Would you want to buy a game just because it is violent even if it gets bad reviews. Would you be turned off to buya game because it is not violent enought to you. Would you bash a sequal because the violence was toned down
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Would you want to buy a game just because it is violent even if it gets bad reviews. Would you be turned off to buya game because it is not violent enought to you. Would you bash a sequal because the violence was toned down
I REALLY hope no one says violence is important in a game. That person would lose ALL his or her ccredibility by saying that.
Not very, depends on the game really I went through most MGS games with very few kills, the same thing with splinter cell, with shooters i try to get almost every target on screen rather than relying on my ally to take them out.
Maybe if you only play pimkin its not important but to a game like Super Smash Bros or a shooter or most RPG's or fighters, or hell most genres, violence is an intrinsic part of the game so I will say it IS important. OH NOES MY CREDIBILITY!!!I REALLY hope no one says violence is important in a game. That person would lose ALL his or her ccredibility by saying that.
Pikminmaniac
[QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"]Maybe if you only play pimkin its not important but to a game like Super Smash Bros or a shooter or most RPG's or fighters, or hell most genres, violence is an intrinsic part of the game so I will say it IS important. OH NOES MY CREDIBILITY!!!I REALLY hope no one says violence is important in a game. That person would lose ALL his or her ccredibility by saying that.
blue_hazy_basic
It is important in some games. Horror (I LOVE the old Resident Evil games) in particular, but if you don't buy Super Mario Galaxy, Viva Pinata, or Little Big Planetbecause it's too "kiddy", that's wrong. Ignoring a whole slew of fantastic games just because you can't draw blood from your opponents would be a sad case.
P.S. Pikmin is more violent than Smash Bros. The pikmin swarm enemies and pelt them to death and then their dead bodies (sometimes just their heads remain) are dragged back to the landing site to reproduce more Pikmin. It's the first time a Nintendo game has delt with the death of enemies in such a manner. Usually dead bodies aren't left behind
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"]
I REALLY hope no one says violence is important in a game. That person would lose ALL his or her ccredibility by saying that.
Maybe if you only play pimkin its not important but to a game like Super Smash Bros or a shooter or most RPG's or fighters, or hell most genres, violence is an intrinsic part of the game so I will say it IS important. OH NOES MY CREDIBILITY!!!It is important in some games. Horror (I LOVE the old Resident Evil games) in particular, but if you don't buy Super Mario Galaxy, Viva Pinata, or Little Big Planetbecause it's too "kiddy", that's wrong. Ignoring a whole slew of fantastic games just because you can't draw blood from your opponents would be a sad case.
Sure violence is not a necessary component of every game, but it is of many games. And people might not buy certain games because they just don't appeal to them. For example Pokemon, pikmin, LKS, etc are of no interest at all. Is it because they have no violence, not at all. I'm just not interested in that style of game.In some games, it's important for immersion, believability, and can make the situation seem more dire or intense. Other than that, I couldn't care less.
Violence is only important if it makes sense, like if I'm playing a FPS I want some blood when I shoot enemies, but If I'm playing a football game I don't want people to lose limbs when I tackle them... Actually yes I do that's the best idea for a game ever.bobbetybobAren't tackles and big hits violent? Or are those really just aggressive hugs? :P
I've enjoyed a few violent games, but I'd rather they tone it down for the most part. I like a good h/s or beat'm up game, but they don't need to be as graphic as they've gotten to be fun. X:Men Origins, while a great game, bothered me that is was so graphic and brutal that it needed a M rating. Yes the character is violent, but the comics are read by kids, the movie the game is directly supporting is PG-13 so a Teen rating would have been better.
Same here. However.... A little blood here and there is always a plus. Fallout 3 FTW!If a game looks good and appeals to me in general then I will buy it - violent or otherwise. So, no, it is not important in the least.
ironcreed
Is simply wrong, violece is everywhere in gaming, you can't downpl;ay it's central role to even many nintendo games.I REALLY hope no one says violence is important in a game. That person would lose ALL his or her ccredibility by saying that.
Pikminmaniac
It all depends on the game. I couldn't play GTA games without it for example, but I can play Gran Turismo without it.
You buy a game whatever RATING it is which your suitable for.
If your not aged enough, then stick what your capable of playing.
Talking about violence is part of a core thing in some games.
Its like talking about super mario galaxy without the platform and jumping or need for speed without the racing etc.
critic reviews although interesting are not of primary concern to me. I don't care how a game compares to another game as far as technical aspects.
I want to know if it is fun to play and I go more by the user scores of my preferred genres of horror-survival, horror-adventure and RPG.
mediocre rated games are often a blast and give me hours of enjoyment as do MMOs.
depends on the type of game... if its a platform title there is no need for explicit violence scenes etc.. i enjoy games such as Sly, Ratchet & Clank, Jak etc
But if i want to play tps, fps or else action/adventure games i think violence can make it more interesting & gets you more involved in the action..
Well, if anyone does what TC says, I'd call them an idiot. I think gore actually DETRIMENTS from some games, actually. Some blood's nice for realism, sure, but some people spend too much time designing gruesome physics systems in the games and forget the game's for playing, not for watching decapitations followed by being impaled on a wall with your intestines hanging out. And then those games get rave reviews because of the over-the-top gore...=/
It depends on the game, If you are talking about a title like "God of War" then hell yes I need violence. I need all the violence AND GORE I can get. It's god of war for god's sake. It's important to see the broken, bloody stretched open jaws of the minotaurs, as well as the medusa heads being popped off like champagne corks. But I agree, that the majority of games out there do not need excessive violence to be fun.
Because everyone cares what you think of them. I think it's important. But only in certain types of games. For instance, I don't expect flying entrails and decapitation in the next Ratchet and Clank, but I bet it will still be fun. However, I also find Fallout 3 to be one of the best games around, and it is possibly the most gory game I have seen this gen. (so far). God of war also includes obscene amounts of gore and violence, and I love it. Then again, There are games like .. well, Final Fantasy (insert number here) that don't need much violence at all to be fun. Well, for starters, what do you classify as violence? I mean, if you wanna get down to the nitty-gritty, even bubble bobble requires you to trap enemies in bubbles, and then destroy their bodies and eat whatever they leave behind. I mean, Violence is prettymuch a keystone in video games. Just on different levels. So... A game doesn't require violence to be good, but most good games have a decent amount of it.I REALLY hope no one says violence is important in a game. That person would lose ALL his or her ccredibility by saying that.
Pikminmaniac
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment