Hopefully Gamespot's bias will not flop F.E.A.R. PS3 as IGN did...

  • 98 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for wok7
wok7

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 wok7
Member since 2003 • 2034 Posts

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/782/782476p1.html

Simply put, PS3 can't hold a candle to the visuals found in Microsoft land. Especially considering the handful of bugs that have dead soldiers getting stuck in walls and twitching on the floor. The detailed environments and clear draw distances aren't found on PS3. If you had never seen the other versions of F.E.A.R., you still wouldn't be impressed with the PS3's graphics, but compared to the PC and 360, this version is graphically dead in the water.

Xenos > RSX confirmed

FEAR PS3 = 8.1

FEAR 360/PC = 9.1+

Pretty surprising since the PS3 version got a few more years of Dev time... 

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#3 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
So bias will make them rate the game lower because its graphics are actually subpar? Interesting...
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
Previews of this game everywhere have been negative. Do not hype FEAR for PS3.
Avatar image for jim_shorts
jim_shorts

7320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#5 jim_shorts
Member since 2006 • 7320 Posts
Maybe the graphics are just bad. 
Avatar image for Not-A-Stalker
Not-A-Stalker

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Not-A-Stalker
Member since 2006 • 5165 Posts
I don't care. I have a horrible computer and never had the chance to play this game, so I will be buying this game regardless of gamespots score.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
Wow, that blows. It has had like 6 months of dev time over the 360 port, and yet it is still worse. :|
Avatar image for Jhung207
Jhung207

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Jhung207
Member since 2005 • 1154 Posts
Why is it a surprise that ps3 is an inferior gaming machine compared to xbox 360.  More ports like rainbow 6 vegas and graw 2 will reconfirm ps3's inferiority.
Avatar image for SergeantSnitch
SergeantSnitch

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SergeantSnitch
Member since 2007 • 3692 Posts
Sony should have released better dev tools earlier.  I knew this game was going to be a crappy waterdown port.
Avatar image for users-name
users-name

574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 users-name
Member since 2006 • 574 Posts
stupid devs are looking for quick cash, but make it seem like theyre improving the product by prolonging its release
Avatar image for _en1gma_
_en1gma_

14617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 _en1gma_
Member since 2004 • 14617 Posts

I don't care. I have a horrible computer and never had the chance to play this game, so I will be buying this game regardless of gamespots score.Not-A-Stalker

it would clearly be best to get it for the 360 

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
The graphics were not impressive on the 360 either. So they must be really bad on the PS3.
Avatar image for Sollet
Sollet

8288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 Sollet
Member since 2003 • 8288 Posts
WEll what do you expect? it's a port of a port!
Avatar image for Not-A-Stalker
Not-A-Stalker

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Not-A-Stalker
Member since 2006 • 5165 Posts

Why is it a surprise that ps3 is an inferior gaming machine compared to xbox 360. More ports like rainbow 6 vegas and graw 2 will reconfirm ps3's inferiority.Jhung207

 

... No. Ports like this just prove that a lot of devs really don't bother to try and improve the graphics all that much. It does not in anyway mean the RSX and Cell are weak. And R6 and GRAW2 are expected to suck on the PS3 because they're UBISOFT PORTS. 

Avatar image for Jhung207
Jhung207

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Jhung207
Member since 2005 • 1154 Posts

stupid devs are looking for quick cash, but make it seem like theyre improving the product by prolonging its releaseusers-name

Or has it ever occur to you that the ps3 is a bad gaming console. 

Avatar image for Zenkuso
Zenkuso

4090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Zenkuso
Member since 2006 • 4090 Posts

The graphics were not impressive on the 360 either. So they must be really bad on the PS3.smokeydabear076

They both look the same, thats the problem. The ps3 only has slightly better lighting for the extra dev time put into it. 

