How can you hate on TLOU Remastered?

Explain what flop means then.

It sold plenty of copies, made Naughty Dog plenty of money, a movie is in the works, and is highly acclaimed and respected by the gaming community. Sorry, your opinion doesn't count.

Big (or small) upcoming releases typically have a "hype" level attached to them judged by hype threads, or sometimes (rarely) general consensus hype found in the forums. HYPE (noun) is a word used to describe the expected results. Example: The hype on Mass Effect for the Xbox 360 was AAA. Sometimes, games do not reach that quotient which then they are considered a FLOP (noun). This occurs when the score of a game does not meet the hype. Example: Mass Effect was hyped AAA yet reached only AA status. A game can be hyped in the following four ways:

• AAAA (or AAAAE) - this is a game that scores a 10 in the review only found on GameSpot.com, unless specified by the post.
• AAA (or AAAE) - this is a game which scores a 9.0 in the review only found on GameSpot.com, unless specified by the post.
• AA (or AAE) - this is a game which scores a 8.0 in the review only found on GameSpot.com, unless specified by the post.
• A (or AE) - this is a game which scores a 7.0 in the review only found on GameSpot.com, unless specified by the post.

This is the proper way to hype a game. If you believe a game is going to get an 8, then you hype it as an AA game. It may also be an AAE game which means it will be exclusive, which will come up later in this guide.

@MonsieurX: You need to stop spamming as its not contributing to the post. And I'm not reading that.

@MarkAndExecute: you're not reading the answer to your question? You wanted to know the definition of a flop here. And he posted the answer

Then you suck at trolling

@MonsieurX: maybe he's just really dumb

No,you are.

@MonsieurX: lalalalalalala I'm rubber you're glue

Show me how to properly troll then oh wise troll master.

You're rubbing my glue?

You should read about it

LMFAO now children....

who's alt are you then?

But lostrib said I was dumb. I don't know how to read.

-4/10

The 60 FPS made the game so much better, especially for then MP portion of the game.

jealousy...its a year old remaster fine

Looks better than anything the Wii U will ever have also

Agreed. Plays better too. 10/10

1/10

top kek

@lostrib said:

@MarkAndExecute said:

Agreed. Plays better too. 10/10

You call for a glitch war? Its on like Donkey Kong biatch!

Mario Kart 8 lulz

And they say Nintendo polishes their games lol

no kidding, the game is $20 lots of places...and included free in a bundle

I own a Wii U....its just reality, graphics are better than anything the Wii U will ever see so to say its "hardly any better looking than the PS3 version" well fine maybe the PS3 version is also better looking anything the Wii U will ever have

-1/10

I like the way you think.

It was a cash grab plain and simple. That's the reason it get's hated on. There was no need to release a "remaster" for a game that came out barely a year earlier. There were so many games that could have used a remaster that were older. Sony just got a bunch of suckers to repurchase the game.

You know what they say...a sucker is born every minute. Describes Sony fans perfectly....that and they're the jokes of SWs

I only purchased the game one time as did many others...lots of people who didn't have PS3's bought PS4's after Microsoft tried to rape gamers

How many times has the first Halo been remastered now?

I own all systems and a PC by the way...I just come on here when people say something really stupid

Pretty much every single half decent game has a "GOTY or Special addition" within a year or two of release, to hate on this particular game is just straight up butt hurt

it supposedly flopped on here because Tom gave it an 8 (just to get attention, has since been kicked to the curb) its one of the highest scoring meta games ever and I'm glad lots more people get to experience it. And if you don't like it don't buy it, funny how most of the people who have a problem with it don't have the necessary hardware to play it anyway

CE Anniversary and MCC

Far better than a year old remaster

Like many others? Please, don't try to justify this cash grab. Sony didn't have any games so they had ND "remaster" a year old game.

How old is Halo? Did it get a remaster after the 1st year? Do you not get the point?

Cant hate a top 5 GOAT.

Like I said I have bought the game one time...and got the best possible version

and Halo is a remaster of a remaster and it doesn't even work so (I also own that game, and nobody forced me to buy it either)

you obviously don't have a PS4 so why do you care? butt hurt

You're trying to say you're the reason Sony came out with the remaster. I'm saying it's a cash grab and it is. Why would you remaster a game that came out 1 year prior?

I ONLY own a PS4. I sold my XOne months ago. Wanna try again?

I can realistically see people getting sick of how overrated and over-praised the game is, especially on these forums.

Definitely a good game, but after playing it I not only felt no need to play through again (nor did I find the MP portion worth my time), but I felt it was merely a solid game, nothing more.

Game could have done well with a big tone down of the action. LOVED the bits where I was free to explore and such and had stealth as a solid option, but it feels like about a third of the way into the game stealth starts becoming less and less of an option do to scripted events and the predicaments they put you in. The game really fell apart during the real action heavy moments IMO.

