How naive are Microsoft to think that they can get away with everything?

  • 69 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

Microsoft thinks that just because that they've been successful (or mildly successful) for one console generation (this console generation), means that they can act all cocky & think that their consumers are dumb enough to keep tolerating their bull****. How naive are they? They've just been starting to be relevant in the gaming industry due to Sony's screw-ups this gen. Heck, even Robbie Bach admitted it:

Link.

At least Sony had a relevant reason to be cocky with the PS3 after they won big with the PS1 & the PS2. Microsoft doesn't. They aren't Sony with the PS brand, & MS could easily lose it in a blink of an eye & go back to irrelevancy before the PS2/GC/Xbox 1 era. The Xbox brand may be strong now, but the Playstation brand is still stronger than it.

Avatar image for ImBatman-
ImBatman-

1279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ImBatman-
Member since 2013 • 1279 Posts

Sony is justice this gen, and justice always prevails.

Avatar image for Handin
Handin

423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Handin
Member since 2004 • 423 Posts

Microsoft thinks that just because that they've been successful (or mildly successful) for one console generation (this console generation), means that they can act all cocky & think that their consumers are dumb enough to keep tolerating their bull****. How naive are they? They've just been starting to be relevant in the gaming industry due to Sony's screw-ups this gen. Heck, even Robbie Bach admitted it:

Link.

At least Sony had a relevant reason to be cocky with the PS3 after they won big with the PS1 & the PS2. Microsoft doesn't. They aren't Sony with the PS brand, & MS could easily lose it in a blink of an eye & go back to irrelevancy before the PS2/GC/Xbox 1 era. The Xbox brand may be strong now, but the Playstation brand is still stronger than it.

Shinobi120

I agree for the most part.  However, the fact that MS is backing Xbox makes me think they won't give up easy even if they start pulling big loses. 

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
Microsoft thinks they can emulate Nintendo's strategy by aiming for the casual market. They don't care about core gamers anymore because that audience didn't put the Xbox 360 over the Wii this gen.
Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts
Microsoft isn't cocky they are about money. The One has the potential to make them a lot of money. You are only looking at this from a gamers perspective which is understandable. From a business perspective the One isn't really a bad idea. They still need to execute it but you can easily see where they are trying to go with it. I just hope they get the games part right because everything else about the console is pretty sweet.
Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
Every word in your post is true. The hundreds of millions they will spend on marketing and 3rd party deals will make the XBone a success though.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

oh, so now the herd is outraged by hubris.

i remember a day when you dudes loved that shyt.

next gen starts when we say it does was a sw battlecry for years.

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

at least they admit it even if the article's from last year. Let's just hope for the best.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts
Switch to the PC and be free. :|
Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

Every word in your post is true. The hundreds of millions they will spend on marketing and 3rd party deals will make the XBone a success though.Floppy_Jim

LOL sorry floppy but its crap like that that makes me laugh. MS are successful, and suddenly its just because of money and marketing?  I know theres some truth to what you say - Microsoft have been very good at marketing. But you still need a quality product to market. Consumers can be influenced, but they aren't braindead.

Nobody can say the Xbox One isn't an impressive device. Of course it hasn't catered to core gamers (yet) hence the backlash (not to mention the total mishandling of policies surrounding ownership and all that - the reveal was a disaster really). But what it does do is pretty impressive.

Avatar image for CJ_ofCamelot
CJ_ofCamelot

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 CJ_ofCamelot
Member since 2013 • 2072 Posts
It's really funny the way they have made it really convenient for themselves and inconvenient for the consumers lol. Alot of side charges that are evident to be, yet they haven't even touched on them yet either.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Chutebox  Online
Member since 2007 • 51588 Posts

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Every word in your post is true. The hundreds of millions they will spend on marketing and 3rd party deals will make the XBone a success though.RR360DD

LOL sorry floppy but its crap like that that makes me laugh. MS are successful, and suddenly its just because of money and marketing?  I know theres some truth to what you say - Microsoft have been very good at marketing. But you still need a quality product to market. Consumers can be influenced, but they aren't braindead.

Nobody can say the Xbox One isn't an impressive device. Of course it hasn't catered to core gamers (yet) hence the backlash (not to mention the total mishandling of policies surrounding ownership and all that - the reveal was a disaster really). But what it does do is pretty impressive.

Why do you think  it's impressive? 

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Every word in your post is true. The hundreds of millions they will spend on marketing and 3rd party deals will make the XBone a success though.Chutebox

LOL sorry floppy but its crap like that that makes me laugh. MS are successful, and suddenly its just because of money and marketing?  I know theres some truth to what you say - Microsoft have been very good at marketing. But you still need a quality product to market. Consumers can be influenced, but they aren't braindead.

Nobody can say the Xbox One isn't an impressive device. Of course it hasn't catered to core gamers (yet) hence the backlash (not to mention the total mishandling of policies surrounding ownership and all that - the reveal was a disaster really). But what it does do is pretty impressive.

Why do you think  it's impressive? 

Because the stuff it could do on an OS level looked pretty neat to me. The controller looks awesome. And the upgrade to XBL with 300 thousand servers meaning dedicated servers for all games (not sure if thats confirmed) and their new matchmaking technology.

Thats whats most important to me. How the online play works. So far we know that from Microsoft. Sony haven't said anything about PSN in that regard.

Avatar image for JamDev
JamDev

992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 JamDev
Member since 2013 • 992 Posts
Microsoft isn't cocky they are about money. The One has the potential to make them a lot of money. You are only looking at this from a gamers perspective which is understandable. From a business perspective the One isn't really a bad idea. They still need to execute it but you can easily see where they are trying to go with it. I just hope they get the games part right because everything else about the console is pretty sweet.NFJSupreme
I can see MS's thinking, but they are making a mistake. You need to get the gamers on board first, no-one is going to be queuing up to pay $500 for a glorified remote control. The added functionality can be a selling point if you match your competitors products, but gamers won't accept inferior games, restrictive DRM, limits on how they can buy and sell their games, arbitrary paywalls and so on just for the sake of using motion controls to change channel. It will interesting to see how a games console that focuses on everything but games will sell, I think MS have badly underestimated the gamer market and wildly over-estimated the media box market.
Avatar image for deactivated-60e799a72eb68
deactivated-60e799a72eb68

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-60e799a72eb68
Member since 2008 • 1678 Posts

I still haven't forgiven Microsoft for the failure rate of early and mid gen 360s.

I moved to PC in 2010, but I *might* pick up a ps4 down the road if there is any backwards compatibility (I haven't even touched the ps3 library). I don't need social media and streaming services in every piece of hardware I own. I only watch a few tv series and the occasional movie. HD camera in my living room that can identify people and listen to them? f*ck no. It's even worse if it records you automatically or keeps logs.

 

By 2015/2016, 4k displays will likely be the equivalent of 1440p monitors right now, and so us pc gamers will again enjoy vastly superior resolutions and frame rates.

What is really keeping me glued to pc is how the XB1/PS4 share similar hardware and that it's very close to what PCs have. I have a feeling that consoles will be noticably inferior right out of the gate this time. And because both systems will use blu ray, this means all around better games assets (I'm hoping pc will finally get decent textures in games).

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Chutebox  Online
Member since 2007 • 51588 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

LOL sorry floppy but its crap like that that makes me laugh. MS are successful, and suddenly its just because of money and marketing?  I know theres some truth to what you say - Microsoft have been very good at marketing. But you still need a quality product to market. Consumers can be influenced, but they aren't braindead.

Nobody can say the Xbox One isn't an impressive device. Of course it hasn't catered to core gamers (yet) hence the backlash (not to mention the total mishandling of policies surrounding ownership and all that - the reveal was a disaster really). But what it does do is pretty impressive.

RR360DD

Why do you think  it's impressive? 

Because the stuff it could do on an OS level looked pretty neat to me. The controller looks awesome. And the upgrade to XBL with 300 thousand servers meaning dedicated servers for all games (not sure if thats confirmed) and their new matchmaking technology.

Thats whats most important to me. How the online play works. So far we know that from Microsoft. Sony haven't said anything about PSN in that regard.

I've heard people talk about the controller (didn't get to watch conference), what did they change?
Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Why do you think  it's impressive? 

Chutebox

Because the stuff it could do on an OS level looked pretty neat to me. The controller looks awesome. And the upgrade to XBL with 300 thousand servers meaning dedicated servers for all games (not sure if thats confirmed) and their new matchmaking technology.

Thats whats most important to me. How the online play works. So far we know that from Microsoft. Sony haven't said anything about PSN in that regard.

I've heard people talk about the controller (didn't get to watch conference), what did they change?

Theres loads of articles about it http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-05-21-the-xbox-one-controller-still-takes-batteries-but-has-programmable-trigger-feedback

But basically they've made it even more comfortable, the triggers now have their own feedback, D pads improved, no deadzone in analogue sticks

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Every word in your post is true. The hundreds of millions they will spend on marketing and 3rd party deals will make the XBone a success though.RR360DD

LOL sorry floppy but its crap like that that makes me laugh. MS are successful, and suddenly its just because of money and marketing?  I know theres some truth to what you say - Microsoft have been very good at marketing. But you still need a quality product to market. Consumers can be influenced, but they aren't braindead.

Nobody can say the Xbox One isn't an impressive device. Of course it hasn't catered to core gamers (yet) hence the backlash (not to mention the total mishandling of policies surrounding ownership and all that - the reveal was a disaster really). But what it does do is pretty impressive.

Not just that, no. Besides Sony have done just the same; they financially outmuscled Sega with bigger marketing, made big 3rd party deals (GTA III timed) and so on.

Avatar image for reaver-x
reaver-x

2795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 reaver-x
Member since 2005 • 2795 Posts
a video game console that does not have games its number one top priority has no right to succeed. if xboxOne ends up winning with there current formula, the gaming business as we know it is in serious trouble
Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#20 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

Fanboy at it's finest! 

 

make some THINK you are the best. They hold your pocket all day, all night, all life time

vlcsnap-74688.jpg

Prison20Break1280_102420T-bag_lzBOXZbnQp

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

Fanboy at it's finest!k2theswiss

How am I a fanboy for speaking the truth? 

Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts
No one knows if they can't yet or not. For all we know Xbox One sells out in stores.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d7fb49ded561
deactivated-5d7fb49ded561

4019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-5d7fb49ded561
Member since 2010 • 4019 Posts

I wonder if Microsoft expected this kind of backlash

Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts

[QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]Microsoft isn't cocky they are about money. The One has the potential to make them a lot of money. You are only looking at this from a gamers perspective which is understandable. From a business perspective the One isn't really a bad idea. They still need to execute it but you can easily see where they are trying to go with it. I just hope they get the games part right because everything else about the console is pretty sweet.JamDev
I can see MS's thinking, but they are making a mistake. You need to get the gamers on board first, no-one is going to be queuing up to pay $500 for a glorified remote control. The added functionality can be a selling point if you match your competitors products, but gamers won't accept inferior games, restrictive DRM, limits on how they can buy and sell their games, arbitrary paywalls and so on just for the sake of using motion controls to change channel. It will interesting to see how a games console that focuses on everything but games will sell, I think MS have badly underestimated the gamer market and wildly over-estimated the media box market.

 

They already do and seem to love it.  Steam is all of these things.  And heavily defended by gamers.

Avatar image for JamDev
JamDev

992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 JamDev
Member since 2013 • 992 Posts

[QUOTE="JamDev"][QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]Microsoft isn't cocky they are about money. The One has the potential to make them a lot of money. You are only looking at this from a gamers perspective which is understandable. From a business perspective the One isn't really a bad idea. They still need to execute it but you can easily see where they are trying to go with it. I just hope they get the games part right because everything else about the console is pretty sweet.FPSfan1985

I can see MS's thinking, but they are making a mistake. You need to get the gamers on board first, no-one is going to be queuing up to pay $500 for a glorified remote control. The added functionality can be a selling point if you match your competitors products, but gamers won't accept inferior games, restrictive DRM, limits on how they can buy and sell their games, arbitrary paywalls and so on just for the sake of using motion controls to change channel. It will interesting to see how a games console that focuses on everything but games will sell, I think MS have badly underestimated the gamer market and wildly over-estimated the media box market.

 

They already do and seem to love it.  Steam is all of these things.  And heavily defended by gamers.

Steam provides inferior games? Steam is a trade off, you get the best versions of multiplats, the widest game selection and a steady supply of really cheap games. What MS are proposing is a console with all the limitations of PC gaming and none of the benefits.
Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#26 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

[QUOTE="k2theswiss"]Fanboy at it's finest!Shinobi120

How am I a fanboy for speaking the truth? 

didn't know i called you a fanboy
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

Oh please enough. Do you think they are just sitting here making these decisions to be like, "Oh ya we are going to screw everyone this gen fo sure!" Listen to what you are saying. Clearly a lot of what they showed was to get casuals and the like excited. At the end of the day this is a business. I know that is hard for people to understand, but thats what it is. They spend millions upon millions if not a billion to get a console out on the market and shareholders hate it. They have to do something to please shareholders. They need to make money and what better way to do it then do it the way they are doing it. If they came out and showed a bunch of games that got all hardcore people on this forum excited it sure as hell wouldn't do much for the other part that is probably bigger in numbers, the casual market. Yes of course from a hardcore or a long time gamer its disappointing that they did not come out with anything that go you excited. BUT it is still early and clearly this was just to show something, anything, and really it was more of a response to Sony's from a few months ago. Lets wait and see what happens instead of just ragging on it. I guarantee half the posers in here that are ragging on the crap that MS is doing they are going to be the first ones to be using said features.

Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts
[QUOTE="FPSfan1985"]

[QUOTE="JamDev"] I can see MS's thinking, but they are making a mistake. You need to get the gamers on board first, no-one is going to be queuing up to pay $500 for a glorified remote control. The added functionality can be a selling point if you match your competitors products, but gamers won't accept inferior games, restrictive DRM, limits on how they can buy and sell their games, arbitrary paywalls and so on just for the sake of using motion controls to change channel. It will interesting to see how a games console that focuses on everything but games will sell, I think MS have badly underestimated the gamer market and wildly over-estimated the media box market.JamDev

 

They already do and seem to love it.  Steam is all of these things.  And heavily defended by gamers.

Steam provides inferior games? Steam is a trade off, you get the best versions of multiplats, the widest game selection and a steady supply of really cheap games. What MS are proposing is a console with all the limitations of PC gaming and none of the benefits.

Thats yet to be seen. Who knows what type of deals MS will offer. And steam offers plenty of inferior games. In no way am I defending this, I hate steam and xbone alike. But gamers are willing to accept alot more than you think. Just look at live fees, or even trade in values at gamestop. Gamers are 90% of the time all bark and no bite.
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

If you really think about it think about it naivety & arrogant are the two words to best describe their thinking.

They have only been involved in console gaming for two gens(and only home systems, unlike competitors) and have come in 2nd & 3rd in sales for those respected generations.

This move(s) are straight up Apple, where they are trying to use monopolistic weight of their company in the field to direct the industry in their favor.

However, as I noted, they are not a monopoly. They are by far not the Apple of gaming & in terms of investment/stake in the industry have the weakest footing of the big 3.

The only way I can see them thinking they could pull this off is if they focus almost exclusively on the US market which would put them at a significant disadvantage in the modern global economy.

Avatar image for catfishmoon23
catfishmoon23

5197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 catfishmoon23
Member since 2005 • 5197 Posts

I imagine the amount of money they made just off of XBL subscriptions played a large part.

Avatar image for jimmypsn
jimmypsn

4425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 jimmypsn
Member since 2010 • 4425 Posts

Every word in your post is true. The hundreds of millions they will spend on marketing and 3rd party deals will make the XBone a success though.Floppy_Jim

 

I guess it had nothing to do with Sony's crappy marketing. 

Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts

I imagine the amount of money they made just off of XBL subscriptions played a large part.

catfishmoon23
Not even subs ads alone most likely bring them in more tan any exclusive ever would.
Avatar image for Lulekani
Lulekani

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Lulekani
Member since 2012 • 2318 Posts
MS Smears peanutbutter on their ****** and expects you to pay for the privelage of lapping it off. And you know what. . . . . Its Working Surprisingly Well.
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

MS are trying to sell a gaming console with gimmicks, NFL,Kinect, and the TV playback stuff. And they talked so much about exclusive content, and that just leads me to believe they dont have the games one would expect to sell this system. Like say Halo, or gears, and maybe even muliplats are not ready to be reveald yet. Also there shouldn't have been a confusion on how a game is linked to your account. Just makes you look like your trying to hide something. Things may get better at E3, but only if they show actual gameplay from games people want to see. Games from Epic, or 343, and turn 10. 

Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

They are just as naive as Sony when announcing the PS3 at 599 US dollars, with arogant claims how the first five million will buy it no matter if it has games or support of any kind.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

Dat Third Console Curse yo.

Avatar image for Minishdriveby
Minishdriveby

10519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#37 Minishdriveby
Member since 2006 • 10519 Posts
Microsoft thinks they can emulate Nintendo's strategy by aiming for the casual market. They don't care about core gamers anymore because that audience didn't put the Xbox 360 over the Wii this gen. princeofshapeir
Basically, I'm just hoping the casual consumer does a little research before buying this for their family. If they're fooled by a low entry cost/subscription based model then I think the XOne could take off which is a frightening thought.
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
Arrogance got the better of them
Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#39 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

We don;t know most of the details about the console yet.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#40 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
Microsoft isn't cocky they are about money. The One has the potential to make them a lot of money. You are only looking at this from a gamers perspective which is understandable. From a business perspective the One isn't really a bad idea. They still need to execute it but you can easily see where they are trying to go with it. I just hope they get the games part right because everything else about the console is pretty sweet.NFJSupreme
Why on Earth would you hope they get the games part right... If this becomes popular amongst gamers it would be freaking horrible.
Avatar image for scottkjz
scottkjz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 scottkjz
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
Microsoft thinks they can emulate Nintendo's strategy by aiming for the casual market.
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="JamDev"][QUOTE="FPSfan1985"]

 

They already do and seem to love it.  Steam is all of these things.  And heavily defended by gamers.

FPSfan1985

Steam provides inferior games? Steam is a trade off, you get the best versions of multiplats, the widest game selection and a steady supply of really cheap games. What MS are proposing is a console with all the limitations of PC gaming and none of the benefits.

Thats yet to be seen. Who knows what type of deals MS will offer. And steam offers plenty of inferior games. In no way am I defending this, I hate steam and xbone alike. But gamers are willing to accept alot more than you think. Just look at live fees, or even trade in values at gamestop. Gamers are 90% of the time all bark and no bite.

Those gamers can suck my knob. We need gamers who actuall stand up for themselves and don't let companies charge them for the sillest things. Don't be a fanboy, folks.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Be ready for the most colossal fvck up of this generation. I don't know what the fk was Nintendo thinking with their WiiU and if MS was thinking at all is another mystery.
Avatar image for deactivated-5ec2b2cb7a41e
deactivated-5ec2b2cb7a41e

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-5ec2b2cb7a41e
Member since 2008 • 2058 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Because the stuff it could do on an OS level looked pretty neat to me. The controller looks awesome. And the upgrade to XBL with 300 thousand servers meaning dedicated servers for all games (not sure if thats confirmed) and their new matchmaking technology.

Thats whats most important to me. How the online play works. So far we know that from Microsoft. Sony haven't said anything about PSN in that regard.

RR360DD

I've heard people talk about the controller (didn't get to watch conference), what did they change?

Theres loads of articles about it http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-05-21-the-xbox-one-controller-still-takes-batteries-but-has-programmable-trigger-feedback

But basically they've made it even more comfortable, the triggers now have their own feedback, D pads improved, no deadzone in analogue sticks

there is so much facepalm in this one i am about to break my palm at my forehead. The controller is the same. seriously. Vibration in triggers while it is a nice addition is NOT a drastic change. Also it is almost USELESS in anything else than Shooters. What? i am going to slash with sword or wield a staff and the trigger will vibrate? The menu buttons... they just renamed the selct and star buttons. IN ALL previous consoles select (now labaled as menu(?) ) always opened the inventory. This is a feat for easily persuaded people. Batteries.... Jesus christ this is 2013 get a grip!!!! This is REDICULOUS. Pressure sensitive buttons... wellcome to Ps3 7 years ago. and that is all./ Nothing has changed. Ulike Wii U OR ps4 controller (share button is s gimmicky one). Prove me wrong
Avatar image for feverberries
feverberries

281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 feverberries
Member since 2013 • 281 Posts
Be ready for the most colossal fvck up of this generation. I don't know what the fk was Nintendo thinking with their WiiU and if MS was thinking at all is another mystery.silversix_
i'm also interested to see how this all folds out. i'm always excited about a new console announcement, but X1 was a disappointment to me. always online and no used games are like a kick in the nuts. there's only a limited amount of BS that a loyal gamer can swallow.
Avatar image for StormyJoe
StormyJoe

7806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 StormyJoe
Member since 2011 • 7806 Posts

Microsoft thinks that just because that they've been successful (or mildly successful) for one console generation (this console generation), means that they can act all cocky & think that their consumers are dumb enough to keep tolerating their bull****. How naive are they? They've just been starting to be relevant in the gaming industry due to Sony's screw-ups this gen. Heck, even Robbie Bach admitted it:

Link.

At least Sony had a relevant reason to be cocky with the PS3 after they won big with the PS1 & the PS2. Microsoft doesn't. They aren't Sony with the PS brand, & MS could easily lose it in a blink of an eye & go back to irrelevancy before the PS2/GC/Xbox 1 era. The Xbox brand may be strong now, but the Playstation brand is still stronger than it.

Shinobi120

Ahh... the butthurt. You all are real jelly over the XBox One.

Avatar image for guard12
guard12

2018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#47 guard12
Member since 2004 • 2018 Posts

I kinda feel MS is actually going after Apple and google consumers opposed to the gaming market. This will be there undoing 

Avatar image for gensigns
gensigns

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 gensigns
Member since 2007 • 1495 Posts

I kinda feel MS is actually going after Apple and google consumers opposed to the gaming market. This will be there undoing 

guard12
Yes, because Apple and Google consumers are such a small market compared to "teh hard corez" gamers.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Every word in your post is true. The hundreds of millions they will spend on marketing and 3rd party deals will make the XBone a success though.RR360DD

LOL sorry floppy but its crap like that that makes me laugh. MS are successful, and suddenly its just because of money and marketing?  I know theres some truth to what you say - Microsoft have been very good at marketing. But you still need a quality product to market. Consumers can be influenced, but they aren't braindead.

Nobody can say the Xbox One isn't an impressive device. Of course it hasn't catered to core gamers (yet) hence the backlash (not to mention the total mishandling of policies surrounding ownership and all that - the reveal was a disaster really). But what it does do is pretty impressive.

I'm sorry but consumers are brain dead. You forget NA made a guy who sold rocks as pets a millionaire. The Xbox is a crappy product sold by hype to gullible people.
Avatar image for feverberries
feverberries

281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 feverberries
Member since 2013 • 281 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] I'm sorry but consumers are brain dead. You forget NA made a guy who sold rocks as pets a millionaire.

admit it. you are talking about Wii, aren't you?