Hermits --- Why are you claiming ownage on lemmings for the Halo 2 score when...

  • 83 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ninjaxams
ninjaxams

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#51 ninjaxams
Member since 2004 • 7500 Posts

It scored 7.0 on YOUR PLATFORM! That's a new one hermits! Claiming ownage on lemmings when a game gets a much worse score on your platform! Seriously, WTF! By your logic if Gear of War releases on PC 3 years later and gets a 7.4, then lemmings are owned. WTF!

I find it funny that many of the hermits are claiming ownage on lemmings for the score...even though it is ON THE PC!!! Wow! They are saying stuff like "Just shows how high PC standards are for FPS and how consoles have ridiculously lower standards". Hermits...Halo 2 got the lowest score on your platform, the PC! Quit claiming ownage on lemmings! It is ridiculous.

AvIdGaMeR444
gears should have recieved a 7.4 in the first place
Avatar image for TekkenMaster606
TekkenMaster606

10980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 TekkenMaster606
Member since 2006 • 10980 Posts
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

It scored 7.0 on YOUR PLATFORM!

DXGreat1_HGL

 

Becuase THEIR game isn't all that great compared to what's on OUR PLATFORM. Based upon that score, 30% of all the PC games out there are better than one of the best games on the Xbox.

I think that's were the problem lies. The console people don't realize that Halo2 seems pretty banal compared to most other PC FPS's. It's a good console experience , but not a good PC experience...

 

Pretty much. The fact that it scored low on the PC still does not change the fact that Halo 2 was one of the BEST console shooter experiences out there.  

Avatar image for ---n00b_kid---
---n00b_kid---

803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 ---n00b_kid---
Member since 2007 • 803 Posts

The reason hermits can claim ownage is because lemmings always try to say that Halo is the greatest FPS franchise EVER! The truth is that it has nothing on most good PC FPS games. Onizuka36

Other than the Half-Life franchise can you name me one FPS that is excellent for the PC (has an excellent STORY, control mechanics, physics, etc) ??

Doom 3 is rubbish and repetitive.

Far Cry got the same score on the Xbox as PC (9.2).

FEAR came out later on Xbox 360 and is nearly the same game with additional content.

Call of Duty 2 came to Xbox 360 and is identical.

Crysis has not come out yet, so you can't use that.

Most cows hide behind Hermits, in fact they pretend to be Hermits in order to bash Halo.

Avatar image for nooblertron
nooblertron

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 nooblertron
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

"The PC has more than its fair share of amazing shooters that blow Halo 2 away in every possible way"

 

 

 

 

The review says that. Thats why they are claiming ownage. Your best and basically only fps game is trash compared to PC shooters. 

Avatar image for Peter_Darkstar
Peter_Darkstar

1091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Peter_Darkstar
Member since 2003 • 1091 Posts

As a hermit, I see halo 2 on the PC as simply another mediocre FPS game.

It might have been astounding on the Xbox, no doubt. However it simply does not stand up to PC standards. 

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#56 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Read the front page of the PC tab: "Halo 2 is a decent game that will appeal to NO ONE who has played recent PC FPS games." Thats the just of it.
Avatar image for raiden509
raiden509

3181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 raiden509
Member since 2006 • 3181 Posts

I thought it was the Cows?

ArisShadows
Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#58 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts
[QUOTE="Onizuka36"]

The reason hermits can claim ownage is because lemmings always try to say that Halo is the greatest FPS franchise EVER! The truth is that it has nothing on most good PC FPS games. ---n00b_kid---

Other than the Half-Life franchise can you name me one FPS that is excellent for the PC (has an excellent STORY, control mechanics, physics, etc) ??

Doom 3 is rubbish and repetitive.

Far Cry got the same score on the Xbox as PC (9.2).

FEAR came out later on Xbox 360 and is nearly the same game with additional content.

Call of Duty 2 came to Xbox 360 and is identical.

Crysis has not come out yet, so you can't use that.

Most cows hide behind Hermits, in fact they pretend to be Hermits in order to bash Halo.

FarCry on PC was amazing, and not the same game that consoles got.

Doom 3 was good, but it was more of a tech demo for their engine.

FEAR on PC not only looks better on PC, but has an expansion pack plus free Multiplayer available from the DEV

Call of Duty 1 + UO are miles better than Big Red One or any other console iteration. COD2 was the same game, looking better on PC with decent hardware.

--------------------------------------

No One Lives Forever 1 and 2  is one of the best FPS's of all time, look it up.

STALKER has an Amazing storyline and was just recently released a few months ago.

System Shock 2, look it up, I'm not going to waste my time.

 Return to Castle Wolfenstein on PC was amazing. Not to mention, spurred one of the biggest online communities with Enemy Territory. Ported to console, but not nearly the same game,

Clive Barker's Undying...One of the scariest games of all time not to mention was amazing. Jericho, the spiritual successor is coming out later this year.

Painkiller and expansion...Not the best story, but very creepy and a nice iteration of old school shooters. Still to this day, best Boss battles in any FPS to date.

Unreal 1 and 2: Awsome story from the guys at Epic. 

 

 

 

Avatar image for eastside49er
eastside49er

19559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 eastside49er
Member since 2002 • 19559 Posts

Probably this bit of the review that does it: "The PC has more than its fair share of amazing shooters that blow Halo 2 away in every possible way"kraidiation

Considering it is nearly 3 years old, I would hope so.

Avatar image for nooblertron
nooblertron

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 nooblertron
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

why is this thread still going

 

 

"The PC has more than its fair share of amazing shooters that blow Halo 2 away in every possible way"

 

 

 

/thread 

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts
[QUOTE="Onizuka36"]

The reason hermits can claim ownage is because lemmings always try to say that Halo is the greatest FPS franchise EVER! The truth is that it has nothing on most good PC FPS games. ---n00b_kid---

Other than the Half-Life franchise can you name me one FPS that is excellent for the PC (has an excellent STORY, control mechanics, physics, etc) ??

Doom 3 is rubbish and repetitive.

Far Cry got the same score on the Xbox as PC (9.2).

FEAR came out later on Xbox 360 and is nearly the same game with additional content.

Call of Duty 2 came to Xbox 360 and is identical.

Crysis has not come out yet, so you can't use that.

Most cows hide behind Hermits, in fact they pretend to be Hermits in order to bash Halo.

 

Dude, Halo just sucks. It's that simple. 

Avatar image for oback
oback

7151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 oback
Member since 2004 • 7151 Posts
[QUOTE="ArisShadows"]

I thought it was the Cows?

AvIdGaMeR444

It is hermits as well. There are already several threads talking about the score, and hermits have made fun of lemmings for the score, saying that the game has such ridiculously low standards for Xbox, and that is why it scored so high on Xbox. They are claiming ownage on lemmings ironically.

you really need to stop taking drugs.  

Avatar image for Neal_Gore
Neal_Gore

416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Neal_Gore
Member since 2007 • 416 Posts

I play games on the PC as well as the 360 and right now the 360 has better FPSs. What game does the PC have that is better right now?

CS? give me a break! UT2004? Holy moly that game is just as outdated as Halo 2!

Crysis isn't out yet herberts and who knows if the game will match the graphics. With guys jumping around in it's multiplayer it doesn't look much different than Far Cry.

Avatar image for Neal_Gore
Neal_Gore

416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Neal_Gore
Member since 2007 • 416 Posts

The reason hermits can claim ownage is because lemmings always try to say that Halo is the greatest FPS franchise EVER! The truth is that it has nothing on most good PC FPS games. The review points out that Halo 2 is worse than most good PC FPS in almost every where. Hence, TLHBO

Onizuka36

Lets compare 2004 PC FPSs vs Halo 2 and Halo 2 will come on top

/thread

Avatar image for joeblak
joeblak

5474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 joeblak
Member since 2005 • 5474 Posts
[QUOTE="Onizuka36"]

The reason hermits can claim ownage is because lemmings always try to say that Halo is the greatest FPS franchise EVER! The truth is that it has nothing on most good PC FPS games. The review points out that Halo 2 is worse than most good PC FPS in almost every where. Hence, TLHBO

Neal_Gore

Lets compare 2004 PC FPSs vs Halo 2 and Halo 2 will come on top

/thread

Is that why Half-Life 2 won FPS GOTY in 2004? 

Avatar image for t3hTwinky
t3hTwinky

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#66 t3hTwinky
Member since 2005 • 3701 Posts

Lets compare 2004 PC FPSs vs Halo 2 and Halo 2 will come on top

Half. Life. 2.

Its longer, its prettier, it has a better tale to tell.

Farcry.

Its longer, its prettier, it has a better tale to tell.

Chronicles of Riddick came out in 04 as well, I think.

Just off the top of my head.

 

Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts
[QUOTE="Onizuka36"]

The reason hermits can claim ownage is because lemmings always try to say that Halo is the greatest FPS franchise EVER! The truth is that it has nothing on most good PC FPS games. The review points out that Halo 2 is worse than most good PC FPS in almost every where. Hence, TLHBO

Neal_Gore

Lets compare 2004 PC FPSs vs Halo 2 and Halo 2 will come on top

/thread

 

is that why Half Life 2 won shooter GOTY? 

Avatar image for Koalakommander
Koalakommander

5462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Koalakommander
Member since 2006 • 5462 Posts

It scored 7.0 on YOUR PLATFORM! That's a new one hermits! Claiming ownage on lemmings when a game gets a much worse score on your platform! Seriously, WTF! By your logic if Gear of War releases on PC 3 years later and gets a 7.4, then lemmings are owned. WTF!

I find it funny that many of the hermits are claiming ownage on lemmings for the score...even though it is ON THE PC!!! Wow! They are saying stuff like "Just shows how high PC standards are for FPS and how consoles have ridiculously lower standards". Hermits...Halo 2 got the lowest score on your platform, the PC! Quit claiming ownage on lemmings! It is ridiculous.

AvIdGaMeR444

you have no idea what you are talking about 

Avatar image for MaTT2011
MaTT2011

3949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 MaTT2011
Member since 2005 • 3949 Posts

Because the STANDARDS OF QUALITY are MUCH HIGHER on OUR platform than it is on the xbox.

 

PC has better games, more innovation and generally better gameplay by virtue of the platform itself. Whereas the xbox is the lowest common denominator and for gamepad peons out there a 7.0 is a 9.0 because they have nothign else to compare it to.

 

Standards are LOWER are xbox, hence why bad games like halo 2 get a 9..........its the best of the worst.

 

So you , halo fanboys and console fanboys have been owned in a huge way.

 

/thread 

Avatar image for Koalakommander
Koalakommander

5462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Koalakommander
Member since 2006 • 5462 Posts

Because the STANDARDS OF QUALITY are MUCH HIGHER on OUR platform than it is on the xbox.

 

PC has better games, more innovation and generally better gameplay by virtue of the platform itself. Whereas the xbox is the lowest common denominator and for gamepad peons out there a 7.0 is a 9.0 because they have nothign else to compare it to.

 

Standards are LOWER are xbox, hence why bad games like halo 2 get a 9..........its the best of the worst.

 

So you , halo fanboys and console fanboys have been owned in a huge way.

 

/thread

MaTT2011

Very well said. High scoring shooters on consoles  don't hold a candle to PC FPS.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#71 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

I play games on the PC as well as the 360 and right now the 360 has better FPSs. What game does the PC have that is better right now?

CS? give me a break! UT2004? Holy moly that game is just as outdated as Halo 2!

Crysis isn't out yet herberts and who knows if the game will match the graphics. With guys jumping around in it's multiplayer it doesn't look much different than Far Cry.

Neal_Gore
Actually, every single FPS shooter that is currently AAA on the 360 (Save PD0) is also on the PC with the argueablly better version on the PC.
Avatar image for PS3_3DO
PS3_3DO

10976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 PS3_3DO
Member since 2006 • 10976 Posts

The hermits love Xbox ports! :lol: They all want GEOW and Mass Effect to be on the PC! :lol:

 

Avatar image for joeblak
joeblak

5474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 joeblak
Member since 2005 • 5474 Posts

The hermits love Xbox ports! :lol: They all want GEOW and Mass Effect to be on the PC! :lol:

 

PS3_3DO

I don't think any hermits want GEOW, to be frank. 

Avatar image for Sparky04
Sparky04

3390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Sparky04
Member since 2006 • 3390 Posts

I thought it was the Cows?

ArisShadows

Ya it is mostly Cows. 

Avatar image for astiop
astiop

3582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 astiop
Member since 2005 • 3582 Posts
It scored so low because it came out ages later :/ You really think it would have scored A if it came out the same time as the xbox version?
Avatar image for PS3_3DO
PS3_3DO

10976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 PS3_3DO
Member since 2006 • 10976 Posts
[QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]

The hermits love Xbox ports! :lol: They all want GEOW and Mass Effect to be on the PC! :lol:

 

joeblak

I don't think any hermits want GEOW, to be frank. 

A lot of them want to play the GOTY. :D

 

Avatar image for MC-Leader-Elite
MC-Leader-Elite

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 MC-Leader-Elite
Member since 2007 • 45 Posts

Halo 2 proves the PC can't handle the best FPS.  Hermits complain that Halo 2 is "crappy" this proves them wrong.

 

/thread 

Avatar image for nooblertron
nooblertron

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 nooblertron
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Halo 2 proves the PC can't handle the best FPS. Hermits complain that Halo 2 is "crappy" this proves them wrong.

 

/thread

MC-Leader-Elite

lol....

 

 

read the review

 

 

he says every pc game is leagues better than halo2, in every way possible. 

Avatar image for MC-Leader-Elite
MC-Leader-Elite

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 MC-Leader-Elite
Member since 2007 • 45 Posts
[QUOTE="MC-Leader-Elite"]

Halo 2 proves the PC can't handle the best FPS. Hermits complain that Halo 2 is "crappy" this proves them wrong.

