How are SMG's graphics compared to the other consoles', graphically, best games?

  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for wii4panta
wii4panta

2886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 wii4panta
Member since 2007 • 2886 Posts

I am just asking, no flamebait or trolling...I have not played the game yet (Europe...) and I'd like to know.

Rate it on a scale from 0 to 10 compared to GoW or Bioshock etc etc so that I can create an oppinion.

Thanks!!

edit:And if anyone could post an HD video from gametrailers, I would be much grateful. :D

Avatar image for Thebettertwin
Thebettertwin

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Thebettertwin
Member since 2005 • 1051 Posts
in a word s***, they are good artistically but technicallyprobably 2-3/10 compared to bioshock, gears, uncharted etc
Avatar image for Yeakob
Yeakob

498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Yeakob
Member since 2004 • 498 Posts
If GoW is 10/10, I'd say SMG is 8/10. But then again, I enjoyed SMG more and to me theSMG visuals were more memorable.
Avatar image for ejstrup
ejstrup

2192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 ejstrup
Member since 2005 • 2192 Posts

in a word s***, they are good artistically but technicallyprobably 2-3/10 compared to bioshock, gears, uncharted etcThebettertwin

what he said

Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts
I suppose 7. Haven't seen thoses games on TVs yet. Bioshock and GeoW I mean.
Avatar image for legol1
legol1

1998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 legol1
Member since 2005 • 1998 Posts

there a video on gametrailer comparing super mario galaxy and super mario sunshine and they are prety close so smg is =sms and very not in the same league as geow or bioshock.

Avatar image for Arnalion
Arnalion

3316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Arnalion
Member since 2006 • 3316 Posts

I am just asking, no flamebait or trolling...I have not played the game yet (Europe...) and I'd like to know.

Rate it on a scale from 0 to 10 compared to GoW or Bioshock etc etc so that I can create an oppinion.

Thanks!!

edit:And if anyone could post an HD video from gametrailers, I would be much grateful. :D

wii4panta

Ehm you know that the game is out in Europe right?

Avatar image for Sgt_Crow
Sgt_Crow

6099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Sgt_Crow
Member since 2004 • 6099 Posts
8/10.
People should try it out for themselves, I found Galaxy to look absolutely amazing.
Even after playing Assassin's Creed for hours on.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

Artistically, its a great game. Gameplay-wise, its a great game.

However, if you own an HDTV, you will most likely curse Nintendo's decision to forgo HD this generation, as Mario looks blurry and jaggy to no end, and this is definately a game I would have loved seeing in clear, sharp HD.

Its no Gears/BioShock/Ratchet, but the game is simply amazing in almost every other area to make up for that.

Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts

there a video on gametrailer comparing super mario galaxy and super mario sunshine and they are prety close so smg is =sms and very not in the same league as geow or bioshock.

legol1
You've seen Galaxy on a TV? Slicker framerate, better textures and better lighting.
Avatar image for wii4panta
wii4panta

2886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 wii4panta
Member since 2007 • 2886 Posts
[QUOTE="wii4panta"]

I am just asking, no flamebait or trolling...I have not played the game yet (Europe...) and I'd like to know.

Rate it on a scale from 0 to 10 compared to GoW or Bioshock etc etc so that I can create an oppinion.

Thanks!!

edit:And if anyone could post an HD video from gametrailers, I would be much grateful. :D

Arnalion

Ehm you know that the game is out in Europe right?

Well not in Greece it seems...but I will check it out! Thanks for the info!

Avatar image for TheLordHimself
TheLordHimself

3316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#12 TheLordHimself
Member since 2005 • 3316 Posts

If it were released on the PS3/360, it would (IMO) be worth about 6/10 for graphics. Thing is though, it doesn't matter. This is the best game i've played all year by far.

Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

20162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Planeforger
Member since 2004 • 20162 Posts

If a game like Bioshock is a 10 (I haven't got Crysis, so I'll use a game I know well), then SMG would probably be...a 7.

It looks great, but it's obviously not as technically advanced as other recent games. Still, it doesn't look bad.

Avatar image for Kratos_OMEGA
Kratos_OMEGA

2872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 Kratos_OMEGA
Member since 2007 • 2872 Posts
Technically Galaxy doesnt' look better than the best looking xbox games( not that worse either).
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
I was thinking 6 or 7.
Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts

Artistically, its a great game. Gameplay-wise, its a great game.

However, if you own an HDTV, you will most likely curse Nintendo's decision to forgo HD this generation, as Mario looks blurry and jaggy to no end, and this is definately a game I would have loved seeing in clear, sharp HD.

Its no Gears/BioShock/Ratchet, but the game is simply amazing in almost every other area to make up for that.

SpruceCaboose
I noticed only that in the main cutscenes (the beggining and the ending) they had some kind of bloom and the jaggies show up more for some reasons. In gameplay, I don't notice them, even on huge HDTVs.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#17 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Artistically, its a great game. Gameplay-wise, its a great game.

However, if you own an HDTV, you will most likely curse Nintendo's decision to forgo HD this generation, as Mario looks blurry and jaggy to no end, and this is definately a game I would have loved seeing in clear, sharp HD.

Its no Gears/BioShock/Ratchet, but the game is simply amazing in almost every other area to make up for that.

m_machine024

I noticed only that in the main cutscenes (the beggining and the ending) they had some kind of bloom and the jaggies show up more for some reasons. In gameplay, I don't notice them, even on huge HDTVs.

I sure do. The game has quite a few jaggies that I see, and everything is softened a bit instead of being sharp. Its not that big a bother, but its the first Wii game I every thought, "Man, this would look so much better at an HD resolution."

Avatar image for EmilioDigsIt
EmilioDigsIt

4391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 EmilioDigsIt
Member since 2005 • 4391 Posts
I have an HDTV + Component cables... though the game is jaggy, I'd give it an 8/10. If you want to get all technical, its pushing more poligons, shaders, physics, animation, and better lighting than Sunshine. The best part, besides the gameplay, is the COLOR. Yes, that's right! C O L O R!!! Something missing from alot of today's games. It'll really use all the pretty colors available on your HDTV.
Avatar image for Sgt_Crow
Sgt_Crow

6099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Sgt_Crow
Member since 2004 • 6099 Posts
[QUOTE="m_machine024"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Artistically, its a great game. Gameplay-wise, its a great game.

However, if you own an HDTV, you will most likely curse Nintendo's decision to forgo HD this generation, as Mario looks blurry and jaggy to no end, and this is definately a game I would have loved seeing in clear, sharp HD.

Its no Gears/BioShock/Ratchet, but the game is simply amazing in almost every other area to make up for that.

SpruceCaboose

I noticed only that in the main cutscenes (the beggining and the ending) they had some kind of bloom and the jaggies show up more for some reasons. In gameplay, I don't notice them, even on huge HDTVs.

I sure do. The game has quite a few jaggies that I see, and everything is softened a bit instead of being sharp. Its not that big a bother, but its the first Wii game I every thought, "Man, this would look so much better at an HD resolution."

Try it on a SDTV then, it looks gorgeos. :P
I play my Wii on a SDTV and my 360 on a HDTV.

Avatar image for prodiqy32
prodiqy32

1624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#20 prodiqy32
Member since 2007 • 1624 Posts

from a technical standpoint...... a 6.

however, from an artistis standpoint it is probably a 8.5 or a 9.the look of the game is more pleaseing to the eye then %60 of the 360 and PS3 games. only prime 3 looks better on the WII. graphics are not about polygon pushing. would you rag a games graphics for being 2-D.ofcourse not. it is all about style in my opinion. ill take street fighter 3 third strike over tekken or VF5 anyday of the week.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#21 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

Try it on a SDTV then, it looks gorgeos. :P
I play my Wii on a SDTV and my 360 on a HDTV.

Sgt_Crow

I have an HDTV. Thats about it. I was thinking of getting the Wii Component cables and doing cable swaps when I play SMG, but I can live with Jaggies more than I want to spend $30 and swap cables every time.

Avatar image for EmilioDigsIt
EmilioDigsIt

4391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 EmilioDigsIt
Member since 2005 • 4391 Posts
[QUOTE="Sgt_Crow"]

Try it on a SDTV then, it looks gorgeos. :P
I play my Wii on a SDTV and my 360 on a HDTV.