Avatar image for Not-A-Stalker
Not-A-Stalker

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Not-A-Stalker
Member since 2006 • 5165 Posts

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]I don't care. I have a horrible computer and never had the chance to play this game, so I will be buying this game regardless of gamespots score._en1gma_

it would clearly be best to get it for the 360

 

Mind sending me a 360 then? :| Of course if I OWNED a 360 I would get the 360 version over the PS3 version in a heartbeat... What, do you assume everybody owns a 360 or something? :|

Avatar image for Screamteam411
Screamteam411

1087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 Screamteam411
Member since 2003 • 1087 Posts

How is this a bias now? A bias would be Oblivion's rating of .1 lower on the PS3.  They had good reason for a 10 point drop.  Also, look on metacritic.com (I think gamerankings is down) and Xbox 360 = 85 average, PC = 88 average, and PS3 = 76 average.  It's not just IGN's bias, the game is actually worse.

Poor fanboys see the world in such blurred view. 

Avatar image for Furbyballistik
Furbyballistik

2056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Furbyballistik
Member since 2005 • 2056 Posts

based on these comparsion videos, this game doesnt look bad at all...if anything it looks exactly like the 360 port..only thing different is its jus a tiny bit brighter

http://www.gamevideos.com/video/id/10662

Avatar image for TheJustin
TheJustin

2197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#20 TheJustin
Member since 2006 • 2197 Posts

[QUOTE="users-name"]stupid devs are looking for quick cash, but make it seem like theyre improving the product by prolonging its releaseJhung207

Or has it ever occur to you that the ps3 is a bad gaming console.



Hey now... :?
Avatar image for Furbyballistik
Furbyballistik

2056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Furbyballistik
Member since 2005 • 2056 Posts
it seems like third party developers dont want to improve on ps3 games...i guess we are just going to have to hope the 1st party developers show the true power of the ps3
Avatar image for _en1gma_
_en1gma_

14617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 _en1gma_
Member since 2004 • 14617 Posts
[QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]I don't care. I have a horrible computer and never had the chance to play this game, so I will be buying this game regardless of gamespots score.Not-A-Stalker

it would clearly be best to get it for the 360

 

Mind sending me a 360 then? :| Of course if I OWNED a 360 I would get the 360 version over the PS3 version in a heartbeat... What, do you assume everybody owns a 360 or something? :|

no, im justing pitying you lol  :| 

Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts
it seems like third party developers dont want to improve on ps3 games...i guess we are just going to have to hope the 1st party developers show the true power of the ps3Furbyballistik
NOt true, the devs that aren't bothering are the same devs failing to improve games on the wii. EA, activision, and take 2 are trying to dev for the ps3, unlike ubisoft or sierra. But what can you expect from those 2 devs?
Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts
[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"]

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]I don't care. I have a horrible computer and never had the chance to play this game, so I will be buying this game regardless of gamespots score._en1gma_

it would clearly be best to get it for the 360

 

Mind sending me a 360 then? :| Of course if I OWNED a 360 I would get the 360 version over the PS3 version in a heartbeat... What, do you assume everybody owns a 360 or something? :|

no, im justing pitying you lol  :| 

Yeah, you get better multiplat's that noone cares about and no one bought :o. Oblivion people actually bought and it was more superior on ps3. What ports sucked on ps3? Tom clancy double agent, and this.
Avatar image for Furbyballistik
Furbyballistik

2056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Furbyballistik
Member since 2005 • 2056 Posts
[QUOTE="Furbyballistik"]it seems like third party developers dont want to improve on ps3 games...i guess we are just going to have to hope the 1st party developers show the true power of the ps3nextgengaming18
NOt true, the devs that aren't bothering are the same devs failing to improve games on the wii. EA, activision, and take 2 are trying to dev for the ps3, unlike ubisoft or sierra. But what can you expect from those 2 devs?

yes, you are correct..i guess i spoke too soon, cuz oblivion was a great port on the ps3, it was actually better than the 360 version..they used that extra development time wisely
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="Zenkuso"]

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]The graphics were not impressive on the 360 either. So they must be really bad on the PS3.THETRUEDOZAH

They both look the same, thats the problem. The ps3 only has slightly better lighting for the extra dev time put into it.

I have to disagree here. Looking at the HD comparison vid, it is readily apparent that the PS3 version is washed-out, and some lighting effects are entirely absent. The 360 version looks much deeper and richer in color saturation, which really makes the games atmoshpere more appropriate.

From what I have seen the 360 version does look better then the PS3 version.
Avatar image for darkside646
darkside646

1086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 darkside646
Member since 2005 • 1086 Posts
do you  realize how every type of fanboy beleives that GS is biased against them/their system? Do you realize how big of a jerk your making yourself look like by calling GS biased?
Avatar image for E_x_i_l_e
E_x_i_l_e

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 E_x_i_l_e
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts

thats bs.. there was a FEAR HD comparison between 360 and PS3 andthey looked pretty much the same... wtf

http://www.gametrailers.com/gamepage.php?id=3336

 plus didnt fear for ps3 get an extra level?

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Everyone flames the devs :lol: It's not their fault the Cell isn't made for gaming.
Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts
Everyone flames the devs :lol: It's not their fault the Cell isn't made for gaming.X360PS3AMD05
This is the one post that bothers me. How is the cell not made for gaming? It has more mass computing, but is harder to program on. So is the ps2 cpu not made for gaming since it is hard to program on? Is n64 cpu not made for gaming because it was hard to program on? 
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]Everyone flames the devs :lol: It's not their fault the Cell isn't made for gaming.nextgengaming18
This is the one post that bothers me. How is the cell not made for gaming? It has more mass computing, but is harder to program on. So is the ps2 cpu not made for gaming since it is hard to program on? Is n64 cpu not made for gaming because it was hard to program on?

Actually yes, devs complained about the PS2 as well, but Sony had huge market share that it was too late. Here is some good reading.
Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]Everyone flames the devs :lol: It's not their fault the Cell isn't made for gaming.X360PS3AMD05
This is the one post that bothers me. How is the cell not made for gaming? It has more mass computing, but is harder to program on. So is the ps2 cpu not made for gaming since it is hard to program on? Is n64 cpu not made for gaming because it was hard to program on?

Actually yes, devs complained about the PS2 as well, but Sony had huge market share that it was too late. Here is some good reading.

Was the ps2, and n64 cpu not for gaming? Because it was used for gaming. This is what I find to be the most idiotic statement on this board (not just you personally). It doesn't make sense, since they are using the cell for gaming. I do know alot more then most people on this board, about the programming and stuff, and I don't need help from a link that states that ps3 sucks and xbox 360 is better. I don't care to read it, thank you.
Avatar image for Not-A-Stalker
Not-A-Stalker

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Not-A-Stalker
Member since 2006 • 5165 Posts

Everyone flames the devs :lol: It's not their fault the Cell isn't made for gaming.X360PS3AMD05

... Are you a fanboy, or just plain stupid? It IS the devs fault the game looks bad. Especially when the System already has launch games that look better than that...

And if the Cell isn't made for gaming, what was it made for? :lol:

 

Avatar image for ATLBIinger
ATLBIinger

646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 ATLBIinger
Member since 2006 • 646 Posts
 I didn't find FEARS too great for the 360. Just felt wierd and the graphics were meh.
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]Everyone flames the devs :lol: It's not their fault the Cell isn't made for gaming.nextgengaming18
This is the one post that bothers me. How is the cell not made for gaming? It has more mass computing, but is harder to program on. So is the ps2 cpu not made for gaming since it is hard to program on? Is n64 cpu not made for gaming because it was hard to program on?

Actually yes, devs complained about the PS2 as well, but Sony had huge market share that it was too late. Here is some good reading.

Was the ps2, and n64 cpu not for gaming? Because it was used for gaming. This is what I find to be the most idiotic statement on this board (not just you personally). It doesn't make sense, since they are using the cell for gaming. I do know alot more then most people on this board, about the programming and stuff, and I don't need help from a link that states that ps3 sucks and xbox 360 is better. I don't care to read it, thank you.

Actually it doesn't say that, if you read it........

[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]Everyone flames the devs :lol: It's not their fault the Cell isn't made for gaming.Not-A-Stalker

... Are you a fanboy, or just plain stupid? It IS the devs fault the game looks bad. Especially when the System already has launch games that look better than that...

And if the Cell isn't made for gaming, what was it made for? :lol:

To be used by hospitals, military and in IBMs new supercomputer. It's good for parallel processing, look here
Avatar image for Not-A-Stalker
Not-A-Stalker

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Not-A-Stalker
Member since 2006 • 5165 Posts
[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]

[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]Everyone flames the devs :lol: It's not their fault the Cell isn't made for gaming.X360PS3AMD05

... Are you a fanboy, or just plain stupid? It IS the devs fault the game looks bad. Especially when the System already has launch games that look better than that...

