How come no one has said anything about PS3 leading in AAA Exclusives?

This discussion isn't really going anywhere. It's just the same arguments being thrown back and forth over and over again. Let's summarize so we can all move on to the next thread:

PS3 has an AAAAe, and 360 doesn't = ownage rights for cows

PS3 and 360 both have the same number of AAAe's. With the former having released one year later this = ownage rights for cows

360 has a bigger library = ownage rigths for lemmings

360 has more AAA's than PS3 = ownage rights for lemmings

Let's call it a draw?

(PS- I own both consoles so I get to play all of them = ownage rights for me and everyone else owning both. So we win I guess? :D)

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

So if we count mgs 4 then obviously that means there is this grand canyon sized gap between the 2 systems right? oh its just 1 more if we count mgs 4? thats not much to be proud of just 1 over.

As for that its AAAA and no the terms do not exist in the game industry they exist as a common and traditionally used method of grading something, Like meat, or food, or such so terms such as A, AA, AAA, AAAA are valid.

But yeah the link you gave...7-7 unless you count mgs 4. then its only 1 and your making out some how that its this unbreachable wall that Sony has built up.

Persistantthug

No amount of side stepping technicality can change the fact that PS3 is now OFFICIALLY leading the charge in the best of the best games this generation.

No amount of "word play" technicality can change that.

Really? Because the PS3 only has 1 9.5 scoring game and 6 9s, while the 360 has 3 9s, 2 9.2s, and 2 9.5s. So, according to your chart, the 360 has higher quality AAA exclusives.