
[QUOTE="Guess_With_ReX"]

dammit : - ( Why couldn't they use all of it!

o yeah ,cause size doesn't matter

SillyManimal

6-8 hour campaign on Gears says otherwse

Ever heard of Mass Effect?