SpruceCaboose

I have an HDTV. Thats about it. I was thinking of getting the Wii Component cables and doing cable swaps when I play SMG, but I can live with Jaggies more than I want to spend $30 and swap cables every time.


Dudebrohamniator, get the cables. It will make everything change. Out of nowhere you'll be enjoying yourself a cup of tea and then from the corner of your eye you peer at the screen "Holy Cheese, I didn't know there was detail on this!" "Sweet Mother of Milk, I never noticed this on that" "Son of a Father, nothing is fuzzy or giving me that 'trailing' effect ".
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#23 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Sgt_Crow"]

Try it on a SDTV then, it looks gorgeos. :P
I play my Wii on a SDTV and my 360 on a HDTV.

EmilioDigsIt

I have an HDTV. Thats about it. I was thinking of getting the Wii Component cables and doing cable swaps when I play SMG, but I can live with Jaggies more than I want to spend $30 and swap cables every time.


Dudebrohamniator, get the cables. It will make everything change. Out of nowhere you'll be enjoying yourself a cup of tea and then from the corner of your eye you peer at the screen "Holy Cheese, I didn't know there was detail on this!" "Sweet Mother of Milk, I never noticed this on that" "Son of a Father, nothing is fuzzy or giving me that 'trailing' effect ".

Did you spike your cup of tea? ;)

Avatar image for EmilioDigsIt
EmilioDigsIt

4391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 EmilioDigsIt
Member since 2005 • 4391 Posts

Did you spike your cup of tea? ;)

SpruceCaboose

You'd like that, wouldnt you? Yeah... I know how ALL you Banana people work! ON GUARD!

Back on topic before I get slapped, 8/10.

Avatar image for prodiqy32
prodiqy32

1624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#25 prodiqy32
Member since 2007 • 1624 Posts
ive got an HDTV and the WII componant cables. it fairs good next to my 360 games in HD. if mario galaxy was in 720p, we would be praising the graphics right now.
Avatar image for SER69
SER69

7096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 SER69
Member since 2003 • 7096 Posts
Who the *** cares about the graphics?(They're awesome!) It is the "funner" game out there you can get this year. Go get it!
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts
They aren't. Nor should they be.
Avatar image for JimmyT2
JimmyT2

771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 JimmyT2
Member since 2007 • 771 Posts
It looks like a good looking last gen game. So 3/10 if you have a hdtv and 6/10 if you don't.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

9/10

I don't see bum textures like in COD4.

Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

It looks like a good looking last gen game. So 3/10 if you have a hdtv and 6/10 if you don't.JimmyT2

First of all, actually play the game on a HDTV before you rate them. Anybody that has played SMG and Gears on the same TV would know that they are comparable in every category. The art style of these two games are very different but I had more "wow" moments with Mario flying across the surface of planets than any time during Gears.

In contrast, I think they had to sacrifice the size of the levels to achieve these graphics, making the game not as deep.

Avatar image for samusarmada
samusarmada

5816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#31 samusarmada
Member since 2005 • 5816 Posts
8/10 mario galaxy looks f***ing beautiful :P
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
8. Lacking technically, but top-notch artistically. BioShock would be a 10, IMO, while Gears of War would be an 8 (technically excellent, but lacking creativity), Halo 3 would be a 9 (technically proficient and some artistic inspiration).
Avatar image for osirisomeomi
osirisomeomi

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 osirisomeomi
Member since 2007 • 3100 Posts

Are its graphics adequate? Yes. Are they great HD craziness? No.

Is the game more fun than almost any other game out there? Yes.

Buy the game that is the most enjoyable.

Avatar image for astiop
astiop

3582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 astiop
Member since 2005 • 3582 Posts
[QUOTE="Arnalion"][QUOTE="wii4panta"]

I am just asking, no flamebait or trolling...I have not played the game yet (Europe...) and I'd like to know.

Rate it on a scale from 0 to 10 compared to GoW or Bioshock etc etc so that I can create an oppinion.

Thanks!!

edit:And if anyone could post an HD video from gametrailers, I would be much grateful. :D

wii4panta

Ehm you know that the game is out in Europe right?

Well not in Greece it seems...but I will check it out! Thanks for the info!

Plaisio doesn't have it on ther site so I guess it's not out. They are usualy up to date with game release info.

