how much difference is there between 360 and pc version of cod4?

no

pc is much better

no

pc is much better

reno7728

PC version: User-created Content, better graphics, higher framerate (depending on hardware), superior controls, more immersive (depending on hardware), superior online...........

360 version: Sticky-Aim and Auto-Aim

No offense to lemmings, but I think you know what version you should get.

Better control, graphic, online (32 persons+dedicated server), communication in online game ( not to hear these silly kid of live is a + for me) and an active mod community

basically all pc games look better than console games, simply becuase they run at a much higher resolution. obviously 1600x1200 > 720p/1080pOMGWTFBBQzzz

[QUOTE="OMGWTFBBQzzz"]basically all pc games look better than console games, simply becuase they run at a much higher resolution. obviously 1600x1200 > 720p/1080pkaos-hero

i wasnt being specific about cod4, i was saying all pc games look better than the maximum resolutions consoles can do.

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

wok7

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

[QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

aliblabla2007

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

wok7

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

Calling any shooter on the 360 tactical is a little far-fetched. But I agree that a lot of multi-plat FPS games are best on 360. They were simply designed with the 360 in mind.

[QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

GodLovesDead

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

Calling any shooter on the 360 tactical is a little far-fetched. But I agree that a lot of multi-plat FPS games are best on 360. They were simply designed with the 360 in mind.

I agree with that last sentence.

[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

wok7

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

1. CoD4 is not a tactical shooter.

2. Gears of War, a tactical shooter, has been stated in the GS review of the PC version to be "is everything the 360 version was and more.".

Actually PC version has 50! players online vs the 16 on 360. :)catlin_czirr

That's cool and all but that's way too many. If you've played Call of Duty 4, you'll know that the maps are tiny. Very tiny. 16 players is too chaotic to be fun, let alone 50. Even on 8 player FFA matches, I get spawnkilled on numerous occasions.

to be honest i have it for PC and it doesn't seem very well optomised.

it runs at 60 fps (fraps) on my comp but it has a stutter to it like no other pc game i have.

I have a Core 2 duo 2.5ghz X1950PRO with 2Gb ram so it's not my rig

[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

wok7

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

[QUOTE="catlin_czirr"]Actually PC version has 50! players online vs the 16 on 360. :)GodLovesDead

That's cool and all but that's way too many. If you've played Call of Duty 4, you'll know that the maps are tiny. Very tiny. 16 players is too chaotic to be fun, let alone 50. Even on 8 player FFA matches, I get spawnkilled on numerous occasions.

50 players+mod support+dedicated servers+FREE online play+better graphics+most precise controls = Best version.

EDIT: I have both versions sitting right here in my room, and I don't even touch the 360 version.

[QUOTE="catlin_czirr"]Actually PC version has 50! players online vs the 16 on 360. :)GodLovesDead

That's cool and all but that's way too many. If you've played Call of Duty 4, you'll know that the maps are tiny. Very tiny. 16 players is too chaotic to be fun, let alone 50. Even on 8 player FFA matches, I get spawnkilled on numerous occasions.

You don't have to play with 50. You can play with a limit of 8 / 16 / 24/ 32 / 64. That means you can have alot more variety in online in CoD4.

[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="catlin_czirr"]Actually PC version has 50! players online vs the 16 on 360. :)catlin_czirr

That's cool and all but that's way too many. If you've played Call of Duty 4, you'll know that the maps are tiny. Very tiny. 16 players is too chaotic to be fun, let alone 50. Even on 8 player FFA matches, I get spawnkilled on numerous occasions.

50 players+mod support+dedicated servers+FREE online play+better graphics+most precise controls = Best version.

I have tried it. I've tried it on the 360, PS3, and PC. More precise controls isn't a valid point because that doesn't make the game better. The controller is accurate enough and has force feedback which actually adds a lot to the game. The graphics definitely are better on the PC, but Call of Duty 4, like Saving Private Ryan, should only be played/watched on a big screen. The differences aren't significant and I like how Call of Duty is locked at 60 fps. It's pretty optimized on the PC, but the FPS is variable so they is hitches.

If you don't have a decent setup for your 360, then the PC version is great. But the gameplay is very "consolized" and arcade-like. It better suits the 360 and better suits larger TVs. There are much better games to spend your money on if you want a PC game. I recommend Stalker or The Witcher.

[QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

aliblabla2007

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

1. CoD4 is not a tactical shooter.

2. Gears of War, a tactical shooter, has been stated in the GS review of the PC version to be "is everything the 360 version was and more.".

You still issue commands and such but whatever, its not a basic shooter like Doom or Hl2, the point still stands.

See Even got the collectors edition for PC :)

[QUOTE="catlin_czirr"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="catlin_czirr"]Actually PC version has 50! players online vs the 16 on 360. :)GodLovesDead

That's cool and all but that's way too many. If you've played Call of Duty 4, you'll know that the maps are tiny. Very tiny. 16 players is too chaotic to be fun, let alone 50. Even on 8 player FFA matches, I get spawnkilled on numerous occasions.

50 players+mod support+dedicated servers+FREE online play+better graphics+most precise controls = Best version.

I have tried it. I've tried it on the 360, PS3, and PC. More precise controls isn't a valid point because that doesn't make the game better. The controller is accurate enough and has force feedback which actually adds a lot to the game. The graphics definitely are better on the PC, but Call of Duty 4, like Saving Private Ryan, should only be played/watched on a big screen. The differences aren't significant and I like how Call of Duty is locked at 60 fps. It's pretty optimized on the PC, but the FPS is variable so they is hitches.

If you don't have a decent setup for your 360, then the PC version is great. But the gameplay is very "consolized" and arcade-like. It better suits the 360 and better suits larger TVs. There are much better games to spend your money on if you want a PC game. I recommend Stalker or The Witcher.

[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

wok7

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

1. CoD4 is not a tactical shooter.

2. Gears of War, a tactical shooter, has been stated in the GS review of the PC version to be "is everything the 360 version was and more.".

You still issue commands and such but whatever, its not a basic shooter like Doom or Hl2, the point still stands.

You don't issue commands. Infact, HL2 is more tactical than Call of Duty 4 because can issue minor commands towards the end if I remember correctly. You follow the AI, the AI doesn't follow you.

[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"][QUOTE="catlin_czirr"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="catlin_czirr"]Actually PC version has 50! players online vs the 16 on 360. :)catlin_czirr

That's cool and all but that's way too many. If you've played Call of Duty 4, you'll know that the maps are tiny. Very tiny. 16 players is too chaotic to be fun, let alone 50. Even on 8 player FFA matches, I get spawnkilled on numerous occasions.

50 players+mod support+dedicated servers+FREE online play+better graphics+most precise controls = Best version.

I have tried it. I've tried it on the 360, PS3, and PC. More precise controls isn't a valid point because that doesn't make the game better. The controller is accurate enough and has force feedback which actually adds a lot to the game. The graphics definitely are better on the PC, but Call of Duty 4, like Saving Private Ryan, should only be played/watched on a big screen. The differences aren't significant and I like how Call of Duty is locked at 60 fps. It's pretty optimized on the PC, but the FPS is variable so they is hitches.

If you don't have a decent setup for your 360, then the PC version is great. But the gameplay is very "consolized" and arcade-like. It better suits the 360 and better suits larger TVs. There are much better games to spend your money on if you want a PC game. I recommend Stalker or The Witcher.

Yes, and I'm sure loads of people are willing to go through the hassle of connecting their PC to their HDTV just to play it on a diminished resolution. Most people I know don't even have a HDTV and PC in the same room, and the few I do wouldn't ever move their TV from its spot for anything, let alone move it to a convenient PC gaming spot.

[QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

GodLovesDead

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

1. CoD4 is not a tactical shooter.

2. Gears of War, a tactical shooter, has been stated in the GS review of the PC version to be "is everything the 360 version was and more.".

You still issue commands and such but whatever, its not a basic shooter like Doom or Hl2, the point still stands.

You don't issue commands.

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

wok7

[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"][QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

catlin_czirr

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

1. CoD4 is not a tactical shooter.

2. Gears of War, a tactical shooter, has been stated in the GS review of the PC version to be "is everything the 360 version was and more.".

You still issue commands and such but whatever, its not a basic shooter like Doom or Hl2, the point still stands.

You don't issue commands.

There isn't a single tactical shooter on the 360. Rainbow Six : Vegas isn't even tactical. You can order a few commands here and there, but they don't do much and it's not really tactical in the least.

[QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

GodLovesDead

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

1. CoD4 is not a tactical shooter.

2. Gears of War, a tactical shooter, has been stated in the GS review of the PC version to be "is everything the 360 version was and more.".

You still issue commands and such but whatever, its not a basic shooter like Doom or Hl2, the point still stands.

You don't issue commands.

[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"][QUOTE="catlin_czirr"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="catlin_czirr"]Actually PC version has 50! players online vs the 16 on 360. :)catlin_czirr

That's cool and all but that's way too many. If you've played Call of Duty 4, you'll know that the maps are tiny. Very tiny. 16 players is too chaotic to be fun, let alone 50. Even on 8 player FFA matches, I get spawnkilled on numerous occasions.

50 players+mod support+dedicated servers+FREE online play+better graphics+most precise controls = Best version.

I have tried it. I've tried it on the 360, PS3, and PC. More precise controls isn't a valid point because that doesn't make the game better. The controller is accurate enough and has force feedback which actually adds a lot to the game. The graphics definitely are better on the PC, but Call of Duty 4, like Saving Private Ryan, should only be played/watched on a big screen. The differences aren't significant and I like how Call of Duty is locked at 60 fps. It's pretty optimized on the PC, but the FPS is variable so they is hitches.

If you don't have a decent setup for your 360, then the PC version is great. But the gameplay is very "consolized" and arcade-like. It better suits the 360 and better suits larger TVs. There are much better games to spend your money on if you want a PC game. I recommend Stalker or The Witcher.

Yes, and I'm sure loads of people are willing to go through the hassle of connecting their PC to their HDTV just to play it on a diminished resolution. Most people I know don't even have a HDTV and PC in the same room, and the few I do wouldn't ever move their TV from its spot for anything, let alone move it to a convenient PC gaming spot.

[QUOTE="catlin_czirr"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"][QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

GodLovesDead

My, oh my, you really are in denial, aren't you......

I thoguht the reviewers were too untill I tried both versions out for myself. But why am I surprised? Tactical shooters being superior on the Xbox360 has been a trend since it launched.

1. CoD4 is not a tactical shooter.

2. Gears of War, a tactical shooter, has been stated in the GS review of the PC version to be "is everything the 360 version was and more.".

You still issue commands and such but whatever, its not a basic shooter like Doom or Hl2, the point still stands.

You don't issue commands.

[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"][QUOTE="catlin_czirr"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="catlin_czirr"]Actually PC version has 50! players online vs the 16 on 360. :)catlin_czirr

That's cool and all but that's way too many. If you've played Call of Duty 4, you'll know that the maps are tiny. Very tiny. 16 players is too chaotic to be fun, let alone 50. Even on 8 player FFA matches, I get spawnkilled on numerous occasions.

50 players+mod support+dedicated servers+FREE online play+better graphics+most precise controls = Best version.

I have tried it. I've tried it on the 360, PS3, and PC. More precise controls isn't a valid point because that doesn't make the game better. The controller is accurate enough and has force feedback which actually adds a lot to the game. The graphics definitely are better on the PC, but Call of Duty 4, like Saving Private Ryan, should only be played/watched on a big screen. The differences aren't significant and I like how Call of Duty is locked at 60 fps. It's pretty optimized on the PC, but the FPS is variable so they is hitches.

If you don't have a decent setup for your 360, then the PC version is great. But the gameplay is very "consolized" and arcade-like. It better suits the 360 and better suits larger TVs. There are much better games to spend your money on if you want a PC game. I recommend Stalker or The Witcher.

Yes, and I'm sure loads of people are willing to go through the hassle of connecting their PC to their HDTV just to play it on a diminished resolution. Most people I know don't even have a HDTV and PC in the same room, and the few I do wouldn't ever move their TV from its spot for anything, let alone move it to a convenient PC gaming spot.

A 360 is very portable. I'd hardly call my PC portable, and once again, I don't think me or anyone else would move their PC around just to play CoD4. You can hook a PC up to an HDTV, but HDTVs aren't capable of interpretting VGA resolutions as well as other forms of media, and you may not be able to get 1080p. My point is that it's not convenient enough to be done on a casual scale. Technically, you can pretty much do anything on the PC. But that's the difference between consoles and PCs. Console have limited functionality, but they are instant. PC's have endless functionality, but require time (sometimes a little bit, sometimes a lot).

I'd also like to add the PC is missing prestige mode if I didn't already say so.

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

wok7

Not really. The controls part is not true, better online is. Also there is basically no difference between pc and x360 gfx.

A 360 is very portable. I'd hardly call my PC portable, and once again, I don't think me or anyone else would move their PC around just to play CoD4. You can hook a PC up to an HDTV, but HDTVs aren't capable of interpretting VGA resolutions as well as other forms of media, and you may not be able to get 1080p. My point is that it's not convenient enough to be done on a casual scale. Technically, you can pretty much do anything on the PC. But that's the difference between consoles and PCs. Console have limited functionality, but they are instant. PC's have endless functionality, but require time (sometimes a little bit, sometimes a lot).

I'd also like to add the PC is missing prestige mode if I didn't already say so.

GodLovesDead

[QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

jangojay

Not really. The controls part is not true, better online is. Also there is basically no difference between pc and x360 gfx.

[QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

jangojay

Not really. The controls part is not true, better online is. Also there is basically no difference between pc and x360 gfx.

[QUOTE="jangojay"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

Indestructible2

Not really. The controls part is not true, better online is. Also there is basically no difference between pc and x360 gfx.

I am.

[QUOTE="jangojay"][QUOTE="wok7"]

Of course CoD4 has better graphics since 360's graphics card is out of date.

But its pretty much agreed that the 360 version has better controls and surprisngly, better Online.

catlin_czirr

Not really. The controls part is not true, better online is. Also there is basically no difference between pc and x360 gfx.

The online has more players and the graphics look basically the same. I can admit that.

Not noticeable unless you are a graphics whore, in which case the PC version is better (assuming you have a good enough rig).SteveMcD