[QUOTE="Relys"][QUOTE="-D3MO-"][QUOTE="Relys"][QUOTE="-D3MO-"]whats the point of waggle then? Why didn't nintendo release a real console w/ HD graphics and a console w/ at least half the power of the 360? Why did they force waggle on you..then turn around and say its not needed for games (their biggest games)?-D3MO-
Who the hell cares? SSBB is going to be an AWESOME game. Who gives a crap about gimmicks when you have a solid title.
Isn't there an option to use motion controls?Ragnarok1051
Kinda, just for smash attacks. It seems like an afterthought.
Who cares? You should...you paid $250 to play a new way...at the expanse of next-gen graphics/physics/ai....and now you're getting old gameplay w/ old graphics....double whammyIt doesn't get rid of that fact that games like SMG. (And probably SSBB) Are tons better than any of the crap you have for our PS3's.
Again, who cares if we're geting solid games?
Mario could have been so much better w/ regular controls (waggle didn't add anything innovative)...and better graphics/ai/physics.It's already been argued that SMG couldn't have been done the same without regular controlls.
The graphics make it the best looking Wii game to date. (Or last gen). The AI was just freaking fine. And last of all, what are you talking about? The physics system is the most amazing use of physics I've seen to date. Don't even try to argue about the physics, you don't know how much I'm into the indie scene.
Are you wondering why it got such good scores? Maybe, just maybe it was because it was a near perfect game and you're biased.
Log in to comment