How is AC3?

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]

[QUOTE="PhazonBlazer"]

Even Revelations:o

charizard1605

Revelations wasn't very good even when it first came out:| It's the only AC game that I beat and never touched again. And it certainly provided little closure, especially:

[spoiler] Not even explaining Lucy except for it DLC

[/spoiler]

Not to mention the story was pretty bad, but at leasy Ezio was still a good character.

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="Bigboi500"]It's better than both Revelations and AC1, and chaz knows it.

PhazonBlazer

Revelations wasn't very good even when it first came out:| It's the only AC game that I beat and never touched again. And it certainly provided little closure, especially:

[spoiler] Not even explaining Lucy except for it DLC

[/spoiler]

Not to mention the story was pretty bad, but at leasy Ezio was still a good character.

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] I'm assessing each game by when they originally released. The first Assassins Creed game was stunning when it released. It aged terribly, but it was great then. Revelations was more satisfying as an experience. Ironically enough, it provided more closure than Assassins Creed 3 did. charizard1605

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="Bigboi500"]That's because the ending of 3 was so terrible and vague, it was clearly a setup for AC4. More milkage is eminent.

Bigboi500

[QUOTE="PhazonBlazer"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] I'm assessing each game by when they originally released. The first Assassins Creed game was stunning when it released. It aged terribly, but it was great then. Revelations was more satisfying as an experience. Ironically enough, it provided more closure than Assassins Creed 3 did. charizard1605

Revelations wasn't very good even when it first came out:| It's the only AC game that I beat and never touched again. And it certainly provided little closure, especially:

[spoiler] Not even explaining Lucy except for it DLC

[/spoiler]

Not to mention the story was pretty bad, but at leasy Ezio was still a good character.

Ezio's story was really good (especially the ending) but the actual story just wasn't very good. The setting was boring, the new characters had no personallity (except Yusef), and the Desmond sections were terrible!

I liked the combat and the hook blade, but overall it's my second least favorite AC game, next to the first one.

I must add, though, the naval battles were incredible. The highlight of the entire game if you ask me. charizard1605

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="PhazonBlazer"]

Revelations wasn't very good even when it first came out:| It's the only AC game that I beat and never touched again. And it certainly provided little closure, especially:

[spoiler] Not even explaining Lucy except for it DLC

[/spoiler]

Not to mention the story was pretty bad, but at leasy Ezio was still a good character.

PhazonBlazer

Ezio's story was really good (especially the ending) but the actual story just wasn't very good. The setting was boring, the new characters had no personallity (except Yusef), and the Desmond sections were terrible!

I liked the combat and the hook blade, but overall it's my second least favorite AC game, next to the first one.

It's a good game, but nowhere near as good as the previous games in the series.charizard1605

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]It's a good game, but nowhere near as good as the previous games in the series.Shinobishyguy

[QUOTE="dommeus"]

It isn't as good as the second. Some of the missions are f*cking irritating, and Connor is a bland, unlikable protagonist.

Bigboi500

yea I dont get it ether. I mean even altier wasint some charming dude. He was a assassin and he only became more social i guess was when he had a family and a bit when he became a leader of the assassins. Ezio grew up a suave dude so that personality transferd to him as a assassin. connor was raised in a different enviorment compared to someone like ezio.

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="charizard1605"]It's a good game, but nowhere near as good as the previous games in the series.charizard1605

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]Even Asscreed 1?
I haven't played it yet, but it would have to be astronomically sh*tty to be worse than thatShinobishyguy

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]

[QUOTE="PhazonBlazer"]

Even Revelations:o

charizard1605

not really. It was ok at best. The missions were sorta boring and didint add much to doing the actual assassination. Which if im recalling right you had to do the missions in order to start the assasination.

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="Bigboi500"]It's better than both Revelations and AC1, and chaz knows it.

finalfantasy94

not really. It was ok at best. The missions were sorta boring and didint add much to doing the actual assassination. Which if im recalling right you had to do the missions in order to start the assasination.

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] I'm assessing each game by when they originally released. The first Assassins Creed game was stunning when it released. It aged terribly, but it was great then. Revelations was more satisfying as an experience. Ironically enough, it provided more closure than Assassins Creed 3 did. charizard1605

I dont get this complaint. I didint find it horrible. It was a cliffhanger is all. Revelations ending felt better mainly cause it told the end of ezio and atier story. So it was wraping something up.

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] I'm assessing each game by when they originally released. The first Assassins Creed game was stunning when it released. It aged terribly, but it was great then. Revelations was more satisfying as an experience. Ironically enough, it provided more closure than Assassins Creed 3 did. charizard1605

not really. It was ok at best. The missions were sorta boring and didint add much to doing the actual assassination. Which if im recalling right you had to do the missions in order to start the assasination.

if thats the true way. Then i dont want it.

[QUOTE="jackfruitchips"]

I'm considering to getting this game at Christmas. I like stealth and the Frontier looks stunning. I have a few questions. I just read Edge review, they said: " There are suprisingly few assassinations and relatively little freedom to plan your approach to them". Is this true ?

PhazonBlazer

There aren't many assassinations but the ones that are there are pretty fun, though not too much freedom. There was one particular assassination that offered alot of freedom though.

It's good but not great, just like every other AC game (except for AC1, that game just straight up sucked).

The combat in AC3 is even easier than before, it literally slows down for you. And there is next to nothing to do in the Frontier, aside from rading convoys and the occasional fort attack, it's pretty empty. Naval battles are fun though.

Can't speak of the MP because I didn't play it, I didn't really like the other online modes for past AC games.