Has blizzard lost it?

  • 100 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

they used to be one of my favorite companies. I know they got bought out by activision. But watching the diablo 3 footage i'm actually quite unimpressed. I'm surprised actually because i'm usually the first person to say if it's blizzard it's awesome. Same with alot of the recent changes to wow. They used to have a real knack for marketing to the masses but it almost seems to me like theya re getting too big for their britches or something and are doing things that didn't make them the company they were in the first place suddenly. Plus ive had issues with their support and everything in between.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
What changes in WoW bugged you?
Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts
Hm, from what I hear from friends, Blizzard themselves haven't changed that much.
Avatar image for 10MP
10MP

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 10MP
Member since 2009 • 454 Posts

i dont have anything to say about wow but d3 looks like d2 but better.

Avatar image for Blixxed
Blixxed

1800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 Blixxed
Member since 2009 • 1800 Posts

I don't think Blizzards take our time ot make it good plan fits in with Activisions MAKE MONEY NOW plans.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

I don't think Blizzards take our time ot make it good plan fits in with Activisions MAKE MONEY NOW plans.

Blixxed
Starcraft 2 has been delayed into each year, so it looks like they're still doing things their way.
Avatar image for Aku101
Aku101

2114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Aku101
Member since 2009 • 2114 Posts

What's so good about blizzard? They make a game like every 10 years.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

I don't think Blizzards take our time ot make it good plan fits in with Activisions MAKE MONEY NOW plans.

Blixxed
yes, that is why delayed starcraft 2 to 2010 and wil be releasing diablo 3 sometime in 2011 :roll:
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

What's so good about blizzard? They make a game like every 10 years.

Aku101
They released a game this year, in 2007, in 2004, in 2003, in 2002, in 2000 and in 1999.
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

What's so good about blizzard? They make a game like every 10 years.

Aku101
except that in the last 10 years they have made 8 games 6 of which have been AAA and 2 AA and that their games are still played till the next iteration is out
Avatar image for Aku101
Aku101

2114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Aku101
Member since 2009 • 2114 Posts

[QUOTE="Aku101"]

What's so good about blizzard? They make a game like every 10 years.

naval

except that in the last 10 years they have made 8 games 6 of which have been AAA and 2 AA and that their games are still played till the next iteration is out

Expansions don't count. They're practically game patches with a price tag.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

[QUOTE="naval"][QUOTE="Aku101"]

What's so good about blizzard? They make a game like every 10 years.

Aku101

except that in the last 10 years they have made 8 games 6 of which have been AAA and 2 AA and that their games are still played till the next iteration is out

Expansions don't count. They're practically game patches with a price tag.

umm... no ..they do count . Jus because you said so doesn't makes it so. And btw they have more content than games like Uncharted 2 for example , so if they don't count then I would say U2 also doesn't counts
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="naval"][QUOTE="Aku101"]

What's so good about blizzard? They make a game like every 10 years.

Aku101

except that in the last 10 years they have made 8 games 6 of which have been AAA and 2 AA and that their games are still played till the next iteration is out

Expansions don't count. They're practically game patches with a price tag.

I defy you to name me a console only game with more content than WOTLK or TBC.
Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#14 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

What's interesting if you don't count expansions they used to release a new game like every year. They havent released a new game in like 5 years now. They used to come up with new games. They had warcraft. They came out with diablo and then starcraft.

Not counting expansions

Warcraft 1994

Warcraft II 1995

Diablo 1996

Starcraft 1998

Diablo 2 2000

Warcraft 3 2002

World of Warcraft 2004

They haven't released a completely new game in like 5 years. It will be 6 when they come out. It's been 11 years and 9 years respectively since they expanded on starcraft and diablo. They havent come up with a new franchise in 11 years. I sense milkage a bit.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#15 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

What's interesting if you don't count expansions they used to release a new game like every year. They havent released a new game in like 5 years now. They used to come up with new games. They had warcraft. They came out with diablo and then starcraft.

Not counting expansions

Warcraft 1994

Warcraft II 1995

Diablo 1996

Starcraft 1998

Diablo 2 2000

Warcraft 3 2002

World of Warcraft 2004

They haven't released a completely new game in like 5 years. It's been 11 years and 9 years respectively since they expanded on starcraft and diablo. They havent come up with a new franchise in 11 years. I sense milkage a bit.

Walker34
Why won't you count expansions? Also, they are working on new IPs now, you know.
Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#16 Walker34
Member since 2005 • 1471 Posts

well they've been milking wow with expansions for the last 5 years. that much is apparent.

Avatar image for zarshack
zarshack

9936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 0

#17 zarshack
Member since 2009 • 9936 Posts

Expansions don't count. They're practically game patches with a price tag.

Aku101

Sounds like you have never even played WoW. The expansions are much more then patch content. Which is supplied for free every few months.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

well they've been milking wow with expansions for the last 5 years. that much is apparent.

Walker34
Why is it consistently receiving critical praise then?
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

well they've been milking wow with expansions for the last 5 years. that much is apparent.

Walker34
and someone else is doing all the work done on Starcraft 2 (to be released in 2010) and diablo 3 (to be released in 2011) and the totally new Batlle.net 2.0 (to be released in 2010) :roll:
Avatar image for Aku101
Aku101

2114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Aku101
Member since 2009 • 2114 Posts

[QUOTE="Aku101"]

[QUOTE="naval"] except that in the last 10 years they have made 8 games 6 of which have been AAA and 2 AA and that their games are still played till the next iteration is outDanm_999

Expansions don't count. They're practically game patches with a price tag.

I defy you to name me a console only game with more content than WOTLK or TBC.

Uncharted 2. Co-op, multiplayer singleplayer, cinema mode plus a slew of other content.

Avatar image for Notsogr8one
Notsogr8one

3739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Notsogr8one
Member since 2004 • 3739 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="Aku101"]

Expansions don't count. They're practically game patches with a price tag.

Aku101

I defy you to name me a console only game with more content than WOTLK or TBC.

Uncharted 2. Co-op, multiplayer singleplayer, cinema mode plus a slew of other content.

Lol. That's is all.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#22 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="Aku101"]

Expansions don't count. They're practically game patches with a price tag.

Aku101

I defy you to name me a console only game with more content than WOTLK or TBC.

Uncharted 2. Co-op, multiplayer singleplayer, cinema mode plus a slew of other content.

Firstly, Uncharted 2 isn't out.

Secondly, it's been pegged at what? 15-20 hours in game length? It takes about that amount of time in WOTLK just to level up from 70 to 80.

WOTLK is hundreds of hours of content, literally. Even if you play Uncharted 2 several times, it doesn't even come close. A WoW expansion is just so much larger than is possible to fit on even a Blu-ray disk.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

Wow, actually it's only 12-15 hours.

Avatar image for siddhu33
siddhu33

3264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 siddhu33
Member since 2008 • 3264 Posts

Comparing Uncharted to WoW is just ridiculous! (Blinded Cows)...

Finishing one raid on WoW can take absolutely ages, and then there are more things that you can do, like quests, roleplay, etc, etc. There are also more people playing WoW than the entire population of Cuba.

So, in essence, comparing Uncharted to WoW is just Epic Fail.

Avatar image for warmaster670
warmaster670

4699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 warmaster670
Member since 2004 • 4699 Posts

So, in essence, comparing Uncharted to WoW is just Epic Fail.

siddhu33

Whats really epic fail is the poeple who play wow and think there hardcore because of it.

Avatar image for Notsogr8one
Notsogr8one

3739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Notsogr8one
Member since 2004 • 3739 Posts

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

So, in essence, comparing Uncharted to WoW is just Epic Fail.

warmaster670

Whats really epic fail is the poeple who play wow and think there hardcore because of it.

Agreed. But seriously, WoW has more content than any other single game ever. It's huge. It just is.
Avatar image for Major_Reeves
Major_Reeves

477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Major_Reeves
Member since 2009 • 477 Posts

[QUOTE="Aku101"]

[QUOTE="Danm_999"] I defy you to name me a console only game with more content than WOTLK or TBC. Notsogr8one

Uncharted 2. Co-op, multiplayer singleplayer, cinema mode plus a slew of other content.

Lol. That's is all.

Just read his sig and his other posts.

Biased fanboy is biased fanboy end of the story line.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#28 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

i dont have anything to say about wow but d3 looks like d2 but better.

10MP
and more diablo 2 in its better form is always great. I highly anticipate for D3 even though it doesnt seem to have changed much from D2 ( why drastically change something great ? )
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

Has blizzard lost it?Walker34

Yes.

Avatar image for kate_jones
kate_jones

3221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 kate_jones
Member since 2007 • 3221 Posts

blizzard dont release much, is taking them forever to what is basically update the graphics on starcraft.

I'd hardly call tbc wtlk a new game. You cant compare the time spent in an mmo to a console game.

if Killing 3000 elementals or flying around trying to beat farmers to mining nodes or herbs is gives you pleasure than so be it, or perhaps doing the same instance over and over hoping for some obscure loot drop, dancing in whatever city is currently the hot spot, getting welfare epics in the arena, ugh *shivers*

Avatar image for theBeorn
theBeorn

1378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 theBeorn
Member since 2003 • 1378 Posts
Blizzard still rules until proven otherwise.
Avatar image for CaptainHarley
CaptainHarley

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#32 CaptainHarley
Member since 2004 • 2703 Posts

Uncharted 2. Co-op, multiplayer singleplayer, cinema mode plus a slew of other content.

Aku101

lol what an awful post, even if most of the content of wow is garbage!

anyway, blizzard does kind of produce games for the same few franchises over and over again. its what theyre good at, just like nintendo.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts
Theyre not what they use to be. WoW has become streamlined to the point where mot of the classes are not even unique or even required, and then we get the lame "bring the player not the class" excuse... while ideal on paper, its more of a case of "We cant offer enough insentive for each individual class, so we will give them eachothers abilities". WOTLK took a nose dive in difficulty, yes yes hide behind the "buh buh teh hardmodes :cry:" when bosses were NATURALLY hardmodes back in Classic and hell in some cases TBC aswell... oh look, your army is dumb enough to press the big red button at mimiron, lets make things harder for the hell of it, either way its the same damn boss. The heroics became a joke aswell, you dont even need any CROWD CONTROL in WOTLK .... streamlined/casualized extreme. Starcraft II - I was never a fan of that segement of RTS, they bore me with thier simplisity, and RTS campaigns never do anything for me, but from what Ive seen, its just a graphically upgraded game, few new units and some current gen or hell even last gen RTS features. Starcraft 1 had excellent balance, something thats very rare, im not even optmistic that they will achieve that again, I can imagine this game selling loads, but Starcraft 1 will still be played more ... one of those dissapointing sequels regaurdless of hype and score. Diablo III - same boat as Starcraft 2, but instead this time theyre adding more inspiritation from thier element found in WoW, not a bad idea by any means, but only being 5 classes, 3 of which are obscure weird choises just screams boredom to me, I dont care if a Warrior talent tree or monk talent tree mimics a paladin, if there isnt a Paladin im not impressed by the choice. (just an example) I can imagine this game being a small 5-6 chapter game aswell. Nothing Blizzard OR VALVE does warrants the time they take, while spear heading features back 10 years ago, these 2 companies for the most part are just in thier safe zones now and quite frankly dont impress anymore. "why fix what isnt broken?" good point, building on old games and ideals is by no means bad, but thier pace is ridiculously slow.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#34 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42220 Posts
I don't think Blizzard has lost it. In fact, (in my opinion anyway) they're the best Activision has right now.
Avatar image for Mythomniac
Mythomniac

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Mythomniac
Member since 2009 • 1695 Posts
They didn't really get bought out by Activision, they are both under Vivendi. Anyway, just wait for SC 2.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

blizzard dont release much, is taking them forever to what is basically update the graphics on starcraft.kate_jones

Blizzard released a game this year, 2007, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000 and 1999. How is that insignificant?

I'd hardly call tbc wtlk a new game. You cant compare the time spent in an mmo to a console game.kate_jones

Why not? It was being argued WoTLK was just a content patch. We established it was hundreds of hours.

if Killing 3000 elementals or flying around trying to beat farmers to mining nodes or herbs is gives you pleasure than so be it, or perhaps doing the same instance over and over hoping for some obscure loot drop, dancing in whatever city is currently the hot spot, getting welfare epics in the arena, ugh *shivers*

kate_jones
Wow, someone hasn't played since TBC by the sounds of it.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#37 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Birdy09"] WOTLK took a nose dive in difficulty, yes yes hide behind the "buh buh teh hardmodes :cry:" when bosses were NATURALLY hardmodes back in Classic and hell in some cases TBC aswell... oh look, your army is dumb enough to press the big red button at mimiron, lets make things harder for the hell of it, either way its the same damn boss. The heroics became a joke aswell, you dont even need any CROWD CONTROL in WOTLK .... streamlined/casualized extreme.

The TC made the argument Blizzard had lost their ability to appeal to mass market. But your criticism (which I partly agree with) suggests they've drawn in an even bigger crowd. Which is it?
Nothing Blizzard OR VALVE does warrants the time they take, while spear heading features back 10 years ago, these 2 companies for the most part are just in thier safe zones now and quite frankly dont impress anymore.Birdy09
So I guess all that critical acclaim and popular success isn't impressing anyone?
"why fix what isnt broken?" good point, building on old games and ideals is by no means bad, but thier pace is ridiculously slow.Birdy09
It's always been slow though. That's why they aren't Activision or EA. They don't churn out garbage every 6 months.
Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] WOTLK took a nose dive in difficulty, yes yes hide behind the "buh buh teh hardmodes :cry:" when bosses were NATURALLY hardmodes back in Classic and hell in some cases TBC aswell... oh look, your army is dumb enough to press the big red button at mimiron, lets make things harder for the hell of it, either way its the same damn boss. The heroics became a joke aswell, you dont even need any CROWD CONTROL in WOTLK .... streamlined/casualized extreme.

The TC made the argument Blizzard had lost their ability to appeal to mass market. But your criticism (which I partly agree with) suggests they've drawn in an even bigger crowd. Which is it?
Nothing Blizzard OR VALVE does warrants the time they take, while spear heading features back 10 years ago, these 2 companies for the most part are just in thier safe zones now and quite frankly dont impress anymore.Birdy09
So I guess all that critical acclaim and popular success isn't impressing anyone?
"why fix what isnt broken?" good point, building on old games and ideals is by no means bad, but thier pace is ridiculously slow.Birdy09
It's always been slow though. That's why they aren't Activision or EA. They don't churn out garbage every 6 months.

I dont particulally agree with the TC, theyre more popular than ever, that goes without a doubt, but as far as I can see thats all they are trying to do now. I still dont see whats impressive about B.Net 2.0...
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#39 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] WOTLK took a nose dive in difficulty, yes yes hide behind the "buh buh teh hardmodes :cry:" when bosses were NATURALLY hardmodes back in Classic and hell in some cases TBC aswell... oh look, your army is dumb enough to press the big red button at mimiron, lets make things harder for the hell of it, either way its the same damn boss. The heroics became a joke aswell, you dont even need any CROWD CONTROL in WOTLK .... streamlined/casualized extreme.

The TC made the argument Blizzard had lost their ability to appeal to mass market. But your criticism (which I partly agree with) suggests they've drawn in an even bigger crowd. Which is it?
Nothing Blizzard OR VALVE does warrants the time they take, while spear heading features back 10 years ago, these 2 companies for the most part are just in thier safe zones now and quite frankly dont impress anymore.Birdy09
So I guess all that critical acclaim and popular success isn't impressing anyone?
"why fix what isnt broken?" good point, building on old games and ideals is by no means bad, but thier pace is ridiculously slow.Birdy09
It's always been slow though. That's why they aren't Activision or EA. They don't churn out garbage every 6 months.

I dont particulally agree with the TC, theyre more popular than ever, that goes without a doubt, but as far as I can see thats all they are trying to do now. I still dont see whats impressive about B.Net 2.0...

Well, I think that's your hang up to be honest. WoW is more popular, and in my opinion, more accessible and polished than ever. I raided up until Naxx in Vanilla and up into BT in TBC, honestly I have no desire to go back to that grind. Starcraft 2 looks great; they aren't re-inventing the wheel but their adding some interesting new changes (layered combat, non-linear gameplay), new units and a new story. Diablo 3 looks seriously cool. I'm sure we'll come to love the Witch Doctor and Monk as much as any other class (people complained the Druid, Assassin and Necromancer were too out there back during Diablo 2 and LOD's development, look how popular they became). Plus, they're working on new IPs. What more could you want? I think we tend to underestimate Blizzard because they have so many prominent franchises, it almost looks like they're resting on their laurels. Think about it, how many other developers how three franchises that popular? Apart from maybe Nintendo, many other developers struggle to achieve one series with the same popularity.
Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#40 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts
What changes in WoW bugged you?Danm_999
Both expansions.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"] Blizzard released a game this year, 2007, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000 and 1999. How is that insignificant?

when all but two of those are expansion packs, yes it is reasonably insignificant.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#44 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="Danm_999"] Blizzard released a game this year, 2007, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000 and 1999. How is that insignificant?

when all but two of those are expansion packs, yes it is reasonably insignificant.

Actually, three of those are full games. Diablo 2, Wc3 and WoW. And I've already argued, Blizzard expansion packs have very significant amounts of content. Both TBC and WoTLK are hundreds of years long, the Frozen Throne was just as long as Reign of Chaos under WC3.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#45 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"]What changes in WoW bugged you?Dead-Memories
Both expansions.

That's not very specific. 'Both expansions' covers hundreds of changes over several years.
Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="Danm_999"] Blizzard released a game this year, 2007, 2004, 2003, 2001, 2000 and 1999. How is that insignificant?STurn21

when all but two of those are expansion packs, yes it is reasonably insignificant.

If you have actually played those "expansion packs" you would realize that they are significantly ahead of most standalone titles.

But they are ahead because of grind mechanics... not acual content quality/variety. I lvoe MMO's, but that arguement is always ridiculous, the time comes with the style of game in MMOs case, not the "sheer ammount of content compared to stand alone games" which is a laughable idea.
Avatar image for AFBrat77
AFBrat77

26848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#47 AFBrat77
Member since 2004 • 26848 Posts

[QUOTE="Aku101"]

What's so good about blizzard? They make a game like every 10 years.

Danm_999

They released a game this year, in 2007, in 2004, in 2003, in 2002, in 2000 and in 1999.

Also, Lord of Destruction expansion for Diablo 2 came out in 2001, so you can add another.

Avatar image for deactivated-5fc30280b8881
deactivated-5fc30280b8881

446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-5fc30280b8881
Member since 2005 • 446 Posts

Blizzard has, in a way, lost it. It is partly because of WoW. I'm not saying that WoW is a bad product, far from it. It's just that, previously, Blizzard was a product-orientated, customer-focused company. It released games, and that was it. WoW requires the company to be service-oriented, not product-oriented. The focus on serving the customer was there by the time WoW came out, at least. But the recent stuff, like a three-part StarCraft 2, cutting LAN from StarCraft 2 and so on are clear signs of losing that focus on serving the customers. Whether it's because the StarCraft devs caught the Vision Disease, or because of Kotick's hunger of money, I can't say definitively. It sounds a bit more like the Vision Disease, though.

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"] Actually, three of those are full games. Diablo 2, Wc3 and WoW.

WarIII was released in 02. and I know they have significant content, they're just not 'separate games'.
Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

As WoW progresses the game just gets more casual. It's far too easy to gain rewards, and is way too accessible to bad players, and as such the game is nowhere near as great as the first game was PvP/PvE-wise.

I'm still gonna try out Diablo 3 though since Diablo 2 was awesome way back when I played it. Don't care much for Starcraft 2 though.