Oh and the story just might be the most OVERRATED story in gaming. The game had some good characters and some emotional moments, but it was far from being the end-all of storytelling like some people claim it is.

Liked the game, but was rather disappointed at certain aspects of it other than the story and characters. I did enjoy the MP though. I also think it's pretty overrated, but nonetheless good.

Settle down children. lol

It was 50...

There were absolutely valid grounds for a remaster of TLoU, and it's the same one as GTA: frame rate. It got so bad in the original at points that it became detrimental to the gameplay. It increased framerate which made it more playable, included the DLC, had higher visual fidelity, included a documentary, and tweaked controls. Unfortunately, it also introduced some flaws not apparent in the PS3 version as a consequence of transferring it over to an unfamiliar and incompatible architecture.

And sure it's a cash grab, but then again.....so is every single game put on the market. This is a business, not a charity. These "suckers" know what they were buying. Many who bought the PS4 transitioned over from the 360 prior and had never experienced the game so it made perfect sense both from a consumer and a business perspective. The only way it doesn't make sense is from a fanboy one, but then, nothing makes sense looking from that perspective, period.

Funny how you talk about cash grabs when Nintendo does the exact same thing with making Amiibos and Mario/Zelda/Pokemon/Smash/Kirby games. Did you levy the same criticism to the gullible Nintendo fans that bought Ocarina of Time 3DS and Wind Waker HD even though they say BS like graphics don't matter?

But keep ignoring the fact that Nintendo likes to capitalize on stupidity which makes up its fans. That's why most of them are broke and unemployed. Manchildren that spend way too much on their paychecks on their precious little toys.

@vitonemesis: Still too high. But That's what happens when Console Makers take away Backwards compatibility.

@locopatho

jeeze, could you ride on Naughty dog's Slong any longer? That DLC shouldn't be worth a split of GAME of the Year considering it's just an Add on. You can't even play it without the base game on ANY system. If it was stand alone, sure That would be okay, but IT'S DLC. a PORTION of a Full Game, EXTRA HELPINGS. This is a BIG SLAP in the face of the Developers of The Stick of Truth, DarkSouls 2, and Dragon Age Inquistion, which were all Running for Best PS3 game and were FULL GAMES that saw hardly ANY backlash.

I can't get over the fact that they completely erased the dynamic/complex AI and the tangible melee combat from the E3 demo. Back in 2012 when they first showed the demo I lost my shit, the AI was not only incredible it also added up replay value and in my opinion it could have revolutionized the gaming medium as a form of storytelling. And the thing is they constantly lied about the AI, they went even as far as to tell us it was improved ever since, so you understand how crushed I was when I finally got to play the game.

Still a great game with a fantastically executed but overused plot. I didn't expect the story to be good since the gameplay was the one that sold me into the game, so that was kind of a surprise.

I never played it on PS3 and i bought the remaster for $25 so no..

@SolidGame_basic:

They should have offered existing owners of the PS3 game a free copy of the game on PS4.

I appreciate how awesome the game was (though hardly without its flaws), and yes it is the customers right to double dip, but considering the flak other remasters have got, you have to understand it for TLoU

Hey dumbfuck, kindly show me where I said literally ANYTHING in praise of Naughty Dog in my post? I haven't even played that DLC and my PS3 GOTY is Dark Souls 2. I only said that there's nothing wrong with DLC winning IF they think it's that good.

I know it's an add on. I know you can't play it without the original Last Of Us. So fucking what? IFit's a brilliant gaming experience, the best all year, why does it matter? A piece of DLC can be vastly superior to a full game. Bethesda DLC for Oblivion, Skyrim and the Fallout games was better than most other RPGs last gen. Rockstar's DLC for GTAIV and Red Dead Redemption was better than most other open world games last gen. I assume you have equal problems with World Of Warcraft expansions winning PC GOTY?

You're just stamping your feet and screaming that an awesome gaming experience "DOESN'T COUNT!" for some made up arbitrary reason. That's all everyone does on System Wars. Invent fucking psychotic rules why games "don't count". You've got people complaining about multiplats winning for christ sake. Because someone else getting to play the game on another system means it no longer exists... oy vei.

To reiterate: I'm glad GS picked their favourite gaming experiences, and didn't start inventing batshit crazy rules as to why their most fun gaming experience of the year ACTUALLY didn't exist.

Bought it, played it five minutes and uninstalled. .. 25 bucks for the upgrade wasn't a bad price, but I had no intention of getting back into it yet... I wanna see how it stacks up two years from now though... Judging by the way Uncharted looked (to me) it could be naughty dogs best ps4 game after 2015. :D

I don't hate it. I just refuse to spend my money on it since I did a year prior.

Very easily actually.