And if the Cell isn't made for gaming, what was it made for? :lol:

 

To be used by hospitals, military and in IBMs new supercomputer. It's good for parallel processing, look here

 

Wow, I didn't know that. I guess I was just owned? But still, the Cell processor is a very good gaming processor, and the difficulty to develop for it should not excuse developers for producing crappy graphics in this generation of gaming.

Avatar image for Uptown
Uptown

10348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Uptown
Member since 2002 • 10348 Posts
Who really cares? This game is 2 years old.
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
 The game is just better on PC/360, there is no bias.
Avatar image for GermanShepard06
GermanShepard06

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 GermanShepard06
Member since 2006 • 3285 Posts
lemms will never understand how things work in the gaming industry, its pretty sad if u ask me. Resistance destroys FEAR on x360 and ps3 and yet lemms still use this game as some example how weak ps3 is.
Avatar image for GermanShepard06
GermanShepard06

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 GermanShepard06
Member since 2006 • 3285 Posts

Who really cares? This game is 2 years old.Uptown

exacly, no point building a 2 year old game from ground up for ps3.

Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/782/782476p1.html

Simply put, PS3 can't hold a candle to the visuals found in Microsoft land. Especially considering the handful of bugs that have dead soldiers getting stuck in walls and twitching on the floor. The detailed environments and clear draw distances aren't found on PS3. If you had never seen the other versions of F.E.A.R., you still wouldn't be impressed with the PS3's graphics, but compared to the PC and 360, this version is graphically dead in the water.

Xenos > RSX confirmed

FEAR PS3 = 8.1

FEAR 360/PC = 9.1+

Pretty surprising since the PS3 version got a few more years of Dev time... 

wok7

Yeah...I'm sure the developers didn't give FEAR a quick, sloppy port treatment from the 360 to the PS3 or anything.  I'm sure it's all the PS3's fault :roll:

Avatar image for GermanShepard06
GermanShepard06

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 GermanShepard06
Member since 2006 • 3285 Posts
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="Uptown"]Who really cares? This game is 2 years old.THETRUEDOZAH

exacly, no point building a 2 year old game from ground up for ps3.

I immediately thought of something different...

what does not being able to do justice to a 2 year old game say about the PS3?

its got nothing to do with that, rofl.

it has nothing to do with the hardware.

Oblivion on ps3 pwns your different thought.

Avatar image for MattBrian
MattBrian

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 MattBrian
Member since 2004 • 625 Posts

Who really cares? This game is 2 years old.Uptown

 

exactly, i'm only getting it b/c i play shooters better w/ a controller and i lost my pc copy

Avatar image for lucas_kelly
lucas_kelly

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 lucas_kelly
Member since 2005 • 5783 Posts
Seriously, who didn't see this coming?
Avatar image for nhpb
nhpb

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 nhpb
Member since 2006 • 84 Posts

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/782/782476p1.html

Simply put, PS3 can't hold a candle to the visuals found in Microsoft land. Especially considering the handful of bugs that have dead soldiers getting stuck in walls and twitching on the floor. The detailed environments and clear draw distances aren't found on PS3. If you had never seen the other versions of F.E.A.R., you still wouldn't be impressed with the PS3's graphics, but compared to the PC and 360, this version is graphically dead in the water.

Xenos > RSX confirmed

FEAR PS3 = 8.1

FEAR 360/PC = 9.1+

Pretty surprising since the PS3 version got a few more years of Dev time...

wok7

360 FEAR = 8.6

And if devs started on PS3, it would be easier to port to 360, meaning ports would be pretty much the exact same. And all Ubi games are made better on the 360. 

Avatar image for MantiCore2K8
MantiCore2K8

447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 MantiCore2K8
Member since 2007 • 447 Posts
Why the heck would you ruin an FPS experience on a console?  It's all about FEAR Combat on the PC!  www.fearcombat.com - Download the free multiplayer game here!  Check the site real good, it's there!!!
Avatar image for DSgamer64
DSgamer64

4449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#50 DSgamer64
Member since 2007 • 4449 Posts
Sorry but the 360 version looks like pure trash compared to the PC version. Consoles will never be able to top PC games for graphics.