How can you support Call of Duty over Halo?

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

Well to be honest with you Ihave enjoyed the Call of Duty's that have come out this generation and I as a gamer have had a lot of fun playing them. It also has been very fun playing Halo. The bottom line is that it is your opinion that it is a rehash. The other 2-3 million people that have bought Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 don't think the same way, so your statement is flawed.

Or you can not support either and simply buy whatever you like or support both, they're not football teams, I don't have to choose one over the other...bobbetybob

^^^ This. Why not go for both?

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

SSCyborg

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

CaptainQuark69

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

CaptainQuark69

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

CaptainQuark69

What does that have to do with anything? Some people like the Sci-Fi genre quite a lot.

Or you can not support either and simply buy whatever you like or support both, they're not football teams, I don't have to choose one over the other...bobbetybob

Well said.

I don't understand it either, I like COD, but the campaigns are shorter than most Halo games, it takes less skill than Halo(I admit to getting owned in Halo sometimes) and there's tons more(milkage) games, click here to see main games and spin offs.

And no COD game outscored the original Halo on Gamespot and metacritic.

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

SSCyborg

And Halo isnt a rehash? for me Call of duty is lots more fun than halo atleast Modern warfare.

[QUOTE="CaptainQuark69"][QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

lundy86_4

What does that have to do with anything? Some people like the Sci-Fi genre quite a lot.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="CaptainQuark69"] HALO is a fictional sci-fi universe, CALL of DUTY games are realistic soldiers with realistic weapons put in actual historic or realistic situations.CaptainQuark69

What does that have to do with anything? Some people like the Sci-Fi genre quite a lot.

You have a scientific study confirming this fact? What a completely unsubstantiated claim.

They are completely different types of games...

And infinity ward COD games are always much improved...your probably taking COD 3 and World at War into account...

COD was a great game, COD 2 was a great game, COD 3 sucked, COD modern warefar was a great game, COD WAW sucked, COD MW2 is a great game

get it?

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="CaptainQuark69"] HALO is a fictional sci-fi universe, CALL of DUTY games are realistic soldiers with realistic weapons put in actual historic or realistic situations.CaptainQuark69

What does that have to do with anything? Some people like the Sci-Fi genre quite a lot.

I agree, you have no proof. Honestly if you want to get real I can't stand realism, because nobody actually does it right. Halo at least admits it is crazy and runs with it.

Bungie is far better at support than most developers, includiing IW imo. However, IW's gameplay has taken some leaps past Halo like a Sprint/Run option for instance.

Halo is great fun, but ultimately, it boils down to a multiplayer jump/shoot fest, and it just looks silly online. Great fun, but IW's gameplay is more enticing to many.

That being said, I do think Bungie is better in many respects...

They are completely different types of games...

And infinity ward COD games are always much improved...your probably taking COD 3 and World at War into account...

COD was a great game, COD 2 was a great game, COD 3 sucked, COD modern warefar was a great game, COD WAW sucked, COD MW2 is a great game

get it?

pentamaroonis

Because I like Call of Duty more than Halo.

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

SSCyborg

Halo could be suported by the pope COD will always be more played

Bungie is far better at support than most developers, includiing IW imo. However, IW's gameplay has taken some leaps past Halo like a Sprint/Run option for instance.

Halo is great fun, but ultimately, it boils down to a multiplayer jump/shoot fest, and it just looks silly online. Great fun, but IW's gameplay is more enticing to many.

That being said, I do think Bungie is better in many respects...

SolidTy

I love how a Sprint/Run feature apparently makes a game groundbreaking. Certain games are better off without like, Halo for one, and Rainbow Six is another example of a sprint feature being unnecessary.

Yeah, MW2 is so enticing and intriguing. Let's sit in this building looking out the window for 15 minutes and just shoot everyone across the map with my pistol and get kills!

Well, I like halo better. Does that count for anthing? :)

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

SSCyborg

I enjoy sprinting, proning and cooking grenade. It just feels right.

