How did Halo 3 achive the same score as Super Mario Galaxy?

dude

fps vs a platformer.

fanboys need to just stfu already. scores are scores.

you cant compare mgs4 to smg when it comes to scores. there different games

if you want to argue a score comparision it should be on multiplats

xbox360isgr8t

unfortunately, this is the way it must be here.

2 totally different games.

I tell you this much: I haven't touched Galaxy since i finished it in a week. Still messing around with Halo 3 to this day.

Which game did I get my monies worth out of?

[QUOTE="xbox360isgr8t"]

dude

fps vs a platformer.

fanboys need to just stfu already. scores are scores.

you cant compare mgs4 to smg when it comes to scores. there different games

if you want to argue a score comparision it should be on multiplats

Dreams-Visions

unfortunately, this is the way it must be here.

2 totally different games.

I tell you this much: I haven't touched Galaxy since i finished it in a week. Still messing around with Halo 3 to this day.

Which game did I get my monies worth out of?

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="xbox360isgr8t"]

dude

fps vs a platformer.

fanboys need to just stfu already. scores are scores.

you cant compare mgs4 to smg when it comes to scores. there different games

if you want to argue a score comparision it should be on multiplats

angelkimne

unfortunately, this is the way it must be here.

2 totally different games.

I tell you this much: I haven't touched Galaxy since i finished it in a week. Still messing around with Halo 3 to this day.

Which game did I get my monies worth out of?

Quoted for m***** f***ing truth

Well COD4 had an exellent thrillride linear singleplayer, that was very well crafted (althought it had some hiccups here and there). Its multiplayer was also exellent. Honestly I think Halo 3s score should have been closer to COD4s.. Its multiplayer is strong - i honestly think its better for the console platform, however its singleplayer is knowhere as good, and its extra features really dont propell it to make up for the singleplayer department. A game doesent need a multiplayer component, or a singleplayer component and loads of features ect. to be a very compelling and exellent game.skrat_01

sorry for the late response skrat.

I completely agree with that last part you wrote. A game doesn't need multiplayer and all that extra stuff in order to be good. but both COD4 and Halo3 have SP and MP, and on top of that, halo3 has the extra stuff like forge and theather too.

you may think it isn't all that compared to other games that have done this before, but it does the job just fine and people make some awesome maps and footage. Just look at all those youtube movies of crazy kills and whatnot. That wouldnt be possible without the features that game has.

I'm just saying, overhyped or not(I think both games are scoreswise), I think halo3's score is fine where it is compared to COD's.

Look I went through the entire Halo 3 campaign with my friend it wasn't good. Halo 3 was and still is a disappointment.

Played SMG I liked it but I was expecting better. Disappointed.

MGS 4 sucked. Terrible. I tried liking the game I really did. Just not my game I can't see how people like it. I really don't.

GTA 4. No just no. I really thought it would be better. Not bad but I still like san andreas better.

Overall this generation has been a disappointment for me these games just don't have the quality that they used to have. However one that did impress me was COD 4 unfornately that's only one game.

if it makes you feel better, just remember that SMG got GOTY over Halo 3 .. take that as 'proof' that it was a better game if you want to

though really, just don't bother too much with reviewers .. your own opinion is much more important, why care what others think?

if it makes you feel better, just remember that SMG got GOTY over Halo 3 .. take that as 'proof' that it was a better game if you want to

though really, just don't bother too much with reviewers .. your own opinion is much more important, why care what others think?

akif22

Gears of War for the 360 won GOTY over Zelda TP... I guess that makes it a better game... Hell didn't PDZ and Kameo score better than TP..

Four player co-op, and an exspansive Multiplayer portion that is great.

Come to think of it, how in the hell did SMG get a 9.5? Does anyone still play that game?

Is this a joke. In no way is Halo as innovative, fun, and exicting as Super Mario Galaxy. I mean look at the user scores Halo 3 (8.9) and SMG(9.3). Halo 3 single player is nothing to SMG and if you don't have live the online is usless. COD4 is better anyway. Dark-Pain

agreed COD 4 is 100 times better then halo 3 imo, SMG is alot better then halo 3 aswell

Is this a joke. In no way is Halo as innovative, fun, and exicting as Super Mario Galaxy. I mean look at the user scores Halo 3 (8.9) and SMG(9.3). Halo 3 single player is nothing to SMG and if you don't have live the online is usless. COD4 is better anyway. Dark-Pain

Halo 3 is an amazing game, who cares if its not a game aimed at jazzy indi freaks who appretiate level design and innovation and other such fruity gimmicks. Its just a generic shooter that sets the bar at the highest of standards. Great fun.

[QUOTE="Dark-Pain"]Is this a joke. In no way is Halo as innovative, fun, and exicting as Super Mario Galaxy. I mean look at the user scores Halo 3 (8.9) and SMG(9.3). Halo 3 single player is nothing to SMG and if you don't have live the online is usless. COD4 is better anyway. Miss_Wacy

agreed COD 4 is 100 times better then halo 3 imo, SMG is alot better then halo 3 aswell

Not exactly giving it a chance.