Avatar image for Taz-Bone
Taz-Bone

1388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Taz-Bone
Member since 2004 • 1388 Posts
Artistically, it's one of the best. Technically, it's great for Wii.
Avatar image for fhiz
Fhiz

7718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#36 Fhiz
Member since 2004 • 7718 Posts
wow way to cherry pick here
Avatar image for SeptimusV_basic
SeptimusV_basic

4625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 SeptimusV_basic
Member since 2002 • 4625 Posts

Are you guys kidding me????

Get real and quit being fanboys and sheep enthusiasts. Compared to GeOW, Uncharted, Unreal, SMG is literally a 4 on such a scale. Do not....get this mistaken.

HDR...NO.
Textures...Minimal
Poly Count...Last gen.

Get real fanboys. You are nowhere close.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

Are you guys kidding me????

Get real and quit being fanboys and sheep enthusiasts. Compared to GeOW, Uncharted, Unreal, SMG is literally a 4 on such a scale. Do not....get this mistaken.

HDR...NO.
Textures...Minimal
Poly Count...Last gen.

Get real fanboys. You are nowhere close.

SeptimusV_basic

Awww, why are you so mad? :( I own all the systems. SMG is gorgeous, bud.

Avatar image for Teh_Chiken
Teh_Chiken

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Teh_Chiken
Member since 2007 • 64 Posts
Although it has the best technical on wii, the design is what really makes it so amazing.
Avatar image for JohnWinger
JohnWinger

1903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 JohnWinger
Member since 2007 • 1903 Posts

What the hell is SMG?

Stop with the acronyms!!!

Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

Are you guys kidding me????

Get real and quit being fanboys and sheep enthusiasts. Compared to GeOW, Uncharted, Unreal, SMG is literally a 4 on such a scale. Do not....get this mistaken.

HDR...NO.
Textures...Minimal
Poly Count...Last gen.

Get real fanboys. You are nowhere close.

SeptimusV_basic

Again, anybody that is honest and played both these games on the same HDTV would admit only seeing a marginal difference.

The fact that you are so defensive leads me to believe that you are the fanboy.

Avatar image for wiretoss
wiretoss

3030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 wiretoss
Member since 2006 • 3030 Posts

I am just asking, no flamebait or trolling...I have not played the game yet (Europe...) and I'd like to know.

Rate it on a scale from 0 to 10 compared to GoW or Bioshock etc etc so that I can create an oppinion.

Thanks!!

edit:And if anyone could post an HD video from gametrailers, I would be much grateful. :D

wii4panta

It's being compared ARTISTICALLY not graphically.

/thread.

Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts
Hard to compare such different games in style and theme. But in comparison, SMG's graphics are around a 6/10 when compared to Gears of War being a 10.
Avatar image for deactivated-60bf765068a74
deactivated-60bf765068a74

9558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-60bf765068a74
Member since 2007 • 9558 Posts

let me make this infintely clear for u

IF RACHET clank graphics = 7.5 on the ps3

MARIO GALAXY graphics = 2.5 on the ps3

rachet looks like a pixar movie with realisitic fur textures awesome robots an explosions it felt like i was watchin that big pixar movie with robots or with the aniamls just amazin

galaxygraphicslook like a cheap cartoon show totally bad if super mario galaxy was a movie or anythin irt would have been epic failure compared to pixar or rachet an clank an would have bombed luckiy mario is well known in teh gamin world an doesnt need good grfx at all to get 9.5's out of 10 or sell good unlike other franchises that hhave to poor tons of cash an there heart an souls into game like rachet to get altealst a 7.5

Avatar image for KingOfKonging
KingOfKonging

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 KingOfKonging
Member since 2007 • 1233 Posts

Graphically? Nowhere close, it looks like a really good XBox game. On my HDTV it's very blurry, jaggedy, etc. It's just nowwhere anywhere near Gears, or any of the good looking 360 or PS3 games. Anyone who says otherwise is being dishonest. So, on the technical scale it's very, very low compared to the best looking games on the 360 (however, it is excellent looking in the artistic department.)

HOWEVER, graphics aren't what the game is about.

It would've been nice to have better graphics and HD output, but the game still kicks ass regardless.

