Have a PC, have a PS3 - What the hell is the point of the 360?

  • 115 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for thetruespin
thetruespin

3256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 thetruespin
Member since 2008 • 3256 Posts

I have a PS3 and am finally getting a new PC. However, it got me thinking. With games like Gears (and no doubt Gears 2 soon) & Mass Effect also available on the PC, and the PC having the best verrsion of games like Left4Dead, what is the point of the 360? Halo 3?

Surely best combo this gen is PC & PS3?

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
Looking at the AAE/AAAE list, it appears to have decent games that aren't on the PS3 or PC. So there's yer answer.
Avatar image for Fumpa
Fumpa

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Fumpa
Member since 2003 • 3307 Posts
What, no Wii in the "best combo"?
Avatar image for SmokeyMcMuffin
SmokeyMcMuffin

106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#4 SmokeyMcMuffin
Member since 2008 • 106 Posts

I have a PS3 and am finally getting a new PC. However, it got me thinking. With games like Gears (and no doubt Gears 2 soon) & Mass Effect also available on the PC, and the PC having the best verrsion of games like Left4Dead, what is the point of the 360? Halo 3?

Surely best combo this gen is PC & PS3?

thetruespin
i disagree, but if your happy with the pc ps3 combo then good for you..
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
Gotta love that argument. Lets combine a ~400 euro PS3, and ~1000 euro PC, and put them against the 360(200 euro). And 360 still has a load of good games not on either.
Avatar image for thetruespin
thetruespin

3256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 thetruespin
Member since 2008 • 3256 Posts
Gotta love that argument. Lets combine a ~400 euro PS3, and ~1000 euro PC, and put them against the 360(200 euro). And 360 still has a load of good games not on either.locopatho
I think its the fact that most people have a PC anyway. I mean, all you guys posting at the moment are on a PC (or maybe a MAC).
Avatar image for Thewbacca
Thewbacca

3197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 Thewbacca
Member since 2006 • 3197 Posts
Gotta love that argument. Lets combine a ~400 euro PS3, and ~1000 euro PC, and put them against the 360(200 euro). And 360 still has a load of good games not on either.locopatho
Load is right, good ius wrong. You can get much better substitutes for all games on the 360, and the Ps3 or the PC will not have failure anywhere near as high. The 360 is irrelevant to modern gaming.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

pretty sure the combo this gen is PC / 360. there are still some great games on the 360 that you can't get on PC and vice-versa. all you need to do is look at a list of games to figure that one out.

the only reason i'd go PC / PS3 is if you're a huge MGS fan, or want LBP, or KZ2, etc. all comes down to personal preference at the end of the day.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
[QUOTE="thetruespin"][QUOTE="locopatho"] I think its the fact that most people have a PC anyway. I mean, all you guys posting at the moment are on a PC (or maybe a MAC).

Internet browsing is a lot less taxing then gaming, this thing can barely run games from 5 years ago :P
[QUOTE="locopatho"]Gotta love that argument. Lets combine a ~400 euro PS3, and ~1000 euro PC, and put them against the 360(200 euro). And 360 still has a load of good games not on either.Thewbacca
Load is right, good ius wrong. You can get much better substitutes for all games on the 360, and the Ps3 or the PC will not have failure anywhere near as high. The 360 is irrelevant to modern gaming.

Lol what a lie.
Avatar image for unknown37
unknown37

5135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#13 unknown37
Member since 2006 • 5135 Posts

Well there is this little game called Halo 3, You might have heard of it.

Plus it plays old xbox games like KOTOR and JSRF :D

Those 3 things make it worth it alone

Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts
To the point of really needing to have a 360 having a PC and a PS3 of course not, but if you still have the money and time to explore yet another platform, go for the 360, that way you can focus only on playing the best games each has to offer
Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
All about the exclusives and what friends have.... I own all 3.
Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts
because you would be less of a fanboyshadow_hosi
hmmmm agreed
Avatar image for ANeuralPathway
ANeuralPathway

580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 ANeuralPathway
Member since 2008 • 580 Posts
Learning how enoyable paying a full console access tax is each year? Why stop with income taxes, double the taxy goodness.
Avatar image for Lord__Darkstorn
Lord__Darkstorn

2031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Lord__Darkstorn
Member since 2007 • 2031 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"]Gotta love that argument. Lets combine a ~400 euro PS3, and ~1000 euro PC, and put them against the 360(200 euro). And 360 still has a load of good games not on either.Thewbacca
Load is right, good ius wrong. You can get much better substitutes for all games on the 360, and the Ps3 or the PC will not have failure anywhere near as high. The 360 is irrelevant to modern gaming.

Better put your flame shield up *bzzzzzrt*

Avatar image for felixworks
felixworks

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 felixworks
Member since 2005 • 337 Posts

Well there is this little game called Halo 3, You might have heard of it.

Plus it plays old xbox games like KOTOR and JSRF :D

Those 3 things make it worth it alone

unknown37

Uhhh...2=3 now??

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="locopatho"]Gotta love that argument. Lets combine a ~400 euro PS3, and ~1000 euro PC, and put them against the 360(200 euro). And 360 still has a load of good games not on either.Thewbacca
Load is right, good ius wrong. You can get much better substitutes for all games on the 360, and the Ps3 or the PC will not have failure anywhere near as high. The 360 is irrelevant to modern gaming.

i'm going to have to go ahead and disagree there. i think a lot of other gamers do, too.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="unknown37"]

Well there is this little game called Halo 3, You might have heard of it.

Plus it plays old xbox games like KOTOR and JSRF :D

Those 3 things make it worth it alone

felixworks

Uhhh...2=3 now??

Halo 3 = a KOTOR = b JSRF = c a + b + c = 3 (halo3 + KOTOR + JSRF) class dismissed :)
Avatar image for MrSlippery39
MrSlippery39

730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 MrSlippery39
Member since 2004 • 730 Posts
I have a 360, what the hell is the point of the PS3 and PC?
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#23 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
I would venture that the point would be the games that are not on the PS3 or PC, but you know, that is only a guess.
Avatar image for Thewbacca
Thewbacca

3197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 Thewbacca
Member since 2006 • 3197 Posts
To the point of really needing to have a 360 having a PC and a PS3 of course not, but if you still have the money and time to explore yet another platform, go for the 360, that way you can focus only on playing the best games each has to offerJKusanagi
But thats the thing - it doesn't have good things now, and it won't in the future (or did you miss hearing Epic saying the 360 had reached its peak?). The 360 is effectively a dead console now, and a burden on the other three.
Avatar image for obamanian
obamanian

3351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 obamanian
Member since 2008 • 3351 Posts

I have a PS3 and am finally getting a new PC. However, it got me thinking. With games like Gears (and no doubt Gears 2 soon) & Mass Effect also available on the PC, and the PC having the best verrsion of games like Left4Dead, what is the point of the 360? Halo 3?

Surely best combo this gen is PC & PS3?

thetruespin

The point of 360 is that for 199$ you can replace PS3+PC

- it gets almost all major PC games, like most WRPG's, Alan Wake, KUF2 etc etc

- it gets 360 only games like Fable 2, Lost Odyssey, Star Ocean 4, Cry On etc

- it gets JRPG's like FF13 that previously were PS3 only, now you just buy a 360 for it

So, 360 combines perfectly both worlds, western PC games and Japanese games, so that is its point, save 400$+800$=1200$ and pay just 199$ to get most of the best games PC and PS3 have and its own amazing exclusives

Avatar image for unknown37
unknown37

5135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#26 unknown37
Member since 2006 • 5135 Posts
[QUOTE="JKusanagi"]To the point of really needing to have a 360 having a PC and a PS3 of course not, but if you still have the money and time to explore yet another platform, go for the 360, that way you can focus only on playing the best games each has to offerThewbacca
But thats the thing - it doesn't have good things now, and it won't in the future (or did you miss hearing Epic saying the 360 had reached its peak?). The 360 is effectively a dead console now, and a burden on the other three.

So just cuz its met its graphical limit that means its already dead?
Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts
[QUOTE="JKusanagi"]To the point of really needing to have a 360 having a PC and a PS3 of course not, but if you still have the money and time to explore yet another platform, go for the 360, that way you can focus only on playing the best games each has to offerThewbacca
But thats the thing - it doesn't have good things now, and it won't in the future (or did you miss hearing Epic saying the 360 had reached its peak?). The 360 is effectively a dead console now, and a burden on the other three.

What I did read is that Epic had a 2 games exclusivity contract with M$ so Gears 3 might be multiplatform. Still I think the 360 has much to offer yet, since lots of 3rd party developers are supporting it
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#28 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="JKusanagi"]To the point of really needing to have a 360 having a PC and a PS3 of course not, but if you still have the money and time to explore yet another platform, go for the 360, that way you can focus only on playing the best games each has to offerThewbacca
But thats the thing - it doesn't have good things now, and it won't in the future (or did you miss hearing Epic saying the 360 had reached its peak?). The 360 is effectively a dead console now, and a burden on the other three.

Do you honestly believe that tripe? How about when Cliff B said that quote was taken out of context, and then explained it as it was intended?
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="Thewbacca"][QUOTE="JKusanagi"]To the point of really needing to have a 360 having a PC and a PS3 of course not, but if you still have the money and time to explore yet another platform, go for the 360, that way you can focus only on playing the best games each has to offerJKusanagi
But thats the thing - it doesn't have good things now, and it won't in the future (or did you miss hearing Epic saying the 360 had reached its peak?). The 360 is effectively a dead console now, and a burden on the other three.

What I did read is that Epic had a 2 games exclusivity contract with M$ so Gears 3 might be multiplatform. Still I think the 360 has much to offer yet, since lots of 3rd party developers are supporting it

he's taking the quote from epic out of context anyways, i wouldn't take it too seriously. cows love to try to spin that quote, here's the full quote: '"I'm not the technical guy... all I know is that with the two to three more years of optimization that we've had, we're much further along than I think, three years ago, we thought we were going to get. So I think we're certainly approaching the upper end of it, as far as what developers are able to do with it, but just looking at all the demos we saw today -- ours and others -- it's clear that all the games just keep improving, and keep pushing that bar. I think it's just a matter of, you know, it's a slow cycle; you only get a kick at it every couple years, and so it takes a while for people to see that progress."'
Avatar image for Darth_Stalin
Darth_Stalin

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Darth_Stalin
Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts
Um, no one is forcing you to buy one....my gosh, you love attention don't you? :?
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="3picuri3"] he's taking the quote from epic out of context anyways, i wouldn't take it too seriously. cows love to try to spin that quote, here's the full quote: '"I'm not the technical guy... all I know is that with the two to three more years of optimization that we've had, we're much further along than I think, three years ago, we thought we were going to get. So I think we're certainly approaching the upper end of it, as far as what developers are able to do with it, but just looking at all the demos we saw today -- ours and others -- it's clear that all the games just keep improving, and keep pushing that bar. I think it's just a matter of, you know, it's a slow cycle; you only get a kick at it every couple years, and so it takes a while for people to see that progress."'

Not only that, but Cliff Bleszinski said, "[Rod Fergusson's] quote that was taken out of context," Bleszinski told Videogaming247. "I think we're pushing the 360, but the system's not going to get any more RAM, it's not going to get a faster processor, but at the same time that puts the impetus on our programmers and artists to be smarter with what they work with."

Bleszinski went on to compare the Xbox 360 life cycle to that of the Super Nintendo console; graphics gradually increased in quality and just as it seems to reach its limit someone uses "ninja code tricks" to push more out of the system. "It's amazing what programmers can do. I wouldn't count our guys out yet," Cliff added.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="3picuri3"] he's taking the quote from epic out of context anyways, i wouldn't take it too seriously. cows love to try to spin that quote, here's the full quote: '"I'm not the technical guy... all I know is that with the two to three more years of optimization that we've had, we're much further along than I think, three years ago, we thought we were going to get. So I think we're certainly approaching the upper end of it, as far as what developers are able to do with it, but just looking at all the demos we saw today -- ours and others -- it's clear that all the games just keep improving, and keep pushing that bar. I think it's just a matter of, you know, it's a slow cycle; you only get a kick at it every couple years, and so it takes a while for people to see that progress."'

Not only that, but Cliff Bleszinski said, "[Rod Fergusson's] quote that was taken out of context," Bleszinski told Videogaming247. "I think we're pushing the 360, but the system's not going to get any more RAM, it's not going to get a faster processor, but at the same time that puts the impetus on our programmers and artists to be smarter with what they work with."

Bleszinski went on to compare the Xbox 360 life cycle to that of the Super Nintendo console; graphics gradually increased in quality and just as it seems to reach its limit someone uses "ninja code tricks" to push more out of the system. "It's amazing what programmers can do. I wouldn't count our guys out yet," Cliff added.

i think the most hilarious part is that cows use it for evidence that the 360 has hit some technical limit when Fergusson opened with 'I'm not the technical guy...'. it's priceless stuff :) i wonder where Thewbacca went? *looks around*
Avatar image for StealthKnife
StealthKnife

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 StealthKnife
Member since 2008 • 2104 Posts
completely ytrue, im planning on selling my 360
Avatar image for Trinexxx
Trinexxx

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Trinexxx
Member since 2008 • 883 Posts

Here are my reasons for being a 360 owner.


Games:

I want to be able to play my favourite franchises when they are released, not a year or two later.

Believe it or not, there are some fantastic exclusive games on the 360 that are not available on the PC. Forza 2, Halo 3, Gears 2, Fable 2, Banjo, all the JRPG's, etc.

I also enjoy playing splitscreen with my friends which is not conveniant/possible on the PC.
I also enjoy playing my games on my couch, with a controller (I could never play NHL 09 with a mouse and keyboard), and on my 51" HDTV.

And although it may be hard to believe, I really dig Xbox Live and think its a great service thats exclusive to the console.

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

To be able to pick from the largest list of quality exclusive titles this gen out of the three consoles.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#36 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="3picuri3"] i think the most hilarious part is that cows use it for evidence that the 360 has hit some technical limit when Fergusson opened with 'I'm not the technical guy...'. it's priceless stuff :) i wonder where Thewbacca went? *looks around*

Plus its common sense. Consoles are not PCs. They will inevitably hit a limit on their graphics, but as every generation thus far has shown, its that graphics get progressively better on every system as time goes on and programmers learn more about the boxes. Gears 2 is not the peak of the 360, and Killzone 2 is not the peak of the PS3.

We never really found the peaks with the PS2, Xbox, and GC, and I don't think we will ever have a game that taps the complete power and resources of any of the current gen systems.
Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#37 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts
Uh... Because there are exclusie 360 games?
Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="JKusanagi"]To the point of really needing to have a 360 having a PC and a PS3 of course not, but if you still have the money and time to explore yet another platform, go for the 360, that way you can focus only on playing the best games each has to offerThewbacca
But thats the thing - it doesn't have good things now, and it won't in the future (or did you miss hearing Epic saying the 360 had reached its peak?). The 360 is effectively a dead console now, and a burden on the other three.

If that is true and then you cannot get anymore horse power out of the 360 then:

Isn't the Wii already maxed?

Developers are forbidden to make new games for the system?

You're showing yourself up to be a die-hard fanboy? :lol:

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="3picuri3"] i think the most hilarious part is that cows use it for evidence that the 360 has hit some technical limit when Fergusson opened with 'I'm not the technical guy...'. it's priceless stuff :) i wonder where Thewbacca went? *looks around*

Plus its common sense. Consoles are not PCs. They will inevitably hit a limit on their graphics, but as every generation thus far has shown, its that graphics get progressively better on every system as time goes on and programmers learn more about the boxes. Gears 2 is not the peak of the 360, and Killzone 2 is not the peak of the PS3.

We never really found the peaks with the PS2, Xbox, and GC, and I don't think we will ever have a game that taps the complete power and resources of any of the current gen systems.

absolutely. to be honest i'm actually shocked they're still bleeding more out of it - it's really interesting to see and kind of underscores how lazy some PC devs can be. if they can squeeze that much out of the hardware on the 360 it seems really odd to me that PC titles struggle with current hardware. just goes to show you how a hardware first, software second mentality can be of benefit as opposed to the software first, hardware second mentality of PC. i love my PC gaming, but i think too many devs assume you'll upgrade your hardware to play their game - instead of making a game that runs on a wide variety of hardware.
Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts
[QUOTE="3picuri3"] i think the most hilarious part is that cows use it for evidence that the 360 has hit some technical limit when Fergusson opened with 'I'm not the technical guy...'. it's priceless stuff :) i wonder where Thewbacca went? *looks around*SpruceCaboose
Plus its common sense. Consoles are not PCs. They will inevitably hit a limit on their graphics, but as every generation thus far has shown, its that graphics get progressively better on every system as time goes on and programmers learn more about the boxes. Gears 2 is not the peak of the 360, and Killzone 2 is not the peak of the PS3.

We never really found the peaks with the PS2, Xbox, and GC, and I don't think we will ever have a game that taps the complete power and resources of any of the current gen systems.

True although I have to say they are incremental increases in performance although I was surprised last gen on how much they were squeazing out of each system at the end. However, even when they do hit a ceiling on overall performance, it doesn't mean the end of the console. If a developer is already that used to a system then they can spare more time in developing new ideas and in being more creative with titles as you also tend to find towards the end of a given cycle imho.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#41 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17906 Posts
[QUOTE="thetruespin"]

I have a PS3 and am finally getting a new PC. However, it got me thinking. With games like Gears (and no doubt Gears 2 soon) & Mass Effect also available on the PC, and the PC having the best verrsion of games like Left4Dead, what is the point of the 360? Halo 3?

Surely best combo this gen is PC & PS3?

obamanian

The point of 360 is that for 199$ you can replace PS3+PC

- it gets almost all major PC games, like most WRPG's, Alan Wake, KUF2 etc etc

- it gets 360 only games like Fable 2, Lost Odyssey, Star Ocean 4, Cry On etc

- it gets JRPG's like FF13 that previously were PS3 only, now you just buy a 360 for it

So, 360 combines perfectly both worlds, western PC games and Japanese games, so that is its point, save 400$+800$=1200$ and pay just 199$ to get most of the best games PC and PS3 have and its own amazing exclusives

I agree 100%, but the PS3 does have some good exclusives, just not all i thought it would be, i thought FF13, MGS4, Tekken, JRPG's, and Tomb Raider were all gonna be on PS3 only, thats why i bought one. but it didnt happen, so i rarely play it, with the exception of LBP but that was only recently
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="3picuri3"] i think the most hilarious part is that cows use it for evidence that the 360 has hit some technical limit when Fergusson opened with 'I'm not the technical guy...'. it's priceless stuff :) i wonder where Thewbacca went? *looks around*DAZZER7
Plus its common sense. Consoles are not PCs. They will inevitably hit a limit on their graphics, but as every generation thus far has shown, its that graphics get progressively better on every system as time goes on and programmers learn more about the boxes. Gears 2 is not the peak of the 360, and Killzone 2 is not the peak of the PS3.

We never really found the peaks with the PS2, Xbox, and GC, and I don't think we will ever have a game that taps the complete power and resources of any of the current gen systems.

True although I have to say they are incremental increases in performance although I was surprised last gen on how much they were squeazing out of each system at the end. However, even when they do hit a ceiling on overall performance, it doesn't mean the end of the console. If a developer is already that used to a system then they can spare more time in developing new ideas and in being more creative with titles as you also tend to find towards the end of a given cycle imho.

this is true. and i think it's what fergusson was getting at. either way it's bloody impressive they're still bleeding improvements for what is essentially technology that is close to 8-10 years old when taking development in to considering, not just retail release. your drawings are pretty awesome btw - show some good potential. keep it up ;). if i still had my magazine i'd offer to publish some.
Avatar image for naydaslayer
naydaslayer

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 naydaslayer
Member since 2008 • 371 Posts
There isn't much of a reason to get a 360 after you have pc and ps3, but they have some exclusives that are only on the 360.
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
There isn't much of a reason to get a 360 after you have pc and ps3, but they have some exclusives that are only on the 360.naydaslayer
and you're 90% cow :P grain of salt added, heh.
Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts
[QUOTE="DAZZER7"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"] Plus its common sense. Consoles are not PCs. They will inevitably hit a limit on their graphics, but as every generation thus far has shown, its that graphics get progressively better on every system as time goes on and programmers learn more about the boxes. Gears 2 is not the peak of the 360, and Killzone 2 is not the peak of the PS3.

We never really found the peaks with the PS2, Xbox, and GC, and I don't think we will ever have a game that taps the complete power and resources of any of the current gen systems.3picuri3

True although I have to say they are incremental increases in performance although I was surprised last gen on how much they were squeazing out of each system at the end. However, even when they do hit a ceiling on overall performance, it doesn't mean the end of the console. If a developer is already that used to a system then they can spare more time in developing new ideas and in being more creative with titles as you also tend to find towards the end of a given cycle imho.

this is true. and i think it's what fergusson was getting at. either way it's bloody impressive they're still bleeding improvements for what is essentially technology that is close to 8-10 years old when taking development in to considering, not just retail release. your drawings are pretty awesome btw - show some good potential. keep it up ;). if i still had my magazine i'd offer to publish some.

Thnx mate.

Avatar image for naydaslayer
naydaslayer

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#46 naydaslayer
Member since 2008 • 371 Posts

[QUOTE="naydaslayer"]There isn't much of a reason to get a 360 after you have pc and ps3, but they have some exclusives that are only on the 360.3picuri3
and you're 90% cow :P grain of salt added, heh.

And you're 100% lemming, with nothing else added. Who cares?

Avatar image for sireclaborn
sireclaborn

1305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 sireclaborn
Member since 2008 • 1305 Posts
There isn't much of a reason to get a 360 after you have pc and ps3, but they have some exclusives that are only on the 360.naydaslayer
agree i haven't seen much of a argument from the lems. with a pc and ps3 i don't have to worry about rrod or paying ms to play online. halo 3??? thats going to be on the pc one day.... and since im not interested in halo i could care less about the 360. the few games the 360 has that are just on the 360 don't seem worth it in my opinion.
Avatar image for Thewbacca
Thewbacca

3197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#48 Thewbacca
Member since 2006 • 3197 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="3picuri3"] he's taking the quote from epic out of context anyways, i wouldn't take it too seriously. cows love to try to spin that quote, here's the full quote: '"I'm not the technical guy... all I know is that with the two to three more years of optimization that we've had, we're much further along than I think, three years ago, we thought we were going to get. So I think we're certainly approaching the upper end of it, as far as what developers are able to do with it, but just looking at all the demos we saw today -- ours and others -- it's clear that all the games just keep improving, and keep pushing that bar. I think it's just a matter of, you know, it's a slow cycle; you only get a kick at it every couple years, and so it takes a while for people to see that progress."'

Not only that, but Cliff Bleszinski said, "[Rod Fergusson's] quote that was taken out of context," Bleszinski told Videogaming247. "I think we're pushing the 360, but the system's not going to get any more RAM, it's not going to get a faster processor, but at the same time that puts the impetus on our programmers and artists to be smarter with what they work with."

Bleszinski went on to compare the Xbox 360 life cycle to that of the Super Nintendo console; graphics gradually increased in quality and just as it seems to reach its limit someone uses "ninja code tricks" to push more out of the system. "It's amazing what programmers can do. I wouldn't count our guys out yet," Cliff added.

So, he's comparing a system of coding that had been working with a standard console, but was untried, and was thuis able to get more things out of it (Like the NES, the Playstation 2, etc.) to a system of coding that was ages old, and relies on new hardware to make it sparkle (the 360, which is based on PC coding, which we already know well enough). Whichever way you slice it, that system has peaked, while th other three still have better years ahead of them.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
Member since 2005 • 4624 Posts
*Reads Thread topic* *Stares hard at 360* *Continues playing 360*
Avatar image for Fumpa
Fumpa

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Fumpa
Member since 2003 • 3307 Posts
[QUOTE="naydaslayer"]There isn't much of a reason to get a 360 after you have pc and ps3, but they have some exclusives that are only on the 360.sireclaborn
agree i haven't seen much of a argument from the lems. with a pc and ps3 i don't have to worry about rrod or paying ms to play online. halo 3??? thats going to be on the pc one day.... and since im not interested in halo i could care less about the 360. the few games the 360 has that are just on the 360 don't seem worth it in my opinion.

why get a ps3 if you have a 360 and a pc? i'm not going to throw stones and list what people perceive as faults in the ps3 or where the 360 is better than a ps3.

both systems have exclusives. i can only assume that the reason you need a ps3 for this supposed "best combo" is because of the exclusives it has to offer. if you start listing of anything other than exclusives then consider what the 360 also has to offer outside of its exclusives. honestly though, if there is a "best combo" for this gen, and you all believe that the PC has a large number of the games already on the powerhouse consoles, then the obvious best combo this generation is PC/Wii, or 360/Wii, or PS3/Wii.

silly topic, and probably one that's been done a million times.

Also, not everyone has a PC that can handle the games, the PC is often used by people for reasons other than gaming so it may not be accessible at all time, PC is not as easy to set up and move around, not everyone knows how to set up everything to play the games...I'm certain there are many other very good reasons why a PC is not the same as a console. So just because a game exists on both doesn't mean they'll both provide the same experience...unless you've got a kickbutt setup but that's not something everyone has.