How relevant are single player games today?

  • 62 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

I remember an article from the nineties about multiplayer because it became much more popular with the rise of the internet. I didn't give it much thought, sure I liked multiplayer, but I sure liked single player a lot as well.

With the xbox 360 and their party chat, multiplayer became much more interesting, voice chat was already a thing on the pc, but in most cases you ended up typing, the x360 came with a mic, and the party chat became hugely popular.

Single player games, for me anyway, became a lot less interesting, and probably for a lot others too, since the best selling games nowadays are multiplayer games.

But I doubt this is only due to the added features for multiplayer in recent history. I mean graphics have always been very important, but they have become less important than in the past. Just because the leaps are less big than let's say during the crysis era. When you add the fact that the gameplay didn't change much either it's probably less interesting for people to buy the next big sp game, than to buy the next big mp game.

I for instance, am interested in playing a lot of sp games that released this gen, but I just can't find the time because I'm so consumed with mp. Heck I've always been a gta fan, and I haven 't even been able to finish the story mode of gta V, I doubt I will even buy rdr2.

Avatar image for kali-b1rd
Kali-B1rd

2241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2  Edited By Kali-B1rd
Member since 2018 • 2241 Posts

They're still big, they havn't diminished as such.

Just multiplayer brought about bigger change and more people are playing those kinds of games more.

Why would they not? its more competitive, its more challenging, its more social... that will usually take priority.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ebea105efb64
deactivated-5ebea105efb64

7262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5ebea105efb64
Member since 2013 • 7262 Posts

Very relevant.

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

26133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#4 Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 26133 Posts

more relevant than multiplayer.

Avatar image for blackballs
BlackBalls

1496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5  Edited By BlackBalls
Member since 2018 • 1496 Posts

Aren't 2 of the best selling retail games this year single player?

Also, aren't a lot of single player games exceeding sales expectations?

Avatar image for gdourado07
Gdourado07

150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6 Gdourado07
Member since 2018 • 150 Posts

Very relevant to me.

I have been gaming for 29 years and I only play single player games.

Always have been. That is what I love. The stories, the virtual worlds, the adventures....

Multi-player has absolutely no interest to me whatsoever.

I don't like it, and I don't wnat to deal with other people.

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22674 Posts

SP games are the most relevant for me... generally, I find them the most interesting.

Avatar image for bussinrounds
bussinrounds

3324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By bussinrounds
Member since 2009 • 3324 Posts

Never play online/mp games. Went through that phase over a decade ago, got it out of my system and now I'm completely done with that.

Was so refreshing getting back to actual games after that repetitive bs and I don't look to games for socializing, more to enjoy something on my own (or with a friend who's sitting right next to me)

AAA can pretty much f**k right off too, so I don't care if they go in that direction, as AA and indie games are more suited to my tastes as far as modern gaming goes anyways.

Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4971 Posts

Single player games are still big in my opinion. I am big on indie games, and many of them are fantastic and single player. Also my favorite games of this generation are single player (Octopath Traveler and Xenoblade Chronicles 2).

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

Very relevant.

I don't spend a lot of time in MP games. My most played games are still played solo.

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

SP games will always be better than MP because you don't have to rely on other players to make or break the experience.

Avatar image for lnv
LnV

151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#12 LnV
Member since 2018 • 151 Posts

For me and a big part of the gamers they are relevant.

The problem is Multiplayer games give more money, thats why companies like EA keep pushing them...

Multiplayers is way too popular, so much that garbage like destiny and Star Wars Battlefront sell way more than they deserve.

Avatar image for todddow
Todddow

916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

#13 Todddow
Member since 2017 • 916 Posts

Multiplayer ran its course, they are unbearable now. Single player are ALL I'll play.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48941 Posts

As relevant as they ever were, i.e. very relevant.

Avatar image for deactivated-5fac80ec445f7
deactivated-5fac80ec445f7

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-5fac80ec445f7
Member since 2017 • 155 Posts

Very. They provide the best damn experiences out there.

Avatar image for blueinheaven
blueinheaven

5554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 blueinheaven
Member since 2008 • 5554 Posts

As someone who used to play a lot of MMO's I only ever play SP games now. Like @bussinrounds said above I got the whole online thing out of my system a long time ago and now look for quality SP experiences and there are plenty of them around.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@blackballs said:

Aren't 2 of the best selling retail games this year single player?

Also, aren't a lot of single player games exceeding sales expectations?

that's going to be obliterated when fifa, bf V and cod releases, and rdr2 will probably have multiplayer as well.

Avatar image for that_old_guy
That_Old_Guy

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#18  Edited By That_Old_Guy
Member since 2018 • 1233 Posts

Well, several single player games sold extremely well this gen....if not more than just several.

So I’d say yes.

I mean, GoW might not have made as much money as Fortnite, but it sold more than Tekken 7 I believe.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

I can't stand multiplayer games except for football (fifa/pes), so single-player all the way.

Avatar image for blackballs
BlackBalls

1496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#20  Edited By BlackBalls
Member since 2018 • 1496 Posts

@commander said:
@blackballs said:

Aren't 2 of the best selling retail games this year single player?

Also, aren't a lot of single player games exceeding sales expectations?

that's going to be obliterated when fifa, bf V and cod releases, and rdr2 will probably have multiplayer as well.

My point still stands. You say single player games are irrelevant when some of the best selling and critically acclaimed games this year are single player.

Also, your comparison of the games you mentioned doesn't really make much sense since those franchises will outsell every other game out there - single player or multiplayer.

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

Solid as rock...The sp oriented games sales are!!!

Therefore very Relevant...The SPOG must be /QED

Avatar image for Sindroid
Sindroid

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By Sindroid
Member since 2009 • 729 Posts
@todddow said:

Multiplayer ran its course, they are unbearable now. Single player are ALL I'll play.

Totally with you on this. All this lootbox money grabbing tactics and profanity with idiot gamers that infest the servers makes MP pretty crap.

Singleplayer ALL the way..

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14558 Posts

As relevant as ever. The only thing the market is rejecting is sub-par games, irrespective of type or genre.

The more delicious question is whether SP-focused games will attempt to rock the boat by changing their standard practice. Publishers don't like SP games because the audience most keen on spending is only asked to do so once. So what gives way first: consumers' reluctance to pay on a rolling basis for content? Or will publishers increase the base price for their product? I lean toward the former.

Avatar image for madrocketeer
madrocketeer

11193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -6

User Lists: 0

#24 madrocketeer
Member since 2005 • 11193 Posts

Skyrim. Single player. One of the best selling games ever. Assassin's Creed Origins. Single player. Sold like hot cakes. God of War. Single player. Flew off the shelves. You get the picture.

"Single player is dead" is just wishful thinking from greedy publishers who want to bring free-to-play economy and microtransactions to the $60 (+ Season Pass + Super-Duper Collector's Edition) AAA market so they can enact their Scrooge McDuck fantasies. This herd mentality is going to backfire on them, and I'm going to bring the popcorn.

And personally, I don't play multiplayer at all. Even in Warframe, I'm almost exclusively a solo player. People on the internet are jerks.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 46831 Posts

I enjoy both sp and mp games equally so I think that they are just as relevant as multiplayer.

Avatar image for Link71113
Link71113

180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Link71113
Member since 2003 • 180 Posts

I feel like the thread backfired for ya but whatever. Like everyone else said, it’s relevant as ever. The games this month and a few last month seems like a testament to that fact.

Avatar image for jereb31
Jereb31

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Jereb31
Member since 2015 • 2025 Posts

I still find them fun.

Avatar image for appariti0n
appariti0n

5185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 appariti0n
Member since 2009 • 5185 Posts

I only like multi-player for the community.

Everquest was amazing in the sense that you NEEDED to make connections if you wanted to achieve anything. Once mmos introduced cross server party finding, instancing, little to no penalty for playing your class poorly, allowing every class to solo right up to max level, my interest dropped significantly.

What’s the point of being online with all these other people if you really don’t need to interact with them? I’d rather play a single player game and just chat on steam or discord at the same time in that case.

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

47514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 SolidGame_basic
Member since 2003 • 47514 Posts

They are going to get even better next gen.

Avatar image for NukleaWorfair
NukleaWorfair

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#30 NukleaWorfair
Member since 2009 • 475 Posts

I know a lot of people who are losing interest in multiplayer, especially FPS games. All I'm interested in these days is SP games.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

SP games are still huge... MP games have been designed to monetize as heavily as possible, and thus are hugely popular. SP games have been monetized for after the initial purchase, but nowhere near as heavily.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@blackballs said:

My point still stands. You say single player games are irrelevant when some of the best selling and critically acclaimed games this year are single player.

Also, your comparison of the games you mentioned doesn't really make much sense since those franchises will outsell every other game out there - single player or multiplayer.

I didn't say they were irrelevant, I asked if they were still relevant because the obvious decline in interest.

And there's a lot more multiplayer games than those big names that would outsell the single player you mention, look at pubg and overwatch, not to mention a lot of people rather spend their money on skins on fortnite than buy a single player game. World of tanks and war thunder are free games too but they have multiple times the revenue sp games do.

Of course you could say those are all big names also, but a lot multiplayer games become big names because they are just a lot more popular in general.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@madrocketeer said:

Skyrim. Single player. One of the best selling games ever. Assassin's Creed Origins. Single player. Sold like hot cakes. God of War. Single player. Flew off the shelves. You get the picture.

"Single player is dead" is just wishful thinking from greedy publishers who want to bring free-to-play economy and microtransactions to the $60 (+ Season Pass + Super-Duper Collector's Edition) AAA market so they can enact their Scrooge McDuck fantasies. This herd mentality is going to backfire on them, and I'm going to bring the popcorn.

And personally, I don't play multiplayer at all. Even in Warframe, I'm almost exclusively a solo player. People on the internet are jerks.

Well fallout 4 was the last sp game I bought, if you don't count skyrim vr and fallout 4 vr. You could say bethesda is a bit of an exception but sp games still can't compete with the popularity of mp games.

To be honest, I don't think those single players games would have sold very well if there were good multiplayer games in stead, apart from fortnite and pubg december last year, there weren't many releases recently, they are all jampacked after the summer.

and I don't know what platform you play on, but I get along quite well with people on the xbox, I meet a lot of different people and you will always have somebody annoying , but that's rather rare. People are quite friendly, of course your opponent in games will sometimes hate on you when they lose, but that's kinda normal.

Avatar image for ahmedkhan1994
ahmedkhan1994

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 ahmedkhan1994
Member since 2008 • 714 Posts

They are the only things that give value to consoles. And if they aren't exclusive It doesn't even matter.

Avatar image for madrocketeer
madrocketeer

11193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -6

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By madrocketeer
Member since 2005 • 11193 Posts
@commander said:

Well fallout 4 was the last sp game I bought, if you don't count skyrim vr and fallout 4 vr. You could say bethesda is a bit of an exception but sp games still can't compete with the popularity of mp games.

To be honest, I don't think those single players games would have sold very well if there were good multiplayer games in stead, apart from fortnite and pubg december last year, there weren't many releases recently, they are all jampacked after the summer.

and I don't know what platform you play on, but I get along quite well with people on the xbox, I meet a lot of different people and you will always have somebody annoying , but that's rather rare. People are quite friendly, of course your opponent in games will sometimes hate on you when they lose, but that's kinda normal.

Bethesda, CD Projekt Red, Sony, Ubisoft still committed to single player, Nintendo sold crates of Switches on the backs of single-player Zelda and Mario games, RDR2 will have a big single-player campaign, so on and so forth. How many "exceptions" does it take for them to stop being "exceptions" and start becoming a significant part of the overall market?

Who says anything about competing? Single-player and multi-player games have coexisted since the days of Quake and StarCraft. As sales numbers show, single-player games are still thriving. This is not a zero-sum game.

AAA publishers are stupid. Single-player games aren't going anywhere, but they see the rolling income generation of free-to-play games, and get dollar signs in their eyes, hence they perpetuate the "single-player is dead" myth to try to nudge people into paying $4.99 for a slightly different coloured gun skin. They're putting all their eggs in one basket, instead of recognizing the diversity of the market and having many toes in multiple puddles. It's going to backfire on them. It's going to be glorious.

I was half-joking about the "people on the internet are jerks" part. I'm just a very private person.

Avatar image for blackballs
BlackBalls

1496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#36  Edited By BlackBalls
Member since 2018 • 1496 Posts

@commander said:
@blackballs said:

My point still stands. You say single player games are irrelevant when some of the best selling and critically acclaimed games this year are single player.

Also, your comparison of the games you mentioned doesn't really make much sense since those franchises will outsell every other game out there - single player or multiplayer.

I didn't say they were irrelevant, I asked if they were still relevant because the obvious decline in interest.

How is interest declined if they are selling extremely well, actually topping last gen sales? You make no sense.

Again, you keep comparing them to multiplayer games and revenue when it's impossible for a single player to make as much money.

A better comparison would be single player game sales last gen vs. this one. Hint: Almost all the big franchises have had record sales numbers - Mario, Zelda, Uncharted, GOW... etc... if anything single player games are making a comeback.

Avatar image for deactivated-6092a2d005fba
deactivated-6092a2d005fba

22663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-6092a2d005fba
Member since 2015 • 22663 Posts

@ghosts4ever: And yet the biggest game in the world right now is Fortnite.

SP is still relevant but it has to have some form of co-op or MP mode otherwise it dies rather quickly, and i dont see value in it.

Avatar image for deactivated-60bf765068a74
deactivated-60bf765068a74

9558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-60bf765068a74
Member since 2007 • 9558 Posts

Spiderman is number 1 seller in the U.K multiplayer can't compete right now just look at the charts

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#40  Edited By commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@blackballs said:
@commander said:
@blackballs said:

My point still stands. You say single player games are irrelevant when some of the best selling and critically acclaimed games this year are single player.

Also, your comparison of the games you mentioned doesn't really make much sense since those franchises will outsell every other game out there - single player or multiplayer.

I didn't say they were irrelevant, I asked if they were still relevant because the obvious decline in interest.

How is interest declined if they are selling extremely well, actually topping last gen sales? You make no sense.

Again, you keep comparing them to multiplayer games and revenue when it's impossible for a single player to make as much money.

A better comparison would be single player game sales last gen vs. this one. Hint: Almost all the big franchises have had record sales numbers - Mario, Zelda, Uncharted, GOW... etc... if anything single player games are making a comeback.

selling extremely well is quite relative for a franchise, gaming becomes increasly popular and the population increases at a very fast rate as well.

You cannot just compare sales numbers when the userbase has increased Not to mention there were much more single player games, people that like single player games will of course lean more to certain titles because there's less to choose from. . Compared to last gen single player games were much more popular.

and of course I'm also talking about revenue, mp get revenue because they add content or are simply free to play.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#41 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38062 Posts

there is a place for all types of games. SP are in great shape. Playground team 2, Ninja Theory and the Initiative aren't building battle royale games I would bet.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#42 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@madrocketeer said:
@commander said:

Well fallout 4 was the last sp game I bought, if you don't count skyrim vr and fallout 4 vr. You could say bethesda is a bit of an exception but sp games still can't compete with the popularity of mp games.

To be honest, I don't think those single players games would have sold very well if there were good multiplayer games in stead, apart from fortnite and pubg december last year, there weren't many releases recently, they are all jampacked after the summer.

and I don't know what platform you play on, but I get along quite well with people on the xbox, I meet a lot of different people and you will always have somebody annoying , but that's rather rare. People are quite friendly, of course your opponent in games will sometimes hate on you when they lose, but that's kinda normal.

Bethesda, CD Projekt Red, Sony, Ubisoft still committed to single player, Nintendo sold crates of Switches on the backs of single-player Zelda and Mario games, RDR2 will have a big single-player campaign, so on and so forth. How many "exceptions" does it take for them to stop being "exceptions" and start becoming a significant part of the overall market?

Who says anything about competing? Single-player and multi-player games have coexisted since the days of Quake and StarCraft. As sales numbers show, single-player games are still thriving. This is not a zero-sum game.

AAA publishers are stupid. Single-player games aren't going anywhere, but they see the rolling income generation of free-to-play games, and get dollar signs in their eyes, hence they perpetuate the "single-player is dead" myth to try to nudge people into paying $4.99 for a slightly different coloured gun skin. They're putting all their eggs in one basket, instead of recognizing the diversity of the market and having many toes in multiple puddles. It's going to backfire on them. It's going to be glorious.

I was half-joking about the "people on the internet are jerks" part. I'm just a very private person.

When I was asking if single player is still relevant, I mean this in terms of popularity, single player games get a lot of attention in media, but the matter of the fact is, most people don't care much about those games anymore, relatively speaking of course.

and this will not backfire on them, most people don't want to sit by themselves playing a game anymore, it's just not as fun anymore as playing with someone else, and the reason it has become increasingly popular is because communication is so much easier as it was in the past. Sure voice chat was possible but not many people did it, now almost everyone does it, especially on console.

Avatar image for ni6htmare01
ni6htmare01

3990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ni6htmare01
Member since 2005 • 3990 Posts

I only play and enjoy sp now a day and I don’t need video games for social as I play 3 on 3 or full court basketball every week.

Avatar image for blackballs
BlackBalls

1496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#44  Edited By BlackBalls
Member since 2018 • 1496 Posts

@commander said:
@blackballs said:
@commander said:
@blackballs said:

My point still stands. You say single player games are irrelevant when some of the best selling and critically acclaimed games this year are single player.

Also, your comparison of the games you mentioned doesn't really make much sense since those franchises will outsell every other game out there - single player or multiplayer.

I didn't say they were irrelevant, I asked if they were still relevant because the obvious decline in interest.

How is interest declined if they are selling extremely well, actually topping last gen sales? You make no sense.

Again, you keep comparing them to multiplayer games and revenue when it's impossible for a single player to make as much money.

A better comparison would be single player game sales last gen vs. this one. Hint: Almost all the big franchises have had record sales numbers - Mario, Zelda, Uncharted, GOW... etc... if anything single player games are making a comeback.

selling extremely well is quite relative for a franchise, gaming becomes increasly popular and the population increases at a very fast rate as well.

You cannot just compare sales numbers when the userbase has increased Not to mention there were much more single player games, people that like single player games will of course lean more to certain titles because there's less to choose from. . Compared to last gen single player games were much more popular.

and of course I'm also talking about revenue, mp get revenue because they add content or are simply free to play.

I think I'm done here. You're pretty much the only person in this thread that thinks that SP are not relevant, except IP Daily, but we know why he's against them. Nothing to discuss.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

@blackballs said:
@commander said:
@blackballs said:
@commander said:

I didn't say they were irrelevant, I asked if they were still relevant because the obvious decline in interest.

How is interest declined if they are selling extremely well, actually topping last gen sales? You make no sense.

Again, you keep comparing them to multiplayer games and revenue when it's impossible for a single player to make as much money.

A better comparison would be single player game sales last gen vs. this one. Hint: Almost all the big franchises have had record sales numbers - Mario, Zelda, Uncharted, GOW... etc... if anything single player games are making a comeback.

selling extremely well is quite relative for a franchise, gaming becomes increasly popular and the population increases at a very fast rate as well.

You cannot just compare sales numbers when the userbase has increased Not to mention there were much more single player games, people that like single player games will of course lean more to certain titles because there's less to choose from. . Compared to last gen single player games were much more popular.

and of course I'm also talking about revenue, mp get revenue because they add content or are simply free to play.

I think I'm done here. You're pretty much the only person in this thread that thinks that SP are not relevant, except IP Daily, but we know why he's against them. Nothing to discuss.

lol you obviously have a very hard time reading, I never said sp games weren't relevant, the title of thread is if they are still relevant?

you think they are relevant, fine, some other do to, but there's no denying they are less relevant that they were before, look at the wolfenstein games at the beginning of this gen, that was a launch price of 20$, and those were quality sp games.

Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

UBER relevant.

Avatar image for madrocketeer
madrocketeer

11193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -6

User Lists: 0

#47  Edited By madrocketeer
Member since 2005 • 11193 Posts
@commander said:

When I was asking if single player is still relevant, I mean this in terms of popularity, single player games get a lot of attention in media, but the matter of the fact is, most people don't care much about those games anymore, relatively speaking of course.

and this will not backfire on them, most people don't want to sit by themselves playing a game anymore, it's just not as fun anymore as playing with someone else, and the reason it has become increasingly popular is because communication is so much easier as it was in the past. Sure voice chat was possible but not many people did it, now almost everyone does it, especially on console.

And I've listed a whole bunch single-player games that sold by the bucketloads in fairly recent times. "Relatively" popular means nothing. Multi-player games can own 60-70% of the market, but as long single-player games still sell well, and as long as there are publishers and studios still willing to put effort and resources into them, single-player games are, by empirical measure, popular and therefore still relevant. Period.

I'm talking about the herd mentality of the AAA publishers who stampede toward the free-to-play-style economy in online-centric games in search of the perpetual cash cow, which is the true motivation behind this "single player is dead" myth. You really need to stop paying attention to them; simple multi-player games are one thing, but this is something else. When they herded towards online passes, it backfired. When they herded towards loot boxes, it backfired. 2K recently had to apologise for charging for a friggin' haircut in an NBA game. Sooner or later, markets are going to saturate, and people are going to get fed up of their games trying to fatten them up to turn them into whales. There have already been backlashes. There will be more to come.

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#48 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

I used to love multiplayer games but I play mostly SP games now. Mainly because most mainstream multiplayer games suck.

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
Cloud_imperium

15146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 103

User Lists: 8

#49 Cloud_imperium
Member since 2013 • 15146 Posts

I only play Single Player games these days. Fvck multiplayer. I play real life multiplayer the entire day. At night I just want to escape the reality for few hours and enjoy my Single Player experience.