How much will Crysis lose for being Crysis

  • 102 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for WatsonC
WatsonC

1976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 WatsonC
Member since 2003 • 1976 Posts

Looking at Crysis I see an amazing game I wont be playing anytime soon, my rig is defniantly not capable of playing it. Seeing as how the game cant perform its best on a regular rig. I am wondering how much will gamespot attack it for its technical requirments.Igwababa

many lemmings spread rumor suggest taht both crysis and MGS 4 will come to 360 hahaha

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts
[QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="Koalakommander"][QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(l-_-l

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Would anyone honestly run a game on minimum settings, i know it would just destroy any enjoyment for me....

That's kind of pathetic. If Crysis becomes a competitive FPS, I'll be all over it, low settings or not.

There's nothing pathetic about it, if i buy a game i want to get the most from it, and i'm not willing to settle for lowest settings.

Then upgrade your PC then. Nobody is going to hold your hand through this experience. keep your PC up to date, or go buy a console with set specs.. I don't understand why you people complain about not being able to play a game on something other than minimum setting. It is your fault you can't play it be not staying up to date enough to do so, not the games fault. I say again, if you can't run crysis, you are a casual. If you can only run it on minimum and thats not good enough for you, the upgrade your PC and stop acting like it is anybody elses fault, but yours.

Trust me if i wanted to play Crysis i would upgrade my PC, but i dont. I wasnt actually moaning originally i just couldnt believe anyone would be willing to play a game at bare minimum settings, sure i've played many a game at recommended or just below recommended but i could never bring myself to play on minimum.

I have done it in the past and a lot of people don't play anywhere near max. Personally it does not destroy the enjoyment for me. At least they are allowing more open minded people to experience the game and not just the people with good PCs.smokeydabear076

I never said i dont play games on recommended etc, just that i find it very hard to enjoy a game on minimum.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
None I dont think.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Koalakommander"][QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(Snugenz

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Would anyone honestly run a game on minimum settings, i know it would just destroy any enjoyment for me....

That's kind of pathetic. If Crysis becomes a competitive FPS, I'll be all over it, low settings or not.

There's nothing pathetic about it, if i buy a game i want to get the most from it, and i'm not willing to settle for lowest settings.

When you buy a multiplat console game your getting the inferiour version to the PC version:|

Worse visuals, worse online, no mods, and you pay for extra content...

Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts
[QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(farrell2k

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Meaning anybody thats actually a PC gamer (andsimply having a PC does NOT makes you a PC gamer, sorry), should have no issues running it. If you can't run the game with at least lowest settings, they you are nothing more than a casual PC gamer.

Eh? Hardcores play the classics, my friend. The new stuff is for casuals...

You do realize how stupid that sounds right? I hope so.

Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts
[QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(Viviath

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Meaning anybody thats actually a PC gamer (andsimply having a PC does NOT makes you a PC gamer, sorry), should have no issues running it. If you can't run the game with at least lowest settings, they you are nothing more than a casual PC gamer.

yes crysis has some great gameplay elements, but the most predominant factor that is making Crysis major talk amongst PC gamers is graphics. Just like FarCry, Crysis is being hyped for its graphics. So if you cant play it at High or Max settings, then the hype for this game is very little.

Actually many are hyping it for its gameplay, like myself.........I really could care less what others are hyping it for.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#57 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
The game is going to be extremely well optimised. Crytek plan on having it running in DX9 beautifully on a two year old system. If they deliver that, it won't lose a thing.
Avatar image for bicme
bicme

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 bicme
Member since 2005 • 51 Posts

buh buh buh whats a grafx card?

thats about the level of technical expertise these SW console jihadists have.

they can just about plug their console into the tv. "Red goes into red, and white into white Danny" said Danny's mom

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts
Around the time Far Cry came out my computer back then was hardly impressive (1.4 ghz, GeForce 3), but I managed to somehow run FC well on medium settings. I'm not worried about running Crysis, especially since I have a monster PC this time around and am more than ready for it, but those with older PCs shouldn't worry either. Crytek knows how to optimize.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#60 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
High technical requirements? Wow, thats the most uninformed statement I've haerd about the game yet. That game is made to run on a wide myriad of hardware, and if you don't have even a 6600 yet, then thats like me saying, "OMG MUH GEARS WON'T RUN IN MUH XBOX ONE LAWL". Seriously people, the 6600 is cheap as dirt by now. If you don't atleast own that you have NO right to complain.
Avatar image for Supernova_86
Supernova_86

517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Supernova_86
Member since 2007 • 517 Posts
[QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(jt8b2z

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Meaning anybody thats actually a PC gamer (andsimply having a PC does NOT makes you a PC gamer, sorry), should have no issues running it. If you can't run the game with at least lowest settings, they you are nothing more than a casual PC gamer.

agreed, if your a pc gamer ( which is generally the audience companies that make pc games go for) you will have no problems running crysis.

Yes, because we ALL have thousands of dollars we are willing to throw around the place every 1-2 years just to play one game.

Avatar image for bicme
bicme

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 bicme
Member since 2005 • 51 Posts

High technical requirements? Wow, thats the most uninformed statement I've haerd about the game yet. That game is made to run on a wide myriad of hardware, and if you don't have even a 6600 yet, then thats like me saying, "OMG MUH GEARS WON'T RUN IN MUH XBOX ONE LAWL". Seriously people, the 6600 is cheap as dirt by now. If you don't atleast own that you have NO right to complain.Vandalvideo

QFT. i gave my old pc with a 6600 to a friend. GAVE. No money.. not worth any...

Avatar image for jt8b2z
jt8b2z

7189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 jt8b2z
Member since 2005 • 7189 Posts
[QUOTE="jt8b2z"][QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(Supernova_86

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Meaning anybody thats actually a PC gamer (andsimply having a PC does NOT makes you a PC gamer, sorry), should have no issues running it. If you can't run the game with at least lowest settings, they you are nothing more than a casual PC gamer.

agreed, if your a pc gamer ( which is generally the audience companies that make pc games go for) you will have no problems running crysis.

Yes, because we ALL have thousands of dollars we are willing to throw around the place every 1-2 years just to play one game.

new top of the linegraphics card = £300

i buy 20 games a year on average at £15 cheaper than 360/ps3 games seen as pc games in the uk are £25/30 new and console games are £40/45 new.

20x£15 = £300 = new graphics card every year = playing the best games current techonology has too offer= :D

also 360 online = 5x£40 = £200 = new powerful cpu :)

Avatar image for Supernova_86
Supernova_86

517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Supernova_86
Member since 2007 • 517 Posts

new top of the linegraphics card = £300

i buy 20 games a year on average at £15 cheaper than 360/ps3 games seen as pc games in the uk are £25/30 new and console games are £40/45 new.

20x£15 = £300 = new graphics card every year = playing the best games current techonology has too offer= :D

jt8b2z

Upgrading is nice, but sometimes there arelimitations as to how much you can upgrade depending on your motherboard. My PCs motherboard only has AGP, not PCI-express, so I am stuck with the lower end Geforce 7300 (AGP version, my older card was an abysmal Geforce MX440). Still fairly decent, but my next "upgrade" will be a new PC :(

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#65 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="jt8b2z"]

new top of the linegraphics card = £300

i buy 20 games a year on average at £15 cheaper than 360/ps3 games seen as pc games in the uk are £25/30 new and console games are £40/45 new.

20x£15 = £300 = new graphics card every year = playing the best games current techonology has too offer= :D

Supernova_86

Upgrading is nice, but sometimes there arelimitations as to how much you can upgrade depending on your motherboard. My PCs motherboard only has AGP, not PCI-express, so I am stuck with the lower end Geforce 7300 (AGP version, my older card was an abysmal Geforce MX440). Still fairly decent, but my next "upgrade" will be a new PC :(

Your mobo is seriously ancient if it doesn't have a PCI slot. 0_o
Avatar image for jt8b2z
jt8b2z

7189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 jt8b2z
Member since 2005 • 7189 Posts

[QUOTE="jt8b2z"]

new top of the linegraphics card = £300

i buy 20 games a year on average at £15 cheaper than 360/ps3 games seen as pc games in the uk are £25/30 new and console games are £40/45 new.

20x£15 = £300 = new graphics card every year = playing the best games current techonology has too offer= :D

Supernova_86

Upgrading is nice, but sometimes there arelimitations as to how much you can upgrade depending on your motherboard. My PCs motherboard only has AGP, not PCI-express, so I am stuck with the lower end Geforce 7300 (AGP version, my older card was an abysmal Geforce MX440). Still fairly decent, but my next "upgrade" will be a new PC :(

yeh, you kind of have to time it right as to when the new best bits of tech will be out.

You can still get fanatastically fast agp card though, i.e. x1950 pro.

Avatar image for anshul89
anshul89

5705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 anshul89
Member since 2006 • 5705 Posts

When you buy a multiplat console game your getting the inferiour version to the PC version:|

Worse visuals, worse online, no mods, and you pay for extra content...

skrat_01


Thats what console fanboys will never understand. They think that because the console version gets a higher score on gamespot their version is better :|

When a game thats released on a console and the pc, the console version gets a higher score... Thats because PC standards are higher (and not because the console version is superior)... For example oblivion on the pc got 9 for graphics and the 360 version too got 9, but has anyone seen the difference ???

Another example : The pc version of bioshock will get a lower score than the 360 version on gs. But obviously the pc version will be better. According to ign "Originally it was just a matter of choosing between playing the PC version or sitting on the couch to play it on the 360. After seeing the interface improvements and how good the game looks on PC I know my choice. I bought a great system at home for a reason. BioShock is it." here's the link
Avatar image for Supernova_86
Supernova_86

517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Supernova_86
Member since 2007 • 517 Posts
[QUOTE="Supernova_86"]

[QUOTE="jt8b2z"]

new top of the linegraphics card = £300

i buy 20 games a year on average at £15 cheaper than 360/ps3 games seen as pc games in the uk are £25/30 new and console games are £40/45 new.

20x£15 = £300 = new graphics card every year = playing the best games current techonology has too offer= :D

Vandalvideo

Upgrading is nice, but sometimes there arelimitations as to how much you can upgrade depending on your motherboard. My PCs motherboard only has AGP, not PCI-express, so I am stuck with the lower end Geforce 7300 (AGP version, my older card was an abysmal Geforce MX440). Still fairly decent, but my next "upgrade" will be a new PC :(

Your mobo is seriously ancient if it doesn't have a PCI slot. 0_o

I bought it in 2003. My current gaming PC is my laptop, which I bought a few months back. the reason why I got a laptop is because I need it for work :)

Avatar image for Vylence
Vylence

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Vylence
Member since 2003 • 268 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

When you buy a multiplat console game your getting the inferiour version to the PC version:|

Worse visuals, worse online, no mods, and you pay for extra content...

anshul89



Thats what console fanboys will never understand. They think that because the console version gets a higher score on gamespot their version is better :|

When a game thats released on a console and the pc, the console version gets a higher score... Thats because PC standards are higher (and not because the console version is superior)... For example oblivion on the pc got 9 for graphics and the 360 version too got 9, but has anyone seen the difference ???

Another example : The pc version of bioshock will get a lower score than the 360 version on gs. But obviously the pc version will be better. According to ign "Originally it was just a matter of choosing between playing the PC version or sitting on the couch to play it on the 360. After seeing the interface improvements and how good the game looks on PC I know my choice. I bought a great system at home for a reason. BioShock is it." here's the link

No I think you do not understand. PC gaming is not this great nirvana that you guys make it out to be. How many games have you guys bought that did not work without a patch, or updating your drivers? I must buy more PC games then you all, because I know this is a major problem. I remember tons of problems with old ATI drivers and graphics cards. I remember safe disk not allowing to even install a game once. It seems about every third game you go through a major headache because you have to do a little tech support on your own computer.

Not only that but many times you have to fiddle with the settings to even get the game to the proper frames per second, you end up constantly adjusting new games to get the image quality/performance that you are used too. And there are times you start messing with the settings so much it becomes a game just to see how high your frames per second can go. Then you go argue about it with other people on the internet.

This is why console gaming is better, because the focus is on the games. You put it in and play. You do not have to alt+tab out to fiddle with your voice chat, you can change your music with the touch of a button. And you can expect everyone online to reasonably have the same chance because one persons hardware is not that so much more godlier than yours.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#70 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
This is why console gaming is better, because the focus is on the games. You put it in and play. You do not have to alt+tab out to fiddle with your voice chat, you can change your music with the touch of a button. And you can expect everyone online to reasonably have the same chance because one persons hardware is not that so much more godlier than yours.Vylence
Actually everything you mentioned is why I PREFER PC gaming. Most problems are end user related and are easily fixable. Driver out of date? Simple, download and update. But what happens when your 360 dies in a flame of torment and retribution? You're stuck waiting for three weeks without anything to bide your time, nor can you fix the problem yourself. Thats what I like about the PC. Easily fixable problems almost always end user related, unlike consoles where, unless you're an EE and you want to void your warranty, you can't fix it yourself.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#71 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
No I think you do not understand. PC gaming is not this great nirvana that you guys make it out to be. How many games have you guys bought that did not work without a patch, or updating your drivers? I must buy more PC games then you all, because I know this is a major problem. I remember tons of problems with old ATI drivers and graphics cards. I remember safe disk not allowing to even install a game once. It seems about every third game you go through a major headache because you have to do a little tech support on your own computer.

Not only that but many times you have to fiddle with the settings to even get the game to the proper frames per second, you end up constantly adjusting new games to get the image quality/performance that you are used too. And there are times you start messing with the settings so much it becomes a game just to see how high your frames per second can go. Then you go argue about it with other people on the internet.

This is why console gaming is better, because the focus is on the games. You put it in and play. You do not have to alt+tab out to fiddle with your voice chat, you can change your music with the touch of a button. And you can expect everyone online to reasonably have the same chance because one persons hardware is not that so much more godlier than yours.

Vylence


I've never had problems with my games aside from Battlefield 2.

That is one of the beauties of PC gaming, you the player get to choose whether or not you want better graphics or a better framerate.

Console gaming being better is subjective, you present it as fact, which it is not.
Avatar image for bicme
bicme

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 bicme
Member since 2005 • 51 Posts

No I think you do not understand. PC gaming is not this great nirvana that you guys make it out to be. How many games have you guys bought that did not work without a patch, or updating your drivers? I must buy more PC games then you all, because I know this is a major problem. I remember tons of problems with old ATI drivers and graphics cards. I remember safe disk not allowing to even install a game once. It seems about every third game you go through a major headache because you have to do a little tech support on your own computer.

Not only that but many times you have to fiddle with the settings to even get the game to the proper frames per second, you end up constantly adjusting new games to get the image quality/performance that you are used too. And there are times you start messing with the settings so much it becomes a game just to see how high your frames per second can go. Then you go argue about it with other people on the internet.

This is why console gaming is better, because the focus is on the games. You put it in and play. You do not have to alt+tab out to fiddle with your voice chat, you can change your music with the touch of a button. And you can expect everyone online to reasonably have the same chance because one persons hardware is not that so much more godlier than yours.

Vylence

= shouldnt operate a convection oven, let alone a pc

Avatar image for jt8b2z
jt8b2z

7189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 jt8b2z
Member since 2005 • 7189 Posts

pc gaming= fully customisable gaming experience in which YOU are the boss of how you play your games

console gaming = Same vanilla experience everyone else is getting. If a games framrate sucks, you have to live with it, if your consoles hardware starts showing its age, you have to live with it. If you don't like controllers for cerrtain genres, you have to live with it, if you want higher resolutions than 720p? tough , live with it.

see what i am getting at?

Avatar image for Vylence
Vylence

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Vylence
Member since 2003 • 268 Posts

Less cheating on console, less fussing with settings, less likely hood of hardware or software conflicts.

If any of you PC gamers really do not think these things are true you have not been playing PC games that long. The earliest game I played on PC you had to make sure you had HIGH mem. Maniac Mansion, Space Quest, then through Doom, up to the Sims, on to Half life 2 and Wow.

Do not pretend or believe I do not know what I am talking about.

Avatar image for anshul89
anshul89

5705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 anshul89
Member since 2006 • 5705 Posts

This is why console gaming is better, because the focus is on the games.

Vylence


The focus is on dead consoles.
Avatar image for neogeo419
neogeo419

1474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 neogeo419
Member since 2006 • 1474 Posts
[QUOTE="anshul89"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]

When you buy a multiplat console game your getting the inferiour version to the PC version:|

Worse visuals, worse online, no mods, and you pay for extra content...

Vylence



Thats what console fanboys will never understand. They think that because the console version gets a higher score on gamespot their version is better :|

When a game thats released on a console and the pc, the console version gets a higher score... Thats because PC standards are higher (and not because the console version is superior)... For example oblivion on the pc got 9 for graphics and the 360 version too got 9, but has anyone seen the difference ???

Another example : The pc version of bioshock will get a lower score than the 360 version on gs. But obviously the pc version will be better. According to ign "Originally it was just a matter of choosing between playing the PC version or sitting on the couch to play it on the 360. After seeing the interface improvements and how good the game looks on PC I know my choice. I bought a great system at home for a reason. BioShock is it." here's the link

No I think you do not understand. PC gaming is not this great nirvana that you guys make it out to be. How many games have you guys bought that did not work without a patch, or updating your drivers? I must buy more PC games then you all, because I know this is a major problem. I remember tons of problems with old ATI drivers and graphics cards. I remember safe disk not allowing to even install a game once. It seems about every third game you go through a major headache because you have to do a little tech support on your own computer.

Not only that but many times you have to fiddle with the settings to even get the game to the proper frames per second, you end up constantly adjusting new games to get the image quality/performance that you are used too. And there are times you start messing with the settings so much it becomes a game just to see how high your frames per second can go. Then you go argue about it with other people on the internet.

This is why console gaming is better, because the focus is on the games. You put it in and play. You do not have to alt+tab out to fiddle with your voice chat, you can change your music with the touch of a button. And you can expect everyone online to reasonably have the same chance because one persons hardware is not that so much more godlier than yours.

Wow, can you ride a bike, or walk and chew gum at the same time?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#77 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

Less cheating on console, less fussing with settings, less likely hood of hardware or software conflicts.

If any of you PC gamers really do not think these things are true you have not been playing PC games that long. The earliest game I played on PC you had to make sure you had HIGH mem. Maniac Mansion, Space Quest, then through Doom, up to the Sims, on to Half life 2 and Wow.

Do not pretend, let yourself not believe that I do not know what I am talking about.

Vylence
They're true, you're just blowing them WAY out of porportion. Saying theres less cheating is like blaming the condom for giving you aids when you didn't wear one. Ever heard of VAC and punkbuster? They work wonders. Settings are also a bonus, because its a fully customizable experience.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#78 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

Less cheating on console, less fussing with settings, less likely hood of hardware or software conflicts.

If any of you PC gamers really do not think these things are true you have not been playing PC games that long. The earliest game I played on PC you had to make sure you had HIGH mem. Maniac Mansion, Space Quest, then through Doom, up to the Sims, on to Half life 2 and Wow.

Do not pretend, let yourself not believe that I do not know what I am talking about.

Vylence
I have been playing PC games for 12 years, and these things are hardly issues for me.
Avatar image for Vylence
Vylence

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Vylence
Member since 2003 • 268 Posts
[QUOTE="Vylence"]

Less cheating on console, less fussing with settings, less likely hood of hardware or software conflicts.

If any of you PC gamers really do not think these things are true you have not been playing PC games that long. The earliest game I played on PC you had to make sure you had HIGH mem. Maniac Mansion, Space Quest, then through Doom, up to the Sims, on to Half life 2 and Wow.

Do not pretend, let yourself not believe that I do not know what I am talking about.

Vandalvideo

They're true, you're just blowing them WAY out of porportion. Saying theres less cheating is like blaming the condom for giving you aids when you didn't wear one. Ever heard of VAC and punkbuster? They work wonders. Settings are also a bonus, because its a fully customizable experience.

Thats right, but you are just pointing out more hoops someone would have to jump through to get the same experience on the console. It would take somewhat better graphics hardware to have the same level of graphics as a console. Games on consoles are better optimised. 360 games come with voice chat, leader boards, and anti-cheating on a level that you would only get with many extra party programs on a PC.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#80 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Thats right, but you are just pointing out more hoops someone would have to jump through to get the same experience on the console. It would take somewhat better graphics hardware to have the same level of graphics as a console. Games on consoles are better optimised. 360 games come with voice chat, leader boards, and anti-cheating on a level that you would only get with many extra party programs on a PC.Vylence
Thats the beautiful thing ABOUT PC gaming though. Its a fully customizable experience unlike your cookie cutter platform. The PC can become anything you want to. I can play it on my bed, I can play it on my head, I can play it in my chair, I can play it up or downstairs, I can play it on a TV, I can play it up a tree, I can play it on the pot, I can play it without it getting too hot. PC gaming is what you make of it. The PC can have better graphics, sound, mod support, and more to make games exponentially better, or you can easily have an experience equal to consoles exponentially cheaper thanks to cheaper games. Thats wherein the beauty lies.
Avatar image for bicme
bicme

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 bicme
Member since 2005 • 51 Posts

I do not know what I am talking about.

Vylence

yes, yes we know.

If you;ve been pc gaming for so long, and those things are still issues for you, dismiss what i said last, please do operate the convection oven, but you have to look really closely at the back wall of it, very closely, with it on.

Avatar image for haols
haols

2348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 haols
Member since 2005 • 2348 Posts
No, almost all machines out there CAN RUN IT.


However, to get the best experience out of it you need a kick-ass machine.
Avatar image for anshul89
anshul89

5705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 anshul89
Member since 2006 • 5705 Posts

Thats right, but you are just pointing out more hoops someone would have to jump through to get the same experience on the console. It would take somewhat better graphics hardware to have the same level of graphics as a console. Games on consoles are better optimised. 360 games come with voice chat, leader boards, and anti-cheating on a level that you would only get with many extra party programs on a PC.

Vylence

Thats right, but you are just pointing out more hoops someone would have to jump through to get a much much better experience than the console.

Fixed :)
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#84 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Thats the beautiful thing ABOUT PC gaming though. Its a fully customizable experience unlike your cookie cutter platform. The PC can become anything you want to. I can play it on my bed, I can play it on my head, I can play it in my chair, I can play it up or downstairs, I can play it on a TV, I can play it up a tree, I can play it on the pot, I can play it without it getting too hot. PC gaming is what you make of it. The PC can have better graphics, sound, mod support, and more to make games exponentially better, or you can easily have an experience equal to consoles exponentially cheaper thanks to cheaper games. Thats wherein the beauty lies.Vandalvideo


You and your Dr. Suess reference are made of epic win! :lol:

And that's right, the PC's customizability destroys whatever "ease of use" excuse any console has.
Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#85 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts
[QUOTE="Igwababa"][QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(Meu2k7

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Meaning anybody thats actually a PC gamer (andsimply having a PC does NOT makes you a PC gamer, sorry), should have no issues running it. If you can't run the game with at least lowest settings, they you are nothing more than a casual PC gamer.

Yes but because you need to be a gamer just to run it ber minimum makes me nervous that GS will shoot it down like with Sup Com

Does it matter? You and I both know Sup Com is a great game, let them mark it down, let cows or lemmings or sheep (I havnt seen many sheep lately :S) have thier "Ownage" ... that wont stop it from being one of the most epic games this year or any other year for that matter.

Exactly. It's going to be the best FPS by miles, and I frankly don't care what Jason Ocampo thinks about it, I'm old enough to judge it for myself. If Crytek delivers on everything they say they are, this is shaping up to be epic.

Avatar image for karmageddon2k4
karmageddon2k4

919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 karmageddon2k4
Member since 2004 • 919 Posts

According to crytek if you can run far cry you can run crysis. Same can't really be said for Supcom as an example. That game is almost not playable on hardware that can easily run a lot of good games.

I doubt it will be docked points if it is as scaleable as they say. Yes you will need a monster of a computer to maybe be able to max it out (as 1 8800GTX Ultra cannot even get close to maxing it) That may be a comment regarding it but a lot of big games tend to ship where you need a computer of the future to max it out but will play just fine on everything else

Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts
[QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(jt8b2z

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Meaning anybody thats actually a PC gamer (andsimply having a PC does NOT makes you a PC gamer, sorry), should have no issues running it. If you can't run the game with at least lowest settings, they you are nothing more than a casual PC gamer.

agreed, if your a pc gamer ( which is generally the audience companies that make pc games go for) you will have no problems running crysis.

lol some of us cant afford vista and a DX10 card !_!

My PC will run it at quite high specs, but just not in dx 10, if the game isn't for xp i will cry.

Avatar image for froidnite
froidnite

2294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#88 froidnite
Member since 2006 • 2294 Posts

personally i dont believe in lowering a game's score because johnny and susy across the street can't run it on their computers. It should be reviewed as a game, and on what it was meant to be played on, a powerful PC. It's like rating PS3 games lower because the PS3 is the most expensive console. That would be nonsense.

Koalakommander

It'll be more like rating a PS3 game lower cos you can't play it on teh PS2

Avatar image for karmageddon2k4
karmageddon2k4

919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 karmageddon2k4
Member since 2004 • 919 Posts
[QUOTE="Vylence"]

No I think you do not understand. PC gaming is not this great nirvana that you guys make it out to be. How many games have you guys bought that did not work without a patch, or updating your drivers? I must buy more PC games then you all, because I know this is a major problem. I remember tons of problems with old ATI drivers and graphics cards. I remember safe disk not allowing to even install a game once. It seems about every third game you go through a major headache because you have to do a little tech support on your own computer.

Not only that but many times you have to fiddle with the settings to even get the game to the proper frames per second, you end up constantly adjusting new games to get the image quality/performance that you are used too. And there are times you start messing with the settings so much it becomes a game just to see how high your frames per second can go. Then you go argue about it with other people on the internet.

This is why console gaming is better, because the focus is on the games. You put it in and play. You do not have to alt+tab out to fiddle with your voice chat, you can change your music with the touch of a button. And you can expect everyone online to reasonably have the same chance because one persons hardware is not that so much more godlier than yours.

bicme

= shouldnt operate a convection oven, let alone a pc

I agree.

I highly doubt Vylence buys more pc games then all of us. I buy a good amount. Rarely do i find a game i have an issue with. Even STALKER i had 0 issues with. Brought it home installed it and poof you know it actually ran flawless without a single patch. I do know a lot of people did have problems but not everyone does. one of my friends used to always do tons of tweaking, etc.. and you know why because he was on an old OS with old hardware and expected things to run well. PC gaming evolves and gets higher requirements all the time hence why people don't buy 1 computer and use it forever without upgrading it.

In general unless you are buying those terrible bargain bin rejects you typically won't have a problem. There are some bad apples but in general it's all good.

Avatar image for Vylence
Vylence

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Vylence
Member since 2003 • 268 Posts
[QUOTE="Vylence"]

I do not know what I am talking about.

bicme

yes, yes we know.

If you;ve been pc gaming for so long, and those things are still issues for you, dismiss what i said last, please do operate the convection oven, but you have to look really closely at the back wall of it, very closely, with it on.

Are you angry or what? And I'm glad you know so much about the oven, keep playing with it if it makes you happy.

And at the same time any PC gamer who has not had to do serious tech support at some time or another is not a PC gamer. And no making pretty cupcakes has nothing to do with PC gaming, I'm sorry you thought it did.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#91 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="bicme"][QUOTE="Vylence"]

I do not know what I am talking about.

Vylence

yes, yes we know.

If you;ve been pc gaming for so long, and those things are still issues for you, dismiss what i said last, please do operate the convection oven, but you have to look really closely at the back wall of it, very closely, with it on.

Are you angry or what? And I'm glad you know so much about the oven, keep playing with it if it makes you happy.

And at the same time any PC gamer who has not had to do serious tech support at some time or another is not a PC gamer. And no making pretty cupcakes has nothing to do with PC gaming, I'm sorry you thought it did.

I didn't know holding down F8 and pressing "start computer with last known good configuration" required a BA in computer science
Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts
[QUOTE="jt8b2z"][QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(Supernova_86

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Meaning anybody thats actually a PC gamer (andsimply having a PC does NOT makes you a PC gamer, sorry), should have no issues running it. If you can't run the game with at least lowest settings, they you are nothing more than a casual PC gamer.

agreed, if your a pc gamer ( which is generally the audience companies that make pc games go for) you will have no problems running crysis.

Yes, because we ALL have thousands of dollars we are willing to throw around the place every 1-2 years just to play one game.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: YOU FAIL :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Learn the prices to computer parts so that the next time you post, you don't look so uninformed.
Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts
[QUOTE="jt8b2z"][QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(toxicmog

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Meaning anybody thats actually a PC gamer (andsimply having a PC does NOT makes you a PC gamer, sorry), should have no issues running it. If you can't run the game with at least lowest settings, they you are nothing more than a casual PC gamer.

agreed, if your a pc gamer ( which is generally the audience companies that make pc games go for) you will have no problems running crysis.

lol some of us cant afford vista and a DX10 card !_!

Considering you can run it in DX9 and on XP, I have to ask......Whats your point?

Avatar image for bicme
bicme

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 bicme
Member since 2005 • 51 Posts

angry? this is humorous. I told you to put your head in an oven, i expect witty replies, not more eluding to how little you know about PC's.

getting games to work is easy if you know what your doin. if you dont, you act like you, and become a console jihadist

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#95 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

According to crytek if you can run far cry you can run crysis. Same can't really be said for Supcom as an example. That game is almost not playable on hardware that can easily run a lot of good games.

I doubt it will be docked points if it is as scaleable as they say. Yes you will need a monster of a computer to maybe be able to max it out (as 1 8800GTX Ultra cannot even get close to maxing it) That may be a comment regarding it but a lot of big games tend to ship where you need a computer of the future to max it out but will play just fine on everything else

karmageddon2k4


Actually, a 8800GTX is said by Crytek to max Crysis.
Avatar image for Vylence
Vylence

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Vylence
Member since 2003 • 268 Posts

angry? this is humorous. I told you to put your head in an oven, i expect witty replies, not more eluding to how little you know about PC's.

getting games to work is easy if you know what your doin. if you dont, you act like you, and become a console jihadist

bicme

You still fail to see that ovens have nothing to do with PC gaming, unless you like cooking games? You should try the Wii for that.

Why do you not try and focus on what the argument is about? I mean its obvious to me that some of the supposed PC gamers here can not actually believe someone would have valid reasons for thinking the console is better. Why do you not address the substance instead of being shallow?

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Gamespot always lower ratings for intensive games, pretty poor way of looking at things. Developers try to advance gaming and because a game wont run on the office onboard graphics pc it gets a lower rating.

Anyone serious about pc gaming will be running this game on max and it will look and sound (play is up for grabs) amazing.

Its like reviewing a 360 game on the original xbox 'Won't run 0/10'.

Avatar image for bicme
bicme

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 bicme
Member since 2005 • 51 Posts

Focus on what the argument is about?

Your trying to tell us that console gaming is superior because it caters to the lowest common denominator.

I reject this on premise, therefore I clown.

Like I said, If you have been pc gaming for so long, and you still dont know how to get a game to run easily, your lost.

console gaming is not worthless but it is quite inferior.

I don't care if your 12 year old brother cant get a game to work. I don't care if you don't knowwhat graphics options you can change without hurting the appearance too drastically. I don't care if you think something is superior because "it just works".

console is to pc as eunich is to man.

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="bicme"][QUOTE="Vylence"]

I do not know what I am talking about.

Vylence

yes, yes we know.

If you;ve been pc gaming for so long, and those things are still issues for you, dismiss what i said last, please do operate the convection oven, but you have to look really closely at the back wall of it, very closely, with it on.

Are you angry or what? And I'm glad you know so much about the oven, keep playing with it if it makes you happy.

And at the same time any PC gamer who has not had to do serious tech support at some time or another is not a PC gamer. And no making pretty cupcakes has nothing to do with PC gaming, I'm sorry you thought it did.

Oh noes, I booted up STALKER and all the rain effects and lighting was screwed! ... Oh wait *cough* 5 minute N8800 driver update and whoa ... works perfectly.

"Teh Inconveniance of teh new technologiez."

Avatar image for bicme
bicme

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 bicme
Member since 2005 • 51 Posts

seriously, dont throw around such technical terms as "driver". your losing him.

But really,

making cupcakes is probably harder than getting a game up and running. now thats relevancy