I prefer Battlefield over those two ever since the glorious days of 1942! But i do play all 3 of these franchises, so i guess it doesnt really matter haha.

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

SSCyborg

Halo3: ODST.

Bungie respects their fanbase?

Is that why I needed map packs to play Team Slayer or most of the playlists ?

or how ODST was priced as a full retail game?

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

Gxgear

Halo3: ODST.

Bungie respects their fanbase?

Is that why I needed map packs to play Team Slayer or most of the playlists ?

or how ODST was priced as a full retail game?

thelastguy

How dare you have a different opinion than me!:roll:

[QUOTE="thelastguy"]

Bungie respects their fanbase?

Is that why I needed map packs to play Team Slayer or most of the playlists ?

or how ODST was priced as a full retail game?

SSCyborg

Yes it did

But it shipped with the multiplayer from Halo 3, how could this be considered a full retail game?

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"][QUOTE="thelastguy"]

Bungie respects their fanbase?

Is that why I needed map packs to play Team Slayer or most of the playlists ?

or how ODST was priced as a full retail game?

thelastguy

Yes it did

But it shipped with the multiplayer from Halo 3, how could this be considered a full retail game?

[QUOTE="thelastguy"]

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"] It offered $30 in DLC alone, plus I gladly payed $112 for the special editionSSCyborg

Yes it did

But it shipped with the multiplayer from Halo 3, how could this be considered a full retail game?

That doesn't change the fact that the multiplayer was from a different game

i like cod4 and mw2 more than halo but halo is a really good game:)

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"][QUOTE="thelastguy"]

Yes it did

But it shipped with the multiplayer from Halo 3, how could this be considered a full retail game?

thelastguy

That doesn't change the fact that the multiplayer was from a different game

[QUOTE="Gxgear"]

[QUOTE="SSCyborg"]

Bungie respects their fanbase. Bungie interacts with their fanbase. Bungie has delivered AAA quality with every Halo release. The Call of Duty games on the other hand are just rehashed year after year after year, and with the recent scandals it's quite clear what they think about you, the gamer. :lol:

SSCyborg

Halo3: ODST.

Fully-priced expansion? That's sure showing a lot of respect. I'm sure the 5hr campaign + 1 new multiplayer mode justifies the $60 ($70 here in Canada).

Now if I were a Halo fan, I wouldn't be very happy about having to pay for the map packs that I've already puchased through DLCs in the past 2-3 years.

Yeah imo Mw1 and Halo 3 were pretty close but imo Halo 3 is way better than MW2

Fully-priced expansion? That's sure showing a lot of respect. I'm sure the 5hr campaign + 1 new multiplayer mode justifies the $60 ($70 here in Canada).

Now if I were a Halo fan, I wouldn't be very happy about having to pay for the map packs that I've already puchased through DLCs in the past 2-3 years.Gxgear

On topic, the campaign was 8 hours the way I played it and had plenty of replayability. It also had plenty of fan service. That alone shows "respect" in my book. Also the new multiplayer mode was fun with friends. Plus it was pretty convenient to have ALL the maps on one disc along with 3 new ones.

[QUOTE="Gxgear"]Fully-priced expansion? That's sure showing a lot of respect. I'm sure the 5hr campaign + 1 new multiplayer mode justifies the $60 ($70 here in Canada).

Now if I were a Halo fan, I wouldn't be very happy about having to pay for the map packs that I've already puchased through DLCs in the past 2-3 years.SpiritOfFire117

On topic, the campaign was 8 hours the way I played it and had plenty of replayability. It also had plenty of fan service. That alone shows "respect" in my book. Also the new multiplayer mode was fun with friends. Plus it was pretty convenient to have ALL the maps on one disc along with 3 new ones.

Waiting for it to hit the bargain bin, but not owning it doesn't make what I said any less true.

Not here to debate whether a game was good or not, just saying this is a case of pot calling the kettle black.

Both games lack originality in my opinion