Avatar image for Lemmywinks_360
Lemmywinks_360

1996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Lemmywinks_360
Member since 2007 • 1996 Posts

What the hell is SMG?

Stop with the acronyms!!!

JohnWinger

Super Mario Galaxy.

OMGWTFBBQ. KTHXBAI.;)

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#47 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

let me make this infintely clear for u

IF RACHET clank graphics = 7.5 on the ps3

MARIO GALAXY graphics = 2.5 on the ps3

rachet looks like a pixar movie with realisitic fur textures awesome robots an explosions it felt like i was watchin that big pixar movie with robots or with the aniamls just amazin

galaxygraphicslook like a cheap cartoon show totally bad if super mario galaxy was a movie or anythin irt would have been epic failure compared to pixar or rachet an clank an would have bombed luckiy mario is well known in teh gamin world an doesnt need good grfx at all to get 9.5's out of 10 or sell good unlike other franchises that hhave to poor tons of cash an there heart an souls into game like rachet to get altealst a 7.5

ProtossRushX

I own both. SMG is a prettier game.

Avatar image for deactivated-60bf765068a74
deactivated-60bf765068a74

9558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-60bf765068a74
Member since 2007 • 9558 Posts
[QUOTE="ProtossRushX"]

let me make this infintely clear for u

IF RACHET clank graphics = 7.5 on the ps3

MARIO GALAXY graphics = 2.5 on the ps3

rachet looks like a pixar movie with realisitic fur textures awesome robots an explosions it felt like i was watchin that big pixar movie with robots or with the aniamls just amazin

galaxygraphicslook like a cheap cartoon show totally bad if super mario galaxy was a movie or anythin irt would have been epic failure compared to pixar or rachet an clank an would have bombed luckiy mario is well known in teh gamin world an doesnt need good grfx at all to get 9.5's out of 10 or sell good unlike other franchises that hhave to poor tons of cash an there heart an souls into game like rachet to get altealst a 7.5

BioShockOwnz

I own both. SMG is a prettier game.

ive played rachet an clank an seen galaxy an the two aren't even in the same league graphically or aestethically

rachet an clank is near perfection on everything in galaxy u can see how fake stuff looks in clank all the backgrounds an places look just unbelievable in galaxy i the back grounds look fuzzy na fake an mario has polygons all over his body an clank looks crisp an so do all its backgrounds an layouts

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18275 Posts
[QUOTE="ProtossRushX"]

let me make this infintely clear for u

IF RACHET clank graphics = 7.5 on the ps3

MARIO GALAXY graphics = 2.5 on the ps3

rachet looks like a pixar movie with realisitic fur textures awesome robots an explosions it felt like i was watchin that big pixar movie with robots or with the aniamls just amazin

galaxygraphicslook like a cheap cartoon show totally bad if super mario galaxy was a movie or anythin irt would have been epic failure compared to pixar or rachet an clank an would have bombed luckiy mario is well known in teh gamin world an doesnt need good grfx at all to get 9.5's out of 10 or sell good unlike other franchises that hhave to poor tons of cash an there heart an souls into game like rachet to get altealst a 7.5

BioShockOwnz

I own both. SMG is a prettier game.

i actually agree (have both also)

obhiously R&C is far superior in every area on the technical side. however despite that....it looks, for lack of a better word, standard. theres very little thats remarkable about it when i just look at it. the city in the first level got an "ooo perty" but after that its just meh. ratchet looks kewl mind.

theres just something about galaxies artistic direction that really makes it appealing. from sphereical water worlds to donut shaped ice....its made me go wow alot more than ratchet.

how would i rate them? well galaxy, in comparison, would get a 2/10 for technical compared to a 10/10 for uncharted.

however just looking at the end product, imho it definately holds its own....7.5/10 v a 10/10 for uncharted

(note i wont bring crysis into this because thats just not fair).

Avatar image for Impex
Impex

5532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#50 Impex
Member since 2005 • 5532 Posts

8/10.
People should try it out for themselves, I found Galaxy to look absolutely amazing.
Even after playing Assassin's Creed for hours on.Sgt_Crow

It's how you look at it. Technically, they are nothing special. However, combined with an awesome art s*yle it makes it look really good for a Wii game.