XXXXXX

66 results
1
2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

7590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#51 deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

Member since 2004 • 7590 Posts

SEGA already owned SSB with Powerstone.
foxhound_fox

That was Capcom, not Sega.

15 years ago

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#52 foxhound_fox

Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

That was Capcom, not Sega.kieranb2000

Right. By 'twas on a SEGA console.

15 years ago

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 Shinobishyguy

Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

Capcom already owned SSB with Powerstone.
foxhound_fox

except that the SSB series out sold it and out scored it :| inb4 "lol opinions".

15 years ago

deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

7590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#54 deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

Member since 2004 • 7590 Posts

[QUOTE="kieranb2000"]That was Capcom, not Sega.foxhound_fox

Right. By 'twas on a SEGA console.

It was also on the PSP, so your point is moot :P

15 years ago

4468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2009 • 4468 Posts

There were about 40 in Brawl and there could have been 40 more Sony or MS could maybe have 20 so it would be a fail.

15 years ago

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 Renzokucant

Member since 2009 • 3157 Posts

well for one, super smash brawl sucks, melee is better, and for 2, if someone wants to play a melee'ish type game, they will just play melee. no substitutes

15 years ago

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#57 foxhound_fox

Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

except that the SSB series out sold it and out scored it :| inb4 "lol opinions".Shinobishyguy

That doesn't stop Powerstone from being the superior brawler. SSBM and SSBB don't know whether they're a fighter or a brawler. They're stuck in between and can't choose whether to be a full fighter or full brawler. Powerstone knows what it is, and does what it is very well.

15 years ago

sonicthemegaman

3783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#58 sonicthemegaman

Member since 2008 • 3783 Posts

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]except that the SSB series out sold it and out scored it :| inb4 "lol opinions".foxhound_fox

That doesn't stop Powerstone from being the superior brawler. SSBM and SSBB don't know whether they're a fighter or a brawler. They're stuck in between and can't choose whether to be a full fighter or full brawler. Powerstone knows what it is, and does what it is very well.

Exactly. Ya know, to me, Smash proved that highly popular game mascots make a game good rather than quality. I've played both Powerstones and they are miles better than Smash at being a fighting/party game. Powerstone had designs to fit One on One matches making it a unique fighter with generally balanced items and a unique Super Form feature. There were no stage bans or character bans(besides Valgas) in Powerstone making it much better than that competitive Melee garbage. Then there is Powerstone 2 that had 4 player, wackier items, and more skilled based gameplay. It was more of a party game at heart compared to the first but, at least it isn't as random or as luck based as Smash with the items on high. Powerstone = underrated. Smash = overrated.

15 years ago

deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

7590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#59 deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

Member since 2004 • 7590 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]except that the SSB series out sold it and out scored it :| inb4 "lol opinions".sonicthemegaman

That doesn't stop Powerstone from being the superior brawler. SSBM and SSBB don't know whether they're a fighter or a brawler. They're stuck in between and can't choose whether to be a full fighter or full brawler. Powerstone knows what it is, and does what it is very well.

Exactly. Ya know, to me, Smash proved that highly popular game mascots make a game good rather than quality. I've played both Powerstones and they are miles better than Smash at being a fighting/party game. Powerstone had designs to fit One on One matches making it a unique fighter with generally balanced items and a unique Super Form feature. There were no stage bans or character bans(besides Valgas) in Powerstone making it much better than that competitive Melee garbage. Then there is Powerstone 2 that had 4 player, wackier items, and more skilled based gameplay. It was more of a party game at heart compared to the first but, at least it isn't as random or as luck based as Smash with the items on high. Powerstone = underrated. Smash = overrated.

I disagree with the "Powerstone 2 had more skill based gameplay" thing. 1 was much more skill based. 2 was just an item spam.

15 years ago

1863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 1863 Posts

Sony could pull this off. Spyro, Ratchet, Clank (giant Clank anyone?), Nathan Hale, Chimera, Snake, Nathan Drake, Cole McGrath, Kratos, Zeus, Nariko, Hellghast, Jak, Daxter (giant Daxter), Crash Bandicoot, and Sackboy. 15 characters right off the top of my head. Add 3rd party characters as well as first party I missed and Sony has a game I'd buy. I don't care if Samus could be Link, I want to see Jak and Ratchet duke it out!

15 years ago

deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

7590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

Member since 2004 • 7590 Posts

Sony could pull this off. Spyro, Ratchet, Clank (giant Clank anyone?), Nathan Hale, Chimera, Snake, Nathan Drake, Cole McGrath, Kratos, Zeus, Nariko, Hellghast, Jak, Daxter (giant Daxter), Crash Bandicoot, and Sackboy. 15 characters right off the top of my head. Add 3rd party characters as well as first party I missed and Sony has a game I'd buy. I don't care if Samus could be Link, I want to see Jak and Ratchet duke it out!gamefan274

You already added some third party in there. Spyro, Snake and Crash Bandicoot wouldn't be in it as 'first party' characters.

15 years ago

sonicthemegaman

3783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#62 sonicthemegaman

Member since 2008 • 3783 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicthemegaman"]
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
That doesn't stop Powerstone from being the superior brawler. SSBM and SSBB don't know whether they're a fighter or a brawler. They're stuck in between and can't choose whether to be a full fighter or full brawler. Powerstone knows what it is, and does what it is very well.
kieranb2000

Exactly. Ya know, to me, Smash proved that highly popular game mascots make a game good rather than quality. I've played both Powerstones and they are miles better than Smash at being a fighting/party game. Powerstone had designs to fit One on One matches making it a unique fighter with generally balanced items and a unique Super Form feature. There were no stage bans or character bans(besides Valgas) in Powerstone making it much better than that competitive Melee garbage. Then there is Powerstone 2 that had 4 player, wackier items, and more skilled based gameplay. It was more of a party game at heart compared to the first but, at least it isn't as random or as luck based as Smash with the items on high. Powerstone = underrated. Smash = overrated.

I disagree with the "Powerstone 2 had more skill based gameplay" thing. 1 was much more skill based. 2 was just an item spam.

I was comparing Powerstone 2 to the party aspects of Smash where the item spamming is more skillful in comparison. We all Powerstone 1 was better than 2. It even had better voice acting for crying out loud.

15 years ago

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
[QUOTE="kieranb2000"]That was Capcom, not Sega.kieranb2000

Right. By 'twas on a SEGA console.

It was also on the PSP, so your point is moot :P

Not to mention since Capcom owns it, it could conceivably appear as a console downloadable (for ANY of the three)

15 years ago

11413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 11413 Posts

because that would probably be a bad idea

15 years ago

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

I would not be interested in such a game.

15 years ago

7154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Thunderdrone

Member since 2009 • 7154 Posts

That doesn't stop Powerstone from being the superior brawler. SSBM and SSBB don't know whether they're a fighter or a brawler. foxhound_fox

Dont mistake your own confusion with the game's suposed lack of identity. SSB is a Brawler franchise, theres nothing to be confused about here,

15 years ago

66 results
1
2

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment