This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="khoofia_pika"]I don't get it. It was OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED that the system is 50% MORE POWERFUL THAN THE 360 AND THE PS3. Why are you people very conveniently ignoring all that?topgunmv
You have a link to that?
Okay, sorry, it was not officially announced, it was a report. But it' pretty clear it will be much more powerful than the HD twins anyway. Anyway, here's the link: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/307037/news/wii-u-50-more-powerful-than-ps3/360/[QUOTE="topgunmv"][QUOTE="khoofia_pika"]I don't get it. It was OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED that the system is 50% MORE POWERFUL THAN THE 360 AND THE PS3. Why are you people very conveniently ignoring all that?khoofia_pika
You have a link to that?
Okay, sorry, it was not officially announced, it was a report. But it' pretty clear it will be much more powerful than the HD twins anyway. Anyway, here's the link: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/307037/news/wii-u-50-more-powerful-than-ps3/360/ That's not official, it's just "someone told us, they think it's 50% more powerful" Official is Nintendo saying it, or releasing specs. And 50% is absolutely nothing, that's not even slightly more powerful...[QUOTE="khoofia_pika"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]Okay, sorry, it was not officially announced, it was a report. But it' pretty clear it will be much more powerful than the HD twins anyway. Anyway, here's the link: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/307037/news/wii-u-50-more-powerful-than-ps3/360/ That's not official, it's just "someone told us, they think it's 50% more powerful" Official is Nintendo saying it, or releasing specs. And 50% is absolutely nothing, that's not even slightly more powerful...You have a link to that?
Inconsistancy
Did you even read my post, or did you just go to the link? :? Here's what I said:
"Okay, sorry, it was not officially announced, it was a report. But it' pretty clear it will be much more powerful than the HD twins anyway."
And it doesn't says 50% AS powerful, it says 50% MORE powerful In simple language, it's as powerful as one and a half PS3s/360s.
i will have to say slightly stronger then the ps3 and 360. which is going to lead to a problem when the ps4 an 720 come out. also "even stronger then the pc" can mean anything since everyones pc is different some people might even have a pc thats weaker then the wii.
I think it is safe to say that it will at least be on the same level, if not a tad stronger. Either way, it will be enough for me and I am excited about the prospects of the new controller as well. All I ask now is that they show me some interesting new exclusives. This will be what seals the deal for me.
[QUOTE="topgunmv"][QUOTE="khoofia_pika"]I don't get it. It was OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED that the system is 50% MORE POWERFUL THAN THE 360 AND THE PS3. Why are you people very conveniently ignoring all that?khoofia_pika
You have a link to that?
Okay, sorry, it was not officially announced,/ I seriously lol'dGood enough to look and perform better then modern consoles, but not so powerful it can beat a top of the line PC or be considered a true next gen system.
Would be hilarious to be the stronger console next-gen, but it won't happen lol.[QUOTE="93BlackHawk93"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
Next-gen. No way matches PC, but it's definitely stronger than the ancient PS3/360 hardware. A lot stronger imo. I'd say we're finally gonna get 1080p and 60FPS on consoles.
Cows/Lems are bashing it now, but once their next console comes out and is just on par with the Wii-U they're gonna praise the heck out of their platform.
ChubbyGuy40
You never know! Consumers are silly enough to buy another 360 even after horrible failure rates from the original. And with Ms going the new APU route, power isn't guarenteed. Sony will be the middle. On par with Wii-U (if it's as strong as it's rumored to be) but better than the next xbawx.
the apu route is actually a stronger choice for consoles by pairing up the cpu and gpu on the same die they elimante the bus latency between the two, the already have a 67xx level graphics card as part of them which actually make a decent mid to high range PC, which would make a ridiculous jump in power with the 360. secondlly the xbox slim is actually using an "apu" they moved the gpu, and cpu on the same die to reduce heat by having two seperate chips generating heat, they also had to put some sort of limiters on the GPU because of how much faster it was without the io/bus between them.50% MORE is what I said, and 50% MORE is NOT worthy as an upgrade, it's basically nothing.Did you even read my post, or did you just go to the link? :? Here's what I said:
"Okay, sorry, it was not officially announced, it was a report. But it' pretty clear it will be much more powerful than the HD twins anyway."
And it doesn't says 50% AS powerful, it says 50% MORE powerful In simple language, it's as powerful as one and a half PS3s/360s.
khoofia_pika
This is what I read, then I saw your link and quoted it, sorry.I guess we both suck at reading.
I don't get it. It was OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED that the system is 50% MORE POWERFUL THAN THE 360 AND THE PS3. Why are you people very conveniently ignoring all that?khoofia_pika
It'll be more powerful than the Wii, but I think Nintendo will yet again be behind in terms of tech.
It'll be more powerful than the Wii, but I think Nintendo will yet again be behind in terms of tech.
StealthMonkey4
I have been thinking about shigeru miyamoto and ask iwata should be talking to sir jack trenton in regards to cell processor, no?
[QUOTE="khoofia_pika"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]Okay, sorry, it was not officially announced,/ I seriously lol'd How nice, you conveniently forgot to read the rest of my post.You have a link to that?
Heil68
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment