[QUOTE="ProtossRushX"] let me make this infintely clear for u
IF RACHET clank graphics = 7.5 on the ps3
MARIO GALAXY graphics = 2.5 on the ps3
rachet looks like a pixar movie with realisitic fur textures awesome robots an explosions it felt like i was watchin that big pixar movie with robots or with the aniamls just amazin
galaxygraphicslook like a cheap cartoon show totally bad if super mario galaxy was a movie or anythin irt would have been epic failure compared to pixar or rachet an clank an would have bombed luckiy mario is well known in teh gamin world an doesnt need good grfx at all to get 9.5's out of 10 or sell good unlike other franchises that hhave to poor tons of cash an there heart an souls into game like rachet to get altealst a 7.5
BioShockOwnz
I own both. SMG is a prettier game.
i actually agree (have both also)
obhiously R&C is far superior in every area on the technical side. however despite that....it looks, for lack of a better word, standard. theres very little thats remarkable about it when i just look at it. the city in the first level got an "ooo perty" but after that its just meh. ratchet looks kewl mind.
theres just something about galaxies artistic direction that really makes it appealing. from sphereical water worlds to donut shaped ice....its made me go wow alot more than ratchet.
how would i rate them? well galaxy, in comparison, would get a 2/10 for technical compared to a 10/10 for uncharted.
however just looking at the end product, imho it definately holds its own....7.5/10 v a 10/10 for uncharted
(note i wont bring crysis into this because thats just not fair).
Log in to comment