 

/thread

nooblertron

lol....

 

 

read the review

 

 

he says every pc game is leagues better than halo2, in every way possible.


Jeff reviewed it, he's more for PC.

If Greg K was still here, it would of easily gotten AAA.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="Onizuka36"]

The reason hermits can claim ownage is because lemmings always try to say that Halo is the greatest FPS franchise EVER! The truth is that it has nothing on most good PC FPS games. The review points out that Halo 2 is worse than most good PC FPS in almost every where. Hence, TLHBO

AvIdGaMeR444

Yes, lemmings say that Halo is the greatest FPS ever.  But, hermits need to admit ownage for the PC version getting a much, much lower score than anticipated.  Halo 2's port is WORSE on PC than Xbox.  That should be ownage to hermits, not lemmings.  Also, yes...PC FPS are held to higher standards.  However, the standards aren't THAT MUCH HIGHER.  Take a look at Doom 3.  Xbox version scored 8.6 and PC version scored 8.5.  There is virtually no difference except graphics.  Taking that into account, Jeff points out that the PC version has outdated graphics.  How is that ownage to lemmings?  It is the developers' fault of not updating the graphics enough.  Also, standards have changed in 3 years.  If this game released on Xbox right now instead of in 2004, then it would score similarly to the PC version.  Why?  Because STANDARDS FOR CONSOLE FPS HAVE RISEN AS WELL.  Hermits seem to believe that console FPS never evolve.  That is simply not the case.  Claiming ownage on a graphically bad 3 year old port to lemmings when it is on the PC is just wrong. 

and look what happened last time a big name pc shooter came to x360, quake 4 6.7 or something like that vs 8 on pc

Avatar image for a_ratchet_fan
a_ratchet_fan

2207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 a_ratchet_fan
Member since 2006 • 2207 Posts

It scored 7.0 on YOUR PLATFORM! That's a new one hermits! Claiming ownage on lemmings when a game gets a much worse score on your platform! Seriously, WTF! By your logic if Gear of War releases on PC 3 years later and gets a 7.4, then lemmings are owned. WTF!

I find it funny that many of the hermits are claiming ownage on lemmings for the score...even though it is ON THE PC!!! Wow! They are saying stuff like "Just shows how high PC standards are for FPS and how consoles have ridiculously lower standards". Hermits...Halo 2 got the lowest score on your platform, the PC! Quit claiming ownage on lemmings! It is ridiculous.

AvIdGaMeR444

 

They weren't claiming ownage because they thought that it would be miles better on PC.  Far from it.  They were claiming ownage because Halo 2 sucks compared to PC FPS, and Halo 2's score illustrates that.  Halo 2 is an awesome console FPS, not an awesome PC FPS.  Hell, I'm willing to bet that even Half Life ONE beats Halo 2 in terms of story an gameplay.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#82 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Jeff reviewed it, he's more for PC.

If Greg K was still here, it would of easily gotten AAA.

MC-Leader-Elite


Didn't Jeff give Gears 9.6?
Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

The lemmings love PC ports! :lol: They all want Crysis and StarCraft 2 to be on the Xbox 360! :lol:

 

PS3_3DO

fixed 

Avatar image for chrisdojo
chrisdojo

5065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 chrisdojo
Member since 2005 • 5065 Posts
i haven't claimed ownage over lemmings..... but obviously pc games have higher standards.
Avatar image for Subcritical
Subcritical

2286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#85 Subcritical
Member since 2004 • 2286 Posts

The only one that is "owned" is Microsoft.  They have the gall to wait three years to release an FPS, charge $50.00, AND require the purchase of a new OS to run a game.  That is pretty pathetic.

 I can hear Microsoft now, "Halo 2 PC sales were dismal.  As a result, we conclude that PC gaming is dying."  Now all the lemmings will be running around pointing to Microsofts observation as proof that PC gaming is dying and their Xbox is so wonderful.

 

Avatar image for darkmanure
darkmanure

548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 darkmanure
Member since 2007 • 548 Posts

Half Life 2 came out around the same time as Halo 2 and It ultimately won Game of the Year like it was nothing, being nominated over 30 times for game of the year and Halo 3 beta has yet top Half Life 2 graphic which was a good 3 years ago.

How can Halo 2 pc compare to Half Life 2? There's no way in hell.

1. Same graphics, which is ugly now to PC gamers, its way outdated.

2. Halo FPS can't compare to PC FPS, PC FPS is way more balenced then killing people with rockets over and over.

3. It's an old game. 

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#87 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
It's a bad port of a 3 year old game with an OS restriction. The only people that are owned are the people that bought it.